| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
lrn2spel's Comment
For some sites on CCBill, if you look up the subscription they will list the UN/password if you click on the "subscription ID" link. I'm not sure if the site you joined does this but it is worth a try, I am assuming you know the email address and credit card no. you used, right (to check on CCBill)? Worth a shot, although I assume they were telling you the truth when they said they don't have it.
|
08-11-12 08:46pm
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think there is a fair amount of diversity in porn, but I wouldn't mind if some of the larger sites got more diverse internally. I pretty much agree with what tangub said, I like a nice variety of women, it would be nice if you didn't have to join 5 different sites to get them.
|
08-11-12 12:03am
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Okay occassionally I suppose, but no fatties! I'm generally more a fan of petite and/or athletic ladies.
|
08-08-12 05:18pm
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm with gayporn on this, I don't think I have ever known a models height, I don't often look at model bios on sites anymore as I find them to be often bullshit anyways.
|
08-07-12 08:25pm
|
Reply
230
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
It certainly would have been good for him to mention his complaint was about VB3 in the comment, as this is certainly the basis of his complaint, but I have seen many people post comments that are quite negative, as well as reviews that are quite negative. Isn't this the point in having a review site, so that people can posts their opinions of sites. I would be intersted to see mike's scores of VB, I like to read negative reviews and comments, even of sites I enjoy, as it helps me see other folks perspective.
|
08-07-12 08:23pm
|
Reply
231
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, its too bad, I did just join Wow and it is pretty good, although smaller. It is good that they dropped the price, because $30 is probably a bit much for a site that is this sized.
|
08-07-12 08:20pm
|
Reply
232
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I understand what you are saying, I just don't think this type of reaction due to frustration is all that uncommon. I agree it gives a negative spin on his feelings of VB, but he is free to give whatever spin he pleases. I guess I just don't see a problem with it. I agree VB is one of the highest rated sites, but personally I think it is also highly overrated. Bitching in the forum may be prudent, but these are also threads that quickly disappear which some users may never notice or know to look for.
I see plenty of negative opinions in comment titles over the past few months, why can't he post the same? In what way is his sentiment (VB3 blows, which I strongly agree with) not valuable information for casual users looking for site reviews? What if the current workaround of using VB2 goes away? Sorry for carrying on this debate, it just seemed like you sort of jumped on the guy.
|
08-06-12 11:09pm
|
Reply
233
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't really see a problem with posting a comment like this before waiting a few days, people do this here all the time with respect to login issues, download speeds, and other technical issues. Clearly he has had some issues with the site over time, and he should feel free to voice his opinion, may be useful to fellow PUs.
|
08-05-12 10:36pm
|
Reply
234
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Reply
Not to state the obvious, but why not just use VB2 then? I haven't been a member here in a while, but I never used VB3 because I can't stand it, as long as 2 is availble (and apparently more functional) why not just use it?
|
08-05-12 10:23pm
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree, well said ClayPaws, I am very impressed with the English abilities of all the non-native speakers around here, probably better than mine, and certainly much better than my only other language of French.
|
08-05-12 10:17pm
|
Reply
236
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
That is very odd Claypaws, I swear when I posted this comment there was an option to join the "entire network", but now when I go to wow and try and join this option is no longer available. Very strange. Sorry if I caused you to waste money.
|
08-01-12 12:09am
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As many I agree with BadMr. It is very dependant on the quality of the model and the filming.
|
07-31-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
238
|
Homegrown Hairy Bush
(0)
|
Reply of
Willard's Reply
Sorry Willard,
A real pity sites like this still exist, but at least PU (and folks like you) can help other avoid these troubles.
Hope it all turns out well for you. I have found using a temporary card number as somewhat useful, as it only exists for that transaction, so the site really can't pull much funny business - aside from running a crappy site, you might want to look into it.
|
07-30-12 10:03pm
|
Reply
239
|
Homegrown Hairy Bush
(0)
|
Reply of
Willard's Comment
That sucks man, used to be a scam a lot of sites ran in the early days, cheap trials that were impossible to cancel (or had odd conditions like cancellation will take 5 days to process, for a 2 day trial).
Hope it all gets worked out for you.
|
07-29-12 12:46pm
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
pat's response sums up my opinion perfectly. I'd rather they wear them.
|
07-29-12 12:45pm
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like tangub, I always check the site stats if they are listed, usually read the reviews as well.
|
07-27-12 11:16pm
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't really watch any Haley Paige scenes anymore, I'm not really sure why. Perhaps it is just the cirumstances of her death that matter as exotics said, I'd probably have a hard time watching anyone who was died of murder/suicide or an STD. Of course, I'm not really in the loop with the happenings of porn stars, so I probably wouldn't even know unless it were well publicized.
|
07-26-12 12:37am
|
Reply
243
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
No problem, wish I had the time to join, I have had wow on my list for a while!
|
07-23-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not so much, I don't think any bodybuilder is all that attractive (female or male)
|
07-23-12 12:49am
|
Reply
245
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree, sort of figured they would add it to the network eventually. Glad they finally did.
|
07-21-12 12:02pm
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anything but a thong or granny, not really a fan of either.
|
07-21-12 12:09am
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've done FaceTime phone sex before, but I'm not sure that would count as 'porn'. Other than that, I agree with tangub, doesn't seem worth the bother.
|
07-19-12 12:22am
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Playboy had some, Sara something. I forget, I thought it was actually kind of interesting, although the videos were super-short. It was like one video per pose or something.
|
07-17-12 12:37am
|
Reply
249
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I was wondering this myself a few months ago exotics, thanks for asking and getting us all an answer. Of the scenes I downloaded from videosz, they did seem rather old, although I haven't been a member of Tainster in a long time, so didn't recognize any of them.
|
07-17-12 12:34am
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As I am otherwise attached, doubt I ever would. Hook-up sites just seem odd.
|
07-17-12 12:18am
|
