Nice review, covers what seems to be the main points.
Two main strikes against the site for me:
1. Site seems very expensive at around $38/month.
2. I'm not into young-old fetish.
There are other cons you noted, but the high price alone is a deal-breaker for me. Unless there was a lot of really excellent content that was easily accessible, I can't see paying that much money. There are plenty of good sites that cost far less.
You didn't mention bonus sites. With a membership, is this the main or only site? Or do you get access to a bunch of other sites as well?
I know I'm spoiled, but paying $20/month for Met-art, which is a mega-site, makes paying for a smaller site seem very expensive. I like some video network sites, but paying for a limited 1-site membership, unless that site is exceptional, is a poor use of my porn dollars.
Maybe that's part of the tease (when they post a set as nude and it isn't).
More to the point: tease is strongly related to frustration or denial. You want something (nudity, a slow striptease, eroticism, sexuality) and it's slowly revealed or unleashed. Too much too soon and you lose the oomph, the longing, the desire, the slow, languishing buildup.
Tease can be a delight. But I also like to see the whole package (the nudity, or the sex, or whatever the payoff is).
What percentage complete nudity (including photos with lingerie that shows all the good bits) is there in the photoshoots? A wild guess is fine by me.
What is the name of your "real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos"? Or is she part of your private stash?
Also, why would a recently posted video (August 2010) be of such low quality? Is this a file they dug up from their unused historical trash? Most sites that post updates use files that are their average quality or above average quality. Why would a site post a below average quality file, unless it had some historical or collector interest?
Wild guesses on my part, because I have no knowledge of this site, except for its name. :)
But unless there is a significant amount of nudity, I doubt I would be interested in joining. I like softcore, but I still want to see the "good" bits. (Bits is a British term, you understand. LOL.)
Edit01: I just looked up "bits". I want to see everything interesting, not just the cunny.
There's a lot I don't understand, but what's the sense for blocking a single porn site for users with Czech IP addresses? Is there a Czech crackdown on porn, and the Czech government or the porn provider is placing the block for legal reasons? I've read that some countries make porn illegal. So is that part of the reason the Czech IP addresses are being blocked?
That's what I gave for my answer to a recent poll question on whether a girl with two guys could be considered a gang-bang. My answer was sure, why not? If there can be an Army of one (a recent motto for the US Army), there could be a gangbang of one. But where the girl fits is not always clear. Lol.
Sometimes you have to move with the times, even if it doesn't make sense at first. I'm still trying to accept the bald pussy look. I grew up with the idea that a female's pubic hair was erotic, and the bald look doesn't impress me much.
I also get a lot of offers from different sites. But I haven't been a member at this network for a while, and for $5, it's worth a join for me. I mean, $5: It costs me $10 to go to a movie theater, and that's with a senior discount. Lol.
So I don't go to movie theaters very much. I'd rather wait for the DVD to come out (usually in a few months after the theatrical releae), and pay $1+ at Redbox.
But some movies I wait to watch on cable.
The Lone Ranger was so bad, I waited to watch it on cable, and only watched a few minutes of it. Couldn't finish the movie, it was so stupid.
As I get older, I have less patience--and enjoyment.
I rented the last Transformers movie, that just came out with Mark Wahlberg. I only made it halfway through, before I stopped watching. I kept hoping the movie would get better, until I realized I was wasting my time on junk. Junk that made over $1 billion in box office.
I'm really glad I didn't spend $10 to see Transformers in a theater. I would have probably walked out long before the end. Something I've almost never done. But the older I get, the less patience I seem to have.
"No problems using my download manager (Firefox DTA)"
Is there a new version of Down Them All that works with the current version of Firefox?
My understanding is that DTA has not worked with the newer versions of Firefox for a while.
So:
Are you using the current version of Firefox, or an older version that allows DTA to work?
If DTA has released an updated version that works with the current version of Firefox, I would be glad to know.
When I first wrote reviews, I spent a lot of time trying to figure what score a site deserved.
But over time, I realized that a score is very subjective: even though some people think that a score should be a precise reflection of the value of a site, I think that is fantasy.
So I don't put a lot of faith or weight on the precise score a site receives. I'm much more interested in the overview and details of a review, and whether the reviewer appreciated the site, and the reasons why, for and against.
I looked at your review, and I'm glad I didn't read it before I wrote mine, because I mainly said the same things you did.
But my review was original, in spite of the resemblance to yours.
LOL.
Release Date: 03/08/10
Synopsis:
The simple life is shaken when death comes to the small, quiet Louisiana town of Bon Temps -- where civilians, vampires, shape-shifters, and mind readers clash in an orgy of sex & mystery. When a dead body is found with the heart ripped out, local waitress, Sookie (Ashlynn Brooke), who has a talent for reading minds, her best friend, Tara (Misty Stone), and her Vampire boyfriend, Bill (James Deen), try to unravel the supernatural web and find the murderer. Sookie and her friends find themselves pushing all their limits, both mentally and sexually, in a climax you'll have to see to believe! The mix of sex, horror, and action is so hot, it must be TRU: A XXX Parody.
