| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm just a little carefull here - I know some folks dig the BTS.
But for this user: It's worthless - in a bad mood I might even say it stinks - and I'm with messmer a lot of the way: It detroys the fantasy.
The reasons are obvious: BTS are mostly done in a stupid way: a lot of laughs, weird remarks og especially ridiculous behaviour from the people behind the shootings - even some condescending attitude towards the viewer/costumer......"Now, folks. Let us show you how we have the fun with theese models, you won't have in your little world"........
Ok, I'm not so carefull about this after all, but.... give me a break!
|
08-17-08 09:51am
|
Reply
577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's ok as long as it's unchecked. And only unchecked!
Once in a while there's a good deal you do not catch/see anywhere else.
|
08-09-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
578
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Not sure...
I'm not in this for the money - still this user has had some top winnings here - I keep winning and am a bit embarrased about it - I must be out of luck in love, then....-:)
I use my winning via Amazon - it would be great if I could spend it on new sites - but I guess there's too much trouble with money-winning across the Atlantic.
Anyway I'm still not sure: Still feel the main thing here is reviews and comments - and those two thing should be first in line with raffle-winnings.
The Forum is great too - but maybe not as importend in the never endning search - anyway - still not sure.
BTW: A good poll, Wittyguy. And by all means: Let's use the Forum in the raffle too.....It just will not affect my activities there...
|
08-07-08 05:59am
|
Reply
579
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Normally nothing - once in a while (rarely) I might send a reply if it's one of my own favorite sites and I feel the score is way too low and not well founded...
Never if I think it's too high....man, they probably like the site, then.
On the other hand: A low score could be a good warning if you have never been there - and then a "thanks-reply" is fine.
|
08-01-08 03:45am
|
Reply
580
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Never sick - but sometimes a bit bored.
And the boredom is typical related to difficulties in finding NEW stuff/NEW girls....
|
07-31-08 07:11am
|
Reply
581
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Weird poll, folks...
Please lets get it together with some better ones - but ok, it's vacation-time.
And the Drooler really freaks out here... funny analogous - and I certainly agree about Fargo - Dark!
But anyway DP: the sites that boasts of DP is mainly one item: V and A...
So what the heck: V and A it is....
|
07-24-08 06:47am
|
Reply
582
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My porn-collection is nobodys bussiness but my own - (and certainly not some pc-repair guy/co.) - so yes: I keep everything on an external hd.
Remember the old days where some dude in a photo-shop looked through peoples private photos....?
|
07-20-08 07:59am
|
Reply
583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
moshic's Poll
I go for the 1280x720.
On a "normal" PC and ditto screen this quality will do the trick.
Even with a good system it's hard to see any difference between 1280x720 and 1980x1080 - and besides: it takes up too much more space - and download time.
And the 640x360: that should be for the past.
|
07-16-08 08:22am
|
Reply
584
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No problems - if it's based on full access trial....
|
07-04-08 10:14am
|
Reply
585
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Great input, great principle.
Salute to you, exotics4me....
|
06-22-08 09:06am
|
Reply
586
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Ten or 15 years ago, sure!
But at this age with a good (third) wife, I would not risk it.
Had adventures before and the cost was divorces (twice) - ok and some of those "One-Night-Stands" were great and went futher (not with a pornstar, though, but among others a pro call-girl, as we called it back then - almost married her, thank the Lord , I did not).
Think those kind of adventures belongs to the younger PU's - go for it, guys!!!!
|
06-21-08 06:53am
|
Reply
587
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I vote both - TBP does some fine first-hand reviews with quite a lot of detailed infos.
Then again PU-reviews is in many other ways my main source - among them good warnings against shitty sites.
Finally I do a lot of research at TBPs "Company Info" of a site. Here you can check out the other sites of this company which in many way helps to judge things - a lot of sites from the same Co. has style, stuff and content in common - and with new sites, you know nothing about you might be lucky to find info at this place...
|
06-17-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
588
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
When I was young - yes, sure. Guess it was a part of the sexual experiments - and it was always the girl doing the masturbation - before the more serious sexual act. Just good memories here.....
Once met this cute, slim brunette and found a dildo in her bed - I asked her to use it before the sex - and it was just great.
But, man - like Merle Haggard said in a song:
"They say life starts at 50....
Well, you've been lied to, my friend.
I wish I was thirty again"
And:
"Youth should be saved for the last
But it's wasted on the young and the fast"
(from the album: Chill Factor)
|
06-08-08 07:06am
|
Reply
589
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm what you'd consider a middle-aged person.
And I'm not blind yet!
But are we getting to a point of lacking good polls?
Like DivBZero, I too ask:
"And the point of this question is?......"
So, fellow PU's: Let's go for some serious polls, here....and let our fantasies run wilder...
