| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
And Oh, BTW: I'd really miss some great fellow PUs here!! - AND the guys at TBP - who can replace Khan, for one?
(Fine poll, badandy)
|
02-16-10 06:18am
|
Reply
952
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Some 'old timers' here might not admit it - and again some will:
Like Jay G I find this place so great, that it'd be SAD if it was not around.
Do not mind to admit: I'm a total porn-freak - and since my steady job is behind me, I enjoy spending much time at both the search elsewhere and the exchange of views/reviews here at PU.
Of course there are some other review-sites - but any PU who's been surfing them got to agree:
None of them lives up to the value of benefits (and fun) you can gain in your porn-search as PU - and again of course TBP which is an indispensable part of the deal...
But why worry - TBP/PU will be here as long as we are...
|
02-16-10 05:54am
|
Reply
953
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the update ect., exotics
And totally agree about her eyes, lips and hair - and as a long time fan, too - I've always loved her 'sweet ass'.
Anyway she not the first model to gain and then again loose weight - still I'm a bit surprised about the info on the Zoliboy-clips - that they're from 2004 - did not see that.
As a (no-no-member in relation to TBP/PU of Easynews) I've found quite a few rare clips of Eve - always on the hunt for her material - old and new - she's just a queen of nudes - and hate to admit it - not a great fan of her old hc/bg - even if they are a bit 'collectors item' - except maybe the first at Pixandvideo (the bathroom-scene - here she's both sexy and sweet)
When I get back to 21st Sextury (and I sure will, if it keeps on like today (maybe the best site around, right now)) - I'll look for the scene with her and Sophie Moone........Yup! - Eve is just GREAT.
|
02-16-10 05:43am
|
Reply
954
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
toynoise's Review
Here we got this site/network send to the grave - at PU, anyway, thanks - good job, toynoise...
They probably only survive because of the name - a name that might appeal to under aged kids doing secret porn-browsing...
|
02-15-10 06:20am
|
Reply
955
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I certainly did not know about those aspects - Thanks, atrapat for this fine warning!
|
02-14-10 11:16am
|
Reply
956
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes...but guess this is the best reason for trust-votes.
Some reviews - not that the short ones are more suspicious than the long ones - but lately we've had some extremely short reviews without any serious arguments - and a lot by the same - new - users - and I think:
Is this a joker or a friend of some owner/webmaster?
STILL: Keep in mind that some very trustworthy PUs make a lot of reviews - and they make some in (sorry, man what du you call it in english: Streams, waves or...?) - a lot in a short time.
Our trusted fellow PU Mbaya did so and does it now and then - makes a lot of reviews - does that create any problem? Does that make Mbaya (Mbaya just as an exampel) less trustworthy? NOT to me.
In the end it's the words/arguments in the review that keeps things straight...
|
02-14-10 10:04am
|
Reply
957
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Reply
well, easy to say - that deal seems quite complicated - and not without risk - as far as former PUs have stated - but I'm a complete novice here...so any fast way around it????
|
02-14-10 09:42am
|
Reply
958
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
Try to mail them - they may have a secondary billing-co....like Epoch, for one - where you get the regular price without the CCBill-scam... (do not remember with this site, though)
AGAIN: To all european users: The most notorious in this currency-problem/scam is CCBill - so if you try to join a site - and it's the same amount in Euros at CCBill - always mail the site and ask for another way to pay - MOST times you get lucky...
|
02-14-10 05:24am
|
Reply
959
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
'allo, 'allo..Ze Droolah
At least I got a fast answer (In the Crack): They were working on it - that currency deal - but I was welcome to pay in cash or money order!
No way I'll send cash in an envelope - and a money order to Canada would exceed the $47 - a lot, so.... In The Crack is on hold.
|
02-13-10 05:21am
|
Reply
960
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Well founded review here - but the score?
Still: no matter - what matters is this accurate statement:
'Anal or not, one issue is that they really seem to focus on quantity over quality. Some of the videos are really bad.'
Cannot agree more - VideoBox seems to have this deal in my mind: Give the suckers a LOT - video-QUALITY - what's that?
|
02-11-10 07:05am
|
Reply
961
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not that I'll 'put down' this poll - but this is shallow - do not think you can put up a question like this.
