| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Capn's Reply)
Yup, like I said it's worth every penny - still I hate it...but yes, now a traitor in the matter of regional pricing, sorry.........
|
08-19-12 11:50am
|
Reply
452
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from anyonebutme:
The site is all solo masturbation vids. Nothing extreme, usually fingering, occasional toy. No talking. There are some fisting and pissing videos, but these are few and far between. None-the-less, is one of the best solo mast sites on the net.
Their videos are better than the imagesets, which suffer from photoshop softening.
|
01-13-10 03:27am
|
Reply
453
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Drooler:
OnlyCuties has hardcore. InFocusGirls doesn't except for lesbian.
|
12-10-09 03:00pm
|
Reply
454
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes, Capn - I'm with you. But I keep having that "mysterious" notion: They (the sites) must know this sincere opposition - and still they hang on to it, even if it means loosing members. Is it just greed?
|
12-17-12 08:42am
|
Reply
455
|
Inexperienced Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(Capn's Reply)
What TBP says is this.
"Some included sites are not stand-alone sites. Users outside of the US may be charged in Euros, which would be much more expensive."
They also sometimes advertise membership for $7.99, but that is only if you join for a whole year.
They charge VAT of 20% on UK memberships. I found that out by giving a phony email address so I could get to the next join up page and see what it looked like. I didn't want the usual spam, so I gave the phony email address, as I had no intention of joining. It's the "may be charged in Euros" phrase on TBP that caught my eye.
I will not join a site that has regional discrimination.
|
09-01-10 06:46pm
|
Reply
456
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from WeeWillyWinky:
(Capn's Reply)
While there is a good mix of fully clothed and fully nude, the photo-sets are frequently non-linear and feature the model in various modes of dress and undress. So no, you will not get the full strip from start to finish. Also bear in mind, the genitalia is blurred in most of the main photo sets, although the pubic hair is not.
In my opinion the JAV models are hands down the most beautiful in the world.
|
06-18-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
457
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Are you talking about the photosets? It's really not that way with Japanese gravure photosets. They're more a random collection of photos than a progression like people are used to with US or European photosets. There will be a number of clothed shots, then some nude, then semi-nude, then clothed, then nude, etc.
If you're looking for a progression as you describe, you might be disappointed. The Japanese stuff is just different.
|
06-17-10 07:24pm
|
Reply
458
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Marcus:
(Capn's Reply)
Hopefully the webmaster will reply as I know they have replied to reviews before. Pre-ticked cross-sells are basically taking advantage of people not noticing the upsell so it isn't fair, really, but I'm pretty sure if I'm understanding correctly there is no more regional pricing.
|
12-28-12 06:16am
|
Reply
459
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from otoh:
(Capn's Reply)
Well, I'm not quite as principled as you on the topic, Cap'n; eg your recent comment on Watch4Beauty, the couple of extra dollars is annoying but not enough to keep me from subscribing - the $15 PU price is already good, so I'm not complaining too much about it being $17.
In this case, though, equating $ with £ is too much...
|
04-16-12 09:20am
|
Reply
460
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
A lot of directors today skip any striptease and proceed directly to go. One moment, the model is wearing clothes and heels. The next instant you see her, she is butt naked and the guy is already laying pipe. :( That's why I prefer old-school and don't like a lot of today's high-volume churn-it and burn-it erotica. Impatient boys miss dessert.
|
01-29-12 02:14pm
|
Reply
461
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
For me, it depends on the model and atmosphere of the scene. In general, however, I usually find it most erotic when some element of clothing remains present--especially a skirt. One thing that's a pet peeve of mine is when the model has a sexy par of stilettos or heels on and not only strips off all the clothes at once, but then removes the heels. :(
|
01-29-12 02:02pm
|
Reply
462
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
Yeah, I understand that it could be frustrating for a lot of people. I like the tease elements, however. I also like it when models have some clothing that complimenets the anatomy and it stays on. I like skirts hiked up and tops folded down to the waist, etc..--those types of things do it for me. Also, for me, nothing like seeing nipples sticking through lace bras or drooping out of a corset :)
|
01-29-12 01:54pm
|
Reply
463
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BubbaGump:
(Capn's Reply)
Hi. Yes. If consistent full nudty is a requirement, this site won't be for you. I would put thise site more in a softcore tease category. There are some full nudes but they are not common and when they exist, they are very conservative. For example, you won't find any images of legs spread eagle or close-in shots of genitals, etc. When it is shown, it's more like full nudity with a flash of bush. This site is R rated and would be something that would pass the censors on HBO.The most hardcore image I saw was a model holding a dildo off to the side. No blowbangs and ATM here.
