WHEREAS THE ALLISON LANE VIDEO, THE GIRL SEEMED LIKE SHE WAS BEING AROUSED BY THE PUSSY EATING, AND THEN REALLY ENJOYED THE FUCKING.
PORN IS FANTASY, BUT THIS VIDEO IS BORING.
Ethnic Gang Bang #05 - Part 01. POSTED 12-25-2018.
Description
Linet Slag knows a lot of guys and has fucked almost all of them. Each Friday fifty two times a year she has a fuck party at her house. She makes a large dinner of beautiful food for all of them and makes sure they all feel fit and happy before she asks them all to take off their clothes and one by one she sucks each of their dicks. Then she lets each of them fuck her one at a time. That's right about when the fucking party gets started as she orders all of them to gang bang her for the next couple of hours and there is only one rule. There are no rules! JUST FUCKING GANG BANG HER GOOD!
Categories
Interracial Hardcore Petite Natural tits Big Tits Anal Double Penetration Deepthroat Gonzo Blowjob Big Dick Ass to mouth Pussy to mouth College Brunette Open Mouth Facial Ass Gangbang Cumshot Black
ANOTHER WORD DESCRIPTION OF A VIDEO WHERE THE WRITE PROBABLY DIDN'T WATCH THE VIDEO, BUT WAS FREE TO MAKE UP A BACK STORY ABOUT A GANG BANG WHERE A WOMAN IS FUCKED BY 5 MEN. THE VIDEO WAS PROFESSIONALLY SHOT (GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD CAMERA WORK, SIMPLE, DECENT SET (A COUCH IN A LARGE ROOM). BUT THE VIDEO IS STRICTLY FOR GANG BANG FANS: NOTHING CREATIVE OR EXCITING OR INTERESTING HAPPENS, OTHER THAN THE WOMAN GETTING ALL HER HOLES FILLED BY 5 DIFFERENT GUYS.
NOTE THAT I SAID 5 GUYS, NOT 52 GUYS LIKE IN THE DESCRIPTION. ALSO, IN THE DESCRIPTION, THE GIRL FEEDS THE GUYS WITH A MEAL SHE CREATES. THAT IS MISSING IN THE VIDEO.
IN THE VIDEO, THE GIRL IS NAKED ON THE COUCH, 5 NAKED GUYS APPEAR (THEY DON'T UNDRESS), AND SHE STARTS LICKING THEIR COCKS BEFORE THEY START TO FUCK HER.
THE VIDEO IS MUCH SIMPLER ACTION THAN THE WORDS DESCRIBE. I DOUBT THE BLURB WRITER ACTUALLY SAW THE VIDEO HE WAS WRITING ABOUT.
ALL THREE WOMEN IN THE VIDOES ABOVE WERE OK LOOKING, WHICH IS A BIG IMPROVEMENT OVER THE MODELS FEATURED IN OLDER VIDEOS, WHO LOOKED LIKE LOW-GRADE SLUTS.
MAYBE THE SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY GOING FOR LOW-RENT SLUTS DOING LOW-RENT PORN.
THE CURRENT LOOKS SEEMS TO BE AVERAGE-LOOKING GIRLS DOING PORN.
EXCEPT THE SETS ARE CHEAP, AND THE VIDEOGRAPHY, WHILE PROFESSIONAL, SEEMS BARE-BONES: THEY ARE NOT SPENDING A LOT OF MONEY MAKING THESE VIDEOS.
AT THE WHITE GHETTO SITE, I SEE TEXT THAT STATES YOU GET ACCESS TO 69+ ADULT TIME CHANNELS FOR FREE. HOWEVER, WHEN YOU ENTER THE ADULT TIME AREA FROM A LOGIN TO WHITE GHETTO, YOU ACTUALLY GET ACCESS TO 142 ADULT TIME CHANNELS.
AT LEAST, THAT IS MY EXPERIENCE. IT'S POSSIBLE THAT A PERSON'S ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK COULD BE DIFFERENT MY FROM MEMBERSHIP, BECAUSE THE TEXT DOES STATE THAT YOU WILL HAVE ACCESS TO 69+ ADULT TIME CHANNELS.
CONTINUED:
IT'S POSSIBLE THAT ANOTHER PERSON WHO SIGNS UP TO WHITE GHETTO OR SOME OTHER SITE IN THE ADULT TIME NETWORK WILL GET ACCESS TO A DIFFERENT NUMBER OF SITES.
