| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Sorry, but could NOT resist another/final reply:
Should WE - paying customers - thread lightly/cautious just not to criticize some paysites for their politics...
Man, where's the world coming to, if so?
|
10-29-10 08:35am
|
Reply
702
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Well, ok. Khan. But how was I - or anybody else for that matter - to know those special deals - or rather NO deals?
I guess all of us here appreciate when good deals are made via TBP - but honestly.......I still think this one "stinks" - do not want to cause problems for your/our site......so be that it.
BTW: I also got that two-ways deal via mail after being member of MetArt - and via TBP, again BTW.
But ok, Khan - I'll cool down - for now - in the interest of all here - still I do NOT think that a deal like this should pass us by - it's not deserved...
|
10-29-10 08:14am
|
Reply
703
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
"The end of a love affair...." - I really like that one, lk2 - and by Golly or what ever it is in the English language.......they deserve it!!!!!
Nobody mess with PU. (which means us)
Bottomline - they DO mess with TBP/PU here - a stupid move by those guys....
|
10-29-10 07:45am
|
Reply
704
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Bottomline: Guess those people do not know/realize what they are missing - not getting TBP/PU into their deal......well, f... them, then!
|
10-29-10 07:42am
|
Reply
705
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Got the same notion - and even replied to PP's comment.
I'd just say: weird..........'not authorized to offer that deal form our site' - our site means TBP, I guess.
Are these guys nuts?????????????
Both MetArt and Nubiles get a TREMENDOUS feedback here.......something seems very wrong!!!
|
10-29-10 06:35am
|
Reply
706
|
N/A
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Yes....Puma Swede, sorry.
|
10-28-10 02:06pm
|
Reply
707
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I confess.........put my vote on Janet Mason - not because it's the first on the list - but because I've follow Janet Mason as one of the few milfs (mayby except from, oh, yes: Julia Ann).... for years - since she started her own site long time back....was a member a couple of times then..
I think Janet Mason has all the best of a milf (weird word, btw - why not just: MATURE).
JM is cute - even if not a teen - and she's maybe the most sexy mature model at presence - but alas: she varies a lot in weight, hairstyle ect.......anyway she's probably the MILF (Mother I Like to Fuck) as numero uno...
|
10-28-10 06:53am
|
Reply
708
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Damn, joined Nubiles a couple of weeks ago - and I could have had MetArt for free - but that's life, LOL...
BTW: This comment is a pretty good example why 'Comment' should be used by non-members of the site/sites in question, too. (Remember the poll?)
|
10-27-10 11:37pm
|
Reply
709
|
Teen Burg
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Fine/great review, lk2 - and I got to say VERY thorough!
Been at Teen Burg and other of the US Tony Bucks-sites at least a couple of times earlier - one thing, though: I'd never forget that the material is based on providers - a lot the same as other so called easteuro pornsites, like TeenSexMoves ect. from that Cyrups Co. - but still Teen Burg has a lot to offer in cute models - AND I quite agree on your score....
BTW: Really dig that: "This is the town where I should have grown up" - even if it's only a dream - and in an easteuro place/country where most porn production is now controlled by the mob...But we, PUs - can still enjoy those cute models far away from the dirt... LOL.
|
10-26-10 08:54am
|
Reply
710
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Rather fine hint to our new PU about reviews in general - that's the spirit - some help or guindiance - and not scorn - well spoken, dracken.
|
10-26-10 07:44am
|
Reply
711
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Well, squirrel - that navigation is certainly a matter of opinion, grant you that. But as Karup's PC was one of my earlier sites ever to join and been coming back now and then for some time, I maybe learned to like/relate to that navigation - still think it's rather simple - but ok, it's probably mostly a matter of "being used to"...
BTW: I do not find that KPC has more close-ups than others - maybe the opposite, even.
But anyway thanks for the thumbs-up...and appreciate the ping-pong about reviews. We need that here.....
|
10-26-10 07:37am
|
Reply
712
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
In school - but certainly not by teachers - but by the talk, bragging (not very serious) and gossip with the mates/pals - at an age of 12-14 or so.
Then came "porn" - not real porn, but all those girlie-magazines...
And finally after dreaming some years met an English girl who seduced me in a summer at 16 years of age - and I stared in disbelief as she gave me the first bj ever - and from then on: I was the man of the world...LOL
|
10-26-10 07:29am
|
Reply
713
|
Eve Angel Official
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Just another request for advice/hint from the EVE-expert, please:
Just went through the preview of Eve Angel Official - most trailers here are followed by annoying music, or rather muzak - what about the real deal of the vids?
