| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Thanks Rusty, yes they really need to sort out their cancellation procedure or hook up with a more familiar biller like CCBill to make life easier for customers.
|
12-20-12 10:49am
|
Reply
102
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from Serious Partner:
We now have lots of real amateur couples on the site that shot it all by themselves and never worked with producers)
|
12-19-12 07:08am
|
Reply
103
|
Chicki Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Serious Partner:
Thank you) We add a new scene every week.
|
12-19-12 07:02am
|
Reply
104
|
Porn Traveling
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from Serious Partner:
Thanks for the review. All the videos are true amateur, even if you see well-known actresses they shot it themselves, no cameraman at all.
We see the point and now try to film more dynamic scenes, we ask couples for 20 mins sex scenes, and we cut boring moments, but it's still amateur so it cannot be compared to any professional shooting.
|
12-19-12 06:56am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from hodayathink:
(RustyJ's Reply)
That depends entirely on how old you are and the type of people you associate with. A 22 year old living in a college/university town is much more likely to run into a teen than they are a MILF.
That being said, I feel like this poll, more than almost any other that isn't explicitly asking how old everyone is, shows that that the members tend to be on the older side (not that that's a bad thing at all). While I'm not young enough that the girls playing teenagers in porn (who, while some are 18-19, are usually around 20-23) would be my contemporaries, I'm nowhere near old enough that it would be unlikely that a woman that old would want to sleep with me. For me, it's about watching attractive women, no matter what age they are or what age I am.
|
12-14-12 09:15pm
|
Reply
106
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I don't know if they are removing their old stuff. They might but I hope not because if they do then they will have to completely remove everything. I believe that it's their futur content that will now be different.
|
12-13-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
107
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I also rarely read the post on their forum. It was from one of the many Kink threads on ADT. I haven't seen any official stuff yet but then again I didn't see anything until Brazzer yanked all of their BSDM themed stuff. I don't know if Mastercard is as hard nosed as Visa but it was a request from Visa that made Brazzer remove their content and it's again Visa.
|
12-12-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from marcdc1:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I agree. I look at reviews, and usually only join if the preview section is generous enough to make clear the quality on the inside, and am not afraid to take a chance on a month long subscription. I've had buyer's remorse a few times, but generally I understand their are business people on the other end of this interaction who need to earn a living.
|
12-12-12 05:13pm
|
Reply
109
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from pat362:
I don't know if you heard but the site is about to go in a slightly different direction and remove the bound part from it's name and it's futur content. Rumor as it that Visa said they would no longer preocess CC for them if they didn't do thse changes so Kink being the smart company that they are. Simply changed things.
I believe the site will be called hard gangbangs. I actually like the change because the bound stuff never did much for me.
|
12-11-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
110
|
Men In Pain
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review - sounds like it's up to Kink's usual standards though I don't like to hear they're recycling content as new - a little tricky and not what I expect from them....
|
12-09-12 11:17am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from gggfan:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I answered 3 days, but I think you're right. A good preview and good reviews on site like pornusers is the best bet to get me subscribing !
|
12-08-12 02:32am
|
Reply
112
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from rearadmiral:
There is no way to tell how close you are to the limit. They don't have any indication. But to make matters worse it seems that there is no universal application of the limit either. Some members here report having a limit imposed (like me) and other say they never had a limit. The Terms of Service are vague too in that they say there is a daily limit of 10GB (which might have been acceptable ten years ago but isn't realistic now) but there is some vague language about allowing a higher limit if you downlaod larger files. I emailed them to ask for clarification on that but never heard back.
I don't think there's any punishment factor here. I think that if at any time in a 24 hour period you hit the limit (amd I hit it at downloads as low as 7GB in a day) you get blocked from downloading for 24 hours.
Maybe with some luck you'll be one of the members who don't have a limit imposed. I'm not completely against limits, but 10GB isn't reasonable.
|
12-07-12 11:33am
|
Reply
113
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from rearadmiral:
I'm always interested to read other PU's reviews of my favourite Kink sites like this one. I'm always a little concerned when I score them high that others will think I'm being subjective so when I see other members scoring high I know I'm not too far off the mark.
Like you, I think this is one of the best sites that Kink offers, and I think Kink is a great network too. This may be just me rationalizing it, but Kink's production values are so high (and therefore there costs must be very high) that I don't see the price as a problem. But... like you I look for email discounts and once you're a member of one Kink site you can join the others at discounted prices. Still, it would be nice to have some bundling option.
