BOTTOM LINE(CONTINUES):
Again, I suggest emailing customer support, before joining, to ask any questions about the sites before you join: because these sites need a news section for current and upcoming changes, but they don't bother to keep one.
They used to have a live cam show with some of their models that was free.
Then they said (while they still had a news page) that the live cam show would stop, and resume in a few months.
Years went by, and that live cam show never resumed.
Instead, they started a live cam show feed from a commercial service, that was far less valuable, since it was created to gain as much money from the viewers as possible.
That live cam show has now been dropped.
No news announcement, since the sites don't bother with news announcements.
So, if you are interested in joining this site or network, I suggest emailing customer support, to find out what you are getting for your money.
I find the lack of transparency a little annoying. So I deducted a few points from the score.
But like I said, the Diesel Network (that used to be called the Diesel Network, but I don't know if the three sites have a new name for the 3 sites, or not), is one of my favorite networks, along with TMW (Teen Mega World).
TMW because of the massive amount of hardcore porn with attractive teen models, that has a lower price.
Diesel Network, less massive content, but with such outstandingly attractive teen models in pleasurable sex.
skippy, thanks for the MetArt tip on viewing options.
I've been a member of MetArt for over 10 years, off and on.
But just looked at the photos, almost never bothered to explore the options to make viewing easier.
LOL.
But I still find it's easier to brows a set of photos at Diesel.
View a photo, and click the mouse to go to the next photo, which opens immediately, in the same window, etc.
Faster and easier than the MetArt system, which requires more mouse clicks, whether you choose to open the photo in a new window, or in the same window.
If you still have a subscription to one of the Diesel sites, try viewing a photoset online. I think you will see what I mean.
As far as Diesel, I don't think there is any basis for deciding what content goes to which site.
I've mentioned years ago that the idea was to create separate sites to build revenue, instead of having a single site. Since more sites usually means more subscriptions.
Years ago, they sometimes had a video of a model, and the photoshoot of the video might be posted on a different site than the video was posted at. Proving, to me, at least, that the basis for selecting what content goes to what site was random.
I'm referring to 18 Only Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn.
When they still had their older sites, most of that content was specific to those sites (before they folded most of that content into 18 Only Girls, and deleted the rest of that content).
When I say that a video and its accompanying photo shoot could be posted at 2 different sites, it was not common, but it did happen. I thought it was funny.
It's probably better if you make this a new comment.
If you re-post this as a new comment, it will have a better chance of being noticed by more members.
Anyway: 18OnlyGirls changed its name to AllFineGirls some time back.
Recently, 18OnlyGirls is no longer listed at PU.
I'm not sure why.
Sometimes sites are no longer listed because they go out of business.
Or because there is some problem at the connection with PU and PU stops promoting the site (listing the site).
Separately, even though I posted at PU that 18OnlyGirls had changed its name to AllFineGirls, PU never bothered to list AllFineGirls as the new name of 18OnlyGirls (probably because the name change slipped through the cracks).
It's difficult, or unlikely, that you will find current information on 18 Only Girls or All Fine Girls at PU (or at TBP, the sister site of PU), because 18 Only Girls is no longer listed.
Since I'm not a current member of any of the three sites, I don't know what the update rate is.
I like the models at the sites, and the videos are professionally shot.
But the membership fee is too expensive for me, to be a continuing member.
I'm sorry I can't give you the details on the update rate for 18OnlyGirls.
Perhaps a current member of that site will post that information, if they happen to read this comment.
I have the "Diamond" membership, but they haven't bothered to tell me what that means, or how I got it.
I do have access to all 11 sites in the Diesel Access network.
I posted at PU, and also at the Diesel Access network forum, asking them to clearly spell out what the rules are for each membership, to gain access to the different sites.
They said they would do that, sometime in the future.
If you like glamcore/heartcore, I think you will enjoy the Diesel Acess network. X-Art and the Diesel Access network are two fine example of that niche.
But if you don't like glamcore, you might find those sites disappointing.
Also, both X-Art and Diesel focus on teens. So if you want a broad range of ages, or slow-strip tease, or something else, you could be disappointed.
Having said that, there is plenty of hardcore action at these sites, with some models that are absolutely stunning or even beautiful. They are truly a feast for the eyes, and fingers, and any other body parts you can imagine.
The point I was making is that, because the site owners/operators/managers are foreign, they don't understand English that well. (They might disagree, because almost everyone thinks he or she is perfect.)
But the webmaster does not clearly state exactly what the rules are for gaining access to all the sites.
The price for joining any of the sites in the network is currently the same, no matter what site you join through.
On the 18 Onbly Girls signup page, it clearyly states that each memb membership option gives you access to 18 Only Girls plus 11 bonus sites.
Actually, that is a mistake. You get 10 bonus sites, plus the 18 Only Girls site, which makes 11 sites total.
(Like I said, because they are foreign, it's easy for simple mistake to creep in, because they think they know what they are saying. If they advertised in Russian or whatever their native language is, they would probably not make the mistakes, but a lot of members don't understand Russian or whatever their native language is.)
