| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Review
Damn - I tried to warn you in my comments in the other review - the update rate of this site is just ridiculously poor.
|
07-07-08 09:46pm
|
Reply
1052
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
runefist's Review
I've checked out this Freeones.com deal and it's kind of a mess. On the first "Join Now" page, it refers to a price of 9.95/month whether you are in a country that uses euros, US dollars or British pounds. Then when you go past that page to the Epoch.com page, the price changes to 9.95 euros for 1 month, recurring at $24.95 euros/month, which is a LOT more expensive than the deal first promised. I've e-mailed Private.com. It will be interesting to see if I get a response.
|
07-05-08 07:51pm
|
Reply
1053
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
I think Kink.com is putting the "I did this intense stuff consentually and enjoyed it" disclaimers as a way of protecting themselves legally. It would at least be more difficult for a jury to find them guilty of brutality or whatever charges some DA wanted to bring against them if they saw that, in the end, the performers were hugging and smiling.
|
07-05-08 04:34pm
|
Reply
1054
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've written before that I won't review a site until I've been there for several weeks, but that's not a standard for PU and I believe that there are numbers of people that write reviews for sites that they have been members of for only a few days.
If a reviewer is open and accurate about their membership and the membership is recent (the thing that burns me is when I see reviews of sites where the person hasn't been there in months), then I think it's OK. It's more info being shared, and that's the whole point, no?
|
07-04-08 07:43am
|
Reply
1055
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Review
Their set-up/navigation/category division is a major pain in the ass.
Price - the official price is $29.95/month, or 3 month recurring membership for $59.80/three months. But when you check out the "Join Now" page, the price that pops up is a Special Offer of $22.90/month. This is one of those sites, like Suze.net, that has very frequent special offers, so if anybody is interested in the site, they should check back often and then just join when they like the price being offered.
|
07-03-08 06:45am
|
Reply
1056
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Good idea. I know that I've rated sites highly that then flew down a rat-hole and other sites made some necessary adjustments to improve.
|
07-03-08 06:31am
|
Reply
1057
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Reply
Kate's a hot MILF now - married, or in a committed relationship anyway (not sure which), with a baby
|
07-02-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
1058
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Reply
They've been doing this blurred heavy painting to her pics these days, from the samples/promos of the new sets that I've seen, so now I feel like I don't even know what she really looks like.
Too bad, cause she was a truly stunning girl. I remember when I was a member of Kate's Playground years ago, Kate would come back from those Internext conventions of web models and would post candids and Kelly was easily one of the very few stunning girls in the pics.
Phil Flash posted great stuff that he shot of Kelly with Tiffany Teen - so freaking hot together!
|
07-02-08 10:27pm
|
Reply
1059
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
juicylucy's Review
I can relate to jl's review. I respect Shap and the whole Twisty's crew quite a bit, for their consistency of updates, the attention they pay to their members and their obvious desire to keep the site fresh in various ways.
But I've grown tired of the predominent style at the site - the photo-shopping makes some of my favorite models look just washed-out so I was finding myself most disappointed by sets of models that I like the most.
There are rays of sunshine. Some sets of Mari Possa that are just wonderful, for example, some really great strip tease vids, and some photo sets, such as the most recent Lanny Barby set, that are just snackalicious.
Still, with days when I was unable to find new updates that I cared much about, it's time, at the end of my current subscription, for me to take a leave from Twisty's for a while.
|
07-02-08 07:59pm
|
Reply
1060
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
juicylucy's Review
Just to lend a dose of cold water here. I think this site is definitely a taste-tester with some, like juicylucy, obviously loving it. I've been a member a couple of times and find it just terribly boring - I don't think the pics have anything exciting about them, I don't find the models all that attractive, in the main or very engaged in what they are doing and I find the interaction between the models incredibly mechanical and flat-out boring. I let my membership lapse after 1 month with no regrets whatsoever.
Enjoy your membership, though, jl - it's always good to find a site that you enjoy thoroughly.
|
07-02-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
1061
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's hot if it seems like the girls are really enjoying it, like with ALS Scan's vids. It's not hot if it seems like the girls are only kissing each other because they were hired to be in a scene where they would be kissing each other and they expect the check to clear - like Sapphic Erotica - booooooorrrrring!
|
07-02-08 07:44pm
|
Reply
1062
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Reply
Sites that update daily with super-hot girls & exclusive content
Met Art
LSG Models
MPL Studios
Femjoy
Babes.tv (6 days a week - 3 days of pics, 3 days of vids)
Sites that update several times a week with super-hot girls & exclusive content
ALS Scan (with 1 remastered update a week)
FTV Girls
Watch4Beauty
And then you look at Superglam's updates
sometimes 3 days, sometimes 15 days between pic updates
sometimes 2 days, sometimes 2 weeks between vid updates
You can convince yourself that's reasonable if you want. I'll vote with my wallet and stay the hell away from it. It's just not a reasonable rate of updates as compared to what else is available.
