| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
18 Virgin Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
longbucks's Reply
Well, thanks HERE!
But this member still cannot gain access to the bonus-sites I joined up for.
When I get access to amourbabes.com and try to get futher to the bonus-sites, all just come up with a windows stating:
"404 Not Found".
If I try to access via the a specific bonus-sites, it's just a NO...
BTW: Never got answers when using your costumer-service...
|
01-12-09 07:35am
|
Reply
777
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
Very accurate, monty.. LOL!
|
03-24-11 10:40am
|
Reply
778
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
Oh, I know, I know - and after calming down a bit, still: It strikes me very odd to send out a mail:
"Free Membership for Loyal Members"...........you got to think about that one for a few seconds. It does ring a bell somewhere about luring commercials.
|
03-24-11 10:15am
|
Reply
779
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
How do you define:
Free Membership????
Your're amazed?
So am I.
The OFFER? - that comes after you ask for a new login/password and with the headline of FREE MEMBERSHIP: Then it turns out to be a 20% discount - if you sign up for a year....
I did NOT expect a month or alike free membership - maybe 3 days or something - to take a look as a many times former member of the news/updates.....
But your policy here is outrageous and I still call that mail SPAM!
|
03-24-11 09:54am
|
Reply
780
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Follow up:
Honestly - I'm really pissed here - I'd almost go as far as to call this fraud - at least it's spam in the first degree.
Maybe I did something wrong in the log in process, I doubt it - and if not, I seriously believe TBP should take action in regarding this networks appearance at TBP.
I still believe that this kind of - at least SPAM - is against every TBP policy...
|
03-24-11 09:08am
|
Reply
781
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Excellent review, ra - just finished the lastest term - and that site got loads and loads of material. And I downloaded "tons".
But pretty strange - do not go back much to watch....got that strange feeling: most of it is repetitive - and yes, it is strange.
|
02-28-13 06:17am
|
Reply
782
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
BTW, Sandstone - something that came up later on: Of course the video re-editing is a long and probably slow process when we think about the amount here - even going back to that one single HC-vid with Eve Angel in the bathroom - or the great vids of Dana/Vera..ect..
BUT: Like Rusty J - I was not able to find any links at the "Fanclub" section - to those lists.....
Another BTW: I'm overwhelmed by the great download-speed (best around) - but mostly it takes quite some time to browse the sites, the search??
|
01-11-12 07:27am
|
Reply
783
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Thanks, Sandstone
|
01-10-12 11:37pm
|
Reply
784
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Reply
It's a tough one, Monty - been having some conversations earlier with the Drooler - since we both been through this:
Where can I find some new and fine material for my taste???
Looking at your inputs above, I have a few suggestions:
Karups PC is a fine site with a lot of the above
A little more special, but great is Ero Berlin (a lot full body) - and most done in some really great sets and vids...
But check out previews....and come back anytime...
|
10-18-11 05:45am
|
Reply
785
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Another good input.
And yes - apart from those loooooong close-ups 21Sextury.com has turned the site into an anal-site when it comes to both hc and solo....using those easteuro deals with those easteuro males like Timo - anal and anal and anal ect.
No wonder this user with no interest in anal material goes elsewhere...
|
10-15-11 06:48am
|
Reply
786
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Thanks monty! - you mention one of my main issues here - especially concerning 21Sextury.com.
Been a fan of that site for years, but the latest vids content has made me give up the site. Reason: Endless time of close-ups....
What's got into them/these producers???
Like monty says:
"Occasional close-ups are fine - but we need some fully body shots way more."
Well put!
More and longer full body shots in general, thank you. (BTW, glad to see that my ol' thread has come to live on this matter)....
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=1977
|
10-15-11 06:43am
|
Reply
787
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
First - take your time to go through the MANY reviews from other PUs - and the one from TBP - guess you'll find a lot of answers here..
Photos are top-quality in my opinion though not the big pix fan.
BUT: What strikes me as a member here a many times - on and off - are a couple of items concerning vids:
1) By all means: top viewing quality (the larger file, the better quality)
2) A - sad - tendency - to focus too much on close-up - both soft and h/c. I really miss some of the earlier full body/posing/strip.
3) And yes, anal has more and more focus here - too much for my taste (too).
|
09-13-11 05:43am
|
Reply
788
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
If you did not have serious experience with corrupted files - that explains all. I would not react on what others have had of bad files in their membership either - concerning my scores, that is.
Guess the files problems are very much on and off - and you avoided them.
And I agree that the WM are very observant here...
