| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks graymane. always good to get some positive feedback. Like you, I don't do many reviews.
|
05-07-11 06:04am
|
Reply
302
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
Thanks Stas. My main concern was not to put people off the network because those who love slim young models will love the site. I'm a mean miserable bastard, and though my mark was lowish compared to some other members it wasn't that low compared to others I have done. It's just personal taste, and for some this is a must see, at least once.
|
05-07-11 06:01am
|
Reply
303
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks Ik, looks like we agree. Much as I dislike the TeenCoreClub network, and the contempt they have for customers, they do a better job of showing off the models.
Whatever happened to puppy fat? When I was a kid, teen girls had puppy fat.
|
05-06-11 07:02pm
|
Reply
304
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I am one of the few dissenters here. I joined them once and never went back. No customer service, the worst download speeds I have ever encountered (down to 1kb/sec on occasions!), regional discrimination, worst of all was the way the videos had the wrong dimensions so the bodies looked distorted. I have to admit I'm virtually on my own with my contempt for videobox.
|
05-06-11 05:20am
|
Reply
305
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Varies by case. I decide only after a number of reviews and after I get to see what the site has available. So any views both positive or negative help to complete the whole picture.
|
04-30-11 05:15am
|
Reply
306
|
Czech Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
This one could be good. I have a feeling there aren't many previews because there aren't many videos. They look to have a good Exploited College Girls type of site as one of the three or four available. I received a spyware/virus warning on this site concerning dangers about giving your details. I'm not brave enough to subscribe to a potential trouble site.
|
04-22-11 07:18pm
|
Reply
307
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
This is true. I put that in my review. The other two sites that come in the package - Picking Up Pussy and TNA Tryouts do have the higher definition downloads, but not 18Eighteen. Don't know why.
|
04-18-11 06:32pm
|
Reply
308
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Excellent review, and not just because I agree with it. I joined the network myself recently, and do not particualrly like the idea that young should mean emaciated or painfully slim. If I get around to doing a review myself, the score will be in the early eighties not nineties. The picture quality and camerawork on some of the sites is awful. Some of the scenes are much too dark, and yes, the models do all look alike. Okay, they are either blond and skinny or brunette and skinny. Like you, I think Beauty Angels is one of the best sites in the network. But overall I wasn't grabbed by the network, which may mean personal taste as much as anything. Overall I found it a disappointment.
|
04-16-11 05:24am
|
Reply
309
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
Reply of
John1's Reply
Hi John,
RealSpankings has moderate to hard spankings and is quite good, but Lupus/RGE is stronger, and generally well directed. Her First Punishment/Rusian Slaves/Nettles/Russian Discipline is all one and the same thing. They are the same production company with different names. They are harder than RealS but maybe not quite as hard as Lupus, but have truly awful direction and editing, and a really annoying top. By far the hardest is Mood Productions, who aren't even linked to from PU/TBP because of legal reasons. Dallas Spanks Hard deserves a mention too. He has a very good reputation for customer service, as do RealS, but I wont subscribe anymore because of download limits. He is similar in strength to RealS. Hope this is of some help.
|
04-14-11 06:23pm
|
Reply
310
|
Teen Bitch Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Am I right in thinking this is one of the sites you have to wait for your second month's subscription - it doesn't come with the first month?
|
04-11-11 02:40pm
|
Reply
311
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks Exotics. Tremendous review, by the way, and everything well explained. I have been close to joining in the past, but I was a little worried there would be too many gynaecological close ups. It now goes back top of the list.
|
04-01-11 06:19am
|
Reply
312
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
99 per cent. FFS that's high! I thought you preferred softcore to hardcore too. Gotta respect your opinion cos you are one of the most highly respected members here. Have never been a member of this network, but now I'm tempted.
|
03-31-11 08:09pm
|
Reply
313
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Give me bare body, which includes bare feet.
|
03-15-11 10:46am
|
Reply
314
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
LOL - I hope Wittyguy remembers this one for his yearly awards.
