| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm much more impressed with the content being posted lately than I was when I had joined previously - and few sets are photo-shopped to Hell.
The site access problem that I had was quite temporary - I went in later and had no problems.
|
03-30-08 05:32pm
|
Reply
1127
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
May 2007
|
03-28-08 09:28pm
|
Reply
1128
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Here's how it went. I got a trial sub to another of their sites. When I called to cancel, I said, "Hey, I've always wondered what the difference is between this site and Cyberclub." The woman on the phone said, "Well, Cyberclub is our flagship and you ought to check it out. Would you like me to set you up for a free trial?" I said, "Hell yeah!"
I liked the trial, but wasn't interested in paying full price. When I called to cancel the free trial, I told the woman customer service person that and she said, "Well would you joing for $6.95/month?" I said, "Hell yeah!"
And so it went - from an inexpensive trial of one site to a free trial to a deal of $6.95/month.
|
03-28-08 09:21pm
|
Reply
1129
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
The advantage to talking to a real human being - if you're a good talker, as I am, you can get a price of $6.95/month - he he
|
03-28-08 09:02pm
|
Reply
1130
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
it sounds like Hell - lol
|
03-26-08 05:54pm
|
Reply
1131
|
Gag A Gay
(0)
|
Reply of
killspears's Review
This isn't a review - it's spam
|
03-26-08 05:51pm
|
Reply
1132
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
This was kind of a new initiative they were doing to please long-time members who had been requesting more of the girls they remembered from years before.
They'll be doing more periodically.
|
03-25-08 09:59pm
|
Reply
1133
|
Raven Riley
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This site has a secret (well, it used to be a secret - lol). When I want a month of Raven, every once in a while, I go to the "join" page and hit the "back" key. The site produces a pop-up saying, "Wait!! Join in the next 60 seconds for a limited-time offer of $19.95/month"
I wouldn't join the site for $29.95/month, just because the pic size and quality is not all that great, in my opinion, but $19.95/month to get my Raven Riley fix is quite a decent deal.
|
03-25-08 06:29pm
|
Reply
1134
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
baddaddie's Review
It's interesting about the "exclusive" part. I had believed them when they said exclusive until I got a trial at Mari Possa's website. Her site hasn't been updated at all since October 2007 and she had a set there that got posted on 2/27/08 as a Twisty's Network Exclusive. The only thing exclusive about it was that Twisty's did their own photo-shopping to the pics, so they were a variation on the pics at Mari's now dormant site.
I don't know how often this is the case with Twisty's "exclusive" material. This is the only time I have caught them in this false statement - and maybe they consider the photo-shopping to justify the exclusivity claim. In this case, I think they did a good job in treating the pics.
I've grown terribly bored of the photo-work that they do, in general. I was really horrified by what they did with Andi Valentino. I thought they destroyed every photo-set that they posted of her, with the blurring of her face. I can't remember a Twisty's Treat where I thought they did a very good job with the model's photos, though what they did with Andi V was a travesty, as far as I'm concerned, given how freaking gorgeous the woman is.
They claimed that it was just the lighting and make-up, when I posted my criticism in their forum, but the vids don't have the blurring so I don't buy it. Oh, well. They've got a lot of material, and I still think their exclusive vids are quite good, so I'll enjoy the remainder of my membership to some degree and be done with the site and join others (ATK Galleria & Karups PC) that have more variety to the photo-sets that they post.
|
03-25-08 06:25pm
|
Reply
1135
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
The company that runs this site and Mya Diamond's site is as bogus as bogus can be, in my opinion. On both sites, they have been just taking their oldest material and tacking it on as new updates for quite a while. You can go to Freeones.com and see material that they have posted as "new" with dates from 2005 on them.
Of course, as with any other site that has a substantial archive of material, if you haven't been there before, it can be new to you, but it's not new material, it's just old stuff tacked on as new with no improvements to them whatsoever - when I was a member of Mya's site, I compared the size of re-posted pic sets and they were exactly the same - no improvements.
|
03-25-08 06:11pm
|
Reply
1136
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
That was one bonus that I didn't care for either, but I didn't invest much time in it. Alex had warned that the quality wasn't going to be up to today's standards, so I downloaded one of the smaller vid files and decided that I wouldn't want to spend the time or space going further. They did it for the same reason they have done other things - lots of members asked. Good for them. I just wasn't one of them.
|
03-25-08 06:06pm
|
Reply
1137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Yeah, I'm with the majority above. I'm happy to get T-Shirts from porn babes or hats from strip clubs and the like, but they're for a private collection as opposed to wearing them out in public. Why would I want to explain it all? I'm not one of those people that wants to put every aspect of their life out on display - I voted for this person, my kid goes to this school, my favorite musical act is ___, I'm a Pisces with Gemini rising, I like young Asian babes with big boobs - etc.