On the Wow sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn), the membership options are priced the same as for a membership to 18 Only Girls. But the access to the bonus sites is not mentioned on the signup page.
So, to be safe, join through 18 Only Girls, and that way, you are sure (because it's in writing on the signup page) that you get access to all 11 sites in the network, which includes Wow Girls and Wow Porn.
If you join through Wow Girls or Wow Porn, you should still get access to all 11 sites. But it's not spelled out on the signup page. And sometimes, in real life, things don't make sense. So it's possible, although unlikely, that you wouldn't get access to all 11 bonus sites, if you join through one of the Wow sites, even though you are paying the same price as if you signed up through 18 Only Girls.
If you have joined a lot of porn sites, sometimes, you will see that joining a network through one site instead of a different site in the same network, can charge you more money for the membership, and give you access to less sites in the network.
I am frustrated that the webmasters at some sites don't clearly spell out what sites you get access to, depending on what site you join through.
For years, Teen Mega World did not spell out what sites you got when you joined through each individual site in the network. Recently, they did show a simple join page, that clearly showed what access you were getting. But that took them many years, and many request that they ignored.
Maybe I am biased, or prejudiced. But sometimes foreigners think differently. Or they think something is obvious, when it's not really clearly spelled out.
Site stats:
151 vids
Most vids come with an accompanying photoset.
The photosets are probably made as screencaps from the video, but the quality is good: the model is focused in the photo, the photo is not as crisp as I would like, but it's far better than the screen caps posted from years ago. The colors are OK, not great. I personally would not collect these photosets, even when the models are cute. Because I would want a better set of photos.
There is a zip file for each photoset. But the zip file only comes in one definition. And as I said, the photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute.
The site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month. But the network updates with 1 video per day. So you get a huge amount of teen hardcore videos at the network (over 5,000 videos, over 1,380 teen models).
There is little to distinguish this teen hardcore site from any other teen hardcore site.
It's basically teens fucking and sucking.
The site strengths are the models are mainly cute, and they are enthusiastic about fucking.
But because you get access to the rest of the TMW network, I'm giving the site a score of 90.
Without network access, the score would be much lower.
Main factors for me to join a site:
-how attractive are the models
-how many models are there
-quality of the pictures
-quantity of the pictures
-price
-(not really into DVDs or videos, takes too much bandwidth, too much space to store on hard drive)
I am trying to get value for my porn dollars, but the main factor is how attractive are the models.
Anyway, I wish you would write some site reviews. You seem to have extensive experience with porn.
Even if I don't agree with your personal tastes (which I don't really know yet), I think it would be interesting, sometimes entertaining, to read your thoughts.
I really have enjoyed reading some of the reviews at this site, not just for the information on possible sites I might join, but also for the humor and insight.
As a bonus, if you write reviews and get points, you have a chance to win a few dollars/pounds/euros in the weekly drawing.
I HAVEN'T BEEN A MEMBER OF THIS SITE IN SLIGHTLY OVER A YEAR.
IT USED TO BE MY FAVORITE GLAMCORE SITE.
BASED ON THE MODELS, AND THE EXCELLENT QUALITY OF THE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS.
IT'S A SHAME THE OVER-ALL QUALITY OF THE SITE HAS DECLINED.
SO IT'S NOT QUITE AS GOOD A VALUE AS IT USED TO BE.
BUT THE BACKLOG OF PHOTOSETS AND VIDEOS IS STILL OUTSTANDING.
I did not base my comment on duplicated material at X-Art and Colette on what I saw at those sites.
I was repeating what I read at Indexxx.com.
The comments were regarding X-Art and Colette.
Not MetArtX or any of the other sites in the MetArt network.
Also, TMW is primarily Russian/Eastern European models, not US models.
omg ? - 2017-01-15 + 0 -
They are adding recycled material, video games scene was published on teenmegaworld long time ago. Even in the x-art info you can see that this model is already 28.
[Chile] pardiboy ? - 2016-12-19 + 0 -
Both x-art and colette sites suck! they posted another model called Tini, showing her old material from wtfpass websites from a couple of years ago. They did the same with Angelica. Does anyone knows what happened to colette/x-art? Did they sell those websites? X-art was one of my favorites :(
You seem to have at least some experience in porn.
But what you are looking for "women OTHER than your stereotypical Hot teen/early 20s woman" is more of a niche product. Yes, there might be sites catering to that, but they are, as you implied, in the minority.
Glamcore sites are gaining interest, but the content is limited compared to mainstream teen/early 20s women.
As far as Asian, Asian women are some of the most beautiful in the world.
One problem with Japanese porn is the mosaic effect, which is required by Japan.
There are some Japanese porn sites that have some content without the mosaic.
If the mosaic bothers you, you can do google searches of PornUsers.com to see what the members have said about sites that might or might not offer some mosaic-free content.
But most Asian sites focus on the teen/early 20s models.
