| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I agree with Capn and several others that the new review format is a definite improvement. Since that choice is not available in the poll, I didn't vote.
|
09-13-09 11:59pm
|
Reply
702
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Personality can be as important as nice face and body. What's nice for face and body? There can be a wide range of what's appealing.
|
09-08-09 11:10am
|
Reply
703
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Variety is good. Pigtails is just one more way to style a model's hair. Nothing wrong with that. As far as making a model look younger, that really depends on the model. I don't go for the models that are in 20's or later who use stuffed toys and a lollipop; that just looks corny and unbelievable.
|
09-03-09 12:58pm
|
Reply
704
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Wittyguy's answer is on the mark. I'm not saying all hardcore would disappear, but the balance would definitely shift to softcore, and that wouldn't be all bad. I wouldn't mind less "cumshots on the face, little anal sex, lots of sexy clothing, real dialogue, and real story lines." Maybe I'm not into sexy clothing as much as Wittyguy, but this guy is definitely thinking in the right direction.
|
09-01-09 04:36pm
|
Reply
705
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I think badandy400 is the purest form of porn addiction I've ever seen, but at least he seems to be enjoying it. Which is great. We've reached the next stage in human society: Porno Badandyicus.
|
08-28-09 08:11am
|
Reply
706
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I look at the info to make the girl more real for me. But I realize that much of that info is made up by the site itself, and that it's not reliable. The age is often wrong or outdated. Area of birth can be wrong (doesn't agree with the country listed for the model at other sites she might be at). The physical description can be wrong: You often see girls' bra cup size wrong: an A cup is listed as a B or C cup, or described as large breasts, when the girl herself is flat-chested (an A cup). So if the physical description is made up, how accurate would the bio information be?
|
08-26-09 05:01am
|
Reply
707
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
That's the kind of honesty I respect and admire. Probably the best answer yet.
|
08-20-09 08:33pm
|
Reply
708
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm not sure about the accuracy of your statement regarding hunger and the 12 cum loads she swallowed. Cum might be like a Chinese meal, where you get hungry again soon after you finish eating. But I'm not really speaking from personal experience, I'm afraid (I'd be even more afraid if I was speaking from personal experience).
But making a 180 degree turn, I'd say that someone could have a relationship with a porn star like Marilyn Chambers, who was was still promoting her older videos at conventions. I only met her once at a glamourcon convention in LA, but she seemed warm, real and friendly. I don't know what she was like as a person (I can't read people that well to know how they will behave), but she seemed to be really nice and down to earth. I think and hope that a woman like she was could have a real marriage or real relationship with someone who cared for her. Maybe I'm a romantic, but she came across as a really nice person.
|
08-20-09 07:40pm
|
Reply
709
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Everyone's different, which is kind of a useless generalization that has some truth to it. But to date/marry a porn star, you would need a thick skin, which I don't have. You would also need a way of accepting your wife/girlfriend having "professional" sex with other men or women or both, and I just don't think that way. Different strokes for different folks, as they said back in the 1970s.
I am surprised at the results of many poll answers, because I think the PU members are responding with their honest feelings in many cases. You would expect a lot more bullshit or posturing in the replies, but I think, partially because of the anonymity of the usernames, that we are being more honest than I would have expected.
|
08-20-09 04:41pm
|
Reply
710
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
The simple answer is, it's none of their business. People have a right to privacy, and I don't see the sense in broadcasting what would be a controversial fact. That's my position. But some men would enjoy the sensation they create, and that's them, not me.
|
08-20-09 05:50am
|
Reply
711
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
New review format is a big improvement over the old one. Much easier to read and understand, with more content.
|
08-19-09 06:09am
|
Reply
712
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I thought I was reading a James Bond parody when I read your reply of brutal leg scissors, the dreaded nipple twister, the pussy grind aided face sit and the 3 finger jammer-slammer.
Would even James Bond be able to stand up to female opponents using these dreaded techniques?
