| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1751
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I would never watch a hardcore movie that's been made softcore, but a movie which is all softcore can be a nice change. That said the best were from the 70, and 80's. Maybe I'm dating myself, but in recent weeks I've rediscovered the appeal for older porn(soft and hard).
|
10-02-07 06:54pm
|
Reply
1752
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I've never saved large quantities of data for any one particular star. I'm sure that I've got GiGs of data saved, but only if you combine many stars
|
09-28-07 09:28pm
|
Reply
1753
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I agree with you that the purpose of thumbs is to give you a good
overall idea of the action in the video, and the written description should help clarify it a little more. I agree that written descriptions are sometimes vague, but I've noticed that the reason is sometimes because they know they can attract more people by lying.
I don't need a major story, but a description of the different action that is inside the video ie: straight sex, anal, dp, lesbian
and so on.
|
09-27-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
1754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Call me an optimist, but I'd rather believe that people just want to write reviews to help other people make up their minds on which sites to join, and maybe even more importantly which websites to avoid. I know that a few of the reviews I've read have saved me some dough, because I'd been tempted to join a particular website, but after having read the review I changed my mind
|
09-26-07 07:06pm
|
Reply
1755
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
One thing that annoys me about thumbs/stills in the preview page is that they don't always show all the action in the video. I'm not asking for dozensof thumbs. I'd much prefer a mixture of written info with some thumbs. This way I can read about the action, and I
can see the performers. The websites handled by kink.com are a good example.
|
09-26-07 07:03pm
|
Reply
1756
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
I'm in agreement with pretty much everyone. Newbies should be subject to trust rating, and I'll second "cblodq" in saying that a rating should never be annonymous. If you don't agree with someone's review then put your name to it, and say why. I'll be honest and say that I got a couple of negative ratings but all where from annonymous.
|
09-23-07 07:15pm
|
Reply
1757
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hi Drooler sorry for not replying sooner I was visiting a friend. I'm mostly a video website guy, but when it comes to a preview. I'll be honest and say I don't mind if it's in thumbs, video trailer or even a description of the action (like handsonhardcore.com). I'm like you in that if I can't get an idea of what the videos offer. I won't join the website. I haven't passed on many websites, because most have smarten up over the years, but there are still a few that I'd join if I could get a good idea of what exactly those videos look like.
|
09-23-07 07:09pm
|
Reply
1758
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm more a video, so I don't care at all.
|
09-18-07 05:27pm
|
Reply
1759
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I only join trial memberships, if they offer full access to their content whether for a limited time or not. I've tried a few where they say limited access, but not once did I come out with a good idea of the content offered. The reason you'd want a trial membership is because what's available on the preview pages is just not enough information.
|
09-16-07 10:15am
|
Reply
1760
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Snowdude said it best. A lack of funds prevents me from joining more sites. I like it when websites say only 1$ a day, but at the end the month that is still 30$. Multiply that by lets say 3 sites and you've spent 120$ on websites, and Need I say that comes close to 1500$ a year. That doesn't include money spent on porn if youb uy dvd's.
|
09-15-07 08:25am
|
Reply
1761
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I don't know if I'd like to write another review for a site that I've rejoined. I'd prefer if we could amend an older review instead. The only exception would be if a websites had changed to such a degree that it required writing a new review
but then it should be possible to ask that original review be deleted, since it no longer is relevant. One thing I always look for is the date of a review.
|
09-13-07 06:29pm
|
Reply
1762
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
If I have paid for access and I don't get it than I at least want to know why. There might be a valid reason but until I'm told what it is. I can
only assume that I'm not being well served, and that can leave a biter taste about that website.
|
09-10-07 06:59pm
|
Reply
1763
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Poll
In my early days of internet surfing. I made the mistake of believing that what a site said had to be true. Well I guess not always, since after dishing out 15$. I got crap covered by more crap. Needless to say that these days unless I've read a review about the content of the site or the fee for a membership is less than 5$. I simply won't take the chance.
