Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Denner (0)  

Feedback:   All (2775)  |   Reviews (120)  |   Comments (399)  |   Replies (2256)

Other:   Replies Received (1709)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 426-450 of 2256 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
426
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Got some favorites that I go to now and then and some maybe 4-6 times a year, like:
1ByDay, Pixandvideo (now: DDF and 21st Sextury), Twistys, Teendreams, Nubiles (not so much lately) - and a couple of other less frequent..
BUT times are changing - some of the 'good ol' sites' are getting worse - BTW: See my latest comment for 21st Sextury - someone else there at the moment??


02-18-10  06:42am

Reply
427
N/A Reply of badandy400's Poll

Guys - fellow PUs - what a lot of damn fine inputs here - and I really agree with all those words - summoned down to this:
We've got a great user community! and man, liked messmers:

'This is my second home!'

Cheers!


02-17-10  06:47am

Reply
428
N/A Reply of badandy400's Poll

And Oh, BTW: I'd really miss some great fellow PUs here!! - AND the guys at TBP - who can replace Khan, for one?
(Fine poll, badandy)


02-16-10  06:18am

Reply
429
N/A Reply of badandy400's Poll

Some 'old timers' here might not admit it - and again some will:
Like Jay G I find this place so great, that it'd be SAD if it was not around.

Do not mind to admit: I'm a total porn-freak - and since my steady job is behind me, I enjoy spending much time at both the search elsewhere and the exchange of views/reviews here at PU.

Of course there are some other review-sites - but any PU who's been surfing them got to agree:
None of them lives up to the value of benefits (and fun) you can gain in your porn-search as PU - and again of course TBP which is an indispensable part of the deal...
But why worry - TBP/PU will be here as long as we are...


02-16-10  05:54am

Reply
430
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes...but guess this is the best reason for trust-votes.

Some reviews - not that the short ones are more suspicious than the long ones - but lately we've had some extremely short reviews without any serious arguments - and a lot by the same - new - users - and I think:
Is this a joker or a friend of some owner/webmaster?

STILL: Keep in mind that some very trustworthy PUs make a lot of reviews - and they make some in (sorry, man what du you call it in english: Streams, waves or...?) - a lot in a short time.
Our trusted fellow PU Mbaya did so and does it now and then - makes a lot of reviews - does that create any problem? Does that make Mbaya (Mbaya just as an exampel) less trustworthy? NOT to me.
In the end it's the words/arguments in the review that keeps things straight...


02-14-10  10:04am

Reply
431
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not that I'll 'put down' this poll - but this is shallow - do not think you can put up a question like this.
SOME girls/women have had an urge at a times - to - by some chance to get close to another girl/woman - and maybe do sex/or close to once - also by curiosity. Does that make them bi-sexual - do not think so.

Was the many girls from the old hippie-time bisexual in flirting openly with other women - do not think so.
Real lesbians are far from the thought of 'bi-sexual'.
Talking about porn: Oh, yes - some models do NOT do hc/bg - but hc/gg - does that make them lesbians or even bi-sexual? Do not think so.....
So: No.


02-10-10  07:15am

Reply
432
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

I have this idea - maybe I'm naive - that today there's better medical check/control - or rather a lot of it - of pornmodels - for their own sake and the other model/models.
Especially when doing anal-stuff.
Guess history has shown different in many ways.
Do not mind watching porn with condoms - and actually, I can get a bit upset if I happen to see that anal stuff without....it's plain stupid (The blood-contact is too risky here) - and some of those latin models live a dangerous life.
Anal sex is the main reason for HIV in the gay world...


02-08-10  07:34am

Reply
433
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Well spoken - and apart from that - and maybe more for us PUs, I really dig this line:

'.......I think this ends up making porn more generic and also more stupider--think BangBros and you might understand what I'm getting at.'


02-05-10  11:51am

Reply
434
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

No - but still:
Us 'older' guys did not have this global netporn in our puberty (except for those 'girlie magazine' - the soft deal and sure, some more rare hc, too) - and I'm a bit gratefull for that.

I'm more concerned about the really young people now - concerned that all this porn (bless it, though) - can give young lads a somewhat wrong picture of love and sex ect.
In US you call it 'adult' - keep it that...


02-05-10  07:20am

Reply
435
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Not into uniforms - except: most kinds of lingerie!
But maybe lingerie is THE sex-uniform?? (LOL)


02-02-10  07:07am

Reply
436
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Never...at a small screen like that - and who will keep a cell phone with a 19" in the pocket...

01-31-10  07:15am

Reply
437
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Three items here: Viewing quality, use of space and download-time.
Guess everybody into videos want good viewing quality - but some sites/producers makes unnecessary large files - In The Crack, for one: 2-3 Gb for a 15-20 minutes clip. Crisp, for sure - BUT other producers can make the same viewing quality at much less: 300-600 Mb.
Even the ol' Twistys have started doing too large files (no need).

