| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1801
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I said 100, but if 75 had been available I'd have picked that. I think anymore than 75, and it's mostly filler anyway. If you break it down 5 pages with 15 pictures per page is plenty for a photoshoot. Like some have said more pictures is just poor or lazy editing of content by webmaster.
|
06-03-07 11:06am
|
Reply
1802
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
This classifies as one of my top 5 most annoying things about models and the different names they appear under on the net. This is not directed at the models themselves, but more the different websites who try to sell the models as being exclusive to them, well if exclusive you mean under that name then sure. I've seen certain websites try to help out, but this is almost a lost cause.
|
05-23-07 04:25pm
|
Reply
1803
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
I agree withh all of the reasons except for the cost and the resolution. I don't mind paying a little bit more for good porn. I don't even look at resolution, because most site now offer medium or above anyway. I'd say that variety of models is more important than quality.
|
05-18-07 06:59am
|
Reply
1804
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Hi Monahan. I've yet to understand why the company that handles strapon lesbians, and a few others, doesn't simply offer the 18.95$ price upfront. If only as an half month membership or something. I'm
sure they'd get more members, which in turn would get them more money to offset the lost of income caused by the reduction of the sign up price.
|
05-16-07 07:15pm
|
Reply
1805
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Exatly what JAY G said. Those annoying attachment on the sign up pages which are already clicked off, and if you aren't paying attention and forget to unclick, will make you regret that oversite. This is not a smart way for website owners to make money. If you want add that extra content and charge more then do so. Usually the extra isn't worth bothering with
|
05-15-07 07:11pm
|
Reply
1806
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Everyboy elses comments were right on. I'll just add. I can't see myself paying 30$ a month long term. I'd much rather come in see what's new download what I like, and cancel my rebill. Then a few months later repeat the process. I would not join sites that down allow or control quantity of downloads.
|
05-05-07 09:19am
|
Reply
1807
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Good Honest Reviews. Site updated regularly. The fact that they identify which company administers the site being reviewed. It give you an idea which site to visit or avoid by comparing the others
|
05-03-07 06:38pm
|
Reply
1808
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Far to often 3rd party should really be called crap party. Most of what falls under that title is old fuzzy, unclear scenes from obscure videos and/or websites. I'm all for getting more for your money, but I'd rather see a reduction in cost
than any third party filler. If your site doen't have enough to satisfy your customer shut it down or offer discounts. That's it that's all.
|
04-28-07 06:57pm
|
Reply
1809
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's too bad that more people don't enjoy reading.
They say that images are worth a 1000's words, but the problem with images is that they are mostly the
photographers words, and not your own, where as when you read a book you create the images with your mind.
|
04-27-07 06:31pm
|
Reply
1810
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The truth is that almost everyone should answer yes, because we have all seen something in the sky which we couldn't identify. Most of these were men made, but some might be from other planets. I'm not sure how many people would like to know that aliens from another planet have been observing us. No matter that you are a believer or not.
|
04-22-07 09:10am
|
Reply
1811
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Porn is,if nothing else, a fantasy. why would anyone subject themselves to the possibility of destroying that fantasy. performers in any media
are playing a part, after all that is their job. I know that I'd never be able to enjoy an actress, if she turned out to be a witch in real life.
|
04-12-07 06:29pm
|
Reply
1812
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's been my experience that sites that don't offer a real (meaning full) trial, have either something to hide or exclusive content is poor and or lacking. That said, I have tried sites without trial and been very satisfied. Best analogy is if you go to a restaurant and there is a meal a little costly on the menu Are you more likely to buy it, if you get to taste it first? A trial is just that a taste at whats on the menu.
|
03-28-07 06:31pm
|
Reply
1813
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I won't comment on pricing, since I've never watched a PPV cam show, that said. I can't see myself sitting at home waiting for the action to start, wondering are they taiking their time, to make more money. I'd much rather download a pre-recorded cam show and watch at my leisure. I then get to skip the parts that don't appeal.
|
02-11-07 10:06am
|
Reply
1814
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
kanaka's Review
This should be in the comments section and not a review since I don't think you can post a review if you haven't actually been inside the site.
|
04-05-14 05:34pm
|
Reply
1815
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
You're right that it's a newbies dream come true. I'm a past member so there is much less stuff to download. I fear that this is the beginning of the end for them. I certainly won't ever rejoin these sites regardless of the price offered.
|
08-25-09 06:51pm
|
Reply
1816
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I concur and I'll add that it's so slow that I couldn't log in one day last week. It's not the only site. Last night House of Taboo was also quite slow. That's not my biggest problem. I'm actually quite diaspointed with the content on most of the sites.
|
08-24-09 06:28pm
|
Reply
1817
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That may be a new thing because the last time I was a member they had very little overlaping material. At least it does appear that they have strated posting brand new material as oppose to re-editing older stuff.
|
01-02-09 10:30am
|
Reply
1818
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Thanks for the info. I was about to join them because I got the email on this offer.
|
01-01-09 06:43am
|
Reply
1819
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I'm willing to allow that the economy isn't helping, but frankly I can count on my hands the number of good mainstream movies were
released this year, and I can safely say that I only need one for amazing movies. It's pretty much the samething for porn, but just multiply the number of movies by 5. People simply do not know how to make movies anymore. It's cookie cutter with all show and no substance.
|
10-01-08 05:26pm
|
Reply
1820
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Miths's Reply
I can't speak for 1byDay since I've only joined once. As far as I've seen there have not been any new scenes at Hands on Hardcore. They don't look recycled, because I think those were older ones that somehow disapeared to reapear in lovely HD quality. I don't think there is anything wrong in doing that, but I wonder how many new members they would get if they admited to the fact.
|
10-01-08 05:22pm
|
Reply
1821
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Miths's Reply
I'm going to keep my fingers cross, because I used to join at least once a year Hands on Hardcore and was very disapointed when this year. All the updates are actually re-issued scenes. If they charged 10-15$ then I might not be as dispointed, but 30$.
|
09-30-08 06:56pm
|
Reply
1822
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
As long as it's new to you then it's all good. I did take a quick look and some scenes do appear new. I'm just not going to spend 30$ for just a few scenes. I'm affraid that this studio is going under because I don't think Hands on Hardcore has had a new scene in months
|
09-30-08 06:31pm
|
Reply
1823
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Hi Cybertoad. Are they still updating with new material as oppose to re-issued stuff? As far as I can see Hands on Hardcore seems to be issuing only older material at new resolution.
|
09-29-08 02:38pm
|
Reply
1824
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I wish I could tell you that you will like the quality but I can't be certain because I'm really not that picky myself. 640x480 is more than an acceptable resolution for me.
|
05-27-12 05:47pm
|
Reply
1825
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It's hard to tell if you would like the bulk of their content. If you aren't dead set on HD then you might go ahead but you should definetely avoid if you need HD. There is simply not enough HD on the entire network to warrant the join price.
|
05-22-12 10:20am
|