|
07-02-08 07:41pm
|
Reply
1063
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
You're mis-understanding the history of this site. This was not a stand-alone site that then added other sites. This site was a new addition to the SexyBabes.TV network of sites - and a great addition. Every single update isn't a stunner, but there are a whole lot of them that are. Overall, the network is a great deal. It should be even better when they start consolidating the updates that are currently spread among SexyBabes.tv, EuroBabes & DreamBabes.
|
07-01-08 06:41pm
|
Reply
1064
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Canyon's Comment
Regular updates coming? As Denner noted in his other comment, their update schedule is a joke when you compare it to other high quality glamour sites that give at least one new update a day. That's pretty much a deal-breaker for me.
|
07-01-08 06:36pm
|
Reply
1065
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Review
How do they get the girls so smooth and bump-free? Photo-shopping. Alex once showed some before-and-after pics because members were asking how much photo-shopping they did and he is an honest guy. They just photo-shop the bumps and blemishes etc and leave everything else the way it it. As to the vids, it's an interesting question, since they look just as clean and bump-free - soft lenses?
A videographer have to answer that one.
|
06-28-08 09:22am
|
Reply
1066
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Keep checking the site itself as well as Freeones.com. They offer this deal quite often.
|
06-28-08 09:14am
|
Reply
1067
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
fugly's Comment
I don't find their download speeds unusually slow. Their vids aren't that good - too small - I like their pic sets, though.
|
06-26-08 07:24pm
|
Reply
1068
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Price affects my score a bit. Value counts. Would I have rated Babelicious as highly as I did if it were not part of a network that provided multiple updates a day for such a good price? Probably not, to be honest.
|
06-26-08 07:21pm
|
Reply
1069
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Your last commment's hilarious!
Good, entertaining review - thanks!
I've been a member a couple of times. The site didn't have the excitement factor to keep me sticking around, but there was a lot to enjoy when I was there.
|
06-22-08 05:44pm
|
Reply
1070
|
Mandy Is Kinky
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
One other note-able "con" about this site is that it is no longer updating. The last update was 4/29/08.
As you say, the good thing is the immediate access to the large number of bonus sites, 17 of which are still updating, so you're getting multiple updates every single day as soon as you join this site, including to many of the best of the 21st Sextury secondary sites - Sweet Sophie Moone, Lesbo Honeys, Horny Eurosluts, Dirty 101, Fassinating, etc - with 2 more sites added every month that you remain a member.
|
06-21-08 11:29pm
|
Reply
1071
|
Adult Movie Club
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I just took a look at the site - not all that appealing to me, but I appreciate Exotics' thorough review.
One thing I noted that fits into the "funny, weird & lazy" category is that they seem to have lifted their porn star bios, or at least some of them, from Twisty's for no apparent reason.
Here is their bio of Amy Reid:
"Amy Reid's Bio...
Sweet little Amy Reid with a body every woman envy's and every man wants, Amy is quickly shooting up our Twistys Ranks see what all the other Twistys Members are seeing. This tight young piece of ass is the hottest new starlet online check out her amazing tits and tight, sexy, squeezable ass. Part of her many charms but not but not her only talents. Find what else Amy can do...only inside Twistys! Twistys has over 690+ exclusive pics of Amy, and we are shooting more of her everyday."
|
06-21-08 11:21pm
|
Reply
1072
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
OK - I looked at it a different way - the Xtra Large pics, as they classify them show as 1064 X 1600 pixels
|
06-21-08 11:34am
|
Reply
1073
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Don't know the dimensions, I'm afraid. When I looked at "properties" of the pic, all it gave was kbs and I'm not sure how that translates to dimensions.
|
06-21-08 10:12am
|
Reply
1074
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm single, so I don't have a wife to have to explain it to or lie to. There's condoms to prevent STD's. If I could arrange it in a way that I could afford it, sure, I'd do it!
|
06-20-08 05:24pm
|
Reply
1075
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
If you're in the mood to join in the next week or so, you'll be able to catch their bonus HD 3-part vid of the first beach day on their 2008 Caribbean trip, which I think is absolutely fantastic - just a batch of gorgeous sexy girls running around, getting drunk, playing in the surf and eventually diving on each other's pussies with abandon. I haven't seen girl/girl stuff better than ALS is presenting anywhere else on the web.
Their redone older pics look pretty damned good to me. The redone older vids not so much. There's just no way to make those older vids look anywhere comparable to the new stuff, but it's collector's type material if you like those models, who have moved on or, in many cases, long ago changed their body shape completely or retired.
|
06-19-08 06:00pm
|