Featuring: Ashlynn Brooke, Bill Bailey, Gracie Glam, James Deen, Johnny Castle, Lana Violet, Levi Cash, Lindy Lane, Misty Stone, Say Sights, Vanessa Naughty
FOR FANS OF PORN PARODIES, THIS SITE MIGHT BE A GOLD MINE.
FOR ME PERSONALLY, IT'S A WASTE OF SPACE.
PORN REVIEWS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE WRITTEN IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER.
BUT I'M TRYING TO BE HONEST: AND I'M GIVING MY OPINION.
I BELIEVE THAT PROFESSIONAL REVIEWS OFTEN INCLUDE THE BIAS AND THOUGHTS OF THE REVIEWER.
SOME REVIEWERS BELIEVE THAT IN GIVING A PROFESSIONAL REVIEW, THE BIAS OF THE REVIEWER IS ELIMINATED.
I BELIEVE THAT THE THOUGHTS OF THE REVIEWER CAN ADD VALUE TO THE REVIEW. BEYOND THE BARE FACTS.
Most of the other sites in this network are on the same poor level:
archive sites (stopped updating years ago), small content, videos you would not want to watch because the definition is so low (I mean really grainy, blurry pictures). Primitive navigation. No search.
There is one site in the network that is worth joining:
exclusiveteenporn
But compared to other pay sites that are available, you are much better off spending your money elsewhere: You will find better quality content, a larger amount of content, sites that are easier to use because of site design.
It makes you realize, if you didn't before, there are good sites out there. But this network is not one of them. What I mean is, it makes you really appreciate sites like Teen Mega World, Nubiles, or the specialty sites like X-Art, Diesel network, etc. Where you can find good to great quality, large amounts of content, and sites that are so easy to use, you forget that site design is so important.
The best thing about this site (pearl teens), is that I downloaded the entire contents in less than a day, and checked every video and photoset, so that my review is based on real-time experience.
At most sites I do not check every video and photoset, because there is too much content. But this is a tiny site.
Thanks for checking. I really appreciate it. I'm pretty sure I've seen the 10 photos each for Karen Sather and Sandy Greco already.
And I was hoping the old photos would have better definition than what I've seen before. But my guess is that photos on the site are probably not better definition, after all.
So I will probably wait a while before joining Penthouse.
I was wondering how many photos there are for each individual model from the 1970s and 1980s? Are there just a few photos on each Penthouse Pet for each month back then, or is there more like 20-30 or more photos of the individual models?
I've seen some of the models back then which only had like 10 photos or so from their photoshoots back then (in the 1970s and 1980s). Does the Penthouse site have more extensive photos on their early Penthouse Pets?
DEVILS FILM AND PETER NORTH (AND I ASSUME MOST OF THE OTHER SITES IN FAME DIGITAL NETWORK) GIVE YOU A SECURE SITE (HTTPS) TO LOG IN TO THE SITE. AND ALSO WHEN YOU SELECT YOUR LOGIN DETAILS.
MANY PORN SITES DON'T BOTHER WITH A SECURE LOGIN.
THERE ARE SOME SITES THAT MAKE IT A REAL PAIN.
AND I'VE WRITTEN COMMENTS ABOUT THOSE SITES AT PU.
BACK IN 2014 I POSTED A PU COMMENT ABOUT CANCELLING PROBLEMS AT DEVILS FILM.
HOWEVER, TODAY I WAS SUPRISED AT HOW FAST I WAS CONNECTED TO A CHAT OPERATOR. AND HE/SHE WAS EXTREMELY HELPFUL AND PATIENT.
I CONNECTED TO A CHAT OPERATOR WITHIN 2 MINUTES. WHICH IS FAR FASTER THAN I GET A CHAT OPERATOR AT AMAZON OR MOST OTHER SITES I'VE JOINED.
ONE THING: BACK ON 11-04-14, I POSTED THAT FAME DIGITAL NETWORK SITES WERE NON-SECURE WHEN LOGGING IN, AND/OR CANCELLING.
THAT HAS CHANGED--AND IMPROVED.
THE FAME DIGITAL SITES ARE NOW SECURE WHEN YOU LOG IN.
SO I ASSUME THEY ARE ALSO SECURE WHEN YOU CANCEL.
ACTUALLY, YOU REPLIED TO MY COMMENT ABOUT THE NON-SECURE STATUS OF DEVILS FILM BACK IN 2014, WHEN I SAID THAT CANCELLING (AND GIVING YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO CANCEL) WAS NON-SECURE, IF YOU CANCEL VIA THE INTERNET.
SO I GUESS THAT WE ARE BOTH FANS OF THE SITE/NETWORK.
LOL.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
