| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2376
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Comment
I just tried it and it came up with the 24.95US price and I'm in canada. Mind you I think tangtub is right and it's just CCBill doing their old regional price gouging deal.
|
09-16-12 05:51pm
|
Reply
2377
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
My membership expired last week and I was a member a couple of years ago and little has changed. It makes sense for them to remain this way because they are still getting customers. Their search options aren't the greatest but you can do a search using the models name and get access to all her content with one click. IMO they have the best download options on the net when it comes to video and they hold their own against many other on the photo side as well.
The only thing that I can fault them is that their videos are too short. I'd prefer longer videos.
|
08-02-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
2378
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
orgasmation's Review
I regret that your experience was so bad. This is a pretty good site in general. This is the type of site that you join if you want to follow the development of a girl as she is starting in the porn biz. I don't know of any other site that does that.
I don't know if you read a few of the PU reviews before you took the plunge. I notice that a few mentioned that the dialogue was all French.
You might want to post in the forum the type of sites that appeal to you and the ones that you avoid. I'm sure that you will get some great suggestion
|
03-08-10 05:52am
|
Reply
2379
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I've been a member twice and unless they have another offer at a low cost then I don't think I'll join again. One of the thing that this site has going for it is that many French(mostly) pornstars made their debut on this site. If you don't speak or undertand French then this is alos a negative mark going against them. If you like softacre then you may find some of the first phtoshoots to be along those lines but I don't think it's as much intenioanl as it's by designed. If you like a certain model then you will stick around to see her go hardcore. Some do and then some simply stop at softcare.
I also find that the updates don't come that often.
|
08-11-09 06:54pm
|
Reply
2380
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
Thanks Arnaud. I'll keep my eyes open for it.
|
07-10-08 06:27pm
|
Reply
2381
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Since I haven't been a member in many years than I can't be 100% sure but I suspect the guy behind this site and backroom casting couch has not changed his style since when I was last a member so I can tell you that it's fake. That's not to say that some of the women who appear here aren't also college students but that is incidental to the scene because for all intense and purposes they are amateur porn performers. The one thing this guy has going for him is that the women he hires are all amateurs to most porn fans. My gut feeling is that many of the women are cam models looking to increase their profile and by creating a larger fan base for their cam career. Not being a fan of cam sites makes it hard for me to confirm that comment but one thing is certain. The vast majority(about 99.9%) never do any other porn scenes.
Some of the girls are quite nice looking but for me the POV, bad camera angles and blurting of the male performer make most of the scene unwatchable and that's why I have never returned to this site or backroom casting couch.
|
10-08-16 07:01pm
|
Reply
2382
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I can't say that I noticed too many problems in regards to zooming but the crappy angles and shaking is all there to be disliked by people like me. Mofo's let's try anal does a kind of similar types of videos and yet the guy at Mofo still manages to do a better job than this one. It's still POV and still crappy but there are levels of crappiness.
|
03-18-12 05:39pm
|
Reply
2383
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I know of a couple of these girls went further in their porn career so it's kind of interesting to see them in their beginning. The thing that kills it for me is the POV. I prefer when the porn is shot by someone other than the performer himself.
|
03-18-12 09:08am
|
Reply
2384
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Hi Cybertoad. Take a look at the review because you'll notice that it has completely changed since I screwed up my review. I used the info for backroom casting couch for exploited college girl. I have corrected my error and made a review for the other site. You will see that exploited gets a better score and review than it's sister site.
|
03-16-12 06:14am
|
Reply
2385
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I agree with you that there are some really good looking girls and some of them seem to have done very little other porn than what's found on his site but he's so F..g annoying that most scenes are ruined.
|
06-07-11 07:03pm
|
Reply
2386
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
bjorn7's Comment
I suspect that this is a recent change because there was a review done in September and I'm sure the reviewer would have mentioned that the site had a significant price increase. I already thought that 25$ was expensive for the content available so 35$ is just ridiculous.
|
01-02-11 04:58pm
|
Reply
2387
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Reply
None of the videos are HD and it would be wasted on this type of site. This is possibly the closest anyone has come to an Ed Powers video except that you never see the face of the performer/camera guy.
It's almost all POV and sometime the camera angle is weird.
|
05-02-10 11:03am
|
Reply
2388
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I took a quick look at the preview pages and I don't think you get any image or video previews but
you do get a pretty good idea of the content.
I've downloaded more than half of the content and I don't think you should bother if you want good pictures. This is really for video fans. Another reason to avoid is if you don't want to see or hear a girl be fairly uncomfortable during the anal portion. I'm not talking the faking sounds and look but girls being unhappy about getting a dick in their ass.
|
02-18-10 06:41pm
|
Reply
2389
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I'm glad that I brought you a moment of laughter. I would also be curious to see how anyone can hold anything with their nads. I think he studied under Ed Powers or watched everyone one of his movies to be able to talk, film and screw all at the same time.
|
02-16-10 06:24pm
|
Reply
2390
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I was really surprised by the amount of up and coming girls he had on his site. I did notice that some of the girls use a different name on his site then what they are now called.
|
02-14-10 06:03pm
|
Reply
2391
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I can't dispute the facts that many established performers have shot for these guys but I still say that their brand of porn should not exist because it's simply too toxic for most performers (not to say all).
|
03-01-15 05:43pm
|
Reply
2392
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I must disagree with you. The two sites you named are known to shoot extreme type of porn. I would say that queesnake shoots ultra extreme content so the type people interested in that are not your run of the mill porn fan. The women who choose to shoot for those sites know exactly what they will subjected to because it's just too extreme for them not to. The same can't be said for the women who get fooled into shooting for FF. I know because I read a first hand account of what happened to one of the women who shot for these guys. I'm talking about a woman who had already shot for a couple of Kink sites so she was comfortable with the more extreme part of the industry. As far as I can tell. She is the only woman to have walked out of her shoot before it got too violent. I saw some of the pictures and she didn't look good after just a few minutes of starting her scene.
