| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1351
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
AmyLusts4u's Reply
ALS Scan currently has a full 2 1/2 months of vids available - this is at the upper end of the scale for them leaving vids out there, so this may change any day. While it is unpredictable how long vids will be available beyond the 4 weeks guaranteed, they do seem to be trying to increase the time of availability in practice.
I agree that the site would tremendously increase the value to their members if they had their full library of vids available.
I'll suggest it to Alex - he's always available for suggestions - and will be pretty direct in saying so if it ain't ever gonna happen.
|
06-16-07 01:30am
|
Reply
1352
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Both ALS Angels and ALS Scan post DVD material - ALS Angels typically has material available from 2 or 3 of their DVD's as part of the current vids
Right now, for instance, included in the current vids on the ALS Angels site are DVD #87 with Sandra Shine, DVD #90 with Eve Angel and DVD #92 with Breanne.
On the ALS Scan site, you can get the complete DVD #91, ALS in St John, with Nella, Brea, Amy Lee, Sandy, Paris & Adele (this is a temporary bonus that may be pulled any day) plus individual scenes from about 7 other DVD's as part of the current vids available.
I've got to say that the vids of their most recent Caribbean trip with Jana Foxy/Jana Jordan are truly wonderful - some of the best stuff that I've ever seen them post.
|
06-16-07 01:22am
|
Reply
1353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
The more important factor to me is info on whether the reviewer is a current member and how long a reviewer has been a member.
People who are reviewing sites where they haven't been a member for months aren't helping much, since good sites make significant changes - I remember one reviewer complaining about the DRM's at Danni.com weeks after that site had done away with DRM's.
Similarly, I personally don't find reviews all that helpful if the reviewer has been a member less than a month - they can give feedback on how much stuff a site has and the quality, but you don't really have the basis to comment on the consistency of updates or possibilities of technical problems if the reviewer just joined yesterday. To me that's the difference between this forum and the reviews by TBP's reviewers - I know that they're just dipping their toes in and giving their reviews from there.
Where this site can be more helpful is by having the feedback of people who have spent a good deal more time with a site.
|
06-16-07 12:31am
|
Reply
1354
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
RobertJason's Review
If you want to get more into the personalities of the girls - and the tease - the Met Art cam shows are a great way to go. Each cam show is 2 hours long, if I remember correctly, so the girls take their time getting naked, spend a lot of time teasing and chatting and playing with the guys in the chat.
The turn-off to me about the chat is it's definitely like little club-house where the guys that are there all know each other and know all of the 'rules' etc. I found it rather off-putting. Others might not.
|
06-12-07 09:47pm
|
Reply
1355
|
Phil Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
You don't get Nikki's site, which is the most expensive of all of Phil's sites, I believe, but you do get access to cam shows of all Phil-Flash models, including Nikki.
It should be noted that Nikki is now pregnant and is doing chats but no stripping on her cam shows until she has her baby and gets back into shape.
|
06-09-07 04:23pm
|
Reply
1356
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Don't forget to check out LonnieWaters.com, NataliaCruze.com and AmateursGoneBad.com, which also come with Crissy's site. If you like Nautica Thorn, as I do, the pic sets on the amateur site are a real treat.
|
06-09-07 04:19pm
|
Reply
1357
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
I totally agree - and at the time I was a member - a year or more ago - you weren't even able to save pics. That's a complete deal-killer to me - and the pics available through Freeones are better quality than the pics on Vivid's site. I don't get it! I truly don't get it!
|
06-06-07 11:11pm
|
Reply
1358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I've seen it fake and that's just kind of pathetic - what's the point?
But when it's real, it can be rather awesome. ALS Scan's first true HD video was a long masturbation scene with Amber Rayne - that woman is crazed - like Debi Diamond crazed - and when she squirted all over the camera man and the lens and he's yelling "Jesus Christ!" in disbelief, - that was some great shit!
|
06-06-07 11:05pm
|
Reply
1359
|
Chloe 18
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
The problem with this company's sites is that the models have all moved on so they have no more updates. I was a member of Little Summer's site during the brief time that she and Kimmie were doing web cam shows - those were freaking hot - especially one where Summer left and the gorgeous Kimmie had to entertain all us horny dogs by her lonesome - did a great job too!
Anyway, sites where the model has moved on in her life and existing material is being slowly removed are not much of a value - and those kind of sites seem to be what this company specializes in.
|
05-31-07 11:28pm
|
Reply
1360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I love this stuff! Tease me - please me - that's my slogan!
|
05-29-07 10:31pm
|
Reply
1361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
There are sites that are part of a network and that bonus content is definitely part of the value of the membership to me - but the "feed" bonuses are generally crap and I always feel that I'm risking viruses whenever I click on them, so I stay the hell away from them these days.
|
05-29-07 10:13pm
|
Reply
1362
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
MrHappy's Review
Why is this a review? Why didn't you just contact the site's Customer Service Dept if the site was down? How bizarre!
|
05-28-07 03:40pm
|
Reply
1363
|
Crissy Moran
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
In early October '06, Crissy announced on her Myspace page that she had found Jesus and decided that sexual modelling was in contradiction to her new-found beliefs. Here's a link to a page that talks about this:
http://www.fleshbot.com/sex/news/crissy-...nds-jesus-206218.php
It's not just this site either. It's a well-known fact. The guys at Twisty's talk about this at their forum and thank their lucky stars that they have lots of un-released Crissy Moran stuff stockpiled to release as they choose over time.
