| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Satin Silk Fun
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from mbaya:
I think you would like ripping4fun by the same company. I wrote a review today that you should check out.
|
12-29-10 06:54am
|
Reply
252
|
The Lisa Ann
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback graymane. I don't foresee any problem with the billing as the cancellation procedure seemed to go through ok...it would just be nice to recieve an email to confirm it. I'll just keep an eye on my credit card around what would have been the renewal date and of course report back here if there are any problems. I have a feeling i might have used DHD Media before without any problems as they are also the biller for Suze.net although its been a few years since i was there.
|
12-25-10 01:00am
|
Reply
253
|
Silvia Saint
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for your reply. Even though she is my favorite, this site wasn't actually a big deciding factor in subscribing to FameDigital for exactly the same reason. I already have a major part of Silvia's production released by Private on DVD's and I think those were her best.
Hawaiian Ecstasy, The Academy, Call Girl, Dangerous Things 1 & 2 etc. Those bring back memories ;)
|
12-22-10 10:55pm
|
Reply
254
|
Only Big Melons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BadMrFrosty:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the kind words my friend. Cheers to you and happy Christmas :)
|
12-17-10 06:27am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from yote78:
(graymane's Reply)
Great story! Made me LOL. After my first time (see Msg #9 below) I did the same thing at least once and probably more, only I didn't have the thrill of having a teacher watching me. I would have loved to have seen the look on her face...I sure she had to know what had just happened.
|
12-16-10 07:42am
|
Reply
256
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks, graymane! It would be strange if our tastes weren't similar in certain respects because I always maintain that our Porn likes and dislikes are formed during the years of our sexual awakening and both of us occupy the same decade! :-)
As to the dramatic come-back? I once again agree, the hairy niche may gain some converts now and then but I don't see a great ground swell of people who all of a sudden got tired of shaved! But that's alright, too. Live and let live. And as I said to Denner, I seem to be getting used to the "new" look! :-)
|
12-07-10 05:53pm
|
Reply
257
|
Amazing Grannies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
LOL. Look, graymane, I can forgive a site just about anything but this is the shoddiest, poorest put together travesty of a network of sites I've come across since I started to pay for my porn. Giving it a fifty was being very kind of me. The frustrating thing is that the occasional picture set might have been worth saving, but not picture by picture, same with the occasional video but there was not even streaming of any kind to indicate what you were getting. Nor a description of the action, nor of the dimensions, nor of the date of production.
Add to that a primitive, rock bottom basic member's page .. the whole thing is only there for one purpose, to rope in the naive victim on a one time basis. It all looks outdated and dead and that goes for all four sites. Arghhh! I changed my mind about never going back because I'm going to get a couple of bucks worth of material out of this monstrosity yet, even if it kills me! :-)
|
12-04-10 06:15pm
|
Reply
258
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(graymane's Reply)
It is interesting content, it is just a bit frustrating to download a scene that is basically home videos for 50 minutes, and like 10 minutes of poorly shot, poorly lit sex or nudity. I like the concept as well, they just didn't execute.
|
12-01-10 09:21pm
|
Reply
259
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
I knew I'd get a comment from you, graymane, because I had read your review carefully before I decided to take the leap and knew that you liked the site a lot.
I really don't know if it is the resolution we use on our monitors, but for me every video I've looked at in streaming so far has looked blurred. And the downloaded HD content was honestly and truly not as good as the identical scenes I had on my hard drive already. Same with the other downloaded material, similar scenes from VideoBox and Videosz, as well as from the now defunct American Vice, all looked crisper by comparison on MY monitor. I wonder if it is the (mostly) .avi format they are using? I find scenes done in mp4 generally sharper, with wmv taking second place but I guess what it always boils down to is individual, subjective taste.
I thought I was being very fair in my assessment but I am sure there are many others like you who would disagree. Happens to me at "Oscars" time as well, I usually dislike the most highly awarded movies and go for the stuff the critics deplore. So don't let my low score upset you. :-)
|
11-30-10 07:16pm
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Drooler:
(graymane's Reply)
Me neither, but then lots of sites have those iPod-formatted videos, too.
Besides, not everyone has jumped on the HD/widescreen bandwagon. Me, for instance. I've never felt the need to go that way. I still watch my porn on a standard tube 17-inch monitor, and it works well enough for me.
I figure that if some folks want to fork out the extra dough to view the stuff on a larger screen with better quality, that's not a bad choice if you're OK with that kind of discretionary spending. But we don't all have to fit into the same box.
|
11-26-10 02:54am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(graymane's Reply)
"Smaller" is a relative term, as widescreen can look smaller on a standard definition monitor, i.e. 4:3 aspect ratio. However a standard definition video can look smaller on a widescreen monitor (most likely an HD monitor), whereas a widescreen video would be full screen on this monitor.
