| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pretty good/straight/simple answer from the Capn - I agree!
|
11-26-11 07:52am
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never been to a site with that deal...
What's the purpose, anyway?
|
11-22-11 05:25am
|
Reply
328
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Great to get your input on this one, NS.
I really do not care that much if the HD-vids material is WMV, AVI or MP4 or whatever - as long as it is in great viewing quality and like 1280x720 (or even better).
You say:
"All newly shot scenes are available in MP4 HD."
From what date are "newly shot scenes" - and HOW many can we see at the site?
Thanks!
|
11-18-11 08:47am
|
Reply
329
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks a lot!!! tangub - for this fine info/update...it's almost like:
Now, your're talking!
This was what I was waiting for - concerning a join...
|
11-18-11 08:37am
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Been doing some hunt for "local" celebs (Danish, Swedish and German)..but, btw: You mostly and only harvest pix in that field.
|
11-18-11 05:56am
|
Reply
331
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Oh,oh...does that mean, that the amount of vids in HD or 1280x720 is considerably higher in MP4??
|
11-18-11 05:20am
|
Reply
332
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Have to second Cybertoad....GREAT and very helpful review.
Have always been a little disappointed with the quality of those vids you also can watch as bonus material at many sites - and for quite a few years now.
Then found some new trailers in top quality - so it's a bit sad to learn this:
"... but remember that WMV HD is rare here."
But hope that will turn to the better in the future....
Thanks, rearadmiral!
|
11-18-11 02:55am
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Guess the question was/should be: "which part" of the female body...ect!
Only part: The feet!
Never got the hang on that particular deal....
Rather watch a model with small, cute, sexy ect. high heels - that getting ten toes in my face.
Too many sites are into that special deal.....
|
11-16-11 06:35am
|
Reply
334
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well, messmer in more mature life I kept on taking a no for a no - and seriously.....guess those weird creatures we call women, (LOL) - got a mind of their own - and sometimes and maybe a lot of different minds....and the old saying: will men ever understand the woman mind???....
|
11-15-11 05:58am
|
Reply
335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Hey...!! - depends on how a girl says STOP...
So here's one for the young ones:
At my age and married - not seducing many or any girls these days..But in my younger days - no, really young days, at 18 I think it was - I remember this incident:
At college finally got this beautiful brunette on a date - a girl a year older and more experienced - and later ended up in her room/bed with her parents gone.
Magnificent tits - but when I started to go between her legs, she said: No,No - stop!
This young man got bewildered/confused and turned on a lot of excuses, backed down ect....
Her reaction: Oh, why do you excuse - why didn't you just push on......now it's not fun anymore...
Oh,Oh..the insecure that comes with youth...
BTW: Damned, never got to bang this beauty after that incident..
|
11-14-11 05:40am
|
Reply
336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only watch porn at the pc - so no need with enough external hd-space...
|
11-12-11 07:27am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Good poll from Cybertoad..
At first hand I'd say fully dressed - but what is that?
If it's "inside" clothing, ok.
Still there's something really sexy about a model wearing only a housecoat (the more sexy kind, though) - and absolutely nothing underneath...
|
11-10-11 06:45am
|
Reply
338
|
Casting Couch Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Another good reason for being here at PU:
Good warnings is at least as important as more positive reviews.
|
11-08-11 09:56am
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Almost a MUST.......the girl/model looking at the viewer - and not at the cameraman or only at the male model i hc/bg - is essential.
And even more in solo sets/vids.
And I dislike vids in the photoshoot manner where the model keeps focusing on the cameraman.
|
11-07-11 08:07am
|
Reply
340
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Thanks for the update here.
The ZTOD network is generally - in my opinion - now making some of the finest produced porn vids in excellent quality and - also, and maybe more important editing fine scenes with much more FOREPLAY that other major sites...not just wham-bam-thank-you-mam...
Some of their DVDs are out there at Videobox and others, but guess a $ 19.95 price is really worth it - going to the mother load - for all three site...
|
11-04-11 07:27am
|
Reply
341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Guess I'll join the 100% "Other"...with a none of above.
|
11-04-11 06:51am
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with graymane...
With no multiple camera angels it all appears like the camera is steady on a fork. Maybe a bit like the now gone Dreamstash-site.
An alternative question could be: Who now makes the best videographers work??
Is the question subjective - no, but the answer probably would be.....
|
11-02-11 07:17am
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
That's one fetish that's not my kind of thing....
|
10-31-11 09:37am
|
Reply
344
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Ok, since some of the esteemed PUs have come up with quite personal experiences, here is this - going on the theme:
"She's lookin' better every beer" (from: New Riders Of The Purple Sage).:
Met this gorgeous looking brunette with a wild hairstyle at a local Copenhagen honky tonk/bar many years ago.
Got to her place in the early morning hours and starting to mess around. Got her partly undressed...but the "great tits" were not so great, but rather saggy when the bra went off - and when she tried to place a rubber before anything else was hard, it was a turn-off, too...so in this lonely case, thank you: couldn't get it up...
Oh, went back the next day to my ex-girlfriend and had great sex for many months.....
|
10-28-11 06:10am
|
Reply
345
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Like anybody else, I guess - have had my ons and offs, LOL..
Just been browsing through the updates.....It really looks great, great, great.....
|
10-27-11 08:58am
|
Reply
346
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
adultlife's Comment
Navigation seems ok to this user, but probably got used to it after several memberships over the years..
Regional pricing: try to mail webmaster for an alternative billing co.
I've received a link to the right price more than once...
And BTW: This site has been on my Top 10 for years - and still is.
|
10-27-11 07:14am
|
Reply
347
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Like lk2fireone.........
|
10-27-11 07:09am
|
Reply
348
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Monty, since I recommended this site on your request let me say this:
Karups PC is like so many major sites with a long background (since 1997):
Newer material is of course much better than what you find from early 2000, before and a little after.
But generally Karup's PC is still getting better and better regarding both vids and pix quality. Though I also get 1500x1000 checking my sets, they're absolutely fine for full screen viewing.
Like vids, like pix you can't only rely on actual size regarding viewing quality....at least in my experience...and this user is considering yet another rejoin.
|
10-26-11 05:58am
|
Reply
349
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
This is a place/forum for free speech - and therefor expressing your/my opinions freely - Also the negative ones.
So I'm not "spreading my dislike"...
This is a matter of telling other PUs in THIS forum about your/my experience.
I understand your're concerned about your company profits in regarding negative inputs here at PU. But your last remarks puzzles me a bit:
"......please don't trash discussion here as we are trying to get in contact with our members and improve our services."
Then why use your time responding to my criticisms - which I do not regard as "trash"?
And BTW: You have no way of knowing when I last joined one of your sites (like others I use several logins and several e-mail addresses)
Anyway: I think your're out of line with this input...
|
10-26-11 05:44am
|
Reply
350
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I use it a lot - it helps you with site backgrounds - say, you find a new site, check the company and then check what other sites they run/own...
It's also useful as warnings - some companies has A LOT of repetitive content from site to site.
|
10-25-11 03:29am
|
