| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1701
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I'm like you, in that I don't think studios will ever require their performers to wear a condom during penetration. That said, if half or more of them do. Then, I think many performers would rather shoot for those studios. It's a money game. A performer who gets an STD, and is sideline for "X" amount of time cannot make money. Since most female performers have at best a six month window to make their money before the next girl takes her place. It stands that you do not want to be off for 2 months with an STD.
|
12-26-07 08:22am
|
Reply
1702
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
You are too funny. I almost fell out of my chair when I read your reply. Of course you realise that if you can't understand what she's saying. You'll never know if she's talking dirty or reciting her grocery list.
|
12-25-07 06:31pm
|
Reply
1703
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
Like nadiencendia, I'm not sure if the poll is based on just physical appearance or it involves everything from language to body type and appearance. I picked other because, I cannot think of a single type of women that doesn't appeal to me. The only thing that is important is language. If I cannot understand what she is saying then that pretty much kills the fantasy.
|
12-25-07 11:36am
|
Reply
1704
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm in complete agreement for Jassie. I don't recognise Klaudia, but there are 100's of amazing european performers with natural small breats. I'd say that most, if not all of my favorite pornstars have had small to medium size breats. It's also why I'm always saddened to see them getting implants, because it changes their entire physical appearance. Not to mention that they often go overboard and get freakin blimps installed on their chest. Here's hoping that women gifted with small breast don't decide to get implants.
|
12-22-07 05:27pm
|
Reply
1705
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Never heard of that, but I'm all for promoting women with small breast, and turning tyhem away from the evils of bolt ons.
|
12-21-07 07:16pm
|
Reply
1706
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I see you point, and you are right that if all porn was condom only, then any teen/young person who saw that would probably think that it's a good idea for him to wear a condom or her to ask that her partner does as well.
|
12-21-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
1707
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I'm 100% with you on not finding teenage pregnacy cute, nor do I find any reference to the positiveness of single mothers be they teenagers or adult women any better. Let's say that you are right about making educational sex/porn videos available to teenagers. You and I both know that since the hardcore porn exist most will bypass the mild stuff, and go for the hardcore one. Think about it. When is the last time you heard the mention of young people trying regular sports. It's all extreme, all the time. We have a generation of teenagers who live for the now and cannot or choose not to think of the future. Having been 13 once upon a time. We know everything at that age, and our parents are the ignorant ones. When it comes to teenagers and parents. It boils down to 2 things respect and fear. You have to respect their decisions and fear the consequences of breaking their rules. You don't have to agree, or think that they are right. These you discover much later on. I did stupid things when I was a teenager, but there are few that I can say my parents would have been disapointed in.
|
12-20-07 07:56pm
|
Reply
1708
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Here's my view on what influences early sexual relations between todays teenagers. Sex is everywhere. It's in the music you hear, the main stream magazines you read, on tv, in movies (even the PG rated ones), and less we forget the internet which includes all of the previous. In fact, I'd say we are seeing an oversaturation of sexuality in every form possible 24 hrs a day. How can teenagers not get mixed messages. Society says one thing, but promotes another. Now do I think Playboy is pornography. Yes it is, because we aren't seeing real women. We are seeing a fantasy. The reason I say that is that most, if not all modern photos are 40% real, and 60% photoshop. Of course, I don't think you can equal Playboy to a softcore sex movie let alone an hardcore one. Because these take the fantasy to a new level. Although your idea of making a movie with a love/educational theme is interesting. I don't think that teenagers would get it. The perfect example is 16 yrs old Jamie Lynn Spears. I'll be honest and say that I was truly disturbed to read that she was pregnant, and had been living with her 19 yrs old boyfriend. When exactly was it acceptable let alone legal to have a minor living with an adult. It isn't, but the States won't intervene and more importantly shouldn't intervene. This is the job of PARENTS. Where were Jamie Lynn's (you could put any other teenagers name here) parents??? If you haven't had a talk about sex and consequences before your child is old enough to have sex, then chances are he/she will and everyone will regret it. Sorry If I got on my high horse, but I'm really tired of reading about teenagers having babies and how cute it all is.
|
12-19-07 06:57pm
|
Reply
1709
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I'm old enough to rememeber looking at National Geographic for nude pictures of girls when I was growing up. It didn't do much for me, but it was my first look a nude girls. Then of course Playboy magazine. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure my parents knew about my stash. So, if the question includes Playboy magazine, then I might turn a blind eye to a 15-16yrs old, but I'd talk to them about it. If the question is about hardcore porn movies then not a chance. Children should never watch that stuff.
|
12-18-07 06:58pm
|
Reply
1710
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I picked twenties, but I wish there was an all of the above option, except for 50 and above. Call me picky but seeing someone who's more than likely a grandmother just doesn't do anything for me. The performeers age isn't as important as the appearance and the scene. There are some amazing looking 40 yrs old like there are some amazing looking 20yrs old.
