| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2201
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
That is an amazing offer. I checked and club Sandy, pix and video and zoliboy all seem to offer the same upfront membership. That is not the case fir the other sites in that network. I'm certainly going to join.
|
10-06-09 06:18pm
|
Reply
2202
|
Club Savanna Samson
(0)
|
Reply of
starduster's Reply
Don't mention it. I also would want to get as much of Savanna's stuff as I could. After all Savanna was a really hot looking women who did some amazing movies.
|
09-21-14 01:11pm
|
Reply
2203
|
Club Savanna Samson
(0)
|
Reply of
starduster's Reply
Did you look at Videobox? You will need to purchase the extra Vivid channel but I think they have the bulk of Savanna's movies and you only need to spend a little extra above the standard VB rate to get access to those movies. It will still cost you less than 20$.
The only negative is that you aren't likely to get a lot of pics.
|
09-21-14 04:53am
|
Reply
2204
|
Club Savanna Samson
(0)
|
Reply of
starduster's Comment
Khan has already told you they no longer do business with them so that means you should avoid the site. Savanna was a Vivid contract star so I suspect that any site like Videobox will have the bulk of her movies.
|
09-20-14 10:01am
|
Reply
2205
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
CaloNord's Comment
I don't know how knowledgeable you are about porn in general so maybe you already know this but CS is now a dead site. I mean you still see updates but a person like me recognizes that most of them are leased material available on multiple sites all over the net. The days when CS only updated with their own content must be long gone now. I don't think they were able to survive the recession of 2008.
Not that they are alone as many sites were already starting to have problems with tube and torrent sites and the crash simply killed them.
Of course that doesn't mean that you shouldn't join them because their join price is ridiculously low but regular members of Eastern European porn sites should be careful because they could join this site only to realise that they already have all of their content.
|
01-24-15 07:23am
|
Reply
2206
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Comment
Sometimes some members will look at a similar site and see something we don't but I do find that 95 was rather high for what I consider to be a semi-dead site. I checked what passes for a preview section and
at least 3 of the updates are many years old since the performers on them have been retired for a couple of years already.
It's nice that you get access to a couple of other sites but frankly Seventeen video is basically the video section of this sites photosets and the other site is a cam site.
There was a time when Seventeen was the site for cute teen models but that time is long gone. There are better ones now and frankly cheaper ones as well.
|
11-10-13 08:24am
|
Reply
2207
|
Colette
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
My main issue with this site is that I honestly don't see what they are offering that is remotely different than what x-art is already offering. If they are hoping that people will buy a membership to both x-art and colette than I think they may be delusional because I don't see that happening. What I see happening is people picking and choosing to join one of them at a time and doing so less often if they see that the updates they loved are now getting split between two sites instead of feeding the needs of just one.
Let's be honest. Why would anyone want to join to mediocre sites when they can join one great site?
|
04-14-15 06:22pm
|
Reply
2208
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
CosplayDeviants's Reply
Let me answer all your excellent point and try to give you an idea of why I'm saying these things.
1-A website tour has to be more than words written on pages but must show what is available inside the members section. How else can anyone be certain that what is written is not just BS but true. There are too many sites that claim one thing in the preview pages but never deliver on those promises. I know because I got burned quite a few times and many of the other reviewers have also been burned.
2-I understand that internet piracy is the blight for any webmaster and I really wish it didn't exist. Sadly it seems to be getting worse. I'm not sure if the recession as a lot to do with it but it as to be part of it. I don't think webmasters care too much about the reasons why someone stole their content because it's the end result that affects them and all their paying members. You have to understand that the great majority of PU members are avid collectors of porn and expect that the money they pay to access that porn includes the ability to download it in an easy manner. You simply have to read the different reviews done by senior members to see that sites receive lower scores when these options are omited or when it's harder to download the content.
3-I actually wasn't upset about the number of reviews. They kind of jumped out because they all arived at the same time and they all had very high scores. My issue is in regards to the amount of info offered in the reviews vs the score given. AlexMercer did the best review out of the 5 and he still omited very important information. two of those reviews aren't even worth looking at because they have 10 or less lines of info and very little actual data. here is a list of things that were omited and would be important to add.
-No one mentioned the number of photosets and videos available on the site.
