| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
Well, boys.... I stated "Uncle who?".
First who the hell is that uncle?
Second: Who are "dirty old men"?
Middle-aged PUs who like teens?
Not likely.
And then I saw the reply from the Drooler.
Man, I did not see that review of Oldje before I went back to the poll again.
Still, It's a pretty fine exampel of a simplification of the term "dirty old men" - I would not go as far as using the term "discremination".
And Droolers review of the somewhat dammed fine older site Oldje is more than welcome for this user.
Been a member before - and what strikes me the most here is, that this site produces some of the finest euro-teens - and some NOT seen anywhere else. And I enjoy it - old boys fucking them or not.
And BTW: Droolers review hits it square on the head - thanks for that review, bro....
|
03-01-09 10:57am
|
Reply
527
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Thanks to Toadsith - man, this is certainly leads/links to a lot of new stuff - already I look forward to some good ol' browsing here....and see whats comming up - very welcome to those hints...
|
02-28-09 11:54am
|
Reply
528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Not any of the four answers really covers my opinion here.
The closest is:
"Only if it has good reviews"
But, man - a site that charge $35 or more really has to have something extra.
There are on a very few sites like that for a charge that high - and even if some of those has a content, I've really been looking for, I'll still hesitate - and probably wait til the site grows and/or till I feel I can afford it - compared and along with other memberships...
|
02-21-09 11:13am
|
Reply
529
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Man, this is a hard one, Drooler...
I never pay much attention to ratings at a specific site - especially ratings of models.
Mainly because I almost disagree or in too many sites there are no model-rating at all. If I'm not mistaken, a lot goes for scene-ratings.
It's difficult to rate a certain model, in general - we all got different taste
- even if there are some "top-models" we all can agree upon.
Another item is: why do some sites skip those ratings?
Maybe because we all got our favorites - and after that there are some new models - take Nubiles, for instance.
That site keeps comming up with entirely new models (not all, of course) - but how do you rate, how do you compare: By their looks, by their acting, by the editing of a photoshoot or video - well, I'm still uncertain about this very interesting poll - and it deserves even more discussions at some new threads...
|
02-11-09 10:55am
|
Reply
530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Those feeds are mostly just meant as a "promiss" of something "extra" - when you join a site. A false and luring appetizer...
And for all those sites, I've joined over the years: Those feeds (if any) have been entirely worthless.
|
02-08-09 09:36am
|
Reply
531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
That one was easy: None.
All that artificial stuff is boring - well, maybe except if you consider a scene where a model talks to her toy exciting. I don't.
|
02-03-09 08:02am
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
For quite a lot of years: The only place I never got cheated is CCBill, can you believe it?
Second is Epoch where I do not THINK they did harm to my creditcard. Some of the others I've had troubles.
Anytime it's not CCBill, I take extra care.
Anybody here have any experience with Netcash?
|
01-31-09 08:33am
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
This is ALSO why it's fun to be here at PU - (quotation from The Squirrel):
" I've been looking at pictures of naked women since I was about 8 and spanked my first girl when I was ten"
Great lines there, bro...
|
01-28-09 08:21am
|
Reply
534
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
Addiction is not the word.
A hobby, an interest - and yes: enthusiasm, of course.
To be active here at PU indicates all above, but take a look at the amount of inputs from the ol' timers here (too): It's a bit like on and off. (this user included)
We all have periods where we're more active in the pornsearch/use, comments, replies and reviews - and some times less (active)- it all depends:
Too much for a long time - you might get bored - but
still most keep comming back again and again.
|
01-28-09 07:23am
|
Reply
535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Agree with Jay G: "The fun is the hunt"
And this user too sometimes (or mostly) gets bored after a few weeks of membership of most sites (because after that period you've been through most - maybe except sites like Videobox)....and oh, yes: quite a few of us are spoiled - and then again: they (paysites)want our money and in order to deliver, the sites got to do the same...
BTW: Good pol, Monahan.
|
01-24-09 07:35am
|
Reply
536
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Rarely!
Been member of Easynews constantly for over four years. And LSGmodels had this cheap offer $44 for a year - but I rarely visit the site - it's a boring site.
But sites like Nubiles, Teendreams, 1byday and a couple others I return to several times during a year.
|
01-24-09 02:41am
|
Reply
537
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
As a video-freak: Higher rez - and MORE - videos.
Some of the best sites have 2,3 og more daily video-updates (exclusive, licensed and non exclusive) - like 1Byday, Pix and video, Videobox and lets hope (I do) that the in many ways legendary Teendreams live up to their promises before last Christmas....more videos, Teendreams...we love them..