|
01-29-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
464
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jutti24:
(Capn's Reply)
Afaik it's more softcore without seeing genitals or "pink" spread shots...
Nice posing though of the girls...
|
01-27-12 11:54am
|
Reply
465
|
Juliland
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from otoh:
Not at all - I'd say it's roughly 2:1 Photo sets to videos. The size of the sets doesn't bother me at all - Ellen Stagg does similar size sets at Stagg Street, a favourite site. It just means the photographer has spent some time editing the set down to the best shots - with a good photographer you respect that decision and the sets are better for it.
And here especially, the pictures are quite stark - I feel they would lose the edge if there were too many of them in a set. The sets are zipped, but only go up to 1600px; I'd have preferred a bit higher res.
I'm liking this site far more than I'd guessed!
|
11-23-11 12:22am
|
Reply
466
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from BubbaGump:
It looks like something I would enjoy viewing. I have bookmarked it for future reference.
How would you rate the overall quality of photos? Are the images clear and crisp or somewhat lacking? I looked at a few of the sample images and they looked a little bit like scans of 35mm film. Or perhaps that is simply due to the lower quality of the samples and them not giving away the best.
Thanks
|
01-18-12 06:15pm
|
Reply
467
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from BubbaGump:
Nice review.
What is the percentage of different model figures? Is it mostly models on the thin side and a few voluptuous women or distributed all around?
|
01-18-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
468
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from tangub:
Great review Cap'n. Is that a full access trial without any download restrictions? I'm not implying that i'd want to download the whole site for the $7 trial as like you i have absolutely no interest in the vids so think the 7 day trial might be a good deal just to grab the photosets that interest me.
|
01-18-12 10:13am
|
Reply
469
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Capn's Reply)
If there's a PU listing page then there's a TBP listing page. Just click the words "TBP Review" where you normally see the TBP review score. That'll take you to the TBP listing page.
Hope that helps.
|
01-11-12 02:43pm
|
Reply
470
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Khan:
You might consider using the "Submit Nomination" for a site review. Just look for the "Nominate" block to the right and about half-way down the page (just above the green, PU "User Feedback section) of the TBP listing page.
|
01-11-12 02:14pm
|
Reply
471
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Claypaws:
(Capn's Reply)
Maybe the Government could encourage entrepreneurs to set up new porn photo sites and stimulate the economy, amongst other things. Ah wait. That isn't going to happen, is it?
|
06-04-12 02:47pm
|
Reply
472
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Claypaws:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes Cap'n. We photo lovers appear to be fishing in an ever diminishing pool. I hope we can keep the photo sites alive and that they do not either go out of business or turn into hardcore video sites.
|
06-04-12 11:51am
|
Reply
473
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MiztaBlu:
(Capn's Reply)
Like I said, I did still factor the quality photos into my score. I suppose someone who is into photos more would still be more lenient with their grading, though.
To be honest, the site just feels outdated in many ways. While they do have good content, the Karup sites feel like they are 3 or so years behind the curve compared to other sites. Whether its video quality, production value or just the site design and navigation.
Not a bad site...but could be so much better.
|
06-04-12 05:50am
|
Reply
474
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from GCode:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks Cap'n, of course any insights and comments are welcome even if I may have not exactly asked. With everyones input and additions I can always have a better impression of what to expect if I decide to join. Thanks for the reply.
|
07-12-10 05:02pm
|
Reply
475
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Capn's Reply)
All cleared up - my mistake....
Cheers!
|
02-05-10 08:22am
|