Nobody want to watch video-clips like they were ten years ago - but today 'crisp' is many things - and the HD-announcement does not always mean HD in that viewing quality...

When a favorite turns up, I always grab the top, but many are the times where I download for exampel that 1500kpbs AND the 3000 - and cannot tell no difference at the screen.

BTW: Good poll - and I hope some siteowners take a look..and consider modifying.


01-29-10  04:44am

Reply
438
N/A Reply of Colm4's Reply

We all got our preferences - but a boob-job would in no way keep me from searching/downloading material with favorite models/girls/women.
Actually some of those favorite models already had boob-jobs - and most are just great...


01-22-10  07:48am

Reply
439
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

Another hard/difficult one: I'll keep on - but maybe with less entusiasm. Like - an exampel - Julia Ann. She WAS great in the early days - she's still a knockout, but, yes, well....not so great anymore - maybe too much 'inflation'...
And oh, yes, RB: the cute Nina - man, it like pressing things for the last drop here..

Still I'll keep my old favorites in mind - and look closely, when new material comes up..
If she should die - I'll keep those videos/photosets at a safe place (external hd).

Yes, nice poll, BTW.


01-21-10  06:55am

Reply
440
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

Very few girls - in real life - like the taste/smell of cum.
And drinking it from a glass - well - even if it's a champagne-ditto - it's fake - and to this user close to disgusting. Or maybe rather like Drooler says: A stunt!

Some porn - most, alas - idolize that cum-deal - with girls/models wanting it in the mouth, face, eyes or whatever - but again - it's a stunt - and nowhere like real life...

But if it turns someone on, well, ok by me...


01-20-10  06:53am

Reply
441
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Do not bother me - even if I'm not interested in gay-material. Like Drooler - when I see the word 'gay' at a new site or review, I just move on.

And on other thing: What could be the next?
Move tranny, move fetish, move lez, move bizar...

NO, let it be!!!

BTW: It could be interesting to see some arguments from PUs who vote YES...


01-17-10  06:31am

Reply
442
N/A Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

New names, new tips are so welcome...Went browsing for Bianca Arden (small gorgeous blondes are great, agree!!)
Is it the same Bianca Arden as at DDF, FootsieBabes, Hornyeurosluts and even at RealityKings....?
She's a cute, sexy, petite blond!


01-15-10  07:37am

Reply
443
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Hard one and a good poll:
Do not find the new models - on a regular basis - have not been at MetArt (where they just keep comming) for a long time (video-freak).

- And it's a matter of luck - and of course good tips from PU. And EBI!
The hc-models come in dozens - but the sc-models seems more rare.
So: 2-4 every two weeks - and the dazzling ones - way too rare.


01-15-10  05:55am

Reply
444
N/A Reply of Khan's Reply

I missed/forgot that. Did not notice any logos.
But GREAT: ASACP is it here! AND TBP/PU is sponsor.
Thanks!


01-13-10  10:22am

Reply
445
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Another view about the subject:

There's NO reason why PU can not go forward in fighting child-pornography.

Actually, I think it'd be a fine deal to make it a 'landmark' - not sure about the right word in English - but that PUs stand up and states that WE all are very much against child-pornography - and make it a point here!
What about some PU-logo against child-pornography???

Well, some may find this site strange, non-Christian or whatever - but one thing for sure: Protect the children - and let the adults - and ONLY adults do their own thing...


01-13-10  08:51am

Reply
446
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

BTW: I think it's great that we PUs AND TBP are active against child-pornography - it's nothing less than disgusting/horrible.

FIGHT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!

In some cases it can be hard to tell if some teen-stuff is on the edge. Exampel: The first Little Lupe-material seemed close to illegal. BUT it was NOT.

Experienced PUs are able to see the difference - but if any doubt: Stay Away - and this user would not mind contacting the local authorities if I stumble over anything that seems too obvious...

But, Thank God, I do not think we'll ever see a regular pornsite with that kind of filth - those people hide...


01-13-10  06:00am

Reply
447
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

I second that: Ze Droolha is 'our' porn-librarian, for sure...
He should be proud of that - and the rest of us can just benefit from it - and thank this fellow PU.
BTW: How does one ever get used to searching for hours for a model with a hell of a lot of akas...easy, it's part of the fun - in some ways.


01-05-10  06:00am

Reply
448
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

Yes, search can be quite difficult/frustrating - AND the same goes for the some models with vast amounts of akas...

01-05-10  12:51am

Reply
449
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

Getting tired of all those facials - mostly with the guy jerking off...
Chest - or tits - and ass/back - both are great - and some clips even have the girl doing the finish at the tits/chest-scenes - great!
But, ok - IF the girl is doing the finish at facial it's fine, too...


01-03-10  07:31am

Reply
450
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

In the 'old days' watching porn on hotel-tv while on a business-travel - sure. But not anymore.... that is part of the past...

12-27-09  11:54am


Shown : 426-450 of 2256 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.5 seconds.