Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from HeatherMcXxx:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Ha! I bet that skill came in handy when you began constructing ransom notes. :)
|
07-12-12 09:25am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from HeatherMcXxx:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Is that like fast-forwarding through a porn scene? ;)
|
07-11-12 05:50pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from HeatherMcXxx:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Hi jberry - I wasn't necessarily referring to erotica when I mentioned reading. In truth, I've never been one for erotic fiction. The only naughty text I've ever enjoyed was "My Secret Garden," an old classic collection of women's fantasies. My older sister had a copy, and I swiped it when I was maybe 14 or 15. It was quite exciting ... introduced me to all sorts of new ideas. ;)
|
07-11-12 04:20am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from messmer:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Ever since I got my tablet I've been going crazy downloading Kindle books to it. I didn't think I would ever get used to reading a book this way, after all what can replace that sensuous feeling of holding a new book in your hand .. but I did get used to it quickly. At the moment I have about 8 Alistair MacLean books lined up waiting to be read as well as about twenty Karl May books in German .. books that were my life as a teen ager and that are obtainable for free through Kindle. Audiobooks I cannot get used to. I have tried but my eyes process things better than my ears. When it comes to listening I have ADD! :-)
|
07-10-12 12:07pm
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from messmer:
(jberryl69's Reply)
I think Heather, Denner and I were thinking more of reading in general. There's nothing like a good book. But then, maybe, they were thinking of erotica, I shouldn't speak for them.
|
07-10-12 11:41am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from pat362:
(jberryl69's Reply)
See my definition of a dumb person or stupid person isn't someone who does one of these things on a rare occasion but someone who knowingly does them once or worse on a regular basis.
I've done a couple of really stupid things in my life but it was only made obvious how stupid they were after the fact and I never did the same thing twice. I learned from my mistake. A good example of a stupid person is someone who watches Jackass and then performs one of the stunt at home. The person on screen is at best an idiot but at least he's getting paid to be an idiot but the person at home doing the stunt is just stupid. A trial recently ended with a guilty verdict for a 17 years old girl because she was driving the car that two of her friends did car surfing on. One of her friends fell off the car and died of her injuries.
|
07-08-12 06:45pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from pat362:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Based on what many people have posted in the forum than I'd classify the bulk of us in the upper echelon of intellectuals. Some people might not think that they are but the language they use and the arguments they put forth are very impressive.
|
07-08-12 08:12am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from graymane:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Thanks, Jberry, for better clearifing this poll question. You've put it in the very context it belongs.
Having read, so far, how most respondents were wrestling with precisely what the question was really saying, I find, after closer reviewing it, I simply have to join them.
Let me expand on that by saying this: At my age, I've been around the block enough times to where the wear-an-tear has me thinkin' I ought to know just about everthing. I don't, of course, and that's magnified in every sense of the word. A "babe in the woods" might comparatively describe my intellectual station.
But I do recognize intellegence in others, and I know it when I see it in action. And drawing from that, I have to say that very few open entities of communication have impressed me more than what I've observed right here on this site. Books written by the best authors of our day are neatly stacked in my wall-to-wall bookcase, collecting cobwebs as I'm pouring over what Porn User members are saying.
That might appear somewhat of a stretch, but for me, it is what it is. The guys hammering out dialogue on this forum entertains, enlightens, and oftentimes are a sizable more stimulating than much of what's printed between the pages of my newspaper and the likes of magazines I thumb through waiting to see a doctor or get a haircut.
So Lets just settle on what jberry has so astutely awaken me on, or, as most have already done, and that being simply interppert the question to their liking and act on it accordingly.
|
07-08-12 03:08am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from slutty:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Perhaps they should do it SAT style:
I for (a) and (b)
II for (a), (b), and (c)
III for all of the above
|
06-27-12 11:17pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Marcus:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Thumbs up for the research jberryl69 :)
I think she has fantastic boobs, proportionally they're pretty much perfect to me. Also like Anna Angel's. It's rare I like anything larger, although I have to say shape is the most important aspect in my opinion.
|
06-01-12 10:23am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Gazette Risque:
(jberryl69's Reply)
They're just doing this to cut the cost on the product. The license fees are outrageous sometimes.
