| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
It looks strange to this user...
All reviews posted the same day within a couple of hours??
|
10-02-11 01:00am
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
In need of "other" - I go for Spent too much on it.
But:
The main mistakes over the years had been joining/paying for too many site that turned out to be big disappointments..
|
09-30-11 12:12am
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A lot of times.....a lot.
(But not in the last 8-10 years - ok, twice in that period)
Especially between spouses and sometimes during ok/fine relationships, too.
Well, it's quite personal, but again we're all anonymous..
BUT:
I have had some GREAT times, with great sex - and by all means - some/few serious downers with bad/not so good chemistry with the girl.
Thinking back, and I do - I can still get exited remembering some of the REALLY good times whit some very fine "ladies of the night" - thought it was mostly during work hours.
Then the whole massage parlor scene can be very different in Europe from the US. Here it was mostly very relaxed and generally a pleasant atmosphere..
I still remember and get exited about 3,4 or 5 of those girls - some I visited more than once......ok...not today, "but those were the days"...LOL
|
09-27-11 08:29am
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
In mid 1960th - got the first magazines with nudes/semi nudes......WHAT an experience!!!
Kept on hunting down pix with nudes together with some friends - we were all in the teens - and WOW - what fun/delight/pleasure it was with those girly magazines.
They also had SOME real Scandinavian PORNOGRAPHY at that time - but it was somewhat weird and "unreal" due to bad stories/bad photoshoots ect......Then came the first "Swedish Erotica" - nothing Swedish about that, but entirely US-productions.........and since then, well - you all know the history...
|
09-25-11 11:14am
|
Reply
380
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Thanks - great to get a response so fast from a WM... and: unlike those sets/vids offered at sites like Teendreams - it's good to hear, that the main site itself has much better quality...
BUT: WHY? - at all offer that low down quality vids/sets in license that make users think: That Viv Thomas deal is not worth it???
|
09-21-11 08:39am
|
Reply
381
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Hope you can clear this up....
There GOT to be a difference between the main Viv Thomas-site - and the one you gain access to via various sites, Teendreams as one.
The vids - via Teendreams - are almost horrible/blurred in quality and 3:4. But seen some trailers from Viv Thomas in 1280x720 (I think it was) - and in great quality...
Guess that's the "Very High Quality"?
And if so....great! And is that only for newer vids?
|
09-21-11 06:10am
|
Reply
382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
graymane....nothing odd about that poll.....doing some thinking (yes, it's still possible, LOL)..it's very clear - not the answers, but the question......
Like Lee Van Cleef asked Clint Eastwood in "For A Few Dollars More":
- Is the question indiscreet?
And he got this in return:
- No, but the answer might be.
Still, I'd go for:
Religious anathema........and then again "guilt" - but that's probably for the young ones.
Manholelover...The UK may still be suffering from the Victorian times...we remember also stories about the Suffragettes that was not only freedom for women, but freedom from the ultra conservative points of view, the church, that House of Lords, you mentions and the general old fashioned way of "British thinking"...Oh, it's better now - but get closer to the rest of Europe......even if we probably got some of the same amount of hypocrisy in some ways
|
09-19-11 08:54am
|
Reply
383
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Guess it was this:
"Details: content count hasn't changed since March, 2010."
Got to learn to look at that "Content Updates"......
Thanks!
|
09-19-11 06:59am
|
Reply
384
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Not too high - not too low...
Guess the cybertoad 85 is - somewhat - fair. The site is an old timer, for sure - and does/has done a lot of good over the years.
Still my main cons here af a vids fan - and ONLY this as a vids fan: Those moving pictures (vids) are getting more and more repetitive - the same editing/style over and over again - a bit like Digital Desire..
|
09-19-11 06:52am
|
Reply
385
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Thanks for the review and heads up on this one, elephant...
It certainly seems like the site has grown a lot better since I gave it a 65...in January 2010.
The material, the quality seems to have improved a lot since then - the vids quality, too.
Still, I'm not crazy about the Co. - from Holland. The price first and then the fact that some of their site have the same content. They ought to come up with a general network deal - not that it'll make much difference according to the content of their 14 sites listed - but a network price would be fair (it's not cheap):
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=1527
|
09-19-11 06:43am
|
Reply
386
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, I like that "zombie" site input. That suits it well. Teenrotica is nowhere near "downright lousy" - maybe except for the vids - but I have rally enjoyed quite a few of the pix sets - BUT: with no more updates..."Hasta la vista, baby" - have already canceled rebill.....
|
09-19-11 06:24am
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It COULD be fun to watch some of those models we all know from sites...