-No one mentioned the average pic resolution per set.
-No one mentioned the video resolution.
-No one mentioned if the chat option is free with the membership or if there is an extra cost.
-Alex mentioned that there was a VIP web cast but again it doesn't say if it's free or if you have to pay extra.
Now the above things are not all essential when doing a review but I think they become quite important when according a high score to a site. I suspect that cosplay is one of those fetishes with a small but passionate following and I can appreciate that. I may not be a fan of this type of porn and frankly I don't really consider this porn. It would require that the models have sex on screen for me to say that your site is a porn site. It's more a nude or semi-nude site with a specific theme in mind.
I think it would be great to see a review that addressed many of the points I posted and where the reviewer is more objective about the content. Of course that might be harder to say that done.
|
10-03-11 08:39am
|
Reply
2209
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
CosplayDeviants's Reply
Sorry to be blunt but if this is what you call a preview then you clearly haven't visited many websites in your life. There's a total of 12 images that can be enlarged on that free tour section. The breakdown is 10 solo female models, 1 solo male model and 1 B/G. You can't even find out how many pics there are per set. You can see the model page and know how many sets she has done but you can't even preview what they look like.
In regards to not being able to download content. I just looked at a review and saw that the reviewer had put in his Cons that there was no downloads. At least now I know that this is a slight error. You can download pics individually but you can't download them as complete sets in zip or rar format. That might not be a problem for some but you will find that the majority of us prefer that sets be downloadable as a complete file.
If you take a look at some of the other reviews on the site then you may understand why I and some of the other members had major issues with 5 new reviews with very high scores and very little content in those reviews to justify the score. Many of us take pride in this site and think it's important that reviews be more than someone's obvious infatuation with a particular site VS actual what others might get out of it.
|
10-02-11 06:57pm
|
Reply
2210
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I have no problem with anyone posting a review of any site he enjoys and I have no problem with the score given but I do have a problem when the score doesn't match the content. The site has no previews so how exactly is anyone to know what he will get for his money? You can't download any content. It would be one thing if this was a video site where you had to pay to stream the videos but a site that claims to offer mostly pics and doesn't allow it's paying members to download those pics is to be avoided at all cost.
As far as I can gather from what I read on the site. This is more like a community posting board where models upload their pictures and get paid for those pics.
|
10-02-11 09:48am
|
Reply
2211
|
Cum on Her Face
(0)
|
Reply of
gareth's Reply
That's always a problem for me when a site does not update the preview page. How can I tell if they are still producing new stuff or if they are recycling the old. Thanks gareth.
|
10-25-08 08:29am
|
Reply
2212
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I thought so because I downloaded most of their content. I don't know if you are aware but they have a preview site(see below link).
I find it great to see all new and upcoming updates without visiting each site individually.
https://www.pornusers.com/review/pornpassforall/
|
03-05-10 10:41am
|
Reply
2213
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I chose to stick with the network long enough to get access to this site. It's not a bad one but I find that it falls in the middle of Lez Cuties and Anal Teen Angels. Many of the same performers on those site are here. Quite afew of the scenes are girls doing solo stuff where anal is prevalent.
|
03-04-10 02:01pm
|
Reply
2214
|
Daily Sex Dose
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Hi RustyJ.
Their last update was July 5 so almost one month without an update but looking at what was updated in the days prior to that makes me think that this might be old content either never released or maybe remastered. They have 2 updates with Victoria Sweet and I don't think they are too recent. Who know's if they'll bring the site back. It always felt like a usueless adder to me because this is the kind of content that could have been included in one of the other existing site instead of creating a new one.
|
08-01-11 09:49am
|
Reply
2215
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
It's true that the vast majority of trials are pitiful at best and that's why I love TBP because they are upfront about what the trial offers. I don't know if you have ever tried TBP's advanced search option but it's possible to see all the sites that offer full trials.