But by all means. TBP has to have a new poll quite often, so let's give them a hand - for the benefit of all.
|
06-07-08 07:52am
|
Reply
590
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm beginning to.
But only because I'm starting to feel a bit like a veteran in this field - among others thanks to PU and all fellow PUs.
I'm not taking any bullshit anymore - it's my money.
So yes, I've started a more frequent feedback to webmasters. Two reasons:
1) Like I'm fed-up with hoax in some sites.
2) Webmasters should be aware that we at PU is not to be fooled around with!
On the other hand - I also do SOME feedback to webmasters when I'm really happy about a site - It has to be both ways.
|
05-30-08 06:46am
|
Reply
591
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I got mad at a site I felt was pure hoax/fraud upon the user, so I choosed "Fraud" at CCBill.
Obivious they (CCBill) regard that choise as Credit Card-fraud - and in the following loooong periode NO billing service would accept that card..first and last time I picked that reason.
And you're sure right: it's not clear.
|
05-26-08 11:00am
|
Reply
592
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Well, honestly.......sometimes I do not care...
Exept with sites who now or before has treated me with some sort of respect as a customer/user...
Alas, there are still quite a few sites out there, that do not give a damn about the paying customer. No answers to mails, no nada...
Still: I once made an error, where I felt the site was a fraud. And I answered "Fraud" as a reason for cancel (CCBill) But that resulted in a block of my creditcard for a long time at any billing co (and BTW: No charge for that site). But ok, that was back years ago - now I choose between: "Other" - "satisfied customer" - or "didn't like the site".
But bottom line: Do anybody at those sites take notice??? Do not know myself.
|
05-25-08 09:07am
|
Reply
593
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Smiling and naughty eyes looking directly at the camera is alomst a must. In both soft and hc.
|
05-23-08 03:09am
|
Reply
594
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Limited trials are normally worthless - with whose sites it's a matter of standard of preview.
BTW: Good previews seems more and more imported in this jungle.
Agree with Monahan - it's a waste of time and money - even for a couple of bucks.
I fell limited trial is a kind of a trap - and that seems like some kind of reason why these sites only have the limited...
On the other hand I do join full trials quite a lot - at sites I never been before. If I like what I see, I normally go back for the full month deal.
But limited trial: Never.
|
05-21-08 08:54am
|
Reply
595
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
No - if it was work, the fun would probably be gone...
|
05-19-08 09:58am
|
Reply
596
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Roseman got a point here. Funny poll.
Are we back in the liberated times of the hippie-area or are we just seeking amusement in our sex-life.
Had this "friend" once who was into somebody else fucking his wife (at that time) while he was watching - and jerking off.
At another time my ex-girlfriend had this even more beautyfull friend and the four of us (two couples) was getting things going. (Well, folks this was back in the early 90th)
But when I started to "mess" around with this girl, she (my ex-girlfriend) got mad - and I got a slap in the face - it could have been fun though, but my girlfriend didn't want sex with the male part of the other couple.
Needles to say that this other specific girl and I got it off later in a great way of just sex all around...it lasted a year or so - with sex only, but wow, she was probably the best "piece of ass" - no offence.
Today my marrige is too good - and I do not think my wife would appreciate that "behavior"...and I don't really need that anymore (sad, isn't it)...I get my appetite at pornsites and eat at home. And getting older....
|
05-17-08 07:35am
|
Reply
597
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
hey asmith
my input was in no way an answer to your random reseach/test - in fact, I think all those random-inputs you've done was quite refreshing.
My input is a try (excuse my not so good english) to give a generel answer to the poll...
Keep it up, buddy!
|
05-15-08 10:31am
|
Reply
598
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
BTW:
Let's tell all the suckers behind sites with socalled "un-ethical-biz" that we want reliable previews - all around....
|
05-15-08 09:29am
|
Reply
599
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
This has got to be based on a feeling...
There are maybe over 100.000 "porn sites" on the net and about 14.000 registered at TBP.
How can we get around to them all?
But one thing seems certain: There are a lot of crap out there..
But giving an estimate of how many of those are bullshitters - that's a though one.
|
05-15-08 08:48am
|
Reply
600
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey, Drooler - great input/reply!
Think I know the feeling. What I remember best was the first times I joined 1ByDay ....and WOW! - those girls made the libido work, for sure - but the video quality lacked a hell of a lot.
Still some euro-girls I had never seen before, like.....sorry, I can't remember them all - just made every thing tick...
And today: well, the overlook, the way of quickly scanning whats in there, whats good and whats not - that takes a few hours, sometimes much less.
So yes, it's a kind of another ballgame now - and, alas, there is too long between those sites where you get - just - some of the exitement from the early days...
And maybe therefore, I too do rush into a fast review onve in a while after beeing a member for a day or two (still l like the "cooling off" bit, though)
Cheers!
|
05-14-08 08:54am
|
