| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
No problem for me as long as the site has something exceptional. I have said this many times before but going back 20-30 years and you could pay £20-£100 per video depending on where you purchased. I may sound like some sort of shill but I think online porn is very cheap at the moment.
It can't last. Better view this as the golden age of porn I think, especially with Pirate Bay in the dock and authorities trying to gain control of the internet. I never dreamed of porn being as cheap or accessible as it is at the moment. With some of the specialist websites catering for every fetish imaginable it is hard to get too jaded. I will make the most of this, in the way I made the most of the punk rock scene in the 70's. Thankfully I still have my hearing.
|
02-22-09 05:07pm
|
Reply
452
|
Anal Teen Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
number1zero's Review
The webmaster has told me this site is not officially open yet, so that would account for the slow updates.
|
02-21-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
453
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
I think lousy customer service and lousy content are of equal importance, as far as I'm concerned, in establishing which sites to avoid. Some people would go for the content as the most important thing, but if you get lousy service or feel you've been ripped off in any way, what should be a fun way to spend money, turns out to be a bloody nuisance and waste of time. I avoid any site or organisation that has terrible customer service. This organisation is now one of them.
|
02-18-09 06:19am
|
Reply
454
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Agreed. This is a very impressive review.
|
02-18-09 06:10am
|
Reply
455
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't have a cut off line. What I do is look at the score and reviews from those members whose views I respect the most and whose taste is nearest to mine. I take no notice of the members who score the fake breast/tattoed back/bleached aged blonde sort of site with a high mark, no notice of those who do about 10 reviews a day, and no notice of those who continually award marks of 90+.
|
02-17-09 05:43am
|
Reply
456
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
I think the main reason for PU existing, is to make money by helping genuine porn sites to make money. It mutually benefits both sides. At the same time they give the little guy a chance and a voice in the same way a lot of those TV shows, who challenge crooked organisations or companies, do.
I am really pleased to hear you got a result out of this. Sometimes sites make money out of very strange, incompetent, or dodgy behaviour, and the customer just lets it go, which encourages them, and means they are unlikely to change their ways. This is bad for the customer in the long run, but sometimes the customer bites back. Don't let them get away with it. By challenging them it benefits all of us.
Lets hope this is a lesson for all sites who try this sort of thing. None of us who have followed this are ever going to subscribe to this organisation now, and rightly so.
|
02-13-09 07:04pm
|
Reply
457
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
I agree with Anth on this. It doesn't matter how good the content is. If a site acts in a fraudulant, dishonest, or incompetetnt way, you would never join the site no matter how good the content is. I understand how pissed off customers are when this sort of thing happens. So shout as loud as you like as far as I'm concerned. I want to hear. You also get the warm feeling that by warning others you are diverting money away from rip off artists to genuine good quality sites.
|
02-12-09 06:27am
|
Reply
458
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have a lot of videos that I left at my parents old place, which is a big place with lots of room for storage. Didn't bother taking them to where I live now. My mother always liked some of the films I have on video and always searches through my collection for something to play. Thing is I never bothered separating them from the porn and the music. So you see titles like "Swedish Anal Schoolgirls" mixed with "Alien." So I literally have the porn mixed with the Disney.
|
02-01-09 05:55pm
|
Reply
459
|
Orgy World Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
These videos look GREAT. Just my sort of thing. I hate it when they describe two couples having sex with 6 people looking on as "an orgy." I hope they get some more content so it's worth joining. Personally I think the best orgy site I have seen is "Orgy Sex Parties," but you have to put up with all the Pink Visual negatives when you subscribe to that one.
|
01-30-09 08:34am
|
Reply
460
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
At first I said usually, but changed it to the next option. The thing is, I don't sign up for sites that have bad or poor reputations anyway. That's why I always check them out here first. Sometimes I would rather trust a site directly with my credit card than some of the billing companies.
|
01-30-09 08:28am
|
Reply
461
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
I agree with everyone. Porn is a hobby which does not take up a lot of time and does not dominate my life. I've been looking at pictures of naked women since I was about 8 and spanked my first girl when I was ten, There are no options which apply. So I haven't chosen any.
This reminds me of a job I applied for years ago (glad I didn't get it). You HAD to fill in an option even if none of them applied, you just HAD to pick the nearest. So in my own writing under the 4 options I put "5. None of the above," drew a little box and ticked that. Needless to say I didn't get the job.
|
01-28-09 07:54am
|
Reply
462
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Poll
I went with perverted because I accept that I am perverted - along with about 95 per cent of men. It's just a case of what you consider to be perverted. As JayG says, it's virtually anything that isn't totally straight sex for the reason of reproduction. As far as deviation goes, they say you become deviant towards something that happens when you have your first sexual feelings in your very early years. I am just grateful my parents were not watching The Queen's Speech, or a party political broadcast when I achieved my very first erection.
|
01-26-09 03:03pm
|
Reply
463
|
Pornstar Tryouts
(0)
|
Reply of
Netsirk's Reply
I realise things can and do go wrong. But thank you for taking the time to explain things and make some comments. As a customer I find this does make a difference.
|
01-26-09 08:49am
|
Reply
464
|
Pornstar Tryouts
(0)
|
Reply of
Netsirk's Reply
Cheers. As requested I have sent you details of some of the emails I sent on 22 and 23 January. I had no problem receieving a reply from jettis it was the other customer services link that did not reply. As with any site, navigation and knowing how to use it can provide a problem. Some of the videos do not play or download, and some are not avaialble for download anyway. These are in the minority. I did think I had done my money (albeit a small amount) when I first joined, but I now like the site. I guess I was very suspicious of a site that seemed to offer such a lot for such a small amount, which is why I always do a thorough search of any site before doing a review.
|
01-26-09 08:33am
|
Reply
465
|
Pornstar Tryouts
(0)
|
Reply of
Netsirk's Reply
Thank you for the reply. I try to be as fair as possible, although some people may think I'm a really mean pain in the ass. I do think your site offers a lot of content for the price and is therefore great value if it is accessed using the link from TBP.
