| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Met-art has a large number of daily photoset updates, and they keep adding new models. No other softcore site comes close in terms of quantity. That's not to say the other sites don't have a lot of value: mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc. are all softcore sites that have a huge amount of models and photosets.
|
01-15-10 01:53am
|
Reply
652
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Definitely delete it. If you bring your PC in to a shop for repair, and someone at the repair shop reports you for porn on your PC, you could go to jail. Or if someone visiting your house looks at your PC without permission, and finds porn, they could report you. The police could search your PC, because you joined some online porn site or for some other reason which might be legal or non-legal.
I've read that PCs (notebook PCs) were seized by customs police from tourists returning from Canada. Don't recall the specifics, but the police kept the notebook PCs of tourists returning to the US from Canada.
|
01-13-10 03:18am
|
Reply
653
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Only if they make me the star of the porn production. Considering the way I look and that I couldn't last beyond 15 seconds of hardcore action, maybe I should start off as a softcore starlet, but I'm a little old to be a starlet (and the wrong sex).
I'm waiting for when we can get replacement bodies, because my own is wearing out, but I doubt I will be around long enough for that to happen for me personally.
|
01-09-10 04:14am
|
Reply
654
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It hasn't come up. Thankfully, we don't live in a police state where we have to fill out a daily questionnaire on our sex habits. But maybe that would be a great idea to require for our grammar/elementary school students. Kick the perverts out of school and stop the contamination.
|
01-07-10 06:31am
|
Reply
655
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
When you find a model you really like, and you want to see what she has been in (photosets + videos), it can be really frustrating to do a search when the same model is given different names at different sites. To make it worse, the same model can have different names at a single site. There is the additional problem that different models can have the same name.
|
01-05-10 03:17pm
|
Reply
656
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I've never cared to see a guy splatter all over a gorgeous girl's face. It makes the girl look like crap.
|
01-03-10 11:10am
|
Reply
657
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
A great photographer can capture all of a model's beauty, including her accent. Future photos will include soundtracks as well as smelltracks as well as feeltracks, for a better transmission of the model, as well as foreign language translation.
But the New York spoken word will not be cracked for another 3 centuries, due to its harsh and grating sound.
|
01-02-10 07:43am
|
Reply
658
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I seem to recall a similar poll question being asked before. Or else it was discussed in a forum thread.
Anyway, for me, an accent can sometimes add a little to the video, as long as the speaker is understandable. It depends. But I don't find New York accents erotic.
|
01-01-10 04:11am
|
Reply
659
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
When I'm a member, Met-art is one of the few sites I log into every day, because of the large update schedule, and I just like searching the huge archives. But most sites are not worth a daily visit. When I first join a site, I spend time trying to find the prime material, then spend less time after that because few sites update with material that I really like on a daily basis.
|
12-30-09 03:19am
|
Reply
660
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
If the guy would rather watch a porno rather than focus on the hot babe seated next to him, I'd say he was overly addicted to porn. Lol.
|
12-27-09 12:22am
|
Reply
661
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I've never owned a laptop yet, so I've never watched porn while travelling. I have seen R-rated movies while staying in a hotel or motel, but that's not considered porn.
|
12-26-09 07:46am
|
Reply
662
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Costumes can add a bit of color and interest to a photo set. Sometimes the costumes can add, other times the costumes add very little or actually detract. It depends on the model and the photographer.
|
12-24-09 11:48pm
|
Reply
663
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Never visited any adult date sites. Closest I got was maybe a popup for one of the sites, that I closed without visiting the site.
|
12-18-09 11:34am
|
Reply
664
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I hadn't given it a lot of thought previously, but Turboshaft brings up an interesting idea: "I mean if a hot girl needed to have her appendix taken out, who are we to judge the scar that it left behind?" Should we ban all porn stars with appendix scars, or allow them in as long as the scar has been photoshopped with taste? My honest opinion is that most appendix scars are less distracting than tattoos and piercings.
