| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
What is this strange thing you people call "the sun?" Same all year, come rain, come wind, come cloud, come more rain.
|
08-26-10 07:43am
|
Reply
352
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
Thanks for the warning. Very nice description of what happens. Some of these sites have the "spiv" attitude of any rip off artist on any London street. At least if anyone downloads free Elegant Angel material they do not have to feel guilty about doing so.
|
08-26-10 07:38am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Originally it was nearly all videos, but over time I have become more interested in pics, possibly due to the influence of members here. Videos are still in the lead though.
|
08-24-10 06:33pm
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I go with not worth the effort. Some of them are scams. It's all the stuff I hear on PU that keeps me from trying one. Have never taken one and probably never will.
|
08-21-10 04:42am
|
Reply
355
|
Young Throats
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I agree with the above opinions. I have said a number of times how this site should score 10 points higher than the usual 80 something it gets from members, given the beautiful girls and very good camerawork. Unfortunately it's run by people with total and utter contempt for customers. Apart from rogue sites that deliberately rip you off, this has to be the worst customer oriented legitimate network out there. A perfect example of why free pirate downloads are so popular.
|
08-10-10 06:37am
|
Reply
356
|
Nubile Girls HD
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Another good review. I hate tampering with photos and videos so that is a pro for me, but sometimes photographers and cameramen do not know how to capture a girl tp show her at her best. It's a network I have always thought about, but never joined. Some dive in, I wait for years. Your reviews are now up there with the best.
|
08-08-10 06:18am
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A definite yes. I like to see a good sample of what the site is all about. Anything censored makes me very wary. It reminds me of rip off aritsts, who have lousy material.
|
08-05-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
358
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes I totally agree with you reasoning behind why they do it. For me there comes a point where I just get sick of it and join a different site because I want an easy time with an easy customer friendly site. I don't mind 3-6 different sites but some of these places take it too far.
Good review that I think tells everyone what sort of content to expect.
|
08-02-10 06:34pm
|
Reply
359
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Check out the Denner review for Teen Mega World, which is over a year old so doesn't have the latest sites on it, but it does go a good way to explaining how complicated it all is. I'm confused. Don't know why these sites don't just have 2 or 3 sites instead of 25 small ones all with the same look and content, or at least similar look and content.
|
08-02-10 03:36pm
|
Reply
360
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Good review. Your description sounds just like it is one of those sites that has that certain look. So many of those teen sites have that look. You would think it would be relatively easy to make attractive girls look attractive, but somehow they manage to do just the opposite.
|
08-01-10 07:39pm
|
Reply
361
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
IK - the least they could have done is send over a couple of lap dancers. Come to think of it the least they could have done is absolutely nothing, which is what they did. Shameful.
Drooler - Yeah it also takes me longer to pee than for one of those newbies to write a 3 line review. But that's age. What can we do about the ever increasing threat of the newbie 3 line review? Suicide bombers, that's what. I'd do it myself but had to take an early retirement. Job was just killing me.
Messmer - The trouble is what we want is now a niche. Everything that isn't what the majority consume (whether they comsume it because they really want it, or because it's foist on them) is a niche. You would think your wanting a simple strip from clothed to nude and sometimes involving lingerie would be simple, or my wanting a simple hardcore set of pics or videos with the same style and class as softcore would be easy to find, but it isn't. I'm probably going to end up doing a wittyguy type rant in the forum. I think Drooler and yourself also noticed something about what was missing in some of the Karups sets. Could have done with more ass and whole body shots, although maybe you have to be a real perv to want a whole body shot.
|
08-01-10 05:07pm
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ass is my number one, but I want to see mainly the whole body from front and back. I really get sick of those close up pussy shots.
|
08-01-10 05:37am
|
Reply
363
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks Drooler, I'm definitely going to have to check out Earl Miller. I'm an ass man myself (err....I hope I have phrased that correctly), and I like to see the whole girl not just groin shots in both hard and softcore. I agree with your points, as I think do a lot of members here. Maybe it's just us and we do no have the taste of a lot of porn consumers. Seems like Ik2 also likes MetArt. If there was just one hardcore site where that sort of photography and camerawork were used, it would be the only place I took out a long term membership to. I would never leave. Have a feeling the search will be as fruitless as Messmer's desperate plea for a site with his particular taste.
|
08-01-10 05:11am
|
Reply
364
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Cheers Drools. Yeah I had that Homer Simpson DOH! sort of feeling when trying to work out how to navigate. I thought there must be an easier way but I just couldn't find it. Most members seem to agree on a lot of the negatives sites have. Those index pics are awful
Is photography on softcore sites better than hardcore sites? It seems to be. Maybe it's because they concentrate on the whole body, and making it look beautiful. Don't see why they can't do the same for hardcore photography, or maybe I'm just plain wrong.
Overall a positive experience well worth the money. The girls looked like normal human beings rather than blow up dolls.
|
07-31-10 07:44pm
|
Reply
365
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Yes, but we're still wondering how the site goes from incredibly dodgy practises to legit? Change of management? Taken over by the mafia? Rick taken over by aliens? Answers please. Anyone?
|
07-31-10 06:46pm
|
Reply
366
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yes I agree about the sameness thing. It shouldn't really be a problem because it's the naked girls we want to look at, but at times it's nice to see some different settings, style, and lighting, which sometimes makes the girls look the same too. On the other hand Karups has some good material, is one of the good guys as far as sites go, and there is some really good material.
Have to check out ATK, but I think that is mainly soft core.
|
07-31-10 06:39pm
|
Reply
367
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Shill shill!!!
|
07-31-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
368
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Yeah I'm with you on that one. I thought haven't I heard that name before with regards to bad reviews and dodgy behaviour? Then I checked and saw all the bad stuff that was reported going on. Run run run away. Not touching the place with a barge pole. Thought I'd let a senior member of the forum make a comment before I said something. Good question - so why the sudden change from BP to Greenpeace?
|
07-30-10 05:26pm
|
Reply
369
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Sounds like a very accurate review given my experience with the organisation. They have some very good material from a year or two ago, but the rest leaves a lot to be desired.
|
07-07-10 10:09am
|
Reply
370
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Another great review. I'm always interested in your opinion on any site before I think of joining, especially the teen ones. Thought this site had stopped updating because the home page always looks the same to me, but it appears I'm wrong.
Only down side appears to be that some of the models on here look a little anorexic. Teen doesn't have to mean skinny, but I know that's what it does mean on most sites. Navigation also looks like it gives members a hard time.
|
05-29-10 07:00pm
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Am I the only one who finds Sarah Palin rather attractive?
|
05-11-10 12:57pm
|
Reply
372
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks messmer, yes I think you are right on all counts. Good observation.
I would hope anyone thinking about joining their first site would consider this one above others. It's a perfect safe first site, and it's also great to come back to.
|
04-24-10 07:20pm
|
Reply
373
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
Thanks goldfish. I always find that facility useful. They have not only a list of what you have viewed or downloaded, but a still from each clip. Makes it easy to see what you have viewed. It's handy if you want to find a clip you have viewed, or the dvd where it's from, but can't remember the name, or can't find it.
|
04-24-10 07:30am
|
Reply
374
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I'm really sorry this happened to you Ace. I hope somehow it can all be sorted out, enough so that you can get your money back and also that it doesn't happen to anyone else.
|
04-07-10 09:24am
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
In folders by site. Thankfully I do not have so much material I have lost track of what I have on my external drives yet. It's sometimes hard to have the willpower to delete things I am unlikely to view again. The externals have not taken over - yet.
|
03-30-10 12:20am
|
