| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Thanks, Rusty! :-)
|
06-11-11 08:54am
|
Reply
302
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Monahan:
(RustyJ's Reply)
By site design, I assume that term included a good search function. The best looking site in the world with a lousy search function is no good as far as I'm concerned.
A site's design is good if it has a good search function, easy navigation, reasonably fast downloading and few, if any, pop-ups.
|
06-06-11 09:39am
|
Reply
303
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from PinkPanther:
My apologies - I'm getting confused between Holly's site and Suze's site.
They're doing hard-core on Suze's site, but it's very pose-y - still true to the site's origins as a glamour site.
|
06-06-11 07:10am
|
Reply
304
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I used to be a member. There is a lot of material - one or two vids added per week and the site has been live for several years now. But there are no hardcore scenes on Suze's site. It's mainly solo. There may be a few girl/girl scenes but nothing very hardcore. It's a glamour site.
|
06-06-11 06:57am
|
Reply
305
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I'm still a member here RustyJ, and no HD downloads that I have seen on any of the network of sites.
|
05-30-11 10:25pm
|
Reply
306
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(RustyJ's Reply)
That would be great since it would be an already-discounted way into the network.
I realized this morning that when I had my last Sex and Submission membership that I forgot to re-download a few scenes in the highest def available. They're older but among my favorites. If you get a chance, check out the scenes with Kat and with Sasha Grey. Both are great.
|
05-30-11 06:35pm
|
Reply
307
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Capn:
Well, that is a good reason for us not giving them our money .
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-30-11 09:04am
|
Reply
308
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from malikstarks:
They just put out an announcement stating that 1080p HD is available to all members.
|
05-29-11 08:59am
|
Reply
309
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I agree. I'd never considered rejoining most of them, but if I did I'd hope that I'd remember to check TBP for a discount first.
|
05-27-11 04:03pm
|
Reply
310
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I hadn't thought about the probability that we're subsidizing some of the BDSM scene in San Francisco. You might be right! But like you, that probably won't cause me to stop taking memberships there because the material is so good.
One of the main reasons that I check my email is to watch for offers from Kink. The great thing about them is that the offers actually mean something. I regularly get offers from past sites that are really valueless because they don't actually offer any enticement to rejoin.
|
05-27-11 08:50am
|
Reply
311
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(RustyJ's Reply)
My experiences with Kink over the years has been excellent, especially with customer service and site quality. Just not having to enter and re-enter my password dozens of times is a benefit I highly value over many other sites.
Regarding pricing, I've often found that I can join a site for about $30 for scores of quality scenes, then quit the site after three weeks or so and join another site on Kink at a discount ($19.95/mo). This has not always been true, but is more often true than not.
While this is not as cheap as 21stsextury (and not as well lit), it does have a quality for the price not found elsewhere when it comes to kinky sex.
|
05-27-11 04:13am
|
Reply
312
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(RustyJ's Reply)
RustyJ:
Thanks for the comments. I think we're on the same page when it comes to pricing issues, but we just differ a bit on how big a deal it is. I'm a big fan on most Kink stuff (some cynics might even think I'm shilling in my reviews, but I'm not. I'm a paying customer.) The production values in all Kink sites justifies the price for me. I suspect that they have to charge this much to cover their costs (and make a profit too) and they have to do this from a smaller customer base.
I also agree that the scenes can seem repetitive. This happens for a lot of their stuff. But, for me that only occurs if I'm watching one scene after another. The innovation and uniqueness comes through if I dabble in the scenes rather than dive in head first.
On your question re pricing, it has been my experience that once you are registered as a paying member on one site you get a $10 discount on memberships to other sites. I don't know if this is a hard-and-fast rule, but it has always occured for me.
If you haven't already done it, make sure to create a free account and ask to be on the mailing list. I'd say at least once a month I get an offer for a discount on one site or another. Recently I got an offer I couldn't refuse: 99 cent one-day access to a few sites which was an excellent opportunity to get inside and take a closer look at some a new site. (And when I was in one a one-day membership I signed up for another site I really wanted and got a $10 discount too) I only wish they'd make that offer on more sites because there are several (Ultimate Surrender is one) that I'd like to check out but don't think I'd have enough interest to warrant the monthly fee.
|
05-26-11 09:10am
|
Reply
313
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from graymane:
(RustyJ's Reply)
The prefix "fore" in my dictionary means "before.
And the suffix "play" notes an indirect ingenious and often cunning means to gain an end. Simply put: "free movement.
Foreplay is forplay......oral sex is just that: oral sex.
I'd have to argue that "oral sex" is a consummation of the sex act itself.....usually culminating in an orgasm or a satisfactory closure.
For the real answer, though, those inclined might pose this poll question to the gender in question.....she won't have a problem with it at all.
|
05-26-11 06:03am
|
Reply
314
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Totally agree with Rusty.
