Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Comment
from littlejoe:
i canceled my membership and was given an option to renew @ $20 instead of $30. i shouldve done that cause im not even close to dling all the videos
|
02-15-08 07:57pm
|
Reply
27
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Comment
from RD41SAB:
Three weeks ago I joined FTVgirls again for the second time. The last time I was a member, back in 2003, I thought FTVgirls was a good site. My opinion has since changed. I must agree with the review put forth by PosterDude. His review is thorough and accurate, and apparently others agree with his review based on the comments that follow. Your opinion and fierce defense of FTV girls appears heavily biased and suspicious. For you to say that FTV girls is a good site only serves to demonstrate that you do not know what else is out there, or at the very least, you do not care about receiving value for your money. With all the talk about FTVgirls and HD video I was expecting much more. There is very little HD video on this site when compared to many other sites. You are accurate in that their video files are extremely large, but they place download limits on what a member can download. That is inexcusable. Moreover, this site does not update enough. How can you be satisfied with few solo girl updates per month? I am not, and will not be renewing. I will spend my money with sites that update daily and provide a much higher quality and variety of content. The quality of their content has remained the same since I was last a member, while most other web sites have advanced leaps and bounds (or leapfrogged as you would say) past FTV girls. I am glad that you are content wasting your money, but please do not mislead the public into wasting theirs.
|
12-24-07 12:39pm
|
Reply
28
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Comment
from PosterDude:
What is a leap-frogged? Much of competation is better and Ftv just start HD video. Competation has years more HD better video for members than Ftv which is better. I join many sites and Ftv not worth money any more and only update site every 5-7 days. Sorry for not so good English but you now what I say is true.
|
12-18-07 08:19am
|
Reply
29
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jd1961:
(Robare's Reply)
BTW Robare, you also called the TBP reviewer "stupid" for having exactly the same con as I do.
|
10-02-07 02:03am
|
Reply
30
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(Robare's Reply)
I gave this site a good mark. The mark was not reflective of the fact that it does not have hardcore, that was mentioned however. I mentioned the comprehensive preview twice, in the review, and in a comment. Obviously I knew what was in the site. I mentioned being "Jaded" to point out that the inexperienced porn surfers would find the material exciting. I did not "ding" the site. I gave credit where credit was due, IMO. Flaming people is "stupid", not honest reviews.
|
10-01-07 02:39pm
|
Reply
31
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Robare's Reply)
Excellent point, Robare. The same can be said for many other sites that update frequently but with short clips of the same talent.
In any case I have just signed up with FTV and, based on the Porn Users reviews, I expect to be very busy during the month. Thanks everyone for all the great feedback.
|
09-05-07 01:29pm
|
Reply
32
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from turismo:
(Robare's Reply)
Fair points - the reason I gave Alison a higher score was simply she is so attractive and uses a lot of clothing fetish crossovers in her content - you are spot on the design of the two sites is virtually identical - but with FTV, despite the huge amount of content there weren't that many models I found all that attractive.
On a solo girl site I expected what I got - decent quality movies with an extremely attractive friendly and enthusiastic model.
A lot of the girls on FTV fell short of those expectations - and for me Alison was the biggest selling point of that site.
Saying that, these were the first couple of reviews I wrote, and weren't as detailed or as objective as I would like to think my reviews have come
|
09-03-07 12:04pm
|
Reply
33
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Review from Robare:
Btw, nygiants03, I just took a look at the site and it appears FTV is going to be making a significant payment on that lesbian debt come Sep. 9... :) To keep up with their average, there'd be three more coming before years end so we'll keep hoping. They seem to be staying with a tradition of having models do a solo update prior to doing a g-g. Perhaps we can get the site owner to comment on the possibilities.
|
08-30-07 09:08pm
|
Reply
34
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Review
from nygiants03:
I agree with practically everything you say. This is one of my favorite if not my favorite porn sites on the net. The only thing that I don't like is they don't update enough, nor do girl/girl updates ever come.
|
08-30-07 02:19pm
|
Reply
35
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Review
from Denner:
I've been to this site a couple of times - and one serious cons., I have are the video-quality/resolution. They need quite some work.
Fine and thorough review from Robare....a little high points though, but still very informative.
|
08-30-07 08:52am
|
Reply
36
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Davit:
(Robare's Reply)
But have you tried it with this site, Robare?
|
02-20-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
37
|
Teens Garden
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd1961:
(Robare's Reply)
there is some sketchy information here: http://peachyforum.com/forums/5/1618/ShowThread.aspx
|
10-11-07 03:09pm
|
Reply
38
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Davit:
(Robare's Reply)
Most welcome indeed. Maybe you'll join and give your own review. You may find other aspects worthy of comment that I didn't, or just offer an alternative viewpoint (which is what user reviews are all about).
Regards.
|
01-21-08 02:34pm
|
Reply
39
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Davit:
(Robare's Reply)
Hi Robare
OK, I'll try and answer your questions mate.
Firstly, yeah, *generally speaking* the updates come in pairs of updates for couples (each the reverse role of the other in terms of recipient) or if it's a threeway then there tends to be 3 updates, where each girl has her turn at being the recipient of the other two. They tend to be not very long - although there are some that go up as long as 11 minutes, but these are in the minority. The shortest one I have is 2mins 11 secs, again in the minority. I'll amend my average to maybe 8 minutes (but that's a best guess - don't expect me to go through my entire collection and work out the exact average, please, I don't want to get pedantic).
Bitrate seems to be mainly 521kbps/320x240. There are also a handful (on my hard drive at least) that are twice this (1060kbps/640x480). This surprised me when I checked this just now, so I played a couple to get a fresh idea of how they look, compared to the many other vids I have. And, very importantly, they *look* much lower res than the stats would suggest. One possible reason is that they've come from a lo-res source - or possibly that the conversion software is substandard. This, of course, is pure conjecture, I can only speak objectively about how they physically look when played. And they do look quite low res and grainy - although, as I said in my review - still watchable.
Your final question about orgasms - in all honesty, I'm not convinced that most of the orgasms portrayed here are genuine. As with most sites, there's little or no evidence of real white 'girl goo' to be seen (the only definitive proof of female orgasm really). But at the same time, the girls don't 'overact' and do seem to be really having a great time together, and most of the climaxes - whether real or not - are the result of anal stimulation principally, and sometimes, but not always, aided by vaginal stimulation simultaneously. The emphasis is definitely on tongue to ass. And the camera is good at getting that shot - after all, it's the whole point of the site.
Hope this helps, but if you have any more questions, or if I have been unclear, please ask away!
Regards
Davit
|
01-20-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
40
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from nige1960:
(Robare's Reply)
I finally gained access to this site but not untill i had requested a refund, i got into the site for about 1 hour, to be honest i did not think much of the site (my opinion) russian girls, some ok videos but on the whole i was pleased to get my money back, which i did within afew days. I will not be subscribing to any other site that i think may feature russian videos, i prefer sites with abit of dialog not just people having sex. good luck to anyone tho that subscribes, they might like it, i did not
|
08-25-07 10:59am
|
Reply
41
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nige1960:
(Robare's Reply)
no, i am still unable to gain access to thsi site.
|
08-05-07 09:20am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
