| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
Adriana Sage
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I bet her cam shows are something that you and your wife would enjoy to watch together - and then you can fuck like crazy afterwards!
|
10-01-07 06:35pm
|
Reply
1252
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, I believe that you're thinking of their sister site, ALCWPP (All Ladies Covered With Pecan Pie). It folded in 2004, unfortunately. I can't imagine why!
|
09-29-07 07:43am
|
Reply
1253
|
Adriana Sage
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
There may be vids that are not DRM-protected, but don't count on it and be disappointed. Adriana wants to protect her material in that way. She is more gorgeous than ever, I've got to say. I saw her feature 3 weeks ago at a near-by strip club, I could hardly speak to her, she was so hot. Her feature show was very hot. My fave part of her site when I was a member was her cam shows - there's something pretty great about watching Adriana pleasure herself with a big toy, going "Ai-yi-yi-yi-yi=yi". Hot stuff - she's got the best looking cam technology I've seen too.
|
09-28-07 05:48am
|
Reply
1254
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
The first time I ever joined, I wasn't able to get access, got a refund from the billing company, then got an e-mail from the techs at 21st Sextury saying "Hey, we really could have solved your problem." Before you get a refund, definitely go for their support e-mails, give them a chance to try to help solve the problem.
Good luck.
|
09-28-07 05:44am
|
Reply
1255
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I just found proof positive of my allegation that Mya's site is a dead site - only "updated" with 2 year old sets carved off from the early days of the site. One of the most recent sets - "Sandy Loves Mya" - was posted on the 23rd and 24th of September 2007, right?
Check this link to a Mya promo set for her site from Freeones.com
http://galleries.myadiamond.com/mya-diamond-sandy-205/olabola:rs:myadiamond/lesbian-pussy-licking-toy-dildo-21.html
Check the date on this promo link above - or check out the copyright date on the pics in the promo itself - 2005.
It's probably the same with Eve Angel's site, though I haven't done the research to prove it - it could easily done by looking at the promos for Eve at Freeones.com, though.
|
09-24-07 11:29pm
|
Reply
1256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
How often have people seen active sites go down? In the world of solo models, it is fairly common for models to move on from one site to another, usually a matter of getting involved in the production of the material, sometimes models get fired - as when Phil-Flash fired Next Door Nikki, Seanna Teen and Princess Blueyez in the space of 2 weeks. But the sites tend to stay around in one form or another for a long time - there are numerous sites around for models such as Sandy Summers/Waldron, Jannah Burnham and Jana Foxy/Jordan as they have moved on in their careers.
|
09-24-07 09:23pm
|
Reply
1257
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
How much of the new stuff at Mya Diamond's site is really new? The beginning of the archives sure seem to get more and more recent. I'm still convinced that they are doing NO new work at Mya's site and only cutting off the oldest stuff and re-posting it as new. The webmaster declined to answer when I asked him the question in another thread.
|
09-24-07 08:32pm
|
Reply
1258
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Good point - High praise is due to Shap at Twisty's and the Captain at Nubiles as well.
|
09-24-07 08:28pm
|
Reply
1259
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Good job, Captain - nothing like responsive webmasters!
|
09-24-07 08:25pm
|
Reply
1260
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
At least they're doing new sets and putting their older stuff on their bonus sites instead of going the General Entertainment (Mya Diamond.com,etc) path of just putting the old stuff in as the new stuff. I like this site, but since I can get so much 21st Sextury stuff from their stepchild sites, I maintain my membership there instead. I love the florid colors and they've got a lot of drool-worthy models.
|
09-24-07 08:23pm
|
Reply
1261
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
I was feeling some major lust for Lanny Barbie, saw that Vivd was advertising lots of photo galleries of this incredibly hot fuck bunnie. I'd been terribly disappointed at the quality of Vivid's pics before but the site was advertising high-res, so I hoped that they had increased the size of their pics and figures - what the hell, I'm only risking $10
Good news for me - the pics are quite a bit larger than the last time I was in this site - still not what I would call high-res, but compared to the last time I was a member they certainly are - and I can save them this time. So I'm happy, despite all of the limitations of this site as described by NY Giants and others.
At least they're going in the right direction!
|
09-22-07 04:05pm
|
Reply
1262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
New browse section? Huh? Have I been asleep?
|
09-21-07 06:02pm
|
Reply
1263
|
Dirty 101
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
I think with this site, and others in this network, potential members need to think about how long they might want to join for. If you remain a member, you get access to more and more sites in the network - most of which are high quality 21st Sextury material. That all makes the price quite reasonable.
If you're only planning on joining for one month, though, the price is going to seem quite a bit higher.
|
09-19-07 05:38am
|
Reply
1264
|
Cruising Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Could be - for that to be the case, though, she would need to post as much content as those sites.
I give her kudos for being a working model that is able to run professional sites.
|
09-19-07 05:34am
|
Reply
1265
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Don't you just LOVE that bait and switch crap? Doesn't it make you want to give them money so you can find out what other kind of ripoffs they have in store for you?
They may as well have a pop-up saying "We're going to take you for everything we can!"
I saw this recently with Mac & Bumble where they had a hot gallery up somewhere saying "click here for a free membership", then you had to put in your e-mail address, after which the next page said, "I'm sorry - this e-mail address is not eligible for a free membership, but we'll gladly have you as a paid member".
Needless to say, I didn't and wouldn't bite on that.
|
09-17-07 06:00pm
|
Reply
1266
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
A current or past member would have to correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that FTV's updates are several photo sets and several vids, isn't that correct? So even if they were updating once a week - and they've updated 3 times in the past 17 days - they would not be doing a bad rate of updates as compared to some sites.
