| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Tee836:
That would be nice but i doubt that will ever happen.What they will do if your a member of a site is discount another one of the kink websites usually like $10 off.Acually deeper discounts would be nice if your already a member of one of their sites like 50% off a second site 75% off a third site and maybe more access to some of their live shows.
|
08-05-10 04:45pm
|
Reply
452
|
Sex With Kathia Nobili
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from ace of aces:
sad that such a good looking girl has such an improvable homepage
|
01-28-11 08:13am
|
Reply
453
|
Sex With Kathia Nobili
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from Denner:
Nice review - and Kathia Nobili is a knockout.
The preview looks a bit confusing - well, it seem like the kind of site as the Eve Angel - a sub-site for 21 Sextury and with access to that...the network.
But why make this a separate site? Why not just make it a part of the entire deal all along. RustyJ has some question about that, too. The amount alone could be a hint for just letting beautiful Kathia be a part of the ol' 21.
It looks like RustyJ has a point about the score here, too....
Thanks again for this update/info.
|
01-07-11 07:32am
|
Reply
454
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I agree that my statement was extreme but the reason why I said it has a lot to do with the preview section. We're expected to pay 10$ for unknown content, know way of knowing how much you get or if the site will keep on adding new stuff. There are worse sites but since this is Seymore's site then he should try to emulate other studios site and most of these do a far superior job than he does and they aren't necessarily more expensive.
I would feel just as cheated if I paid 2$ for content I already had than if I paid 10$. The only difference is that I would be out of more money and be a little more pissed. Seymore is more or less an inactive director and the bulk of his movies are many years old and they are not getting any younger. He made his profits on them years ago and this is just another way to make more money but unlike many of the other studios. he hasn't made available most of his work. not to mention that the content is really not exclusif.
If the site showed potential members what is available inside the members section then I think I would have a different opinion but it doesn't and I don't think they plan on doing that.
|
01-13-13 11:27am
|
Reply
455
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from pat362:
If and this is a big if his site at least offered access to half of his movies then it might be worth it but you only get access to a tiny amount that 10$ is still way too much money. The preview section is basically one page and it sucks. There's no way to really see what's available inside the site. TBP listed 147 movies in October and they say he adds one new video about every 2-6 days so the best you can hope for is 5 to 15 videos per month. That means that he would now have close to 200 videos. Seymore is credited with directing 170 movies on IAFD so at a minimum of 4 scenes per movie then there should be at least 600 videos that should be available.
It gets worse when you consider that VB already has 191 of his videos. I'm a huge fan of his work but unless he is willng to make his entire library available for download then he will never be worth joining at any price.
|
01-13-13 10:06am
|
Reply
456
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from lk2fireone:
Review is well written and interesting. I am thinking of hiring you to write at least some of my reviews, from now on. Especially since we seem to have joined many of the same sites. Lol.
|
01-07-11 01:00am
|
Reply
457
|
Silvia Saint
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from graymane:
Nice review, Rusty. Acknowledging your input, If I didn't already have so much on Silvia, I would probably.give this one a shot.
|
12-22-10 03:28pm
|
Reply
458
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from happyending:
Here are more 4k downloadable trailers.
naughtyamerica4k.com
Naughtyamerica 4k 2160p trailer is coded at 40 Mbps using H.264 Main Profile.
Actual Naughtyamerica 4k 2160p videos are coded at 25 Mbps H.264 High Profile.
Brazzers 1080p videos are coded at 12 Mbps H.264 High Profile.
Most Adult 1080p Blu-rays are coded about 18 Mbps on a 25 Gb single blu-ray disc.
|
08-25-14 04:06pm
|
Reply
459
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Thanks. I was really curious. I on the other hand am not remotely interested in 1080p porn so you can imagine what my feelings must be in regards to 4k. I don't think that there is a single piece of porn that can be improved if it is in HD and I think most actually look worse because of it.
|
08-25-14 01:28pm
|
Reply
460
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from happyending:
Like 1080p videos, the 4k video quality depends on video bitrates and compression profiles like H.264, H.265, main, advance, etc. Going from 480p to 1080p, I can see a difference. Likewise, going from 1080p videos or 2 megapixel picture to 2160p or 8 megapixel picture, I can tell a different.
Here are some 4k videos samples.
http://www.ultrahdtv.net/4k-video/
|
08-25-14 11:35am
|
Reply
461
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ghosty:
(RustyJ's Reply)
You really shouldn't expect too much. It mostly depends on the size of your TV and how close you sit to it. Even if you drastically increase the pixels and bitrate, your eyes most likely will not notice much of a difference.
|
08-25-14 07:54am
|
Reply
462
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from pat362:
Are you saying that if you only have 1080p videos than that is no longer sufficient for your porn needs and you won't be satisfied with anything less than 4K?
|
08-24-14 06:07pm
|
Reply
463
|
Sin Drive
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from happyending:
The follow websites have 4k videos.
