| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Sandstone:
Hello RustyJ,
First of all let me thank you for your continuous presence and activity, the constant feedback means a lot for us.
About this issue you've mentioned.
Despite of the common belief spreading around, the support - and me personally - struggles a lot with this problem. But the situation is a bit more difficult than it seems.
As the majority of the content providers, we also use a third party hosting service to host the huge amount of content we offer. When this service fails on the provider's part, the results show on ours, and - like in this present example - we are trapped between two fires.
We're trying to push our request through the partner, urging them toward a quick solution, while trying to help our members as good as we can, despite of the fact that not much more we can do to solve this issue.
So yes...
We are aware of the problem and the drawback it causes, and we are working hard to find a solution. We are indeed deeply sorry for the difficulties and inconveniences it causes to our members, but all we can do at the moment is to promise that we try to handle this issue as fast as possible, even if it forces us to find another CDN partner.
Kind Regards,
Gabriel S.
21Sextury Team
|
11-29-10 02:16am
|
Reply
427
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Thanks for the comment. I hope the review helps some fellow members.
|
11-25-10 04:09am
|
Reply
428
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Drooler:
I thought AssTraffic was too "gapey." I'd look away and FFWD when they'd zoom in on the expanded anus. Ughhhh. What a weird thing to enjoy the sight of.
Well, now I'm waiting for some idiot to come swooping down and tell me I'm wrong for having said that! LOL.
|
11-19-10 04:18pm
|
Reply
429
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
Where the fuck do they find these beefed up thugs? How the fuck can a man with an endowment like that brutalize a woman in such a way? These thugs are like animals. Is this the only way these poor girls can make a living? Fuck these gorillas and their sickening, psychotic energy. Disgusting.
|
11-18-10 07:20pm
|
Reply
430
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
This shit is worrisome. What the fuck is going on in a man's mind who gets turned on watching shit like this?
|
11-18-10 07:13pm
|
Reply
431
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from messmer:
I downloaded the video and started to watch it but a grown woman licking that over sized lollipop and wearing that silly head band made the whole thing so ludicrous that I hit delete after suffering the scene for five minutes. Going by your comment, I am glad that I did! I usually don't go for "gaping" either, but because this was a new site for us I thought I'd get a trial scene just to see what it was like. I won't go back. Not my niche, for sure!
|
11-18-10 06:17pm
|
Reply
432
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I definitely agree about the less English the better which is why I usually am joining the Euro sites. As hot as Eva Angelina is, she can become really annoying with the constant talking and screaming. Also saw a video recently of Tiffany Taylor teasing a guy and she said the same thing about 40 times in the video, "You're such a naughty boy" over and over and over! Yeah, Rocco gets a little carried away. The worst part about the males is that the best you can usually hope from them is that they are humorous, but even then they get annoying since we're not watching porn to see a comedy set.
|
11-15-10 01:26pm
|
Reply
433
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from ace of aces:
(RustyJ's Reply)
i personal rate the seperate sites of a network by themselve. only in my rating for the qantity of videos i don`t give them less points when the network has plenty to offer...but everyones practice differs ^^
|
11-15-10 08:23am
|
Reply
434
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from malikstarks:
I've always felt that Reality Kings had the best pictures amongst the major North American sites. That has changed as anyone who has downloaded recent sets from Brazzers can attest. (Not trying to toot Brazzers horn as I know they are not very popular, but this is the truth).
However they are still very good. Although I don't know the specs.
|
11-14-10 11:51am
|
Reply
435
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from atrapat:
I'm pretty sure 900x600 is the best they have so the preview ones should give you a good idea of the quality.
Unfortunately, too often they mix many screen captures into the photos to allow continuity of the scene's events even though there's also a separate screen captures section. You end up with mostly 900x600 photos but also some slightly smaller and darker screen captures in between.
|
11-14-10 07:36am
|
Reply
436
|
Cheating Whore Wives
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice review: short but comprehensive. I need to learn to write more leanly like you. :)
It seems like a lot of sites are starting out with a very nice update schedule, and then, less than a year later, some in 3 or 6 months, stop updating altogether. I think the financial downturn, which has been with us for years already, lasting much longer than usual, might be partly responsible: sites start out with good intentions, but apparently the money for updates runs out. And it's also partially because networks want to advertise as many member-sites as possible, to lure more subscribers in. The more sites a network has, obviously, the more wonderful it becomes. Except when most of the member-sites are no longer updating, and many of the member-sites might have little content.