Lol.
|
08-19-09 05:55am
|
Reply
713
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Teen sites (at least the mega-sites) feature girls/women that are in their teens to early twenties. I can accept that. What's annoying is when the women who are supposed to be teens look like they are in their thirties or even beyond. Nobody expects 100% truth in advertising in the porn world, but if they advertise a site as teens, then the site should be mainly teens to early 20s.
|
08-18-09 05:33pm
|
Reply
714
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I prefer natural to fake. But if a woman has had breast surgery for cancer, and she wants to go for implants, that's her choice.
Is bigger really better? Not in my opinion. But there must be a huge number of male fans who like the big, oversized look, judging from the number of porn stars who get implants.
|
08-14-09 09:37am
|
Reply
715
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'd go along with Drooler that a model's acting ability adds or detracts from the value of the scene.
The idea that the quiz reflects the person's view of acting is nice.
I would add that the quiz also reflects the person's appetite or style of eating: when you watch a porn clip, do you shovel it into your mouth and wait for it to digest, or do you go for gourmet style, and try to appreciate the different elements of the scene?
Most porn is better viewed with your eyes closed and your brain turned off.
|
08-11-09 08:30am
|
Reply
716
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
If the preview is really great, I will sometimes join a site, even if it does not have any comments or reviews. I joined paysites before becoming a member of PU, and the experience could be hit or miss. With PU as a guide, I've done much better. But if the site preview is really enticing, I will join a site that doesn't have any reviews at PU/TBP.
Then again, there are so many enticing sites out there, that I want to join but don't have the time or money for. There's only 24 hours in a day, and I can't spend them all on watching porn (I have to stop and eat sometime).
|
07-31-09 01:30am
|
Reply
717
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I'm not sure what the difference is between "Maybe" and "Not sure". Both answers seem about the same to me. Anyway, it definitely takes more eroticism in a picture to arouse me than it did when I was a teenager.
|
07-29-09 12:46am
|
Reply
718
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't use wallpaper. Just a simple blue desktop with the icons for files and shortcuts on it.
|
07-28-09 07:35pm
|
Reply
719
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I look at the PU/TBP reviews, then check the preview pages at the site, to get an idea whether the site might interest me. I don't usually bother with outside reviews, because I generally go for sites that have been reviewed at least a couple of times at PU, and that gives me enough of an idea of what I might expect.
|
07-21-09 12:31am
|
Reply
720
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Porn stars are supposed to be adults. If you are an adult, you have the right of free choice. That means you (and porn stars) can refuse to perform sexual actions (anal, dps, etc.).
I think the question is confusing the issue of contract, which is legal, with slavery, which is illegal. Being under contract does not make you a slave.
|
07-17-09 05:38am
|
Reply
721
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I only subscribe to a few paysites at any one time. So it's just as easy to type in the name as to bother setting up and using a bookmark. I use firefox, so like atrapat mentioned, the autocomplete feature means I only have to type in a few letters, and firefox will complete the site address for me.
|
07-15-09 04:33pm
|
Reply
722
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm getting up there in age, and I don't remember what my first paysite was, to tell the truth. Before I joined my first paysite, I used to look at free photos of Playboy playmates on the Internet. I guess old Hef is the one who led me down that garden path.
Some of the older playmates from the 1970s and 1980s were special. Far better than what they are choosing for the 2000+ playmates. The older ones seemed more real, less plastic. I'm sure there were a number of boob jobs and whatnot back then, but it was less obvious.
|
07-09-09 01:32am
|
Reply
723
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I find it difficult to tell the age of a person from looking at the person in real life or at a picture.
|
07-07-09 03:57pm
|
Reply
724
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
No. Porn is private.
|
07-07-09 03:54pm
|
Reply
725
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
We have a black president.
Gays/lesbians are accepted in open society, some states even recognize same-sex marriages.
Why can't porn stars be accepted as contributing members of society?
|
07-01-09 02:12am
|
