| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1376
|
Video Angels.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan - yes, bro - first of all I guess it's a one month site ONLY - the updates seems really slow, so..
The quality of videos are VERY different throughout the site - I've not been through all yet - first I go for my favorites. But compared to some "top-sites" you got to be prepared for some videos in average/low quality, alas.
Still I rate it the 80 because of a handfull of more fine videos with those "old timers" - but again: compared to "better sites" the quality is very much unstable - I'd say half is fine/ok...
But finally from one Fiona Cooper-fan to another: You get the girls/models from that time - and man, some of those videos of the models mentioned in my review is a revival - not crisp in viewing quality, but you can live with it...for most of them.
And oh, btw - the photo-deal is very slim (14 sets) and not worth much...
|
02-22-09 12:11pm
|
Reply
1377
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, I guess it's the shower-scene with Luciana at 1by your're talking about.
And what I recollect is that the scene with Luciana from january 22 (the lingeri-set) is about the same.
Concerning "replays", "reediting" or whatever at 1by, I got the same notion at the moment - never thought that this site would get tiresome..
Ending my membership this term - and sure, I got the same thing here: It'll take a while before returning...
And, alas - the same goes for Teendreams.
Found some rather special stuff on some british site I'd asked Khan to put on TBP - for a later review. It's mostly with some wellknown ( in Europe anyway) uk-models from the 1990th...WELL, at least it's something new even if it's ten og 15 years old... be back..
Denner
|
02-22-09 05:53am
|
Reply
1378
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I agree to some extend (there's fine licensed stuff at Teendreams once in a while) - just getting tired of finding similar stuff on different sites - and that's kind of paying for the same thing more than once..
|
02-21-09 04:00pm
|
Reply
1379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Not any of the four answers really covers my opinion here.
The closest is:
"Only if it has good reviews"
But, man - a site that charge $35 or more really has to have something extra.
There are on a very few sites like that for a charge that high - and even if some of those has a content, I've really been looking for, I'll still hesitate - and probably wait til the site grows and/or till I feel I can afford it - compared and along with other memberships...
|
02-21-09 11:13am
|
Reply
1380
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
ByteMaster's Comment
Generally I certainly agree with with our new fellow PU, ByteMaster.
The definition of the concept: EXCLUSIVE is getting to a point where things seems to be influenced by a still worse economy in the way of experiencing new AND socalled "exclusive" material on a lot of sites.
We're all seeing more and more licensed stuff on TOO many sites. Licensed material may be all right to a certain degree, but in the final aspect it means, that we users join sites where we can risk spending our money twice (or more) for the same stuff...
We've been around this subject before, but since ByteMaster brings it up, I think its a good idea to mention to the site-owners, that this policy is or can be a matter of some sort of inflation - if sites keep up this policy, it'll problably result in loosing a lot of PUs and others as costumers...
|
02-21-09 11:02am
|
Reply
1381
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Second Squirrel - could not think of it differently - this is THE place to shout out loud if a site mistreat their obligations to any user - the more serious and relevant warnings we get, the better.......
And Anth: you got every right to be pissed!
|
02-12-09 08:28am
|
Reply
1382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Man, this is a hard one, Drooler...
I never pay much attention to ratings at a specific site - especially ratings of models.
Mainly because I almost disagree or in too many sites there are no model-rating at all. If I'm not mistaken, a lot goes for scene-ratings.
It's difficult to rate a certain model, in general - we all got different taste
- even if there are some "top-models" we all can agree upon.
Another item is: why do some sites skip those ratings?
Maybe because we all got our favorites - and after that there are some new models - take Nubiles, for instance.
That site keeps comming up with entirely new models (not all, of course) - but how do you rate, how do you compare: By their looks, by their acting, by the editing of a photoshoot or video - well, I'm still uncertain about this very interesting poll - and it deserves even more discussions at some new threads...
|
02-11-09 10:55am
|
Reply
1383
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Thanks, bro - Danni is still somewhat of an institution - I've allways thought, though - that their preview lacks a lot......and again maybe that's why old/former members keep re-joining - just to see what has happend...
|
02-09-09 11:16am
|
Reply
1384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Those feeds are mostly just meant as a "promiss" of something "extra" - when you join a site. A false and luring appetizer...
And for all those sites, I've joined over the years: Those feeds (if any) have been entirely worthless.
|
02-08-09 09:36am
|
Reply
1385
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Well the question was to all here at PU, sorry if it was not so clear (I think so, anyway), but I try again in my highschool (scandinavian)english:
VideoBox has 2 different prices for sign-up: Standard resolution: 9.95 og DVD-resolution: 17.95.
BUT: Signing-up for the DVD-resolution does generally NOT give you better videos than the standard-resolution - in this users opinion and - what it seems - quite a few others.