After joining DDFProd and being whelmed with the volume of superb quality material, I made the mistake (?) of signing up for 21Sextury and became totally overwhelmed by the volume of absolutely mind blowing great content.
|
05-25-11 11:03pm
|
Reply
315
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from otoh:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Exactly, RustyJ - for the same reason I don't watch any reality TV, it's just cheap and easy to produce. Much better to see that all involved - not just the actress - are making an effort!
|
05-22-11 11:16pm
|
Reply
316
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from james4096:
(RustyJ's Reply)
RustyJ nailed it. POV often means that they didn't have separate people to shoot and act in the video.
|
05-22-11 05:42pm
|
Reply
317
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(RustyJ's Reply)
I go along with Rusty. POV is often just poor camera-work.
|
05-22-11 08:08am
|
Reply
318
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(RustyJ's Reply)
Thanks Rusty, For some reason I can't view their previews or download them. I had even went to one TGP site I trust, Tiava's, searched public disgrace and got around 40 results, but when I clicked them to download the samples the pages were blank. Maybe they were just having some technical issues.
That indoor, dark, repetitive part was the part I was worried about since I've been a member on 3 of their sites and all 3 sites seemed to shoot in the same general area. Feel the same about the tied part. I noticed in one of the pictures, a woman covered with clothespins clipped onto her body and that's one of those things I don't think I could get into either. Maybe I can get some of the samples to start working and start re-considering whether to join or not.
|
05-17-11 11:17am
|
Reply
319
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from ipg386:
This is one of the best sites of all. The pics and the vids are excellent with beautiful girls in true hardcore action.
|
05-14-11 10:04pm
|
Reply
320
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from moonbyrd:
1. Yes, but not for all movies. Some of the scenes marked "HD" are available only in "Web HD" or 540p (actually 960x544). Although they seem to have added the 720p option to some of those lately. Both HD options are in MP4 (H.264) format. Personally I tend to prefer the lower resolution to save bandwidth, as the scenes tend to be overlong, some individual scenes are feature film length.
2. The $9.95 means €9.95 for Europeans. Considering the price this might not be a major issue.
My own observations: Performer IDs are inconsistent and sometimes missing. For instance in a recent update (Evil Anal 12 scene 4) they omit the name of the female talent (Lou Charmelle) entirely. And some performers are listed under multiple names, which is confusing.
Although there are sometimes large picture galleries they are pretty much useless as they are vievable only in-browser and not very conveniently at that.
The length of scenes over an hour long is displayed incorrectly.
|
05-12-11 03:01am
|
Reply
321
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from greg909:
I checked out 21sextury this month, and the biggest (and most annoying) surprise was how small all the easily accessible images are. I mean, the ones you can view or download individually are tiny by today's standards. The only way, it seems, that you can obtain larger versions is to download an entire zip file of the gallery -- and that's only available on a few sets. It took AN HOUR to download one of these zips on broadband, then a further 30 mins or so to unzip it, etc... and all I wanted was about four shots in HD. Totally unacceptable.
And the content? Well, I don't know what all the fuss is about. Of all the bizzare categories, there's not even one for regular gals with bush.
|
05-07-11 11:57am
|
Reply
322
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from Sandstone:
Hello Guys,
Sorry for the confusion, let me clear up the fog about the issue.
We've started LetsPlayLez and TrannySmuts not long ago. The first site got to the 21Sextury Network, while the latter is part of the 21Sexterme Network.
But we have some old members, those who joined before March 2011, when we had no double Network yet. They still have the old offer, and these sites not implemented to the old offer yet.
Soon we will enable these new sites in these old bundles too, let me ask for your patience about it.
|
05-05-11 11:27pm
|
Reply
323
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(RustyJ's Reply)
That new transexual site is definetely on the 21sextreme network. Of course I don't know what that means for anyone that had an old membership that included the more extreme types of sites. I kind of miss some of the sites now available through 21sextreme but I don't ind that their updates are as good as the ones on the 21sextury network.
|
05-05-11 09:45am
|
Reply
324
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from pat362:
If you already have access to 21sextury's group of sites that include pix and video, club sandy lez cuties and many others than this one should also be in the list. Where it might get complicated is if you have an older membership that includes sites now only available through 21sextreme. In that case it's possible that this site is not one you'll get.
I rejoined only after they had made the split so I lost some sites but in return I have access to this one.
|
05-03-11 11:10am
|
Reply
325
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
from moonbyrd:
I have access to it, have had it for days. It should be automatic, you probably should contact the support if it doesn't show up.
It is another of the Russian sites, you could say it is a sluttier version of Lezcuties or perhaps a lesbian version of Gapeland. I'm not yet sure what to think of it. I like the concept in principle because they lose the "innocent little teenygirl" style of Lezcuties while using many of the same models, but haven't been blown away yet.
|
05-03-11 02:44am
|