I have noticed that I may not be totally alone in noticing the value. Elonlybuster reviewed Ebony Auditions which is also your company I think. It offers the same $9.95 deal with the TBP link. It is one I may be tempted to take up next month, although I am not sure how much material will be duplicated from Pornstar Tryouts Either way, I do think these sites offer very good value for money.
|
01-26-09 08:09am
|
Reply
466
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I'm with the one month only buch, with a few exceptions. What JayG says is pretty accurate.
|
01-25-09 04:13pm
|
Reply
467
|
Pigtails Big Tits
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
I have just checked it out for myself. Not only does it say limited trial on the sign up form, there is a cross check for another sign up on the form too. So watch out.
|
01-20-09 09:42am
|
Reply
468
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
It really does depend, that's why I voted for "other" changed from "not important at all." I'm with JayG on the pizza delivery thing. I'd rather have a scene setting along the lines of - here's the girl she's getting paid some money to have sex, or other things, rather than some phony acting and pretending they're enjoying it. Lousy acting is a big turn off. The models are paid money to have sex. Might as well be honest about it, without being disrespectful.
|
01-20-09 06:28am
|
Reply
469
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
One day later and I did actually receive a reply. The strange thing is, did anyone know analteenangels wasn't open? The reply is below.
"the site analteenangels is not open, it is not updated. the pornpassforall bonuses are listed on the first freetour page, there are two lists: the sites in the first will you get immediately, and the sites in the second list are the loyalty bonuses."
|
01-20-09 06:05am
|
Reply
470
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Good reply. All of those things you mentioned are very important. It also shows you are thinking and using your own guidelines, which is more than can be said for some of the reviews. Clearly the site is customer friendly. I like your reviews I just hope you take the content a little more into consideration in the future. Even if you don't I would not argue against your right to set up your own criteria when reviewing. It is part of what makes the site so interesting. The only thing I would say is what about if you had all the great stuff that Brazzers has, and then has stunningly beautiful girls as well? Surely it would deserve more than 2 more marks. This isn't meant as a harsh criticism, more a continuation of my theme a few weeks ago about not marking too high, because then what do you do if a truly sensational site comes along? Okay I know - dream on, it probably isn't going to happen.
|
01-19-09 05:43pm
|
Reply
471
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Well I can't say it isn't a thorough review, but 98!? Noooooooooooooo........
Okay I know it's personal taste and all that. To me this site is a total turn off. The reasons are, too many breast jobs, everything looks the same from what I can make out, too many tattoos, and too many over 40's girls. Once again it's those over made up girls with phony breasts.
There seem to be 2 types of girls. The blonde, looking orange from so much makeup, well over 35, with fake breasts so unnatural they create sagging lines from pulling all the natural flesh out of its normal position, so many tattoos they look like they've been in a bar fight with Mike Tyson, and won, looking like they are 50 trying to look 18 but ending up looking 70. Or there's the brunette, looking orange from so much makeup, well over 35, with fake breasts so unnatural they create sagging lines from pulling all the natural flesh out of its normal position, so many tattoos they look like they've been in a bar fight with Mike Tyson, and won, looking like they are 50 trying to look 18, but ending up looking 70.
Okay, you disagree and love the site, and its just taste and all that - but you have noticed these things from your review. 98!!?? NOOOOOOOOOOO.
|
01-19-09 04:43pm
|
Reply
472
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
In fact I probably wont bother subscribing at all, even if the do answer. They will probably take my money and then I will find somehow my membership or password doesn't work, or mystically other people have used it to log in so I'm banned and forfeit my money.
Yes, it was a rude email. But if these people would care to answwer some fu**ing emails occasionally, they may get some more customers and actually divert some people away from piracy.
If they have so many customers they are oh far to busy to answer emails, then the solution is to do them a favour, and lessen their load, by not signing up in the first place.
|
01-19-09 08:46am
|
Reply
473
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I am.
|
01-18-09 06:54am
|
Reply
474
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
The Clyde's Review
I like the review. As you can see from my review, I agree with you about this site.
|
01-16-09 02:18pm
|
Reply
475
|
Tiny's Black Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
This is a great point. Not all of us can be at our computers continually. There are some days I cant't login at all, so we lose those opportunities to download. Even if they said - well 6 times 31 is 186, so we will allow you 186 downloads in a month, I may be tempted. This organisation comes across as a total couldn't care less about the customers network. Until a few months ago these people only had streaming available. I believe the best way to deal with this sort of customer unfriendly strategy is the same as dealing with DRM. Don't purchase. There are lots of other better value sites out there. If they become more reasonable I will join, but to me their current policy is an insult.
|
01-15-09 08:55am
|
