Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from tangub:
Well looking at the company info on TBP site facts would seem to suggest the two are not related. I have a feeling this is just some copycat sight trying to cash in on the MET reputation. If i was the owner of Met Art I think i would be calling my lawyer.
|
12-02-10 12:36am
|
Reply
527
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Capn's Reply)
Can't really disagree.
I've never been a member. But from the preview area, I think I prefer X-Art or Diesel Access (the Diesel network) for this type of erotic video. That's just a guess, because, like I say, I've never been a member of this site.
But if you are a member of any of the MetArt sites, you can usually get a discounted membership to any of the other sites in their network. So that's a good thing to remember.
|
01-12-13 04:14pm
|
Reply
528
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
My guess is that the people behind it had no intention to actually create a site and likely no experience either. It may have just grown out of the fan community and then they figured the could charge perverts like me to join. As a site, it really needs a lot of work.
|
02-02-13 04:57am
|
Reply
529
|
Miss Youth
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MissYouth:
(Capn's Reply)
Hi Capn,
Our priority is to make our member's happy! As soon as Kyote pointed out the bug we had our programmer work on the issue right away = ). The one download freezing issue is FIXED already. Users are able to launch multiple downloads and surf at the same time with a smile on their faces.
|
02-05-10 10:36am
|
Reply
530
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(Capn's Reply)
With Mofos operating both pre checked cross selling and regional discrimination, the only good thing you can say about them is they believe in some kimd of perverse equality - they expect us porn users to bend over and take it just like their models.
I agree that if TBP wants to keep any kind of reputation they need to be more careful who they promote.
|
01-05-13 06:07am
|
Reply
531
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
That's why I put those details re. fully nude in just for you, Cap'n. Honestly! :-)
|
04-03-12 09:54am
|
Reply
532
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(Capn's Reply)
It was working for me earlier when i tried but now it's not...maybe they are just having some temporary technical problems.
|
01-23-13 12:50am
|
Reply
533
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BradlyH:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks Capn !
The site needs work that's for sure. The only reason i gave this a 60 and not lower is because i found i downloaded a lot of the sets, not all is lost with this site only because of the models. Other then that I'm just glad it was under 20 dollars !
|
01-08-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
534
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from BradlyH:
Good review Capn, i can defiantly relate my experience at Morey with yours, especially the Navigation and shortage of pictures in a set subject.
|
01-08-12 03:32pm
|
Reply
535
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from Trip999:
Sorry you had what sounded like a bit of a disappointing time there, but thanks for the informative review anyway.
Low resolutions of 'high-res' pics are indeed quite frustrating, I agree. I'm currently a member over at Teen Dreams (admittedly not an art photography site, but still) where I've happily downloaded a number of (older) sets only to be disappointed by the lower resolution of so-called 'high-res' photos - blurring any attempt to zoom in and get a better look at things.
|
03-30-11 02:05pm
|
Reply
536
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for the review on this one Cap'n. Drooler's "LSG Clone" comment probably means i will give this one a miss as i've already been a member there and was not overly impressed by the standard of photography.
|
03-27-11 11:45am
|
Reply
537
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from otoh:
Thanks for the review, Cap'n - this looks a bit more playful/erotic than some art nude sites and there are a few models I like - particularly Mai Ly. But will give it a wide berth for the time being.
I'm tempted to sign up at Digital Desire - have you visited recently/at all?
|
03-27-11 01:42am
|
Reply
538
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback Cap'n. I guess there would probably not be enough fully clothed sets here for the site to appeal to you.
|
07-29-11 02:00pm
|
Reply
539
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from tangub:
I've never joined because the price puts me off when i can always find similar sites to join for less money. If they lowered the price to $25 monthly i would join straight away without question
|
08-15-10 07:53am
|
Reply
540
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Sevrin:
I've been a member at this site a couple of times and have enjoyed it very much. They have great models and somewhat racier content than MET, but it is a bit on the expensive side.
