| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Sadly I couldn't find any magazines, but you can download zipped photos. Choose the pictures option at the top of the viewer. At the bottom of the viewer, below the line of photos there's a download zip option. Right click and save as.
|
12-02-13 10:14am
|
Reply
52
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
Thanks for the warning. Conmen are everywhere, and this sort of thing gives online porn a dirty reputation. We know there are many decent customer oriented ones around who are happy to give you a good deal at a fair price. Places like this hurt the good ones. Let's hope this warning helps others.
|
12-02-13 09:48am
|
Reply
53
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Not my sort of thing, but very good descriptive review. Shame there are no videos.
|
12-02-13 09:42am
|
Reply
54
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Good comprehensive review Wittyguy. Place looks good apart from the tats, trickery and fake breasts. I've never been a member but might be tempted if they did away with the cross sales.
|
11-28-13 08:07am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm on the 1080m bandwagon. It looks fantastic, providing you have the production values to start with, and a decent monitor/screen to appreciate it.
|
11-28-13 06:49am
|
Reply
56
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another very good review admiral. I seem to be following in your footsteps, this is another site I was thinking about joining.
|
11-27-13 10:06am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes definitely, especially if they offer a discount, and have no hidden tricks.
|
11-15-13 10:33am
|
Reply
58
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks admiral, I think I will. It was those negative comments that sort of put me off until now, but the quality and speed is a lot better than I expected, and also agree about those on location shoots compared to the usual couch.
|
11-13-13 05:53pm
|
Reply
59
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Well there's a coincidence! Would you believe it I only signed up about four hours ago. It took me a few minutes to realise this was yet another one of those places that isn't really a network, but same as you, I very much like what they offer. Every place has its own style, and I quite like what I see here. Very good and accurate review.
I am also much preferring higher end video quality. It may be the new computer and screen, but I am noticing a lot of difference in quality nowadays. I have found the streaming quality to be good and the download speed fast - so far.
|
11-13-13 04:02pm
|
Reply
60
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Review
Congratulations, another very good review from a new member who can write and inform.
|
11-06-13 08:22pm
|
Reply
61
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
SFguy's Comment
That's what some of us are saying. That PU/TBP doesn't block is a big negative as far as integrity goes. Black mark for PU/TBP.
|
10-25-13 09:43am
|
Reply
62
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I agree with the comments which are more thorough than most reviews. It is a vid rather than pic site, but the material is very professional. The price of my principals is $5 or £5, as I took up another offer from this network, this time for Devils Film. They have regional discrimination as well as pre checked cross selling but I took them up on their offer to steal material at a steal price.
I cancelled the next day because I know how tricky they can be. I received no confirmation either when I cancelled or when I followed up with two email queries. I had to go to live support who weren't there the first couple of times but when I finally got through they said I hadn't received a confirmation because I hadn't cancelled.
If anyone joins this site I would suggest you go straight to live support if you don't receive a cancellation confirmation email, because this is the second time I have joined a site for the $5 offer, cancelled and never received confirmation. Live support on both occasions sent me a notification within minutes.
|
10-20-13 07:49am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Still have it.
|
10-16-13 08:43am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
"Other" because tats, fake breasts, too skinny, plus the Drooler and Monahan comments apply too.
|
10-14-13 10:25am
|
Reply
65
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
No it's not your fault admiral, it's the fault of these organisations once again. It's not designed by chance, it's designed to deceive. This type of behaviour, is robbing people of money, and causing a lot of bad feeling towards porn networks. This sort of thing doesn't happen when you visit tube sites, and doesn't happen when you download for free. They are scaring and chasing away the few of us left who do wish to pay for our porn.
|
10-14-13 10:21am
|
Reply
66
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Ed Freiland's Reply
For me it's mainly principal, although any site that has pre checked cross selling is not to be trusted as they are trying to trick customers. I say "mainly principal" because I did take up the offer at the ridiculously cheap $5 price, which is basically giving it away. If not for the trickery I would view 21 Sextury in a different light, and would have been a member for many more months of the year.
I still think of this network as a place that has excellent material, but these new members are a tough crowd.
|
10-14-13 10:17am
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Really hate it.
|
10-13-13 07:20pm
|
Reply
68
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
What I meant to say, and should have said, was the overall quality of today's material is superior to the overall quality of older material, but for me, Buttman's movies still stand head and shoulders above almost anything that's ever been produced. I think the reason is although he focuses on the butt, he doesn't forget to include the whole girl. Too many of the others turn it into a gynaecological show.
|
10-12-13 06:47pm
|
Reply
69
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Cheers Admiral. Yes I love those old Buttman movies. They were broadcast over here on porn satellite stations 10-15 years ago so I have quite a few of them on video. Ah them were the days!
Although some of those Buttman movies were sensational, I think the overall quality of what we have today is superior, but what Buttman did was to produce erotic porn which made the girls look sexy and gorgeous. Given the inability of most porn directors to do that, it can't be very easy. In my opinion too many have failed to make attractive girls look sexy. It should be easy, but obviously isn't. Buttman's an original. Not many of those in any walk of life.
|
10-12-13 04:18pm
|
Reply
70
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
BobA's Review
Agreed, for me 69 is a little low, especially when you compare this network to anywhere else scoring 70-80. They still produce some very good scenes in a professional way. My one downside is the pre checked cross sales, which is why I'm not signed up.
|
10-09-13 10:52am
|
Reply
71
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Laptopbs's Comment
How many more warnings do people need. I am disappointed PU/TBP have not discontinued the link along with a warning.
|
10-09-13 10:23am
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I thought I would be on my own, but it seems most are of the same opinion, it's all about moods, being sensitive to them, and being a decent human being.
|
10-09-13 08:12am
|
Reply
73
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Like you I visit tube sites. Most of my memberships over the past two years have been inspired by checking out material there. 320x240 is ridiculous, and is a waste of some attractive girls. They are clearly not customer oriented and aren't going to be selling many memberships.
|
10-06-13 04:14pm
|
Reply
74
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The one argument for not going to tube sites is because of the poor quality. If the quality isn't any better on the original site, that's one group of potential customers gone before they've started. They should be going for better, not worse quality.
Admittedly free download forums will have the same quality as the original, but if the webmaster chooses to fight piracy by producing something no one wants in the first place, he could be in the running for a Darwin award.
|
10-05-13 04:43pm
|
Reply
75
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another great review admiral. I like this sort of material myself so was tempted by this one, but the quality sounds absolutely awful! Looks like another place that has been left to die.
|
10-04-13 10:22am
|