I'm okay when the women who choose to shoot a certain type of scene know exactly what is going to happen and know that their safety is paramount to the people shooting the scene. that doesn't man that accidents won't happen but those are usually the exception and not the rule. You will have to point to me which FF scene you are dead certain that the woman was thrilled with what happened to her and would gladly sign up for another run. I have never seen it and I know some women have shot more than once for FF.
|
02-28-15 05:11pm
|
Reply
2393
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
I'll grant you it's rare and there isn't a single day that I don't wish that it was extinct. Their brand of porn is what you get when you mix the most fucked up stuff Max Hardcore did toward the end of his career and add a cup of insanity. They are the poster child for misogynistic porn.
There is no current site that compares to them which is saying a lot.
They changed their name from facial abuse to face fucking because they were probably having a hard time getting any woman to shoot for them. I would be curious to know how they manage to entice any woman to actually shoot for them.
|
02-26-15 06:12pm
|
Reply
2394
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
The reason marcus gave seems logical but is it possible that they changed their name because they were having a harder time recruiting women to appear on their FA site because of their bad reputation with talent? Maybe they think that they can fool new girls in appearing on their new site since they won't equate the old FA with the new FF.
I would rather they went out of business but that's just me.
|
09-01-14 04:58pm
|
Reply
2395
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
I'm sure that in retrospect her trust was badly placed but I gathered from her comment that she sort of trusted the opinion of the other girl. She learned the really hard way that she made a mistake but she isn't the first person to do that and she won't be the last.
|
10-04-13 05:57pm
|
Reply
2396
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
The main reason why she didn't go with her gut feeling is because the girl who arranged the shoot (for a 10% fee) was an acquaintance and Clayra trusted her that it would be all show and not misogynistic crap. You can imagine how pissed Clayra was with the other girl.
I saw a couple of the pics and it's not pretty. I'm glad that she had the guts to walk away because she had to know that she wasn't going to get paid or at least get a much, much smaller amount than she was promised.
If you want to see the pics then visit Clayra's ADT thread and scroll to 2010 or 2011. You can read her account of the event as well as see a couple of pictures.
|
10-03-13 06:13pm
|
Reply
2397
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Have you ever read what happened to Clayra Beau when she shot for FA? If you haven't then the gist is that she had done some research prior to shooting for them and had decided that it wasn't for her. Be aware that she had shot for Kink and another BSDM type of site so extreme porn was not an issue but she didn't trust them. She had an acquaintance that asked her if she would be willing to shoot for them and the girl said that what you see on camera isn't what happens behind the scene. She had shot for them so she supposedly knew what she was talking about. Let's just say that Clayra was slap around and not in a good way. She wound up with blood in both eyes and a bloody nose and that was just in the BJ part. She stopped the shoot right away and told them what they could do with the rest of the shoot.
I don't know if she is an isolated case but having been a member twice in the last decade then my gut feeling is that she isn't. I grant you that some women have gone back to them but they are in the minority.
|
10-02-13 05:55pm
|
Reply
2398
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I used to believe what the women said in those after scene interviews had to be the truth but some recent revelations have made me doubt that belief. I still think that some of them are being honest but I also know that some of them do it because it's part of the deal the signed and some may still be under the shock of what happened that they are not be able to think properly.
Even the most pain loving person cannot come out of a standard FA shoot with anything positive to say about what just happened to her and I think the same can be said for Kink's Hardcore Ganbang scenes. Getting spat on, slapped, chocked and fucked two ways to sunday may make for great extreme porn but the girl receiving this kind of treatment can't be as thrilled as she makes it sound.
|
09-27-13 06:17pm
|
Reply
2399
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
I'll return the compliment. This kind of dialogue is why I have always loved PU. I hope we can have other discussions and if you haven't taken a look at the forum then hopefully you will do so. It's always great to get new blood and new views.
|
09-26-13 02:35pm
|
Reply
2400
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
I used to think that Kink was the safest company any girl could work for but the recent HIV events have made me seriously doubt that belief. Not for all of their sites but Public Disgrace is now in serious trouble and it would not surprise me to see it disappear or at the very least see it changed into something very different, The HC gangbang site is borderline for me. The plot themselves aren't an issue for me because they aren't real but the misogynistic way the girls get treated by the guys and the excessive physical violence in the form of face slapping, spitting, chocking means that I rarely join this site and when I do then I only save the odd video.
I know that it was once easier to differentiate between what FA does and what Kink's PD and HCGB do but I think that Kink crossed a line that they didn't realise was there and some of the stuff both of the above named sites do are starting to tread dangerously close to FA territory. I still think that there is a significant difference between both companies philosophy but that could change if Kink isn't careful.
|
09-26-13 03:40am
|