Anyway, great review!
BTW - some (like me) see the 'failed scenes' as a pro since they add to the realism. I wish there were more of them.
|
12-04-12 02:26pm
|
Reply
114
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from arnaud:
Hello RustyJ
The site is still alive. We keep shooting updates.
Sometimes there's a lag between the updates page in the tour and the updates page in the members area.
As you can see on the screenshot below, there are updates on december.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/577...omeexpliciteart.jpg/
Videos are in 720p
Arnaud
|
12-04-12 08:59am
|
Reply
115
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from Cybertoad:
Looks like a very nice review wish they had more content though for nearly 30.00 ?
|
12-03-12 01:04pm
|
Reply
116
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from lk2fireone:
Fine review.
I'm curious. You say your connection maxed out at 11-12 megabytes per second. Is that 11-12 MB/sec? Or is it more like 1.5 MB/sec (because of the conversion factor of bits to bytes)?
My max download speed is about 1.3 MB/sec.
How much are you paying for a connection that fast? (If you don't think that's too personal.) I have a connection through AT&T, and that usually runs around $45/month. I shudder to think what a faster connection would cost. Especially one that was maybe 9 times faster than mine.
|
12-03-12 06:24am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from lk2fireone:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Agree with Rusty. Whenever I feel like it.
|
11-20-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
118
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Ergo Proxy:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Concerning DVDs (but clinic stuff) the company Viola did some awesome stuff. But that's dated back in the 90's (of course it was VHS then).
Maybe try Rubber-Passion too? Lucy also does some f/m fucking but the action there is mostly solo or f/f.
|
11-17-12 10:52am
|
Reply
119
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
I am too a little bit disappointed by all the sites you mentioned. They are doing so, so and have great potential (that's the main thing which hurts me) but lack some aspects. I am not sure if I understood what you are searching for correctly (concerning bizarre+f/m or just latex f/m). My general experience is that if you start searching there is not much appealing out there (or it's all softcore or model sites). Perhaps I can recommend a tiny something:
"fetishkitsch.com":
It's a couple doing quite a lot of fucking in latex, so you have f/m. There is no clinic content here but some bondage, inflatables, masks etc.
"http://www.bpclips.com/0000094/rubber-fucking-c-1.html";
Rubber Fucking had its own site some time ago but degraded into a collection of clips from BP productions. The name speaks for itself. I have most of their clips and they are pretty decent. The downside is that there is just one guy banging the girls and the variety of women is limited to a small number. If you look around they have some other niches there like breathplay and that sort.
Quite frankly when it comes to hardcore and latex most of it is just garbage nowadays.
|
11-17-12 09:46am
|
Reply
120
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(RustyJ's Reply)
It's obviously one of the biggest sites around and it can be pretty good, but I joined for one scene and now that I have it I likely won't go back. Unless Lexi Diamond does an anal scene for them... then I'd be back in a heartbeat.
|
11-13-12 04:55pm
|
Reply
121
|
Anal Teen Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Sandstone:
Don't worry, Rusty, it won't. :) The slower updates are only temporary, and it will be on its usual update speed again hopefully very soon.
|
11-09-12 07:38am
|
Reply
122
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Eugene:
Wholly agree with RustyJ on DRM - it's the only thing that keeps me from joining for quite some time now. Because otherwise site is very good and girl is hot!
Though if it makes them feel safer that way I can understand that, since they're not overgrown media company with limitless budget.
It's true that there is some jerks who have money to pay and still download from sharing sites. And those who don't have enough money won't pay either way. But I think that vast majority of people would gladly support the site because it's good.
|
11-07-12 10:53pm
|
Reply
123
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from tetros:
Yes, the new updates are boring.
|
11-05-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
124
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from messmer:
Could we make that "Combining the site back with 21Sextreme that has EVEN LESS going on???!!!"
|
11-01-12 11:41am
|
Reply
125
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I was also thinking the same thing about the guys being bi. I made a similar complaint in my Sex Art review though a completely different genre. I think as these sites move into the future they are going to realize they're going to have to up the believability, as in, it doesn't convince me it's a big deal for a bi man to take another man's cumshot or in Sex Art's case, to have a sensitive, effeminate male act sensitive.
The Men In Pain site is a little more femdom and comes with this one. I also thought the women were more feminine on it and it did make those more believable. Especially Jasmine Byrne, she's such a dainty, tiny woman. It was pretty believable she could make a man take her punishment just to be with her.
|
10-08-12 01:23pm
|