AND: What vids is most recommended according to these fine words:
"She's back to the hip-grinding, body jerking orgasms that made her arguably the most believable and best solo model....."?
All vids got their own name/title, it seems.
Thanks..
|
10-25-10 09:03am
|
Reply
714
|
Eve Angel Official
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Have not seen the latest material of Eve, yet - but according to this from exotics:
"As far as the new shoots go, there is marked improvement in Eve's performances in the newer videos. She's back to the hip-grinding, body jerking orgasms that made her arguably the most believable and best solo model."
........I better get back to her, the sooner, the better...
Thanks for the update!
|
10-25-10 08:27am
|
Reply
715
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Another good point from PP - about making comments without beeing a member: Navigation in the preview......that navigation and result means a lot in the decision to join or not.
|
10-25-10 07:35am
|
Reply
716
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Comments are a lot different than reviews.
Reviews should only be based on membership, whereas comments can be useful if you as a non-member discovers changes of content, price, update, irregularities in general ect.
News from previews can be useful....not everybody checks out all previews, all the time, la, la, la...
|
10-24-10 07:59am
|
Reply
717
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Damn fine review, GCode - had my eyes on this site earlier - and without this review I'd never stand a chance to get just some idea of the site in general through the rather confusing preview.....thumbs up!!!!
|
10-23-10 08:46am
|
Reply
718
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Funny: I would have suggested tangub and lk2 to take a look at NU Dolls (too/instead) - but that site is ALSO down for the same reason.....
That caught my attention - since both have quite similar style (NOT the exactly same vids and pix and not the same company, according to TBP) - but still...
Anyway, tangub and lk2 - when "they" are up again - take a look at that NU Dolls - if you like FM Teens....
|
10-22-10 07:31am
|
Reply
719
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
Just an update to my reply:
I agree with PP and RustyJ that a bad navigation is strict concerning squirrels low score in this case. BUT thats his opinion (and I certainly respect that) - even if we/some do not agree on the number...
BUT I think it's essential that someone put a serious question mark here about the entire navigations-system/design build at this (former) good ol' site/network..... they NEED to make new changes....
|
10-22-10 07:21am
|
Reply
720
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Well, yes - maybe all above....it differs - and to the older guys here with longer marriages: We all got our fantasies - and the inner eye never put you down, does it?
|
10-22-10 07:12am
|
Reply
721
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
Even though Pix and Video - and the 21. Sextury sites in general NOW has some very crisp material, very nice models (not a lot of new ones, though) I follow squirrel quite a bit along the way...
Never, Never got used to the new navigation in the whole deal - the entire network - mildly put: it's MESSY........Ok, time moves on and changes has to come - in this case compared to the old/former Pix and Video.
But again - this user, too - think they made a mess out of it - and oh, yes - squirrel: they should get another website-designer to redo the whole deal...
Do not want to comment on your score - I'm sure you got your reason...
And bottom line: Well spoken!
|
10-22-10 06:51am
|
Reply
722
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
BTW - the poll is good - at least it reminded me - once more - to take a look at some new/newer PUs reviews - and I voted - but please count out my votes here concerning raffles....(to be voting right now for scores would be hypocritical)....
|
10-19-10 06:00am
|
Reply
723
|
Playboy's All Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Well, pat362 - did not run into problems earlier when joining that Playboy site with "Fresh Faces", "Busty Babes" ect. - DID in fact get out via net-cancel in some way. (Thanks for the concern, anyway).
BUT they got over 60 sites and some of the 'main' or larger sites seems to have that problem - still. So I was just wondering - and I'd probably never join a site where I go on/pay via net and have to cancel via phone..And THAT is definitely a problem for members (and stupid of that ICS.Inc. Playboy company)
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=17
|
10-19-10 05:46am
|
Reply
724
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
NO. Never thought that trust ratings would earn you special points for the raffle deal.
On the contrary - the trust deals are something special that is supposed to be for the common good here.
Do not even believe that trust ratings should have any influence on those raffle tickets - at all.
1) If I read a good review from a new PU, I'll look out for the second and third - and then consider the trust.
2) We got some lousy/suspicious reviews now and then, but I'd NOT give them a NO TRUST the first time - give them a chance - if it's repeatedly, it could be different, but I guess Khan or others would eliminate them.
|
10-18-10 06:15am
|
Reply
725
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Get those ads about enlargement as pop-ups now and then...but generally - does anybody believe in that hoax? .....those ads are just in the same league as 'the loose weight' ads........just bull...and the FTC will probably never get to the bottom of this...
I'll NOT quote JFK......but some folks are too naive...
|
10-16-10 07:44am
|