|
12-13-07 06:46pm
|
Reply
1711
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
The fact of the matter is that there are tons of clone or fly by night sites, and most offer leased or crappy content. What is encouraging is that many newer and established sites are improving the quality, frequency, download possibilities of their content. I think the best rule is if you haven't seen a review or they are less than stellar. Than just stay away, because the odds are you will be disapointed.
|
12-11-07 07:12pm
|
Reply
1712
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you're giving a trust rating or giving comment than the lest you should do is sign it
|
12-07-07 05:26pm
|
Reply
1713
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I much prefer the flaws than the photoshop look of today.
|
12-02-07 08:42am
|
Reply
1714
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I know you're right but I wish you weren't. Let's just say that it won't be happen in the near future.
|
11-30-07 07:18pm
|
Reply
1715
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Poll
I've used most of these and I have never once had a single problem.
|
11-29-07 06:03pm
|
Reply
1716
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I don't know if you've ever seen it or remember it, but there was a shampoo commercial which went something like this. I told a friend and she told a friend an so on and so on. It's numbers. If more people start to talk about it, then more people will talk about it. Sooner or later the pendulum will move in that direction. I can remember a time when anal sex was rare. If you take a look at any actress before the 80's at IAFD. You will have a hard time finding anal scenes. Take a look at almost any actress today, and tell me that didn't change. I hate to put it on the shoulders of women, but if top female performers had a condom only rule. You would see changes, but that said it requires them to be willing to lose out on good money, because they would then be offered more money to go bareback.
|
11-29-07 06:00pm
|
Reply
1717
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
The only one's that don't do anything for me are foot fetish, water sports, and scat. I enjoy a little S & M but not the ultraviolent stuff.
|
11-27-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
1718
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Look at it this way. Last week you were alone in believing in condom only penetration, and I was alone. Today there are 2 of us. Who knows what tomorrow will bring.
|
11-27-07 06:24pm
|
Reply
1719
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
You and I are on the same page. Anything that can bring the message that condom use during intercourse is the only way to go, is a good thing. I've stopped reading statistics years ago, because I just couldn't bring myself to belive that in an era of Aids, Hepatitis, and all other STD's that young people still don't use condoms. I guess it starts with you, me and others out there to suggest that porn movies should be all condom.
|
11-26-07 06:51pm
|
Reply
1720
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
You are correct that you get a lot of bacterias in a handshake, but
most of it is just your normal run of the mill bacteria. Afterall most of us do not stick our fingers in our ass before shaking hands, but there is bound to be transfers from people who do not know what soap and water is used for in a bathroom. So I guess part of it must be the quantity of bacterias you come into contact. True that they aren't tobacco companies, but they are making money out of porn.
So like a lot of corpaoration you do not want a negative light to be shined on your industry, because that could and would cost you money.
You are correct that not too many doctors would think of doing a study on the effects of atm and health.
|
11-26-07 06:44pm
|
Reply
1721
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cblodg's Poll
It's cc all the way. I've never had a single problem with using my cc to purchase stuff on the net.
|
11-25-07 09:27am
|
Reply
1722
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
It's Sad but true. Too many people want to see bareback porn only. I've read a few post where fans will not watch a scene if there is condom use. Of course if tommorrow all the studios made mandatory condom use for all penetration scenes, then I'm pretty sure that people would get used to it. If your choice is no new porn or condom only porn then you probably will lesrn to enjoy condom porn. Of course I live in a rose colored world because studios wil NEVER do that. That would require a united stand on the subject.
|
11-25-07 09:26am
|
Reply
1723
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I agree that we all in one form or another eat shit, but I think you'd agree that none of us eat it straight from the source as in someone doing an atm. True, that performers douche themselves before, but I'm affraid that only cleans part of the piping. Since you can't actually turn off the tap. You will get something from higher up going down. I'll be surprise if you ever see any medical reports on this. The industry probably doesn't want this kind of information made public.
|
11-25-07 09:18am
|
Reply
1724
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
No matter how we cut it atm is still someone having contact with fecal matter. Someone could argue that atm is not as bad, because the bacteria in our mouths are design to proctect us from other bacterias. To them I say you eat shit and then tell me you feel OK.I enjoy reading the posts at ADT(adultdvdtalk.com), and sadly this subject comes up frequently. The general opinion from different posters, some of which are performers themselves, is that most male & female performers have had gonorrhea at least once. It gets worse from there. I think if we're going to poll people on bareback as oppose to condom, the the next poll should be how many of the voters are willing to lose all their favorite performers because of std's.
|
11-24-07 06:39pm
|
Reply
1725
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
You are quite right, but since the question was about atm. I didn't really get into the condom or not issue. The fact is that wearing one would be beneficial to the male performer's health only, since he'd be proctected but the female would still be doing atm. Since you did mention condoms then let me say that I have no problem about making every male peformer wear a condom during intercourse. Far too many performers catch a variety of STD's which often cannot be well treated, or not at all in some dire cases. I'm actually curious to know how many people have a problem between condom and bareback sex. That might be an interesting poll.
|
11-24-07 09:55am
|