The question really comes down to how hot you think their work is.
|
09-16-07 05:23pm
|
Reply
1267
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
Home base is Maryland - technically that would make it mid-Atlantic, I believe.
|
09-16-07 05:16pm
|
Reply
1268
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Good job - anybody can make mistakes.
I've got to say, though, that I've never had a problem cancelling either through e-mail or by phone. They solve other customer service issues by phone pretty well also.
|
09-15-07 04:00pm
|
Reply
1269
|
Cruising Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Sandra is one hard-working woman - and very responsive to her fans.
She posts at Freeones.com's message board - very cool! I don't think that I'll take the leap to this site anytime soon, though they look like they have very nice material.
So many sites deserving of attention these days - I love it!
|
09-14-07 08:33am
|
Reply
1270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I made it pretty clear that the "wait one month" rule was a rule that I enforced for myself and was not claiming that everyone else on this site should wait that length of time.
There are rules that I believe would help this site.
I just ran across a review for ALS Scan where the reviewer, in a later comment added to her review, said that she had not been a member prior to her review IN OVER A YEAR!!!!
That, to me, is just ridiculous, and should be grounds for that review being yanked from this site altogether.
|
09-14-07 07:43am
|
Reply
1271
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
I don't understand the point of writing a review when you haven't been a subscriber in over a year.
In my opinion, but that's just ridiculous!
I'm glad that Sarah responded with some of the significant improvements to the site in the last year.
In terms of content, I find ALS Scan to be more "genuine" than most other sites around - the footage from their most recent Caribbean trip is the best example of this - but you wouldn't have seen that since you're reviewing a site that you haven't been a member of in over a year - makes this review fairly worthless, in my opinion.
Really, given that you haven't been a member of this site in over a year - truly hard to believe to me that you think you should be writing a review given that reality - you should have just put your distaste for this site's content as a comment somewhere.
I'm glad that you included the note about Alex's response to your note to him - it shows the honesty of the people running this site - if you don't like what they're doing, just go elsewhere.
|
09-14-07 07:40am
|
Reply
1272
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
I'm sorry, but this review is just wrong! Silvia Saint has a whole large section at Suze.net. I believe that you were thrown off by their navigation, which is a LITTLE confusing - not that confusing to me, but, hey,...
If you click on Models at Suze.net, there is a message that you are looking at a Beta list that only includes the current shoots and then you have to click on "Complete List" or something like that. If you do that, and then click on "S", not only does Silvia Saint have a large section, but she's one of the featured "S" models, s well she should be.
In terms of Suze's posts, it's fairly common knowledge that Suze Randall is computer illiterate and always has been. I'm not aware of her former forum postings, but if she did them, it was definitely her daughter Holly posting for her, because Suze doesn't do ANYTHING with computers - never has. As to how much Suze is shooting these days, I really don't know - but I bet that Holly and her team would give a straight answer in their forum.
I've always considered Suze's site hit or miss, but at $10 now - their specials are all over the map in terms of pricing but all low - for both Suze.net AND Suze.video, I can't complain about this site since it continues to be updated, they have NOT purged their archives except where they have lost licensing or been begged by models that were now out of the biz to remove their shoots, they continue to make improvements, they've lowered the price to an amazing degree while still being top-rate in customer response and they are active in their forum - and very blunt.
I remember reading a post by Holly complaining about how expensive Amy Reid was to hire for boy/girl shoots, something most web-masters would be loathe to mention. Sorry, but I had to step in here to give credit where credit is due - and this site deserves credit for having a LOT of hot stuff!
|
09-13-07 06:38pm
|
Reply
1273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I actually have a rule NOT to review a site within the first month. For myself, I just don't think it's a good amount of time to give a fair review - not to say that I consider all of the reviews done by others within the first month are unfair.
It's just that a site can have an inordinate amount of good or bad stuff posted right at the point that I join and if I'm reviewing right away, I'll be affected by that. I'm bound to give a more balanced review if I wait several weeks.
I agree with leaving reviews available to edit for a year - I think it would be a really good idea to show the before and after scores, though.
For instance: 84 on 1/07/07, 73 on 9/13/07 - with the date of the follow-up comments showing as well, similar to the way that TBP reviews work. If a site hasn't moved a reviewer to change the score within one year, the reviewer should just do a new review if they care to.
|
09-13-07 06:25pm
|
Reply
1274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
It's the difference between a professional web site that gives a damn about their members and a completely un-professional site that doesn't give a flying f about their members.
What difference does it make what the site's content is if you cannot access it after paying to do so?
Webmasters that ignore this critical piece of the business are missing the boat completely.
In my experience:
Hall of fame: Suze.net, DDF, Phil-Flash.com, ALS Scan - all responded quickly and professionally and took care of the issue with no hassle whatsoever
Hall of Shame: MyaDiamond.com (responded after weeks of hard work following them everywhere I could think of), stephanieswift.com (I had to track down the guy that designed the site to get access - I love Stephanie, but she needs someone to run her site for her), Asia Diva.com (HORRIBLE people to deal with!)
|
09-10-07 09:26am
|
Reply
1275
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
I like the girls that your photographers shoot - I think you're on the right track in working with the photographers to get the models to be more engaged and to have more fun with the shoots.
I'm sure it's challenging when you need to have a certain amount of content coming in consistently. As I said in the review, it's clear that you and the other people involved in the site care about making the site better.
|
09-09-07 08:15pm
|