Yeah it's confusing (especially when I explain it), but it really depends on the aspect ratios of the video and the display. A 60 inch standard definition TV from the '90s would make any 4:3 video look huge, even if it's not technically as large pixel-wise as an HD 1080p video, which would be a 16:9 widescreen ratio.
And people insist size doesn't matter! : - O
|
11-25-10 07:55pm
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(graymane's Reply)
Then it can't be done on a company computer, or probably even on company property--using your own laptop you would likely still rely on their Internet connection.
I think it's a good rule of thumb to be overly paranoid anytime your on a public computer or using a computer in a public area. Yes, even in the privacy of your own office/cubicle/wherever you should assume something or someone is tracking your browser history and therefore your at-work porn appetite.
The intention is sound; people are at work to work, not goof off on 'tube sites or take care of their morning wood. Save for a few jobs your work probably doesn't involve going through porn videos or pics and it's best such activities remain at home.
|
11-23-10 07:20pm
|
Reply
263
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Denner:
Fine review, graymane - short and sweet..
Last time I was at ATK, it was the premium one - and guess not much different.
ATK still got the amount of nice looking models, but not just really exclusive all over, by far - and though I've considered from time to time to join one of those sites again........well, there are so much other possibilities out there....
|
11-21-10 08:02am
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you, graymane1777. You are now being considered for the position of my number 1 acolyte, for recognizing what I revealed to the PU community: lk2fireone is Truth.
|
11-13-10 02:27am
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Jay G:
(graymane's Reply)
Interesting comments, Gray. When I think of the money I threw away chasing (real) women a couple decades ago, it makes me sick. Luckily, I rebuilt things and changed my standards. What I spend on porn in two or three YEARS now, was once wasted on women in two or three NIGHTS! That also doesn't include the time wasted in the chase. Time spent in a good relationship is SO MUCH BETTER!
|
11-04-10 01:43pm
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Jay G:
(graymane's Reply)
I took so many classes over the years that a little actually sunk in.
Truth be told, "repulsive" and "vulgar" and "low-class" (I often hear the word "ghetto" also used very negatively as an adjective also, as in "That's so ghetto"), all denote disgust with those who don't live up to the standards of the upper class. Americans may believe in equality, but we have lots of the historical English class system beliefs just under the surface.
|
11-03-10 09:03am
|
Reply
267
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Capn:
I am sorry to say I think the vast majority of their sets are formulaic.
So much so, that there is often little to choose between the menu thumbnail of each set.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-02-10 10:29am
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Capn:
(graymane's Reply)
Yes, but it would be interesting to see the split.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-02-10 09:59am
|
Reply
269
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Cryton:
I ceased being a member when more and more of their photographers started using aggressive blur filters to turn the skin of models into one solid block of colour, and as a result make them appear like lifeless, plastic dolls.
Is that still going on?
|
11-01-10 08:09pm
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(graymane's Reply)
That's almost a whole genre unto itself, though usually with something other than a cocktail glass (shot glass typically), and frequently taken too far for many viewers...
|
11-01-10 07:50pm
|
Reply
271
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from tangub:
(graymane's Reply)
Sorry to hear you were disappointed with this site. I was there 2 or 3 years ago and still rate it as one of my favorite sites.
|
10-22-10 03:31am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks that makes it easier for me. In that case then I would bid my time until she lets me out of the dog house, but I'd find any way to accelarate moment.
|
10-21-10 06:00pm
|
Reply
273
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(graymane's Reply)
It is a pretty good option.
WeAreHairy is worth a look too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-21-10 03:03pm
|
Reply
274
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Capn:
Looking in the tour area, it does look to be good quality photography.
Do they ever break out of the cliched nude glamour shoot approach though?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 09:51am
|
Reply
275
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(graymane's Reply)
That's what we all want, a site "to do something for me". But as we get older, that changes. When I was an early teen, looking at a copy of the Sears catalog (the women's swimwear or lingerie sections) would do it for me. But now I can look at a catalog of Victoria's Secret, which is far more colorful and explicit than what I ever saw in the Sears catalog, and
Victoria's Secret is just a catalog, even though it has beautiful women in lovely lingerie.
I used to be exclusively softcore. Then I joined PU, and I've been getting into hardcore. I'm still mainly softcore, but I'm looking for new material and new sites that I hope I will find entertaining. Most of what I find doesn't really appeal to me. But I keep searching. Because there is a lot of good content out there, somewhere. :)
As far as your score for this site, that's an entirely personal opinion. I used to worry when I gave a site a score whether it was the "right" score. But then I finally realized that a site score is very subjective. Some people think a site's score is based on objective factors, and they even have a rigorous system to create a score based on specific factors. But I personally believe a score is both subjective and objective, as long as the basic factors of download speed, ease of navigation, basic quality of contents, basic amount of contents are at the site. And each person's standards of acceptable varies, as does the person's tastes and opinions.
|
10-18-10 10:44pm
|