|
12-16-09 09:21pm
|
Reply
665
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Some photoshop is acceptable if it improves the picture. But photoshop can be overdone and produce artificial-looking results. Some photographers go way overboard in using photoshop so that the model appears to be an alien instead of a beautiful earthling. My feeling is that photoshop (or a similar process) is being over-used lately at Met-art, and the photosets are less attractive because of it.
|
12-16-09 12:36am
|
Reply
666
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I try to balance price versus content (quality and quantity of content), to make a rough guess as to whether a site is worth joining. I do read the reviews at PU to get an idea of the site contents (quality + quantity of photosets, frequency of updates, ease of site navigation, and any problems the site might have.
|
12-15-09 03:20pm
|
Reply
667
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
RB, feel free to talk back to me anytime, even on a wrong button.
|
12-12-09 05:41pm
|
Reply
668
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Porn videos are mainly acting, and most porn actors leave a lot to be desired. Nice looking face and body are plusses, but like pat362 and pinkerton state, if the girl looks like she is making out a grocery list while she getting fucked, or her moans, groans and excitement are so obviously fake, it takes away from the value of the scene.
|
12-12-09 12:37pm
|
Reply
669
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, have they been using more photoshop or a similar process at metart? I don't mind some photoshop at metart, but lately it seems to be used over-much and the photosets, even of attractive models, are less appealing. The coloring and appearance of the model seems fake instead of real.
|
12-11-09 06:11pm
|
Reply
670
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I think it's easier to find good quality softcore pics than hardcore material (pics and vids).
But most softcore vids don't really appeal to me that much.
I don't know why softcore pix are so much better than softcore vids. In general, it's easier to produce pix than vids, so that's part of the reason why softcore pix are much higher in quality than softcore vids.
Most hardcore pix that I've seen are much lower in quality than the softcore pix that are available.
But even given that quality pix are easier to make than vids, I don't understand why most softcore vids have very little value for me.
Except that with vids, there are so many more factors that can detract from the enjoyment of the vid compared to a picture. A lovely girl opens her mouth, and her voice or what she says in a vid destroys the illusion of beauty, grace, attractiveness, etc. The lighting and focus and other elements in a vid are much harder to control than for a picture. It's much more expensive shooting a video than a photoset. The detail/definition of a picture can be much higher than what is found in most videos. Etc., etc., etc. High quality softcore pix are found at many sites.
There are not a lot of high-quality softcore vids that appeal to me. There are few high-quality hardcore pix that appeal to me. There are high-quality hardcore vids, but they are much harder to find and collect than high-quality softcore photosets. Sorry if I was rambling, but the ideas I stated are the ones I believe.
|
12-10-09 12:19am
|
Reply
671
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
pinkerton "The conclusion of porn sex back then in the early 80s was the guy cumming on the girl's body rather than in her mouth/face, usually on her chest or ass."
I think it's a lot classier cumming on the girl's body than on her face. It's degrading to cum on her face, but that's what today's audience seems to expect.
|
12-06-09 11:52am
|
Reply
672
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm thinking it was my first time, but I wasn't really watching myself that closely. I was paying more attention to the girl I was with.
|
12-06-09 09:09am
|
Reply
673
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
RagingBuddhist stated 2 of my main grips with porn clips:
2a. Cameramen with diarrhea of the mouth
2b. Women overplaying the sex
I have a lot of other gripes about porn videos, but the two above would be a good start on how to improve many clips.
|
12-04-09 01:35pm
|
Reply
674
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I like lesbian porn, as long as the models are attractive. Toys can be used, but I would like to see a "real" or "natural" approach where the actors have some regard or feeling for each other, instead of a lot of fake moaning and groaning that starts off with the toy or hand or mouth or whatever still a foot or more away from the woman's body. Are we supposed to believe these actors/models are so excited that they are ready to orgasm just by looking at each other, without any physical stimulation?
|
12-04-09 01:04pm
|
Reply
675
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
I read the site reviews and comments to get an idea of whether a site is worth joining. I also like reading some of the threads.
|
11-30-09 04:40pm
|