I don't know how many of them are in the 2$ range but there are plenty of them in the 10$ or less. The only important thing in those cases is the number of days you get. I'm pretty picky about my porn so I can often download most of what I want from a site in less than 3 days so some trials are great but unless the join price is very high then I may still get the monthly membership in support of the site.
|
05-12-12 06:39am
|
Reply
2216
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
You could be right because the post is a little unclear. Mine was mostly as a warning to others anyway since it was already too late for omberman to do anything about it. What I said still makes sense in that regard because the best you can hope for is to stream three videos and look at 3 photosets. The site doesn't have a great preview section but then again the trailer pretty much tells you what you'll get since the content doesn't vary from video to video.
|
05-11-12 06:23pm
|
Reply
2217
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
omberman's Comment
Did you by any chance visit TBP and read the info about the trial? It's clearly marked that it allows user to view the latest updates, including 3 video clips, scren caps and photosets.
It is very very important that anyone thinking about joining any site should look at TBP and Pu and see any and all reviews. If you look on the right side of the TBP page then you will clearly see under the dates when the review was done and also when the sites data was updated. An older review might still be relevant if the fatcs were updated recently. It's especially important to visit TBP because they usually tell you what a trial membership actually gives you.
|
05-11-12 11:07am
|
Reply
2218
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
Reply of
AlexMercer's Review
Do you know how many videos they have? What's the resolution on the videos? Can they be downloaded as a single file or are they broken into smaller clips? TBP review is dated in 2007 so I'm curious to know if they have done any chnages.
I don't know if you have looked at fucking gamble but it has certain similarities to thi site.
|
10-03-11 09:05am
|
Reply
2219
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Sadly IR is still taboo in 2016 because way too many people are still racist and therefore that's why many performers who are not racist themselves will avoid doing for fear that it will make them pariah with many fans.
|
01-23-16 06:08pm
|
Reply
2220
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I don't know if this makes me weird(or weirder) but one of the main reasons why I like IR is because I like the contrast in skin color between the performers. I don't care if it's a black woman with a black man or vice versa. As long as there is a contrast than I'm happy. Not sure if this is one of the appeals of IR or if like anal and other sexual fetishes. It is still a taboo subject. In fact it would quite easy to argue that IR is in many ways more taboo than almost any other fetish(baring the illegal ones).
I'm sure that at some point I will join Dark X but unless they get an exclusive scene that I must have than it will be many months before I even consider joining.
|
01-22-16 03:20pm
|
Reply
2221
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I completely understand your reason and I see nothing wrong with it. I do wonder if you would have been as magnanimous if you had to pay full price instead of the TBP/PU discount. Don't get wrong. I joined Tushy and paid the full price all the while knowing that there wasn't a lot of content and updates were once a week so cost isn't always an issue but in this case I think what Dark X and in many ways what Hard X has done is borderline reprehensible because Dark is not really going to be a true stand alone site so much as a site that the owners of Hard X will now upload the IR content they would have once used on their own site. Instead of having a much bigger site with more updates. I think you will now have two smaller sites with fewer updates.
Of course I may be all wrong and this is just the beginning of them shooting way more content to update both sites.
|
01-21-16 05:56pm
|
Reply
2222
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another excellent review. I agree with you that IR in porn term is somewhat different than IR in real life. In porn IR tends to always mean a black man or woman with a white man or woman. As much as I enjoy IR porn.
This is one of those sites that I classify under not going to join for a very long time because it's going to take them a long time to accumulate content. Worse it actually penalizes it's sister site Hard X because the people behind Dark X didn't so much create a brand stand alone new site as they stole the content that would have once gone to Hard X and used it to supply a IR only site. It's not like Hard X has already a huge library of content but now they will either have to share the same content or see some scenes that would have once been on their site get used on Dark X.
|
01-18-16 06:04pm
|
Reply
2223
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
raider55's Reply
I'm not going to ask what you are accused of doing to get banned for life so I'm simply going to say that it sucks.
I'm not surprised that Epoch is so popular. It is in my opinion the best CC processor.
|
05-01-16 08:28am
|
Reply
2224
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
raider55's Comment
This is really tough because not every site offers the possibility of choosing another CC processor. Is there any way for you to contact Epoch and see if there is something you can do to fix the issue. My favorite CC processor is Epoch. I've never had any issue with them and they helped me out when I had a small problem with a membership.
|
04-29-16 05:37pm
|
Reply
2225
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
You can add using leased material to the list of things they do that can be considered less than desirable but all of these semi-negative things have to be compared with the fact that they update with about
|
07-24-14 04:06pm
|