In answer to the question I quite like DP occasionally, but the drawback is it's very hard to see the girl, as she's buried between two guys. So so it's okay on occasions.
|
03-08-11 06:02am
|
Reply
315
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Another good review. I would put this site near to the front of a list of sites ot join simply becasue of the no hitting, spitting or slapping policy.
I wouldn't give any site a 50 becasue of a slow download speed, but at least this gives another view. I don't know why some sites are slower for some people than others. I do know my least favourite site (a well known video site) that a lot of people on here love, gave me consistently the worst DL speeds I have ever experienced. Given the comments it appeared to be worse for Europe. Hugow is from America so that can't be a reason for the slow downloads for this site. He gave it 90 when the speeds were okay. Down to 50 is a big drop.
The content sounds good, so I'll have to check this one out.
|
03-08-11 05:59am
|
Reply
316
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Thanks to PU and TBP, I think this sort of thing happens less than it used to, nevertheless it still does happen. It makes people afraid to give their credit card details, so download for free instead. There are a lot of reputable sites out there, but you still sometimes see that old rip off, fleece em once, cheap gangster mentality.
|
02-23-11 02:03pm
|
Reply
317
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
It was another good review Frosty. One of those cases where the review is better than the network. I'm never subscribing to any site that only scores 30.
|
02-20-11 06:10am
|
Reply
318
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I'm afraid this is now more a rule than an exception. It makes PU all the more important. Good spot, IK.
|
02-11-11 06:16pm
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Forget it. It would be one of my least favourite jobs. Same as being a musician. It's okay being a fan, but I wouldn't want to be part of the industry.
|
02-11-11 06:15pm
|
Reply
320
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Yep Cap'n, same applies here, which probably makes us sort of weird. Being weird is something I came to accept, and eventually be proud of. Better that, than be mainstream sheep, being told what to watch, what to think, and what to consume.
As a final PS before the review gets buried, I think I had better add that if you go to the model directory or photos on 18 Eighteen, you will find a wealth of archive softcore photos. Finding hardcore is very rare, but the softcore picture archives go back ten years. I should have put that in the review, but being more a hardcore fan I virtually ignored it, and the navigation is not user friendly, so I gave up searching. There is also some hardcore in there which is not listed under hardcore.
|
02-04-11 06:08am
|
Reply
321
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Cheers Cap'n!
Maybe we here at PU are just out of synch with the majority of the porn buying public, and the producers.
|
02-03-11 06:13pm
|
Reply
322
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Otoh - I was looking at porn from the age of 8, which is 45 years ago (and look what it's done to me). Shaved was definitely not the norm, it was all bushy, except in early days when they couldn't show pubic hair at all. I remember having a conversation when I was 17 with another school friend about trimmed pussy. Even then I preferred the shaven look, but he preferred the natural look. I was ahead of my time! It's possible my preference comes from those old 50's and 60's pics where they couldn't show pubic hair.
|
02-02-11 06:20am
|
Reply
323
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks Graymane, it's always nice to receive a positive comment. Yeah I have always hated those gynaecological close ups. I want to see the whole beautiful girl. It's not so bad on the pics, and the photography is good. It's just on the videos they close in far too often for my taste. It's been a problem with porn since the very start, and this site is by no means the worst. Even on those old fashioned 70's films with plots, that some members here rave about, there were a lot of closeups in the hardcore scenes. There were stand ins for some of the actresses in quite a few of those too, which is why they used the closeups.
|
02-02-11 05:51am
|
Reply
324
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
Despite being old, I am with admiral and andy on this one. I prefer clean shaven or landing strip.
|
02-01-11 07:12am
|
Reply
325
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
Good review, as always. I like this sort of thing, so was interested to hear what Sex Video Casting was like. I presumed there was no hardcore, but it sounds as though I was wrong. I don't really like the ddf heavily made up 10,000 shoots a month sort of porn, but this site sounds a bit different, and more to my liking.
|
01-30-11 04:52pm
|
