| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
You are a sick, sick man, graymane!!! :-)
|
01-23-13 11:07am
|
Reply
127
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Capn:
Always interesting to see your take, G. :0)
I have to agree with a lot of your points, but for me it is the only subscription I have at the moment.
That says volumes for the lack of choice in our favoured genres.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-23-13 09:15am
|
Reply
128
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
GM,
Thank you again for an excellent review. I particularly like the Shakespeare reference in the reply section :)
The Bard would be proud, know if you could only have it all in iambic pentameter and include a pun :)
Hope too see more reviews from you again soon-
|
01-22-13 06:47pm
|
Reply
129
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
Ooooh, gross! That picture is going to stay with me all day now. But your answer also gave me a bit of insight as to why the site is doing well despite the leg hair. I was honestly convinced that it was despised by the vast majority of subscribers. As I said only yesterday, learn something new every day. :-) Enjoy the hair, gm!!
|
01-22-13 09:56am
|
Reply
130
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from otoh:
Great review, GM, thanks for all the useful info. I far prefer unshaven models, so keep an eye on reviews for the hairy sites - but I guess the search continues for one which isn't a) leaning toward scary hairy; and b) is actually erotic!
|
01-22-13 08:50am
|
Reply
131
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks Graymane, it's reciprocated. Your contributions are always entertaining, as well as informative.
I guess like most of us, I look in but don't contribute as much nowadays, unless there's something I just have to get off my chest. There's not enough time at the moment to post here, or view porn, but at least I don't get jaded as some do.
Been a porn fan since I was 8, so I suppose I'm never going off it, but I could do with some more customer oriented networks. There's only a limited influence PU can have, and currently the mainstream market is very homogeneous, for a number of reasons. All we can do is register our opinion.
Happily today is a day and night off, so I can spend some time putting together a review.
|
01-22-13 08:50am
|
Reply
132
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from messmer:
Hey, graymane, I always enjoy your reviews. How did you like all the hairy legs?
Us old timers tend to wax sentimental over the good old days before the models shaved but we think mostly of the pubic bush, while this site has evolved into a true fetishists dream.
As you stated "hair, hair everywhere" - hair on the nipples, hair in the pits, hair on the legs, hair in the cracks. However, one thing in their favor I do believe that their statistics might very well be right on.
This site has been around for a long, long time, therefore between 8 - 10 picture updates a day, with most sets containing at least a hundred pictures, it is not beyond belief that they have as many sets and models as they say they have.
I recently quit with two months to go, not because they lied to me, but because I found most updates either too hairy for my taste (the legs) or too bland or for the "vaginal over exposure" as you put it so nicely. But you know me, looking at a set without the girl at least wearing some sort of erotic lingerie, is the epitome of boredom.
|
01-21-13 07:01pm
|
Reply
133
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Thanks for the entertaining review Gray one. You happened to pick out a couple of big irritants as far as I'm concerned. First of all the ever present genitalia closeups. Then there's the constant moving about. You get to the point where they finally show the whole girl in all her glory, then they have to change her position and it's back to the closeups.
The cameraman goes to sleep on the closeups, but the minute they finally focus on the whole body they have to move. You just cannot get to experience the glory of the whole body. It's like they do it deliberately just to piss off porn viewers. "Ner ner ner, you paid for this, but you're not going to see anything stimulating, oh no, we can do this all the time to the end of the video you know." And they do.
|
01-21-13 06:11pm
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
Gee Graymane, I feel your pain.
|
01-21-13 07:13am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(graymane's Reply)
I think the nub of it is the interaction element.
It is a step further when, instead of being a viewer, you are talking in an intimate erotic way to another person who isn't your SO ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-19-13 02:37am
|
Reply
136
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
I don't know Graymane - I probably won't go looking. I've subscribed to Met-Art's newsletter in the past just to take and edit some of the photos to go on labels of my DVDs. I've shown some of them in other posts but that's about my extent of my still photo interest.... oh, except some ripped photos from videos of throating to the balls of some models that I play with just cause I can.
|
01-17-13 08:09pm
|
Reply
137
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from jberryl69:
After reviewing the site, I have to say, based on your current poll question, Sandra is the hottest in my book. Shame she has no updates and has "retired", whatever that means.
|
01-17-13 01:18pm
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
I am going to go with GM on this one, why a nice natural set is awesome,
the reality is you can separate and attractive woman from a sexy one
by her legs above all else.
|
01-17-13 08:40am
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
AAH! But I have given up the determinded search because no such thing seems to exist, graymane. I am now waiting (as reflected in my Forum post under Happy New Year) for someone to build a site like it and for TBP to bring it to my attention. Nice try, old friend. :-)
|
01-01-13 06:40pm
|
Reply
140
|
Milk Enema
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you, kind sir!
|
12-29-12 04:54am
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
here, here!
|
12-18-12 04:34pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Reminds me when I am using my external for downloading I have a small fan that blows on it to keep it from smoking LOL
|
11-19-12 08:08am
|
Reply
143
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you, sir!
|
11-07-12 01:32pm
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
graymane said: "Since I've been tagged as the "inspiration" for this poll question, I think it is only fair that the source please step forward and explain how that came to be."
It has been mentioned before, we rerun polls from time to time. When we re-run one submitted by a user, it's noted again. That's what happened here and perhaps why you don't recall it.
On this specific poll:
On 13-Feb-2011, you submitted a poll. That poll ran on 7-March-2011.
As you were notified (via email) at that time, "We had to re-word both the question and the answers but the question is basically what you asked." I don't have the exact wording of your original submission but the fact that this poll (both times it ran) say, "Inspired By" rather than "Submitted By" indicated the wording was changed significantly though the subject was retained.
So, to answer your direct question, YOU are the source but I was happy to explain how that came to be.
Thus, another of life's mysteries solved.
;-)
|
11-06-12 01:59pm
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
You know I was joking right GM ?
CT
|
11-06-12 01:03pm
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
We took a poll GM, and you were almost not picked by the popular vote, but the electoral votes put you in. LOL
I thought you made the poll that's interested and sounds ironic as well.
|
11-06-12 10:25am
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
It's just one of my life stories that holds itself out for it's singularity and novelty of the situation. One interesting side note, until I noticed, I actually was enjoying myself. One of those situations where had I not been able to actually process the information things might have been different.
|
10-26-12 06:22am
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from gaypornolover:
(graymane's Reply)
Aww graymane you're so sweet and such a good guy! I really appreciate the effort you make!
|
10-25-12 08:37am
|
Reply
149
|
Naughty Country Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks graymare,
Really it was more I had to do the reviews while I had the time before all the other commitments of life kept my from logging in. Even replies have had a back seat the last few days.
|
10-21-12 12:19pm
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
As mentioned above, a PUerview is an sort of forum interview we ran with a few of the regulars. I think there were a total of five done.
If you do a word search (in the forum) for the term "PUerview" you should find them. Or you could just use this link.
:)
I thought they were a great way for users to get a better feel for the person behind a name. They were intended as a fun addition to the day-to-day discussions.
We let them drop after a number of the regulars declined our invitation to participate. Seems they feared they'd leak some tid-bit of info that would let the world discover their PU secret identity ... or something like that.
Anyway, back to this poll.
I posted it to see if there's any general interest in seeing a few more interviews in the future.
|
10-19-12 07:31am
|