ALTHOUGH ADULT TIME ANNOUNCED THAT IT ENDED BETA TESTING AROUND JANUARY 15, 2019, IT SEEMS THAT THEY COULD BE MAKING CHANGES AS THEY GO ALONG: ONE PU MEMBER POSTED A REVIEW OF 21 SEXTURY WHERE HE STATED HE WAS PROMISED (BY THE ADVERTISEMENT AT THE 21 SEXTURY SITE) ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK, BUT WAS NOT GIVEN ACCESS.
I ALSO READ A COMMENT FROM ANOTHER PU MEMBER THAT HE WAS ABLE TO ENTER SOME PORN SITE THROUGH HIS ADULT TIME MEMBERSHIP, WHILE ANOTHER PU MEMBER STATED HE WAS NOT ABLE TO ENTER THAT SITE, EVEN THOUGH HE WAS A MEMBER OF THE ADULT TIME NETWORK.
GETTING BACK TO THE WHITE GHETTO SITE, WHICH IS ONE OF THE POOREST SITES IN THE ADULT TIME NETWORK, IN TERMS OF QUALITY OF PORN:
THE SITE GIVES A DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION THAT'S SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE FOR EACH VIDEO.
HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THAT MANY TIMES, THE GUY WRITING THE BLURB (THE SUMMARY FOR THE VIDEO) DID NOT BOTHER WATCHING THE VIDEO HE WROTE ABOUT:
EXAMPLE: My Daughters Fucking A Black Man #10. POSTED 02-19-2019.
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Allison Lane was a sweet young slut, who loved big cock. She lived in an area where there were not many black guys. When she ran into the local black up and coming street hood, she fell in love! She would text him, and hope one day to get a chance to make love to a black guy. Well within a few days, her dream came true! But Ethan Hunt did not make love to her, he fucked her ghetto style and she loved it, and came over and over again!!!!
THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION IS WELL-WRITTEN, BUT THE WRITER PROBABLY DIDN'T BOTHER WATCHING THE VIDEO: THE SEX IS NOT HARSH, CRUEL, OR GHETTO-STYLE. IT'S JUST A BLACK GUY EATING THE GIRL'S PUSSY TO GET HER AROUSED, THEN FUCKING HER UNTIL SHE COMES. NO HARSH SEX, NO CRUELTY, NO DEGRADATION OF THE GIRL. JUST TWO YOUNG PEOPLE HAVING A NICE, STRONG FUCK THAT SATISFIES BOTH.
Black Kong Dong #30. POSTED 02-05-2019.
SITE DESCRIPTION:
It seems some girls just can't get enough dick. They go from one guy to the next. Brittany Angel is one of those girls. She craves cock and now is in search of some new BLACK MEAT. She showed Julius Ceazher that she knew how to handle sweet black meat. She showed him tricks he had never seen and worked his cock like a true champ. He could almost not handle her tight pussy, it took everything he had not to cum too fast. When he did pop she loved it and wanted more, what a hottie Brittany is!!!!!
ANOTHER WORD DESCRIPTION THAT SOUNDS BETTER THAN WHAT THE VIDEO PRESENTS.
TRUE, IT'S A BLACK MAN AND A WHITE WOMAN.
THE WHITE WOMAN SUCKS AND LICKS THE GUY'S PENIS AND BALLS, THEY FUCK. THE SEX IS LESS HOT THAN THE VIDEO "My Daughters Fucking A Black Man #10". MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE THE WOMAN IN THIS VIDEO IS ACTING LIKE A PROFESSIONAL WHORE WHO IS DOING HER JOB.
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
Separate from the site or network score (although related), I do try, when writing a site review, to mention some of the positive and negative aspects of the site I am reviewing.
In the case of White Ghetto, the major positive factor is that it is part of a nice network. I searched really hard to find something positive to say about the site. :)
On the negative side, other than I didn't like any of the models or the video clips or anything else about the site, I tried to say it in an intelligent way. But I'm afraid that it mainly came out as "I just don't like this site".
So I'm glad that I finished with my review of that site, and will hopefully focus more on sites that are easier for me to enjoy.
But the truth is that a site score has limited value. What is more important, on an individual basis, is whether the site caters to your personal tastes. My tastes are mainly softcore. I don't mind some hardcore, but I would like it to be good-looking or glamorous or nice. I don't like rough.
Site content (quality and quantity) and ease of use and price are the main factors in determining score, for me. My approach is different than the TBP approach, which does not consider price. But those are the factors which are important to me. Price does matter.