|
03-22-08 07:33am
|
Reply
1138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I like them - quite a bit. I'm not going to surf for porn at work. I've had to report people to their managers when they were doing that stupid shit in a dept full of women - it's begging for a lawsuit otherwise. I guess I've been lucky in finding the ones that I've run across to be quite decent quality. If not, I probably wouldn't care for them. It'd be downright stupid for a webmaster to post a crappy-looking auto-play vid on their site. It'd be like naming their site "Poor Quality Porn 4 You"
|
03-20-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
1139
|
Misha Online
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Thanks for the detailed review. I was a member of the site when they first opened for over a year, have thought about re-joining, but was held off by the lack of detailed info on updates - that's usually a bad sign. Your review confirmed it.
I doubt if Misha has retired, but I know she has had a few children, might have gotten awfully busy. One would think, though, that she would be smart and build up a stash of updates to keep the site humming. She's one of the most well-thought-of photographers in the glamour game and has access to the most sought-after models out there because of it.
It's just lame for sites to go dead where updates are concerned.
|
03-16-08 08:45am
|
Reply
1140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Internet porn, no? A fun trip to my fave strip club - most likely - I can think of some gorgeous honeys that I'd like to stimulate - economically and otherwise!
|
03-16-08 08:40am
|
Reply
1141
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I believe that you can peruse ATK Galleria's model listing before joining. I wouldn't know otherwise, how much of an overlap there is between those 2 sites' models, aside from the fact that I didn't see much in the way of hairy models when I was a member of ATK Galleria - which I consider to be good thing.
|
03-15-08 06:22pm
|
Reply
1142
|
88 Square
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Review
How is it more than $30/month.
The highest price listed on the join page is $29.99/month and you can also join for 90 days for $74.95.
|
03-15-08 05:33pm
|
Reply
1143
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
My suggestion - If you're looking for young women as you describe - check out Nubiles.net. If you're looking for a range of women with a large enough archive that you're going to find WHATEVER you're looking for - ATK Galleria or KarupsPC
Both update 5 days a week with a range of models and a range of photographers so there is a fair amount of material done in pretty much any style you can think of.
Twisty's is much more set in their style.
|
03-15-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
1144
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Review
I totally agree with you about the air-brushing. I got a $10/month offer and couldn't stand it for more than 1 month - there's nothing worse than getting excited about a set and when you start looking at the pics, they are so shellaced over that the heat is completely gone, gone, gone - so was I after 1 month and I ain't coming back either.
|
03-10-08 07:11pm
|
Reply
1145
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yep - that's the main rub with this site
The other thing is that it is not state-of-the-art when it comes to size of pics or quality of vids. One-By-Day has left it in the dust in those important areas, not to mention frequency of updates.
I don't know - this site needs to do something pretty massive to challenge the quality of what DDF is doing these days, and if they can't even keep the site up and running.......
|
03-10-08 07:09pm
|
Reply
1146
|
Phil Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
This used to be one of my favorite sites. Phil seems to have lost interest quite a bit. Updates are weekly - sometimes - and USUALLY older un-released material. Other than that, the main updates are web cam show archives, which are sometimes hot, but the quality is not so great - small pictures, not anywhere near state of the art.
Every once in a while, Phil will come up with new outstanding material, like a recent update of Janessa that is mind-blowing. The archives are the reason for my sticking around along with the membership in the several other sites that you get with this one. At his best, Phil had a great erotic style of in-your-tease and there's a LOT of Phil's best available with this site, though it's frustrating as hell where this site is now compared to its glory days of multiple mind-blowing updates a week and lots of web cam shows that were much larger than postage-stamp size with hot, hot girls.
|
03-10-08 07:06pm
|
Reply
1147
|
Galactic Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
kikaida1's Comment
That's too bad, because they've never really made it worthwhile to join for MORE than a trial, in my opinion. Their trials were decent, though.
|
03-10-08 06:59pm
|
Reply
1148
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Review
Well-done review of a site that I love.
Some might love the emphasis on pee-ing and weird insertions. Some might be turned off by same.
Me, I love it for the great high-quality photography and vids of such large numbers of gorgeous babes.
And the appreciation of their customers that marks everything about this site is impressive - which models they update, when and how they update, what areas of improvement have been focused on first - all have been highly influenced by customer feedback.
|
03-08-08 09:25am
|
Reply
1149
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
damon21's Reply
If you're able to identify that this was indeed your competitors, I hope you sue the hell out of them. I can't think of anything more unethical than that.
|
03-08-08 09:16am
|
Reply
1150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
I like tattoos on women. Why? Cause they're guides to erogenous zones. Start kissing and nibbling in every spot where there's a tattoo and you're guaranteed to hear some sexy sounds.
|
03-07-08 06:10pm
|