Also, many people don't even have a DVD drive anymore. So why pay for more when you won't need it?
But, you're right, it's still a bit strange.
|
05-14-12 07:54am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from graymane:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Sorry about gettin' back to you so late, partner, but other issues away from PU has had me nailed down with bigger fish to fry (think whales).
Anyway, Just wanted to pass on how much I appreciate your input about Osteo Bi-Flex, as well as the extra effort you rendered.
I've never heard of the product, nor have I seen it around; but when I do get around to gettin' my hands on the stuff, you'll be the first to know if it has the punch I need to help my condition.
Thanks again...... an' keep'em busy in the forum deciphering the gist of those clever retorts you're so good at.
|
05-09-12 01:38pm
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from badandy400:
(jberryl69's Reply)
I suspect that if the situation came up where you needed to defend yourself or your comrades you would have done so without much thought. Then later that night you would have had reality sink in. I am glad for you sake this never became a factor.
Personal defense is different from military engagements. In battles the average firefight has several hundred yards between the opposing sides. Obviously there are close range ambushes and urban warfare, but both of these can include or transition to 400 yard engagements. So there you were likely carrying the M-16 (hopefully M-16A), or perhaps AK-47 depending on where you are from.
In personal defense there are not long range engagements. The fights are very intimate. The "whites of the eyes" hold true for legal personal defense as well. If I am 200 feet away from you and you shoot me, you are going to prison. They will say you could/should have attempted to leave the situation. Now if I am 15 feet away with a gun, or I am thrusting a knife into your liver, you have every right to shoot and to shoot to kill. This situation t a weapon like The Judge becomes an amazing defense powerhouse. A this range, the legal range, it will stop any man in his tracks. The gun is great because it forces you to wait until lethal force becomes legal (potentially). You can not shoot someone 200 feet away with any success using the shot shells, and you also can not accidentally kill a bystander that is 200 feet away. For home defense it is great because it has less wall penetration than a slug would carry.
|
04-20-12 10:04pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from badandy400:
(jberryl69's Reply)
"You are 100% correct though, being armed is a blessing and a burden all at the same time."
Was a direct response to:
"What do they call you when your weapon gets taken away from and you're killed? Even happens to cops."
Gun were certainly a game changer.
Survival of the fittest had a change in meaning. It became less about physical strength and much more about technological abilities. When the Germans invade Russia, the Russian Red Guard was sent. They are like the current day SEALS, while not the same as the SEALS, their abilities were like comparing a normal current person to a SEAL. These were fighting machines with amazing training. And the were sent after a group of Germans that were old, wore men from the first World War. The Russian Red guard was slaughtered by these old, tired Germans. This fight was not hand to hand, in which case the Guard would have had a dominating victory, no, the Germans had machine guns and simply mowed down the charging Guard force. This is one of my favorite examples of how technology can change the tides of war.
|
04-14-12 11:32am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from badandy400:
(jberryl69's Reply)
In that case, not prepared enough.
That is certainly a risk that would be involved in it. There are holsters that are very difficult for other to remove the weapon from, but are not 100%.
Not every situation ha such a risk. Being in a hand to hand fight with someone it is certainly possible. Ideally you are either able to draw and fire before they get to you, or the weapon can remain concealed until you deem it appropriate to use. When a gun enters a fight it will be used. That is were training becomes paramount.
In home defense situations it is not all the likely unless you are moving about the house and they surprise you in a hallway. Then it becomes similar to a street fight. Most situations there is a little distance involved, otherwise you would not be able to get to your weapon as you are not likely to be carrying it in your home. If I know someone is coming I will have heavily armed and, if have a little time, armored. In this event I have 30 rounds ready to go and 100 more in banana clips. There was a woman on the news a few month back who called 911 looking for permission to kill to men who were trying to intrude on her home. She had more than 15 minutes before they got in. Will not always have that much time obviously, but she had enough time to hole up and the two intrudes stood no chance against her shotgun.
You take a chance either way when choosing to not have a weapon and choosing to have a weapon. But when you do carry you know you have it and what you need to do. Someone who is legally armed does not look for a fight, because they know they have the power to end it quickly and decisively.