Do a google search (I'm not expert on Google searches) for PU members who like and have commented on sites that feature mature models. But I don't recall, off-hand, that they have mentioned sites that are combined mature models + glamcore, or non-white models + glamcore.
But like I said, the internet is big, so hopefully you will find sites that you think are worth the money to join.
When you think about it, a large part of enjoying porn is in the hunt.
When you find content that you really like, that is the payoff. But, hopefully, you will appreciate search, as well.
The Porn Users site can be a resource to check on porn sites
And most members are friendly, and willing to share their knowledge and interests.
But porn is a hobby, not a business, for most of us. LOL.
Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and 18 Only Girls are strong in hardcore videos.
Those sites cost about $30, so they are more expensive than Met-Art.
Those site are borderline glamcore.
I think 18 Only Girls is the best value of the three, because it has the most content.
There are different options to join:
You can join any one of the 3 sites by itself, or you can join all 3 sites, but it gets expensive.
Lovely models, professionally shot videos, and the quality of the photo sets has increased in recent years--but not quite to the level of Met-Art or MPL Studios.
There are a bunch of other glamcore sites that were created the last few years.
What is the best value for you is truly personal: what your likes are, what you enjoy.
Do you focus on photos, videos, what type of women do you like (age, body type, race), softcore, hardcore, fetishes, etc.
The Met-Art network, which might have sites that you would find interesting.
Can you be more specific in what you are looking for? And the truth is, I'm not a real expert on porn or glamcore: other PU members might quibble about what glamcore is, or even what softcore midcore or hardcore is. Everyone seems to have their own opinions.
I'm rambling, but you or I could write book-length replies on what "glamcore" sites you might like. :)
There are a number of glamcore sites. Most of them good, but it's a question of how much money do you want to spend.
Unlimited money, a lot to explore.
But for most people, you only join one or two sites, on a limited budget.
First, what are your interests, likes?
Do you want mainly photos, or mainly videos, or a combination of the two?
What type of women are you interested in? All ages, teen, mature, what?
Ethnicity: most sites are mainly white models, but some sites emphasize other races as well.
For teen to early 20s women, photos only, softcore, Met-Art is my favorite site.
The site also has a lot of videos of beautiful naked women, but I find the videos almost all boring, and so do most other members at PU who have commented.
But at $20/month, or $99/year if you really like the site, this is a great value.
MPL Studios is also a good choice. Mostly softcore, but the videos have a slightly harder edge than Met-Art.
$30/month membership.
Parsnip, send me a private email through the PU email system, and I will send you a link to join X-Art for $9.95 for the first month, rebilling at $19.95/month.
To send a private email, click on the hotlink of my username, that should bring up my PU data page; then click on the E-mail lk2fireone hot link, and write your message.
Very useful review. I have been a member of this site several times in the past, haven't belonged for about 6 months.
Sad to hear that the quality has dropped so much.
This site used to be one of my favorite glamcore sites.
The models were almost all great looking girls.
I'm not currently a member of x art.
When I was a member, I never encountered any download limits or problems. I have a 2.3 MB/sec download speed, and when I first joined, I downloaded a lot of their content in the first few days, and was never blocked.
At a different site, that had a download limit of 10 GB/day, I was blocked, because their system was faulty, and it blocked me after downloading about 3 GB. That happened a few times, being blocked for 24 hours. But it never happened at x art.
The price for each site (with PU discount):
x art $24.95
passion hd $17.95
fantasy hd $17.95
x art has over 300 videos. The videos are short. Many are only around 10-14 minutes in length.
fantasy is small site. Less than 40 videos. The videos run around 30 minutes.
passion hd has over 200 videos. The videos run around 30 minutes.
All three sites are glamcore style. Very attractive models. No gonzo sex (rough, violent, abusive to the women).
I like the selection of models at x art. And the videos and photos. They models are some of the most attractive teens and early-twenties models in porn, and the photographers and video-makers try to present the models as attractively as possible. X-art is my favorite glamcore site, along with the Diesel Access network.
But passion hd also seems like a good site. Not as nice as X Art, which is top-of-the-line. But worth visiting at least once, if you like glamcore style.
But fantasy hd is too small. You can download the entire site in a few days, and then there's nothing else to get.
Good to hear from you. There is very little strip-tease or lingerie at this site, but the sex is mainly heartcore/glamcore, and if you check all the videos (and there are a lot), you might find some that are to your liking. You just have to keep looking, and the models are really pretty.
I didn't even realize there was no search, until I found a listing for a photoshoot of a model that was at that site. And now I can't find that photoshoot. So I don't know if the photoshoot is hidden somewhere on the site, or if it was deleted.
From a reply by the webmaster of this site, at the time he wrote the reply, it seemed that all past material was still available at this site.
Arty style is sometimes more a matter of production value instead of actual content.
I've seen videos and photosets posted on the Teen Mega World network that were later posted on the Diesel network. The same videos and photosets. But at the Diesel network, the videos and photosets were much more appealing because of better lighting, more vivid colors, and maybe other factors.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