Even with fewer updates, I would consider an annual membership if the price was more in line with MET's, especially now that they have added public cam shows. That would be $100-120 a year they'd be getting out of me instead of $35 a year.
|
08-15-10 06:33am
|
Reply
541
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Drooler:
Totally agree! 6 months of MPL Studios would get you a year of MetArt, but as I'm sure you're aware, MPL only does one thing per day while MetArt does 4, usually, and even more at the start of each month.
And MPL sometimes does a non-nude "postcard." I like them, but I think they should be posted with a nude set the same day.
My most recent 6-month MPL membership ran out and I've been lurking around about there but waiting until I can get the effective monthly price down before diving back in. But I probably won't wait long enough for it to be at the MetArt level.
Would be nice to get a discount offer from them. I've been a returning member since 2003!
|
08-15-10 06:01am
|
Reply
542
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Totally agree. I mentioned in a comment over a year ago that the site was very expensive, and wondered if there was a discount available. But there is no easy way to get a discount to this site.
|
08-15-10 05:14am
|
Reply
543
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from slutty:
There are a good number of pics from most of the scenes I saw, although since they are screen caps they are not exactly the best quality. If pics are your thing, especially high quality pics, this probably isn't the best site for you.
|
06-29-10 02:02pm
|
Reply
544
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LePornoisseur:
(Capn's Reply)
Ain't that the truth, Cap'n! Very disappointing. They had some really
good pic sets (quality & quantity) too.
|
09-14-13 03:56pm
|
Reply
545
|
Naked News
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Sigh!!! There's never enough stripping, anywhere .. for me. The tease element has largely gone out of Porn. Younger users are impatient, they want to get to nekkid and the action as quickly as possible.
|
09-06-09 09:26am
|
Reply
546
|
Nakedby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from otoh:
Aha, Cap'n, you are right... the focus here isn't really on full strips. There are some, and most sets do involve undressing, but generally start with lingerie or something flimsy (that often gets wet).
I suspect you'd prefer Petites Parisiennes, which has more (and actually quite a few getting dressed sets). But even more so Breath Takers, which does have a lot of strips from fully dressed, usually in casual wear.
|
07-05-11 11:42pm
|
Reply
547
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
I agree, Cap'n! And will add that it might have been my confusion. I thought I had signed on for $ 7.95 because I did it through PU but it might have been for $ 9.95 and I got things mixed up????? I honestly don't know now.
|
12-26-12 09:57am
|
Reply
548
|
Naughty Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from WeeWillyWinky:
(Capn's Reply)
Hi Capn,
Thanks for the trust vote and for all the replies. Now, if I can answer your question:
It has been a long while since I've been to the site, and I should stress that I NEVER download hardcore picture sets. They bore me to tears. I've taken a few b/g stills featuring a model I like, or if the pic in interesting in other ways, but I've never downloaded a complete set. So, when I look at what I collected from Naughty Mag, all I have are solo-model sets and a handful of videos. The vids were all yawnfests, except for a scant few. The solo sets were very good, as far as I'm concerned, because they were well-edited, didn't use dozens of shots with no noticeable change in pose, and because they featured undies which I like: more towards full-cut, full-back as opposed to thongs and "sexy" stuff. Mind you, I am an archive-miner, as I like the way they did things back in the late ninetees, early oughts. I can't comment on newer sets since I didn't focus much on them. I would imagine they have caught up with the modern trends just like ATK and the like.
If memory serves, there was the usual amount of toy/masturbation stuff, as well as lots of hardcore, but I honestly cannot say what the ratio would be between hard and soft. Sorry. It's been too long and I was there for the archives.
|
09-12-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
549
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(Capn's Reply)
Yep - definitely a good join!
And, were you impressed because I really liked the site or because I didn't shred the site and leave it with a horrible score? (Literally laughing out loud)
Seriously - from one gray beard to another - thanks for the compliment!
|
02-21-12 07:43pm
|
Reply
550
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
For porn, and for many other things, that's an apt description...
|
01-28-12 02:54pm
|