SOME girls/women have had an urge at a times - to - by some chance to get close to another girl/woman - and maybe do sex/or close to once - also by curiosity. Does that make them bi-sexual - do not think so.
Was the many girls from the old hippie-time bisexual in flirting openly with other women - do not think so.
Real lesbians are far from the thought of 'bi-sexual'.
Talking about porn: Oh, yes - some models do NOT do hc/bg - but hc/gg - does that make them lesbians or even bi-sexual? Do not think so.....
So: No.
|
02-10-10 07:15am
|
Reply
962
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks, mbaya!
|
02-09-10 03:09pm
|
Reply
963
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I have this idea - maybe I'm naive - that today there's better medical check/control - or rather a lot of it - of pornmodels - for their own sake and the other model/models.
Especially when doing anal-stuff.
Guess history has shown different in many ways.
Do not mind watching porn with condoms - and actually, I can get a bit upset if I happen to see that anal stuff without....it's plain stupid (The blood-contact is too risky here) - and some of those latin models live a dangerous life.
Anal sex is the main reason for HIV in the gay world...
|
02-08-10 07:34am
|
Reply
964
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Well spoken - and apart from that - and maybe more for us PUs, I really dig this line:
'.......I think this ends up making porn more generic and also more stupider--think BangBros and you might understand what I'm getting at.'
|
02-05-10 11:51am
|
Reply
965
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
Disappointed too!
But also because MPL does so many videos/sets outdoor - been a member on and off for years, and it's getting worse.
MPL has a great selection of new and some almost exclusive models - they try to make the sets/videos sexy, but still way too much 'art'. - and that maybe 75 % of those videos/sets are made outdoors does not make it any better.
We've had that outdoor/indoor discussion before, but it's still a major item - most people (PUs anyway according to earlier threads) prefer the indoor with a little more erotica than art, so...
|
02-05-10 09:00am
|
Reply
966
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
All cleared up - my mistake....
Cheers!
|
02-05-10 08:22am
|
Reply
967
|
La Zona Modelos
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Guess you are right here, PP - would not bet against it... LOL.
Still it could be 'nice' to get a comment from the webmaster - also because I rather like that site - is this the future or what?
|
02-05-10 08:19am
|
Reply
968
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Reply
Fine info, adrenalinrush - thanks for heads up, here!
|
02-05-10 08:10am
|
Reply
969
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, Capn - a bit strange, that this somewhat major Co. keep the low quality-standard of videos.....
BTW: You say ATK about this Karup's-site - as I see it at TBP: Karup's and ATK are too different companies - or do you have info that they are the same - if so - it's interesting....
|
02-05-10 07:28am
|
Reply
970
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
No - but still:
Us 'older' guys did not have this global netporn in our puberty (except for those 'girlie magazine' - the soft deal and sure, some more rare hc, too) - and I'm a bit gratefull for that.
I'm more concerned about the really young people now - concerned that all this porn (bless it, though) - can give young lads a somewhat wrong picture of love and sex ect.
In US you call it 'adult' - keep it that...
|
02-05-10 07:20am
|
Reply
971
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
EVE - BTW:
Just downloaded some new vids/sets with Eve (DDF) - and something strikes me ( and please do not get 'pissed' - as I know how big a fan you are) - but like other models Eve is getting older - and with grace - she's been at it for a long time.
BUT she certainly seems to be gaining weight - at her cute butt (only) - I know this is almost blasphemy: still it's getting somewhat bigger....?
|
02-03-10 07:02am
|
Reply
972
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not into uniforms - except: most kinds of lingerie!
But maybe lingerie is THE sex-uniform?? (LOL)
|
02-02-10 07:07am
|
Reply
973
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Never...at a small screen like that - and who will keep a cell phone with a 19" in the pocket...
|
01-31-10 07:15am
|
Reply
974
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
JuicyMe's Reply
Hey JuicyMe
Well, your're right, too - been a member of Twistys countless times - AND it's a up and down with the exclusive contra the non....still a lot here go back again and again.
|
01-31-10 07:12am
|
Reply
975
|
Wild Porn Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Vanessa's Reply
Thanks!
I've was just somewhat surprised here - with the score compared to the rest of the review - and the PU-review/comments.
Great that you guys deal with these kinds of inputs....and reply the way you do...
Cheers!
Denner
|
01-30-10 10:54am
|