And a hope for an even better year for the very fine Nudolls - the best site that turned up in 2008 - I think.
|
01-14-09 10:04am
|
Reply
538
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I voted the six months...
In this kind of line it just seems impossible, that we (PUs) now and then NOT hit something thats been "kind of" up to debate before.
And again it may be a matter of a small diffenrence in a poll - and so what? As long as we keep polls alive and well in a mix of polls suggested by PUs or placed by TBP...
And like they say in the newspaper-bussiness: Readers sure have a short memory....and frankly - somtimes I think TBP is a little fast to reject a poll, just because the subject has been up earlier.
|
01-10-09 08:05am
|
Reply
539
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Things differs according to nationality, I guess.
I'd never consider Playboy as Porn - it's nudity - and nudity is not porn.
Porn is interaction - fucking, 69 or whatever - with two persons of different sex or same makes love/fucks in front of a camera (still or video).
|
01-08-09 08:14am
|
Reply
540
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
A poll that covers most of the things that keeps this user from getting involved.
DRM - well I guess no real PU will ever accept that again.
DOWNLOAD LIMITS - never really figured out why some sites tend to this - anyway it's a no-no..
HIGH PRICE - if a site got value for the money, ok - but high price also tends to scare a lot of users away - and why a high price? Probably greed!
FILES NOT ZIPPED - No way I'd join a site where they do not even bother to do zip for photo-files.
BAD REVIEWS - It all depends - how well founded the review is, details, man details - and finally opinions.
OTHER - Lousy feedback, not taking care of the difference in currency and man, what is very importend: Updates......
|
01-03-09 11:24am
|
Reply
541
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Does anyone notice, like williamj asks? Probably not - Only thing those changes can create is a bit confusion - but bottomline: we all know the names, after all... So: No problems here. (and BTW: those avatars are also kind of fun, aren't they?)
|
12-31-08 08:34am
|
Reply
542
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
NO WAY - simple as that!
|
12-23-08 05:04am
|
Reply
543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ok, maybe something like those tats are taking the make-up thing or dresses or furcoats further - man, it's kind of complicated...like women themselves...
|
12-21-08 02:32pm
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Just a serious meant reply in this matter - as elephant puts it:
"I see such cute girls spoil themselves with these ugly tats."
I could not agree more...well put.
And BTW: This seems to be the wish here - so why not have a "statement" (no, not a congregation, but anyway)) with "PUs against tatts"?
|
12-21-08 07:54am
|
Reply
545
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
I maybe old fashioned, but girls with a lot of tattoos really turns me OFF.
It seems to be a new trend - more and more models get first one tattoo, then another, then even more. Don't mind using faul language here: It looks like shit!
Now television even got programmes on how to tattoo your body in the "most decorative ways". Jeezz.. I remember when that kind of stuff were only for sailors.
Ok, one of my earlier girlsfriends had a small butterfly just above the pubic hair - that was some kind of sweet - but when a girl get big tattooes on breasts, arm, around the navel and some on their entire back, man - it's just ugly...
|
12-21-08 05:14am
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
The rather short history of this Forum at PU shows NO.
Thought about this again: Apart from a couple of facts (that siteowners have to join to go along - good thing and we have to keep up) - look at other issues:
We often see older threads comming up again and again. Why? Because PUs keeps comming back to some of the questions that seems importend - and have been a thread earlier. I do not find that redundant.
BTW: Good poll (and discussion)
|
12-17-08 10:37am
|
Reply
547
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Agree with badandy here - many threads can have somewhat similar content - BUT nevertheless it could "take the conversation in a different direction".
Well put!
So, yes: NO!
Keep it up, brothers! (and sisters)
|
12-17-08 09:11am
|
Reply
548
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Maybe once a week - or rather an average of about 4 or 5 in a month. Things do not go regular anyway - sometimes 2 or 3 in the same week and then a break in joining new sites.
I spend too much and am shaken almost every time the monthly credit-card overview drops in - but guess I'd rather save money elsewhere..
But it of course also depends on the flow of new quality-sites.
|
12-13-08 04:07am
|
Reply
549
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
What I'd appreciate is a more regular update on amount of videos at the sites - but guess it's almost hopeless since the amount of reviewed sites are well over 5000...
Still I consinder those site facts very importend before joining.
|
12-12-08 11:58am
|
Reply
550
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Toy-action mostly is ridiculous...
VERY few sites and VERY few models/girls are able to handle those toys in a manner where things are natural (videos).
Some is well done by a few models at Nubiles and again at some licensend stuff at Teendreams (licensend, I think).
Too many US-models/girls SEEMS like it's acting ALL the way - in an exaggrerated sort of style...and man, I do not blame the girls/models - rather the photografer/video-ditto.
|
12-09-08 12:12pm
|