You are 100% correct though, being armed is a blessing and a burden all at the same time.
|
04-13-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Cybertoad:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Can not go wrong with Sig Sauer arms, they are made in germany and assembled here.
|
04-12-12 06:48pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from badandy400:
(jberryl69's Reply)
I would suggest a rifle for home defense. This is contrary to many beliefs but some of the new home defense rounds have great stopping power yet low wall penetration....do not want to be killing your neighbors too. Any 16.5" barreled M4 type AR-15 would do.
Second I would get a revolver. The Judge is a great option because it can fire large shot shells. They do make shot shells that are normal bullet sized as well, they can be used in an automatic, but jam consistently. They would great in revolvers because the round is already chambered and just waiting to be fired. I recommend this, again, because of amazing stopping power up close, but much lower risk of collateral damage. At 15 feet or less this would blow a hole the size of a grapefruit in someone, but at 100 yards is nothing more than getting hit with a BB gun or two. They reduce risk of getting jail time for a collateral kill, force to be within the legal range to use lethal force, do great damage up close, and can miss a little but still cause damage because of spread. This is important because people ALWAYS miss a little when in that situation. A 9mm that passes 1 mm from the persons neck could mean your death. A shot shell from a revolver that is centered 1 mm from the persons neck is a bloody mess, and you and your family live.
Go to your local dealer, a good one, and discuss it with them. Spend some time at a local range and see what feels right. Then keep going to the range so you stay at least familiar with how to operate the gun(s). Take some defense courses too.
That all being said, I most sincerely hope that all of you and myself never NEED a gun. They will call you paranoid, until you need it, then they will call you prepared.
|
04-12-12 04:13pm
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from graymane:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Gratitude spins again from me to thee for sharing some more of your enlightened pearls of wisdom with us, JB.....
One can always count on you to provide those sparkling nuggets that here-to-fore and otherwise might sadly remain buried, and likewise possibly never surface without your personally unearthing them for our pleasure.
Forgive me for dragging this deserving compliment around the block... but you know me, enigmas and never anything simple.
BTW.... had I thought about or known you were gonna tune in, I'd've thrown in a little deep throat.
|
04-04-12 03:44pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(jberryl69's Reply)
I think you are dead on Jberry, its like renaming the Presidents name every every few months.
I miss out on a few models cause of this and obviously I can not join every existing site looking for them.
|
02-28-12 07:45am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Not THAT written word, jb! :-)
|
11-28-11 01:38pm
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from graymane:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Good job with the graphics, JB .....Hereafter I'll always think of your comment when I pour myself a glass of chocolate milk.
|
10-14-11 06:04pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from lk2fireone:
(jberryl69's Reply)
Thanks for the suggestion. I usually do re-size my screen fonts. Like they are currently. But that makes for another problem, because now the complete page does not fit inside the monitor. I have a small section of the URL page that is outside the monitor, that I don't see unless I use the "whatever" bar at the bottom of the page, to move the page slightly so I can now see/read whatever is on that small section of the URL page that I don't see.
But it's better for me to re-size the fonts, because I only sometimes want/need to see the section of the URL page that is not shown to me.
|
10-12-11 01:15pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from pat362:
(jberryl69's Reply)
I didn't think the question was in any offensive. I just assumed you were curious to know exactly what I was talking about. I've seen quite a few G/G scenes where one girl spits in the mouth of the other and vice versa. I have also seen where girls play with each others saliva but they usually drool it rather than spit it. Jay Sin's stuff often includes these things and I usually skip over it.
Playing with saliva is not really offensive to me but it is simply not sexually interesting.
|
09-04-11 07:11pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from lk2fireone:
(jberryl69's Reply)
If you watch r-rated British crime dramas, you sometimes hear one guy calling another guy a cunt. That's a term of disrespect. It doesn't mean the other guy is a homosexual. It means, from the context, the other guy is a jerk, stupid, someone to be taken advantage of, someone who can be pushed around, something like that.
|
09-04-11 10:40am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from pat362:
(jberryl69's Reply)
It is to me if said spit is not during a ckis. I don't care if both performers are into spitting into each others mouth and they both find it thrilling. I will always consider it offensive if one person spits anywhwere on another person.
|
09-04-11 09:31am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