And thanks for the this thorough reply!
|
04-04-11 02:31pm
|
Reply
789
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I always respect your reviews - like kind of the ol' timers that been here for quite a while and the same ol' timers who's been "around"...
Still, amigo - does it not give you some thoughts when giving score about the general problems to users that 21.Sextury has.
It's been on "comments" quite a few times - especially problems with material that is not down loadable after all.
We've got the latest input from RustyJ - ok, before your review - but still: THAT problem seem to keep repeating itself...and quite a lot of earlier similar inputs...
Just wondered?
|
04-04-11 06:39am
|
Reply
790
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I'll not hassle 21.Sextury or Sandstone, who is maybe one of the most active webmasters to get back here at PU - and thanks for that!
But bottom line: As a very long time fan and member of first one site (Pixandvideo, of course) and then others and then the network I think it's sad, annoying, a shame ect. that this fine site/now network that has had top material for many years present these problems to the users...
This input from RustyJ is - alas - too easy to recognize. Over and over again. For years I joined/rejoined, but not lately since I got that same problem:
Finding a new model/new material- getting the appetizer - and not being able to download.
I really hope 21.Sextury will get back to a situation when everything is reliable.....
|
04-04-11 05:50am
|
Reply
791
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ok, thanks - but bottom line - and so I - just maybe - can understand this once and for all:
The ISP is only your/the internet provider - and if they have this 1TB pr month the download limit it's then general ---- like for example: exotics wants to download a hell-of-a-lot - but his provider states a monthly 1TB download limit....like this: Well, wow 21. Sextury has SO much stuff that I have to keep my downloading within my providers monthly 1TB....
We do not have that here in little ol' Denmark - only for mobile internet..
|
03-22-11 08:45am
|
Reply
792
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Thanks for this info/update....well, it's local then and NOT the site..
|
03-22-11 08:02am
|
Reply
793
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Man, am I a novice here.....
That means that it's NOT 21.Sextury who puts up the limit...or what?
|
03-22-11 07:52am
|
Reply
794
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
What's ISP?
But does that mean a general download limit of 1TB pr month of membership?
Not that it matters much - you got to be a busy little bee to download that amount.
And about new models: Willa - oh, yes, she's been at 21. for a year or so - got this great vid: strip at the pole and DP - downloaded it in May 2010..
But bottom line, exotics: thanks for the update/info for this - still - great network.
|
03-22-11 07:21am
|
Reply
795
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Hello Sandstone
Thank you for coming forward here at PU - which was my intention - just a reaction and some explanation here at PU..
After your reply I realized that this explanation from you was at the former comment - the same day, almost at the same time, so I did not see that, before my input.
I have now - and thanks - hope it'll all work out...
Cheers!
Denner
|
01-18-11 03:56am
|
Reply
796
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Praise RustyJ for this input......and honestly:
"Today was a good day"
We PAY for our deals - and we - of course - expect to get what we pay for....not for sites that miss their obligations towards the customer.
Sure, any site can run into problems - but why do I so much recognize the situation (over and over) stated here by RustyJ?
......and again: "Today was a good day" (at 21Sextury) .......Jeeeeez...
Tomorrow I may expect the worse...
|
01-13-11 07:58am
|
Reply
797
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Lordy, lordy - do they still have that extremely annoying problem? - and I was about to join once more - the previews seems so great, again...
They have had this earlier, btw, quite a lot of times in 2010.
Webmasters at 21Sextury.com: how can you live with this?
An answer to present and future members would be appropriate...
|
01-07-11 07:43am
|
Reply
798
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
nadiencendia, this has been annoying me too - for a long time...so it's good you bring it up again - and thanks to your comment, I could not resist to make a new thread - see that, if you like....
BTW: agree somewhat about Viv Thomas - except that what I've seen the vid quality lacks a lot - in general...
|
12-10-10 07:55am
|
Reply
799
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
I think nadiencendia here says what a lot of us/PUs feel - and not only for this site/network - but for quite a few others:
Instead of being so fond - photographers/video-ditto - of a vast amout/looooong minutes of close-ups - let's get much more full body views...including the face, the legs, the high heels...
Close-ups are part of the deal and it's ok - BUT not 2/3 or even 3/4 of a set/video...
We have been around this many times, so the producers/Webmasters must have an idea what the paying users are looking for - it's still a mystery, that they obviously do not listen...don't you guys care - not to loose the dough from users?
Anyway - thanks for bringing it up again!
|
12-10-10 07:02am
|
Reply
800
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Very fast reply from WM (8 minutes) - thumbs up!
|
12-10-10 06:39am
|
