Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Mason Wyler
(0)
|
Reply of
Allicide's Comment
from manholelover:
i must concur with allicide here. Although I'm not criticising the professional reviewers at all,in fact I find their posts very informative, there is a lack of gay reviewers and members here generally. It probably does reflect the population in general, but I've looked for similar sites like this one aimed at a specific gay market, and there's none, only sites which are probably sponsored by certain companies, blogs, or else just one person reviewing all material. Nothing touches the depth and interactivity of this site. I only hope more gay people will post. I intend to do my bit, but perhaps a little marketing from PU could get more gay contributors...
|
06-20-11 04:33pm
|
Reply
2
|
Mason Wyler
(0)
|
Reply of
Allicide's Comment
from Rick:
Hi Allicide,
Fair question for sure. I can't disagree with the argument. I assume you're referring to our reviews at TheBestPorn.com btw.
I do agree our reviews can suffer when it comes to personal tastes. Gay sites and certain fetishes has to be our ultimate weakness. There are probably other specialized review sites that could provide more personal opinions about the content. We probably couldn't compete with that.
Where we do excel is with our expertise on pay-sites in general. We detail more about each site (regardless of it's niche) than any other review site. Our team views more porn content than any other reviewers in the biz, in all genres. To say they may not be superfans of gay content, is fair. But they have enough viewing power to make fair comparisons and intelligent observations. They have the experience to effectively detail the major/minor strengths and weaknesses of any adult pay-site.
Our goal is to be able to cover nearly every pay-site in adult. That would be impossible if we didn't take a chance and go outside our comfort zone. Perfection and demands may never be met 100%, but overall as long as we're providing users with a service they'll return to again and again, then it's worth the effort.
|
02-08-10 10:47am
|
Reply
3
|
Mason Wyler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Allicide's Reply)
Thanks, Allicide! I can see your reasoning. I, for one, would feel much more qualified to review mature, lingerie or hairy sites than someone who loves teenie or glamor sites. I am glad your remarks were not directed toward Spencer because, after reading his review, I couldn't understand your reaction. I haven't really seen too many reviews by Porn Users when it comes to gay sites so it was a natural assumption on my part. As I stated, originally, just curious about the comment. Thanks again for the explanation.
|
02-08-10 09:07am
|
Reply
4
|
Mason Wyler
(0)
|
Reply of
Allicide's Comment
from messmer:
Just curious. What motivated you to write this comment? You made me go to Spencer's review and I find it very objective. The negatives listed are in connection with flaws in the site not in connection with its "gayness." Are there other reviewers to whom "gay" is/was a stumbling block? Asked very non-confrontationally. :-)
|
02-07-10 12:24pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