The 4k videos varies in bitrates, but the videos are in 4k. .
naughtyamerica.com
amkingdom.com
tiny4k.com
woodmancastingx.com
|
08-24-14 02:24pm
|
Reply
464
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Yep, I think that is what Brits refer to as a Chinese Burn.
It certainly adds reality to 'screwing' another Brit slang for a fuck!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 05:11am
|
Reply
465
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(RustyJ's Reply)
It brings tears to the eyes just looking at it.
Pre-book an ambulance before trying that one!
Make sure you have a good story for the Doctor too!
Cap'n. :00
|
01-21-11 04:07am
|
Reply
466
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Serious Partner:
The old ones are 432p-576p, and the new ones you can watch in 720p streaming and download in 1080p. I believe the first scene appeared in 2006-2007.
|
08-26-13 05:12am
|
Reply
467
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from Thomas20:
Hello Rusty J - Before I write a detailed comment, may I ask if you had problems downloading the files from this site ? Especially with the Hi Definition files crashing out before fully downloading and, where they have downloaded, crashing when playing them back ? Also, did you find a lot of digital artifacts on the videos ? I'm wanting to know if it is just me.
|
07-23-11 05:58am
|
Reply
468
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from slutty:
Nice review man, I agree that this site has some attractive ladies, I just wish the scenes were a good bit shorter...
|
02-13-11 11:04pm
|
Reply
469
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from mbaya:
An excellent review that I truly enjoyed reading. I have to say that you are becoming one of the best reviewers on PU, in my not so humble opinion. Keep this up and you will be breaking 100 points soon. Your English is quite good, is it your first language?
|
02-11-11 07:27pm
|
Reply
470
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice review that gives the flavor of the site.
I like Russian and East European porn. And I like attractive models, which this site has.
But I prefer one-on-one. Also, I like videos to be edited. I would like a build-up to the sex, but a lot of aimless chatter in Russian (even with subtitles) can get boring fast.
And I appreciate your comments on the sound track being poor to miserable.
And I guess the lighting could be much improved (strictly a guess, as I haven't seen any of the videos).
I prefer good lighting and good editing over the "reality" flavored porn. And good camera work. And good sound would be a bonus.
So I will pass on this site.
|
02-09-11 09:13am
|
Reply
471
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from PinkPanther:
My apologies - I'm getting confused between Holly's site and Suze's site.
They're doing hard-core on Suze's site, but it's very pose-y - still true to the site's origins as a glamour site.
|
06-06-11 07:10am
|
Reply
472
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I used to be a member. There is a lot of material - one or two vids added per week and the site has been live for several years now. But there are no hardcore scenes on Suze's site. It's mainly solo. There may be a few girl/girl scenes but nothing very hardcore. It's a glamour site.
|
06-06-11 06:57am
|
Reply
473
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from nadiencendia:
I am also a big (huge!) fan of Sophie Moone: when I started watching porn in the internet she immediately caught my eye (and everything else) and I've followed her work since, being a member of all her "official sites" and most of the other sites that offer her content.
For me the worst thing about "Sweet Sophie Moone II: the return of Sophie" is the excessive ammount of bonus and backstage content they offer. With only 4 updates a month, I feel that they should make sure that at least 3 of them are real action sets. In fact, I think it would be more fair if all 4 sets were real action, and the bonus sets came, well, as real bonuses inbetween.
As for the other "complaints", it's true that Sophie is not a teenager any more, but I think she still looks gorgeus (I wouldn't kick her out of my bed, for sure :P), and I don't really miss her b/g scenes. But I do have a sense of inauthenticity in most of her most recent sets, like she is just going through the moves and not really interested in what she is doing.
In any case, I know that I will at least once more join this site sometime next year...
|
10-23-10 02:10am
|
Reply
474
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from Goldfish:
I'm a big fan of Sophie Moone and I'd love to see some new HD video from her but my guess is this site would be a disappointment from your review. What I REALLY want is someone to go back in a time machine to 2003 with an HD camera and bring back new, high quality video of young Sofie.
|
10-22-10 05:03pm
|
Reply
475
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from graymane:
You've put together a fine review here, Rusty. Anybody contemplating joining this site would certainly benefit from it.
|
10-20-10 10:20pm
|