Hope it's more clear now...
|
02-08-09 07:56am
|
Reply
1386
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Comment
Once again we got a PU to comment on the strage things with the quality of videos from VideoBox - thanks for bringing it up again, Trashman.
For a long time and during many join-ups I've had this problem with VideoBox: Oh, I'd like to spend an extra few dollars to get the socalled HD-stuff, but every time I get dissapointed.
The reason is as stated by Trashman: the resolution in socalled HD (or WMVDVD) is NOT better than ordinary socalled WMVHigh - both at times I went for the older stuff and the new videos...
So: Is there no difference at all and is it just a scam to take more money from PUs and others....?
|
02-08-09 07:41am
|
Reply
1387
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yes, bro - it's "nice" without all that pseudo-interview-stuff. And sure, forgot that importend issue about the missing zip - was too busy browsing all those fine videos....
|
02-08-09 05:14am
|
Reply
1388
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Guess you're - very - right about the videos. My score is related to me beeing hook on videos - and here ATK lacks some - the amount and girl-quality of photosets alone is probably worth a better score...you can browse forever and forever...
The same goes for Karups, BTW - This user finds that site a bit better, all around..
|
02-06-09 07:43am
|
Reply
1389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
That one was easy: None.
All that artificial stuff is boring - well, maybe except if you consider a scene where a model talks to her toy exciting. I don't.
|
02-03-09 08:02am
|
Reply
1390
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mantas's Comment
There are still problems with a few sites in the question of regional pricing. But I never had any of those problems here in Scandinavia with VideoBox - just for the record...
|
02-01-09 10:55am
|
Reply
1391
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Just a hint, elephant: the sweet Nata - aka a lot of names - appears on quite a few sites. But never hc. The best stuff I've found with this doll is still the videos at Nubiles....
|
02-01-09 10:52am
|
Reply
1392
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, bro - plain and simple: don't even waste the dollar and the clicks joining. The photos are also still the same old standard and the quality nothing to speak off....
|
02-01-09 10:46am
|
Reply
1393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
For quite a lot of years: The only place I never got cheated is CCBill, can you believe it?
Second is Epoch where I do not THINK they did harm to my creditcard. Some of the others I've had troubles.
Anytime it's not CCBill, I take extra care.
Anybody here have any experience with Netcash?
|
01-31-09 08:33am
|
Reply
1394
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Review
Now, this seems to be an honest and well founded review by a new PU - short, but "modest".
I almost agree with the score - and certainly with the arguments.
Welcome to a new user - read his reviews for MetArt and Femjoy.
Not too many words, but well chosen.
Maybe we all could do things a bit shorter in our reviews - it's not always necesarry to make a novel out of a review - sometimes I get lost along the way. (And by all means: some of my own reviews have been far too long, too).
Instead:
Short news you can use...
PUs interested in the particular sites can always go back and ask fellow PUs for futher details..
Gotta give this new user a thumb-up.
|
01-28-09 10:04am
|
Reply
1395
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
It may be worth to try and check out for TBP...
|
01-28-09 09:49am
|
Reply
1396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
This is ALSO why it's fun to be here at PU - (quotation from The Squirrel):
" I've been looking at pictures of naked women since I was about 8 and spanked my first girl when I was ten"
Great lines there, bro...
|
01-28-09 08:21am
|
Reply
1397
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I plead guilty...been lurkin' here several times and waiting for two thing:
1) The updates
2) The conversion-rates to get straight.
So I look for news about this site, too...
|
01-28-09 07:27am
|
Reply
1398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
Addiction is not the word.
A hobby, an interest - and yes: enthusiasm, of course.
To be active here at PU indicates all above, but take a look at the amount of inputs from the ol' timers here (too): It's a bit like on and off. (this user included)
We all have periods where we're more active in the pornsearch/use, comments, replies and reviews - and some times less (active)- it all depends:
Too much for a long time - you might get bored - but
still most keep comming back again and again.
|
01-28-09 07:23am
|
Reply
1399
|
Best DVDz
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Tnanks for that tip!!
Since it seems like you have some knowledge of Caballero and their "Swedish Erotica" - do you remember a petite brunette by the name of Barbie or Candy - her hair was almost ravenblack and she had this strange, but cute little nose and small tits with rather speciel nipples?
Cannot find her at the site in mention or elsewhere.
She was a knock-out in some of my first encounters with 8mm filmporn in the early 1980s..
|
01-24-09 09:50am
|
Reply
1400
|
Suze Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Fine tip and fine review.
The review speaks for itself, but the tip about this new Suze-site is great - I tend to some of the classics more and more - and when you get the hole Suze-deal for less than $ 10 - it sure seems worth it.
BTW: Yes, Raquel Darian - still hunting for her stuff..she was just top.
|
01-24-09 07:57am
|