But I do try (and hope) that my reviews will have some usefulness or value to a PU member who might read the review, as an indicator of whether a site might be worth a membership or not. Based on individual tastes, of course. For a lot of PU members, my personal tastes are far too softcore.
I am not following the PU suggestion of rating an individual site that is part of a network as an individual site.
Instead, I am rating the overall network of sites.
I have reviewed several different sites in this netFameSolutions network, and I gave the same score to each site. Each site has a different individual value, but most of the value comes from the ability to access all the sites in the network, to access all the videos (and pictures, which are a minor part of this network).
I explained in each separate review in the BOTTOM LINE (summary) section the basis of my score: that I was not giving the site a score based on the value of the site itself, but on the network of the sites.
Perhaps I did not make that point clear enough.
You are entirely correct that, if I was thinking consistently, based on the negatives I reported about this individual site, my score would have been far lower than the 87 I gave the site--if I was rating the site on an individual basis. But I am not rating the site on an individual basis, but on a network basis.
I wrote at the end of this review: "I'm giving this site a score of 87 for its network value. As a stand-alone site, this site personally has zero value for me. But tastes vary. Some PU members might find it worthwhile to visit."
Technically, I am being too hard when I say the site has zero value, but I basically regard this site as a waste of time for me, personally.
But I wrote in this review, "I'm giving this site a score of 87 for its network value". What I meant was that the network of sites has a score of 87, even though this individual site has, for me, little or no value. Individual tastes vary, so maybe some people will enjoy at least some of the video clips.
Sorry to write such a long explanation to a simple remark, but I am trying to explain clearly what I meant when I said I was giving this site a "network score", instead of a score as an individual site.
"a couple of the movies I have downloaded have the most ridiculous watermark I have ever scene - a solid Wicked smack in the middle of the video."
I don't remember ever seeing that before: a large watermark in the middle of a video.
Those might be collector's items some day. I suggest downloading all you can, and storing them somewhere safe. And if the videos themselves are any good, you can always show them at the porn parties you put on for your friends.
I know that I have seen old porn novels from the 1970s and 1980s advertised on the Internet. Those novels originally sold for $2-$4 each. The current prices can range from $25-$50-$100 each for a single copy of those $2-$4 novels, depending on the condition of the novels (which are paperbacks).
That gives me hope for the re-sale value of our porn stashes. Except that we would have copyright issues that don't come into play when re-selling an old paperback that we own.
I've had many different credit cards declined at many different sites.
The reasons for the decline can differ.
If you really want to join the Woodman site, you can call each of your credit cards that were declined, and ask if the card charge was declined by the card company.
Many times, the decline, when applying for a porn site membership, is because the card company suspects fraud.
If the card charge was declined by the credit card company, you can tell them the charge was valid, and they will process the payment for membership.
The algorithm credit card companies use to decline charges is sometimes flawed.
I've had charges declined on one card that had a recurring charge to a payment processor, and I tried to use the card as payment for a new porn membership with the same payment processor, and those charges were declined (because of suspected fraud).
WHAT IS NICE IS THAT YOU GIVE A REVIEW OF A SITE THAT MANY PU MEMBERS KNOW, BUT THE REVIEW STILL SEEMS FRESH AND FILLED WITH WORTHWHILE OPINIONS.
I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY THAT SOME GIRLS IN PORN, AFTER A FEW YEARS, SEEM TO HAVE AGED A LOT. FOR ME IT'S NOT BITTERSWEET, JUST FUCKING SAD.
BUT YOU PUT IT IN MORE POETICAL TERMS.
I think the theory is that the watermark is supposed to be a sign of ownership. So the watermark is supposed to discourage piracy. As well as being a form of advertising.
But like I said, and I'm sure a lot of PU members will agree, there's no need for large watermarks. They are just ugly and distracting, and can actually hide part of what you want to see in a video or photo.
Slutty, I thought your review was good, I was not trying to criticize it in any way. Please understand that. It's just that I thought you would be more enthusiastic or satisfied with the site when you gave it a score of 82. We seem to have similar tastes, because I have enjoyed many of the sites you have reviewed, and I thought your scores for those sites I knew about were close to what I would have scored them.
So I am not quibbling with your score. I just thought you didn't personally enjoy the site very much. But I was just trying to read more into your review than what you wrote.
But like you say, there are good and bad points to the site, and how much you enjoy it is a personal matter. Even though we are writing a review that is supposed to be a guide for others.
