| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Hey Khan
No big deal - just wondered...
Thanks for reply.
|
10-09-07 12:40pm
|
Reply
702
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My answer is NO.
But do not get this poll.
Is it some kind of survey in general payed by some sponsor to see if users here are an interesting object?
If that's the case, please tell us. I think we can cope.
|
10-09-07 12:02pm
|
Reply
703
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I always look for good deals via TBP, Rabbit or Porninspector - and sometimes just browsing out there.
But normally my limit is the 30 bucks - maybe because the top-sites IN GENERAL - have that level - a level I'm getting used to.
Lately I've joined two sites at $ 39.95. I don't like the price, off course, but they got the stuff I want (FM Teens and british RealSexPass).
Rosemans poll here is importend - in a way of telling the site-owners that they better deliver the ultimate or the users at this PU will go elsewhere....(I hope)
|
10-06-07 08:53am
|
Reply
704
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I agree with williamj...
I'm a lazy bastard and hate all those extra log-ins in diffenrent forms. With both numbers and letters - most of the times you have to guess if a letter is capital or not.
What I like is my password-manager taking care of things, so I just have to click - once (and ok, maybe twice).
And yeah, sometimes I'm not up to going through all that jazz.. and skip that particular site.
|
10-04-07 06:39am
|
Reply
705
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nada - not anymore. Tried it some time ago, but it was lousy. For two reasons: The shit I saw was like before the Korean war (well, ok - with some exaggeration) and second reason: Somebody else decides what you can watch here and now...
No, it all internet.
|
10-02-07 09:38am
|
Reply
706
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Along with quite a few other PU's I think I have a pretty good feeling of the "market".
The users here at TBP/PU are probably better off when choosing new sites - than the vast amount of rookies/browsers out there.
The old sites we know, of course we make a lot of mistakes in the way of beeing disapointed with especially rather unknown, new sites.
But it's nothing compared to the browsers that are not following what I consider to be the best consumers-link to good porn: PU.
|
09-30-07 08:52am
|
Reply
707
|
N/A
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
Crissy Moran has her own site - look at TBP for her name.
Or try Bikini Riot - a softcore-site...
And, Yeah, HeatherMcXxx, go for Alessandra..
Take care....over there in the wonderfull state of Texas. (Been there four times now and allready miss it - it's a lot different from Northern Europe)
|
09-29-07 10:55am
|
Reply
708
|
N/A
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
I like your input, HeatherMcXxx - and why should'nt the catalogs with Alessandra count???
For myself I really enjoy Crissy Moran and Silvia Saint.
And the collecting thing, well, as a matter of fact, maybe you're right - it's quite seldom I go back to the harddesk with the "old" stuff...still keep looking for new things there..
|
09-29-07 08:29am
|
Reply
709
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Got too much - time to clean up, I guess - about 350 Gb in all.
Over 10 Gb of Silvia Saint, Eve Angel and a little less of Crissy Moran.
|
09-29-07 02:09am
|
Reply
710
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cblodg's Reply
Hey. buddy
Sorry to hear that - with the dammed transmission.
But go for it, anyway. Luck always change...
|
09-27-07 09:49am
|
Reply
711
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cblodg's Reply
Well, cblodg..
I don't se it as a requirement.
More like Rod Steiger put it in a famous line from the fantastic movie "In The Heat of The Night":
- It's an opportunity you just can't pass by!
|
09-27-07 09:24am
|
Reply
712
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Well, it seems the activities grow close to the tuesdays.
But I don't think most here at this PU do it for the winnings. The reviews are generally for the good of all. I try to give my veiws and gain from other views.
And by the way, my winnings are used via Amazon to buy books (money/cash from US to Europe is just a hassle).
But, of course - it's fun to win.
And another thing: Comments and replys and so on generate a lot of points compared to reviews, so.....
|
09-26-07 08:20am
|
Reply
713
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Users in general are getting more confident and do not want to pay for crap (also thanks to sites like TBP and of course PU).
So let this fine poll be a warning to those owners and webmasters who just go after the money and give a damm about quality and customers/consumers...
|
09-24-07 07:14am
|
Reply
714
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
Second jd1961..... and I think "no" in trust rating a reason should be mandatory for all users.
|
09-22-07 02:17pm
|
Reply
715
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Sounds great - look forward to more sites with good deals...
|
09-21-07 08:03am
|
Reply
716
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Well, folks. Both at TBP and PU.
Looks like "we" are moving up in "this" world....
I think it's a very interesting response here from Rick - and TBP:
TBP are making improvements for google and radio advertising.
I sincerly hope this could mean an even better TBP/PU-site concerning an even better understanding from the pornsite-owners/operators - which again could give us customers, yeah, again: even better deals.