|
05-28-07 03:38pm
|
Reply
1364
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Cenobite75's Review
Cenobite, if you're looking for high quality solo/les pics and vids, I highly recommend ALS Scan - amazing stuff being done there these days if you like gorgeous, young women being shown in all their glory.
|
05-28-07 11:12am
|
Reply
1365
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
4nic8's Review
Expensive? That depends on how long you want to join for - at $99/year, it's damned inexpensive - especially when you consider the amount of content that they put up.
|
05-25-07 07:45am
|
Reply
1366
|
Next Door Nikki
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
I've been a member at various times - Nikki's damned hot, though I have to say that I'm not as hot for her these days as I was at one time - the main justification for the price is the size of the site - she's been doing this for a few years and with weekly updates at least, most of the time, there's a lot of Nikki material here.
My biggest complaint about the PF sites is the zip sets used as upsell - the prices of the regular sites is high enough that they really ought to include the zip material in the regular site - that's my opinion, anyway.
That's an issue throughout the NN-model world, though it's a trend being bucked by models that are doing a lot more full-nudity and even HC material in their (formerly) tease sites.
|
05-23-07 07:04pm
|
Reply
1367
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Good question, SnowDude - it would make a good poll, in fact
How would you define hardcore?
This came up on the NNBoards forum the other day. Naughty Girl Sandy has decided to put all her goods out there for her members - full nudity, including pussy display, with scorchingly hot masturbation and girl/girl photo sets and vids. She did a cam show last night that blew my mind with her pussy sitting on top of the cam, basically, while she thrust her fingers deep inside.
To me, that was hardcore - and she's calling it hardcore. For other people, unless a guy is drilling her ass while choking her, it's all softcore.
|
05-22-07 09:12pm
|
Reply
1368
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Agreed - this is a really juicy site that is held back by a hideously poor navigation system. New Sensations has had most "name" porn babes coming through their hands at one time or another, but finding all the good stuff on their site is a struggle and a half. Once you find it, though, there is a lot to enjoy, though I found their vids rather repetitious after a while.
I'm often tempted to go back for more diving through their archives though and probably will at some point.
|
05-22-07 09:05pm
|
Reply
1369
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
MrHappy's Review
I don't really get the complaint about limited content. This site alone has 5 full photo-set updates and 1 full vid update consistently every week. The archive is also fully available and it pretty dang extensive. The content of the updates tends to be about 1/3 hardcore, 2/3 softer stuff.
Then the fact that it's part of a network of sites means that you're getting multiple updates on most days and at least one update every single day.
That's not terribly limited.
|
05-22-07 09:00pm
|
Reply
1370
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
Glad to hear it, Nick - I continue to enjoy this site a lot and look forward to seeing it get even better.
I like the navigation of this site - I like the way the site uses members' ratings to push and pull you to check out other hot stuff.
|
05-17-07 06:14am
|
Reply
1371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
Models are definitely most important, but the other factors can't be neglected either.
I was a member of Jannah Burnham's site for one month. As soon as I became a member and realized that the site wasn't allowing members to save any pics, I knew I wouldn't stay a member no matter what else was going on.
Then there's resolution of pics and vids - quality standards at many sites are quite high, so all sites that are charging more than a nominal fee better be paying attention to this - there's just no excuse for posting pics and vids that aren't high res and expecting anybody to pay for it at this point.
Then there's "heat" and this is very subjective. The best example, for my taste, of a site that gets the Great Models and High Res parts right and the "heat" part neglected is InFocus Girls. I don't seem to be the only one since most reviews mention that this site is just lacking that "oomph" or "heat" factor - a deal-killer for me, despite the other things they get right.
Price - yeah, price is a factor - if a site is going to be charging a premium price, they damned well better be delivering premium content and lots of it. But, personally, I'm not going to stay a member of an inexpensive site if I don't find myself excited by what I find there.
|
05-17-07 06:10am
|
Reply
1372
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
It's funny - I found more tech issues with Eve Angel's site than this one during my short membership (1 month) at that site and I found very little involvement by Eve as compared to Mya, who is sporadic but there. I never saw any real involvement by Eve - I guess that must have changed.
|
05-15-07 06:49am
|
Reply
1373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
For me it depends on the site. I'll watch vids full screen if they look great full screen. If they are going to look better smaller, I'll watch them smaller.
|
05-09-07 07:24am
|
Reply
1374
|
Sweet Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I agree - for me it was a teaser for 1-by-Day. I enjoyed a brief membership at Sweet Models enough to try a 5-month membership at 1-by-Day, which is a much better run site, being the flagship and all.
I found periodic links and other technical issues at Sweet Models, though problems would be cleared up in a day or two.
|
05-06-07 11:21am
|
Reply
1375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
To me, it's a question of keeping my interest more than anything else. I like cam shows, so a site like Phil-Flash.com, which I rated extremely high, that has frequent HOT updates, adds bonus material to keep me glad that I'm a member and has lots of cam shows, which are events that you have to be there for to get the full effect, well I ain't leaving.
ALS Scans uses a different incentive - their vids are only available for 1-2 months, then they're gone for quite a long time, so since I love their vids I maintain my membership on an ongoing basis.
If a site gives me no special benefit to maintain membership on an ongoing basis, though, I'm more likely to leave and come back when the mood strikes me again.
|
05-05-07 06:43pm
|