But again: Not today - if I was 20-25 and go with the buddies - at around 60 - I'd feel strange - an old geezer - porn has become more private at older age.
BTW:
There are a lot of those "conventions" or erotik messe here in Europe - one link, for fun:
http://www.eros-amore.at/
Sorry - not in English
|
09-17-11 07:11am
|
Reply
388
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Within 2 hours I got a reply from the long time webmaster, Andrea with an alternative link...it's Epoch AND the price is the $19.95 in Europe.
Pretty good.. Andrea has alway been fast with a response.
And: Just joined
|
09-16-11 03:10pm
|
Reply
389
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Been a member several times - and each time I wrote the webmaster and got an alternative billing co. to get that $ 19.95 price - and did. But it's quite some time ago.
Think I'm going to try again - that site had and/or has a lot to offer - got to think about that reading yours and messmers inputs here, so...thanks
|
09-16-11 01:06pm
|
Reply
390
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
BTW:
Kudos or not - the site still got regional billing.....
So for Europeans it's not $19.95 - but around $27.
|
09-16-11 12:56pm
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nada...first not entirely sure what it really is - apart from some students getting together during college, university ect. ....as seen in some movies.
And guess it's much an American deal...is it like "living in a fraternity house"?
Not much of that in Europe - not now or in my time (centuries ago, LOL)at the University in Copenhagen. But it seems like a fine and fun way to spend time with mates and getting a touch of social life after "leaving home" - is that it???
But in connection with PU, like Monahan asks: Why?
|
09-15-11 06:56am
|
Reply
392
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
First - take your time to go through the MANY reviews from other PUs - and the one from TBP - guess you'll find a lot of answers here..
Photos are top-quality in my opinion though not the big pix fan.
BUT: What strikes me as a member here a many times - on and off - are a couple of items concerning vids:
1) By all means: top viewing quality (the larger file, the better quality)
2) A - sad - tendency - to focus too much on close-up - both soft and h/c. I really miss some of the earlier full body/posing/strip.
3) And yes, anal has more and more focus here - too much for my taste (too).
|
09-13-11 05:43am
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Well put, graymane:..........."I like'm movin'"
What can I say, just:
Same here!
|
09-12-11 07:54am
|
Reply
394
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
FINE review, dracken. You really get around the issues here - thumbs up.
Never forget the best vid I've ever seen with Anabella/Anabell:
http://www.pornteengirl.com/model/anabell.html
It came from this site....
|
09-11-11 08:52am
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
95% vids in my stash - but still very fond of my pixset stash, too....
My personal reason:
Grew up with pix only (magazines) - in the teens and a little later on - no vids where really available.
Then we got 8 mm and then betamax, then VHS and so on.
But seeing some of the quality vids in todays standard is almost amazing....so...yes, "live pictures", LOL.
|
09-11-11 08:42am
|
Reply
396
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
If they really stopped updating in 2009 this should be verified and informed at TBP...
|
09-10-11 08:09am
|
Reply
397
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
I'm not very tech about pix - but the sets (the large size) I've downloaded says:
2000x1338x24b
Guess that 24b is bits?
Hope that helps!
Or maybe Drooler sees this - he's been a member -and has much more knowledge about pix than I have...
|
09-10-11 02:35am
|
Reply
398
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
I've seen what seems like most of the material shown at the preview of
sandysfantasies.com before/elsewhere at DDF.
Some of the vids/sets are dated back to 2006 and earlier. Guess it's partly older stuff from the main Sandy-site (and others from DDF).
So why make this new site: Maybe to attract newcomers at DDF in general...?
|
09-06-11 05:59am
|
Reply
399
|
Justine's Bedroom
(0)
|
Reply of
tomjones's Review
Interesting to see a review of this site.
Was a member a long time ago - even way before joining TBP/PU in April 2007.
But judging from the preview not much have happened sine then - still got that old, old video trailer for preview - could not find any "update" - but again - the vids at "videos" seems the same as in 2005/2006 - AND in a quality somewhere between lousy and almost fairly good. For todays standard it's worse...
tomjones - what is the status today of newer vid-quality?
Again like tomjones conclude the site - or rather the redheaded Justine has quality in her performance and special sexuality - still got some in my stash...
|
09-05-11 05:19am
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No interest....
Nothing to do with sex/erotica for me.
It's kids stuff - like this line from an ol' danish comedy song about childhood: "Watching Jenny piss for 5 cents..." (freely translated)
What I really "hate" - or rather get disgusted about is human faeces in porn. When browsing I came upon a whole bunch of short vids with girls delivering, is it called stool in English - on a platter...jeeez, could not get away fast enough. It got to take a serious weird mind to enjoy that...
|
09-05-11 05:01am
|