In spite of succes I hope, that TBP will always be a place for consumers!
|
09-20-07 09:11am
|
Reply
717
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I really enjoy the fast overlook - and especially the new icons with DISCOUNT!, DRM, LTD TRIAL and so on.
And of course the PU-point out to the right - guess I'll spend quite some time in this new section.
Fine improvement!
|
09-20-07 05:58am
|
Reply
718
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Trials for 3-5 days with full access is what I'm looking for most of the time: For a good price, of course.
I hope more and more sites would realize it could also be a good deal for their part - if they got the stuff serious PU-folks are looking for.
If the content is in the upper level, I'd be quite tempted to go for a full membership.
In contrast to sites which are reluctant to show customers what they can offer...
A very importend poll from roseman!!!
|
09-16-07 08:16am
|
Reply
719
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Ricks answer put things in perspective - it is great that TBP and PU combined has such a traffic.
And there are two importend factors here:
That we users here at PU can benefit from this in influencing the pornsites (owners and webmasters) to be on their marks concerning both quality of content and price.
It might also be the bridge between sites and comsumers - but in that direction also to rule out or boycutt sites that just try to sell us trash....
Let this PU-thing grow, folks!
|
09-12-07 03:14pm
|
Reply
720
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Well, one of the things for sure Rick is right about is date/time for a review. Let's keep that.
And after all most of us do our reviews whitin the first month ( or am I not right here?)
The second thing is the "Follow-Up"-field, which I think is very good: You do your review, but then get wiser( or whatever) during two or three or four weeks (or more) and fell like you want to give your fellow users an ajustment - and a reason for that ajustment.
I think the Follow-Up-systemt is fine - it gives the other users an idea of changes concerning a site - from the reviewers point of view...
And one question to Rick: Any info to us registred users about how many hits TBP gets dayly/weekly/mothly- it must be a LOT more that what we stand for... or is that a company secret?
The reason I ask is the kind of pressure we can put on prices as mentioned in a LOT of comments/reviews.
And by the way - TBP/PU is the absolutly the best guide for a pornuser - as Cheech and Chong once put it: "I'll recommend it to all my friends out there...."
Thanks, guys!
|
09-12-07 09:44am
|
Reply
721
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
For better rating after some time as a member I'd like to mention Pier 999. I rated that site 84 from the start after just a few days as a member/customer. But after taking my time and enjoying the site, I simply had to raise the points - and now after 2 weeks I even would go a bit higher - great site, but just an example.
At the other end I'm almost through with 1 month at Teen Flood. I never understood the 86 at TBP and I still don't. Have you guys seen their latest videos. We're used to half-blurred and half-lousy videos of older dates. But the five or six latest Teen Flood put on - they are just as bad in quality.
Take a look at the start of theese last one: The Teen Flood logo is almost crisp, but when the video starts it's blurred to say the least - and even the logo in the left corner - it's hard to read.
|
09-12-07 05:41am
|
Reply
722
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Should a PU who submitted this poll answer too. Yeah, why not?
I guess everybody has an urge, when joining a site. And what a bummer it is when you can't gain access after paying.
So it's a very importend issue, that webmasters or even a billing-company see to it, that paying costumers get their moneys worth - is that the right frase in english?
I've had what I think is more than my share of problems - after paying up.
Some webmasters/billing companies are doing an ok job, but as long as there are sites that don't give a shit about paying customers, it's good we have PU and TBP.
Thanks to the fellow PU's for responding to this little poll.
|
09-10-07 07:46am
|
Reply
723
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom Veller's News
Looks good
BUT when I tried to browse the site, I kept getting a virus-warning from my F-secure...
Anybody experienced anything like that?
|
09-09-07 07:36am
|
Reply
724
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Poll
Woodruff has got a point...
Every once in a while there is a model who you'd like to see in hardcore scenes. I have 2 right now:
Nadja/Vanessa Cooper/Ambra and Nikol W./Corinna and more (se Euro Babe Index (thanks to Drooler)).
If I see a site with these two doing hc, I'd jump into it no matter what....do not think it'll happen, but you can always hope.
The site Sexy Employee has the big tit Monika Cajth/Monika Benjar in the first real hc-scene I've seen.
I joined up because of that.
|
09-08-07 08:20am
|
Reply
725
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I put my vote on: "They work well on most sites"
That has been my experience, anyway - and I enjoy using my download manager (IDM).
But I have had one or two problems with sites: Latest with Thainee (and 3 bonus sites). I got blocked off the site. And the webmaster responded to my block-off that it was because of my IDM that apperently took gigabytes. Never understood that - but for most sites it's a good tool. And the owners/webmaster of the sites should take download-managers for granted - it's the thing to use.
|
09-06-07 09:40am
|