I keep flipping from one side to the other, which can be annoying. LOL. I keep saying the same thing in my own reviews, that "how much you enjoy a site depends on your personal reaction to the contents, and not just the contents themselves".
Nice review, but I get the impression that you scored the site higher than you actually enjoyed the site contents. Or maybe you are trying to become a professional reviewer and giving an "objective" score/rating instead of one based on what you feel. Or maybe I've read too many reviews lately, and need to take a break. :)
Informative review with nice details and personal opinions. He's not my idea of a nice guy, but is extremely persuasive in getting the girls to do what he wants.
I'm jealous.
I'm paying $40 for a 75 Mbps internet connection from ATT.
But the download speeds I'm getting (over wifi) are from less than 1 Mbps to about 20 Mbps.
Which means it takes many hours to download a video, with a lot of failed attempts.
4 hours to download a file that is 683 MB (assuming no failed attempt).
So at least you have a great internet connection to watch the news and whatever else you want to see, in spite of the cold.
LOL.
Spectrum was supposed to roll out 1 Gbps lines in Southern Calif. in 2018.
But my local Spectrum office only offers 100 Mbps speeds.
But if I can't increase my ATT wifi speeds, I might switch back to Spectrum, because I was getting much better speeds with their 100 Mbps rated service.
Sometimes the wifi speeds dropped down, but they were usually better than the ATT speeds I'm getting.
Excellent review.
I'm surprised you get access to all three sites.
Formerly, if you joined one of the wow sites, you immediately got access to the other wow site.
But you had to stay a member for 2 months before you got access to All Fine Girls, unless you paid an extra fee to access all 3 sites.
Maybe that's changed. The sites don't do a good job telling you publicly what the rules are (for getting access to all 3 sites).
If you joined All Fine Girls, formerly, you didn't get access to the 2 wow sites, until you were a member for 2 continuous months.
Again, that seems to have changed, based on your experience.
Congratulations on the upgrade from Spectrum.
I was paying around $46 for a 100 Mbps connection.
I don't think they even offer a 1 Gbps connection in my area (north LA county).
I recently switched to AT&T because I had some problems with Spectrum.
Now I'm on a 75 Mbps connection, but my average download speed is much slower, running anywhere from 1 Mbps to about 25 Mbps.
Which makes downloading a photo set or a video a multi-hour task, and with a lot of failed downloads.
Did you have to pay extra for the 1 Gbps upgrade, or did they throw it in for free?
I just went to the Spectrum website for my location, and the only download speed for internet is 100 Mbps listed.
So I don't know if they even offer a faster speed in my area.
The 3 sites are one of my favorite teen networks.
I'm currently a member.
Like you said, the quality of the girls is outstanding.
The same for me.
If I look at the non-member preview page for updates, there are no updates shown.
Poor web preview design.
Previously, they had a non-member update page, that was misleading:
They mixed thumbnails of videos from the 3 different sites together, but did not make it clear they were showing updates from all 3 sites.
Some PU members complained that was misleading, because they were expecting to find the videos when they joined one of the sites, and found out some of the videos were posted at one of the other sites, that they did not have access to (without paying for another membership).
My guess is that, in spite of running porn sites for many years, some of the staff still don't know what they are doing.
So they make simple mistakes.
That hurts the appeal and value of the sites.
But all 3 sites in the Diesel Access network do update daily.
(They recently added a 4th site to the network, but that requires a separate membership: UltraFilms.)
A FEW WEEKS AGO, EARLY JANUARY, THERE WERE SERVER PROBLEMS AT DIESEL.
DOWNLOADING A 720p FILE WOULD TAKE HOURS, INSTEAD OF A FEW MINUTES.
I ALSO HAD TIMES WHEN I COULDN'T LOG IN TO THE NETWORK.
I GOT THE ERROR MESSAGE:
503 Service Temporarily Unavailable
I POSTED A COMMENT ABOUT THIS AT PU.
THE SERVER PROBLEMS WERE FIXED WITHIN A FEW DAYS.
HOWEVER, ANOTHER PU MEMBER SENT ME A PRIVATE MESSAGE THAT HE WAS HAVING VERY SLOW DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ABOUT A MONTH LATER AT DIESEL, COMPARED TO OTHER PAYSITES HE WAS USING.
DIESEL CUSTOMER SERVICE SEEMS HIT OR MISS.
WHEN I SENT AN EMAIL TO DIESEL CUSTOMER SERVICE STATING I WAS HAVING SLOW DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AND TROUBLE LOGGING IN, I GOT A REPLY A FEW DAYS LATER THAT THE PROBLEM HAD BEEN FIXED. NO OTHER EXPLANATION OR APOLOGY.