|
09-09-07 09:47am
|
Reply
1764
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I don't think I've ever used any, so can't speak from experience. In my case downloads are fast enough for me, so why would I want to use one.
|
09-07-07 07:48pm
|
Reply
1765
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Unless I've made the mistake of forgetting to cancel the rebill, than I never allow a trial to extaend into a full membership. That said I have stuck after the trial, but that's because the site offered a special price to stick with them.
|
09-05-07 07:10pm
|
Reply
1766
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The cost of a membership is my first concern right after content. I don't mind paying for a sure thing, but sometimes you aren't certain, so those discounts allow me to try more sites than I might otherwise. Like Denner, I wouldn't mind a wish list being available.
|
09-02-07 10:10am
|
Reply
1767
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never intentionaly bought a multi month membership, but I have forgotten to cancel the rebill a couple of times. I can't see the appeal of staying with a website for more than a month. That said I don't mind joining the same website more than once in a year, but realistically speaking how much new stuff will be added in the following month, and those is warrant spending the usual 29$ or so dollars? In my opinion, no.
|
08-29-07 06:05pm
|
Reply
1768
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
If by constant you mean keep track of updates and every few months rejoin to download the new stuff then yes 1-3 sites is about right. There are some that are really good, but at best I'll keep track of them, but may only join once a year.
|
08-27-07 06:19pm
|
Reply
1769
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I can't comment from experience, since I have never tried a 1$ trial, but I'll stick to the old proverb that "if it looks too good to be true, than it probably is". Like some others post, I'd love to hear the opinion from someone who did a 1$ trial.
|
08-25-07 06:09pm
|
Reply
1770
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't get caught often these days, but that's because I almost never join until I've read a review of a website. I remember some unpleasnt memories of wasting 20$ on crappy websites.
Not to bash pornstars, because more often than not they aren't administring their own sites, but I find that these are usually the ones which disapoint the most.
|
08-21-07 06:46pm
|
Reply
1771
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
For all it's fault I still like my XP, and my IE. There might be some that are better, but that's often because they took the idea and built on it. That said, I have been burned a couple of times with the patches. Live and learn
|
08-20-07 07:36pm
|
Reply
1772
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's true that updating can cause problems, but a patch is usually issued rather quickly. If niothing else you can usually rollback to a previous version until a working pathc is issued. I'm affraid that in todays netsurfing it requires us to keep our systems up to date, if we don't want some hacker messing with it.
|
08-19-07 10:39am
|
Reply
1773
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If a site is part of a network, and that their content is meant to cater to somekind of fetish or other. Then I understand if some of their content isn't exclusive. My problem is sites that say their content is exclusive. I usually pick a site based on review, content, downloadability, and pricing. The exclusivity isn't much of a factor.
|
08-17-07 06:21pm
|
Reply
1774
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I don't want to sound like I'm sucking up, but TBP is by far the best website review out there. I used to enjoy the reviews at X3, but they almost don't do any reviews anymore. I'll sometimes take a look at rabit reviews, but then again it's from the link on a review at TBP. Of course now there is this great site know as Porn Users. I don't know if any of you have heard of it???
|
08-15-07 07:05pm
|
Reply
1775
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm going to expect less, but since the question isn't: Are you going to be less critical of a site if the membership is free. Then whether I spend 5, 10 or 40$ on a website. Last time I checked I'm still not rich enough to think that 5$ isn't a lot of money. I do base my expectation on the amount, but that's not the only reason. I don't believe that you always get what you pay for. The best example is go into an expensive restaurant and order a burger. I'm betting you that the price is going to be anything above 12$. It won't be better tasting or more satisfying than a burger from your local burger joint. Some webmasters decide that they'd rather have 100 customers paying 30$, others think that they'd rather have 500 paying 15$. If a porn master wants to survive he has to decide how many customers are going to pay his rates.
|
08-14-07 07:19pm
|