You find a site you like, because of the model selection, or the good video or photo quality, and it's a real disappointment when the site stops updating. Lack of updates definitely affects the value/score of a site.
|
11-11-10 02:03pm
|
Reply
437
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I'm cool with the scoring approach.
21Sextury is loaded with superb material for every taste - if we could only find it easily! - so a new site in the network that is adding content gives a subscriber access to many more sites deserves to be rated higher than if the site was a stand alone site.
I am not that much into gaping, but I do enjoy the more extreme stuff as is found in Zoliboy, for example, so it's likely that I would rate teh gape site lower than you if it were a stand alone site.
|
11-07-10 11:42am
|
Reply
438
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I seldom download the 1080p videos so I can't say but the medium quality videos look the same as the others. I'm going to download one and let you after I compare it.
|
11-05-10 06:51pm
|
Reply
439
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from Trip999:
Interesting read :-) I might well consider joining at a later date for the content on this site and associated others.
Have come across a few others tonight which you may/may not have come across which also look appealing : rectalfreaks.com and freeanalpassport.com (apparently free to join for 2 days then billing kicks in - see review over on Porn Inspector if interested). Both look strong on anal content w. Russian/E European actresses.
|
11-05-10 04:42pm
|
Reply
440
|
No Rest Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Trip999:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Thanks! A small contribution to what looks like a great resource bank of experiences here.
|
11-05-10 01:58pm
|
Reply
441
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Many thanks for the fast response. A lot of information packed into a very short reply. Wish I could learn to be as compact as you are. Lol.
|
11-05-10 08:24am
|
Reply
442
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(RustyJ's Reply)
As an aside ...
The last question on your user profile is a great place to remind fellow users how you tend to judge sites/networks.
|
11-05-10 08:04am
|
Reply
443
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from ace of aces:
fine review. anyway for only 16 scenes is imo the rating to high, (because it`s a review for a site and not for the network)
|
11-05-10 07:42am
|
Reply
444
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Do you have any opinion on the value of the site? And old review from about 3 years ago rated the site very low, a score of 50. And the replies to that review also say the site is poor. One old reply even mentions the site had DRM.
|
11-05-10 05:22am
|
Reply
445
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(RustyJ's Reply)
That error report/comment is what I was referring to. Is it still there? I checked yesterday and just now as well and didn't see it, thought it had been discarded.
I'm glad it's still there - proved accurate now, I believe, by the new reviews here of all of the bonus sites, which have been confirmed as dead - no longer updating for months - or years, in a number of cases.
|
11-01-10 05:37pm
|
Reply
446
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(RustyJ's Reply)
You're probably right on that one Rusty. Thanks
|
11-01-10 07:30am
|
Reply
447
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I hope so too because I got kind of nervous when he mentioned 3 kind of packages? I hope it's not the kind of setup where you have to join more than one package to get what you could currently get with a long term reward memebership. I guess we'll know very soon.
|
10-29-10 06:51pm
|
Reply
448
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Thanks for your reply to Pat, Rusty. Yes, I have the two additional sites as well. I wasn't interested in Kathia Nobili or Aletta (horrible fake boobs) but might have a look at the other two you mention.
|
10-23-10 06:39pm
|
Reply
449
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Yes, since I learned how to right-click to open new windows (and to save archive files), the navigation issues really dwindled down.
Plus, I've usually things coming from more than one site at once, so having those windows open until I need to close them is very helpful.
|
10-23-10 08:05am
|
Reply
450
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
from nadiencendia:
I am also a big (huge!) fan of Sophie Moone: when I started watching porn in the internet she immediately caught my eye (and everything else) and I've followed her work since, being a member of all her "official sites" and most of the other sites that offer her content.
For me the worst thing about "Sweet Sophie Moone II: the return of Sophie" is the excessive ammount of bonus and backstage content they offer. With only 4 updates a month, I feel that they should make sure that at least 3 of them are real action sets. In fact, I think it would be more fair if all 4 sets were real action, and the bonus sets came, well, as real bonuses inbetween.
As for the other "complaints", it's true that Sophie is not a teenager any more, but I think she still looks gorgeus (I wouldn't kick her out of my bed, for sure :P), and I don't really miss her b/g scenes. But I do have a sense of inauthenticity in most of her most recent sets, like she is just going through the moves and not really interested in what she is doing.
In any case, I know that I will at least once more join this site sometime next year...
|
10-23-10 02:10am
|