LATER, I HAD ANOTHER PROBLEM WITH DIESEL, SENT THEM AN EMAIL TO CUSTOMER SERVICE, AND NEVER GOT A REPLY.
NORMALLY, I'M HAPPY WITH THE SERVERS AT DIESEL. BUT THEY CAN HAVE PROBLEMS, EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE.
Thanks for the positive comment.
Most reviews today get no comments/replies, unlike in years past, which makes me wonder if anyone is actually reading these reviews (except for PU staff).
I don't know if the Christmas discounts are still available.
But if you use Google, if you ever want to join Diesel, you might be able to find a nice discount before joining.
I was thinking about your comment that an expensive upgrade was needed for many videos.
(I'm a slow thinker, as I get older.)
I think the problem might be that Diesel might not be clear about what videos belong to what sites.
In the past, if you belonged to one of their sites (I'm going to simplify, and pretend that there were 3 sites, since that is the current basic structure--years ago, the 18 Only Girls site was combined with a number of different sites in the Diesel network).
Anyway, if you belonged to one of the 3 main sites (18 Only Girls, Wow Porn, Wow Girls), the advertising for any of the individual sites often did not make clear what videos were available at that specific site:
The advertising seemed to imply that a bunch of videos were available with your subscription, but, in reality, the videos were not available unless you were also a member of one of the other sites in the network.
Sorry if I am not expressing myself clearly.
The advertising seemed to imply that a bunch of videos were available to you, which was misleading:
Only if you had a membership to the site that held that video, could you view or download that video.
And that might be why you wrote that you need an expensive upgrade to view some videos.
Because the upgrade is to join all three sites in the network.
The upgrade is expensive.
And I agree that Diesel does a poor job explaining the details of what each site membership gives you access to.
It used to be that if you remain a member of any one site, in time (it used to be 2 or 3 months), you would automatically gain access to the other two sites, without paying for the upgrade.
If you don't understand what is happening, it's easy to feel cheated.
And even if you do understand what is happening, it's still easy to feel cheated, because the site owners/operators don't make make clear, what you are paying for: The advertising seems to imply that you are getting access to a lot of different videos, but only if you are a member of all three sites do you gain access to all the videos that are being advertised.
But it's been over a year since I joined any of them.
Could you give some more details about the upgrade price, and what % of the videos are un-available without the upgrade, and what the upgrade price is?
All three sites, in the past, were expensive, in my opinion, but the girls were cute and the videos were professionally shot in excellent quality.
But there was no upgrade needed to view or download any video at the time I was a member.
In the past, you become a diamond member automatically when you have maintained a membership for a number of months (I'm not sure if it's two or three or a certain number of days).
So I would guess that if you continue your membership, you will be upgraded to diamond very soon.
Years ago, there was a popup on the membership page that told you how many days before you got your diamond membership.
It's been a while since I was a member, but I'm guessing that you will gain access to 18 Only Girls, which they seem to have re-named as All Fine Girls.
I agree that the upgrade to diamond is very expensive, and I just waited for my membership to upgrade automatically.
That's the way it used to work. And I assume it still does.
Maybe you can send an email to their support team, and they can tell you how long you would have to wait to be upgraded to diamond status.
I agree that Diesel has a lot of attractive to lovely girls.
Blacked.com and Tushy.com also has attractive girls, and both sites do a great job making the girls look stunning.
I was a member 1 or 2 years ago (my memory is getting terrible as I get older), and they had a banner on the site that counted off the days before I would have access to all three sites.
It used to be that if you stayed a member of 18OnlyGirls, WowGirls, or WowPorn for a certain amount of time, you automatically became a member of all three sites.
Is that still the way it works?
And how long do you have to stay a member at one of the sites, to automatically gain access to all three sites?
There was a separate method of gaining access to all three sites, if you paid a higher membership fee.
Or if you paid an upgrade fee after you joined one of their sites, to get access to all three sites.
I assume, since your membership is over 3 months, that you now have access to all 3 sites.
Correct?
The girls at the 3 sites are extremely attractive. And the videos, as you wrote, are top quality, as well.
I was recently a member of the Diesel network.
I joined 18 Only Girls, and since I remained a member, I gained access to the other two sites over time.
But my experience was different from yours.
It took at least 60 days, maybe more, before I gained access to the other sites. And when I did gain access, it was to both of the other sites at once.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
