| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1626
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said no. I'm sorry to say but when it comes to sexuality, women don't have the same options as guys. Last I checked womens breast are sexual objects. I don't think that's ever been said about a guys chest.
|
06-02-08 06:04pm
|
Reply
1627
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks for the explanation. I don't know why you feel like a nerd, but even if you do. You should be proud of that fact. I know I'm quite proud of the fact that I am one giant nerd. I usually look that as being a sign of intelligence. In Canada we don't elect a Prime Minister as much as we elect the party itself. Whoemever happens to be in charge of the party is the Prime Minister. We do have a problem in that certain sections of the electoral map with low population have as much voting power as those with larger populations. Every once in a while the governments redraw the map to make it fairer, but there is always some complaining.
|
05-31-08 03:36pm
|
Reply
1628
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
There is no such thing as a true democracy except on paper or in movies. The fact of the matter is that it takes money to become a candidate, even more to be on a ballot, and the amounts required to be elected, make it next to impossible for mere mortals.
I agree that Al Gore probably should have been president in 2000, but only 51.3% of eligible voters actualy bothered to vote.
There are many political systems in the world(I'm excluding any dictatorships or places where there's only one name on the ballot). If you don't bother to vote, you have a difficult moral ground to complain about the person elected.
|
05-31-08 09:00am
|
Reply
1629
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I picked Mccain only because he's Republican and who knows how much baggage he will carry over from the prior administration. That said my opinion counts for nothing since I'm Canadian and I will no be voting in the fall for who will be the next president. If I can wish for one thing is that the people go out a vote, because you can't bitch about who's elected if you were too busy to vote.
|
05-31-08 07:17am
|
Reply
1630
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I usually pick moving on or something similar to that. I rarely add comments, but when I do it's because there was something annoying about the site. Funny thing is, I've never been contacted after leaving a comment so I must assume that the webmasters don't care about the reasons.
|
05-25-08 04:19pm
|
Reply
1631
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'm assuming that by a "limited trial" we are talking about a site that offers only certain sections of what's truly available and not the full content for shorter period. In that case I'm with everybody else in thinking thats it's a lose lose situation. If a sites thinks it's material is that good then the preview page will prove it.
|
05-21-08 10:49am
|
Reply
1632
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Although on the surface the idea seems appealing. The reality is that reviewing porn for a living means that you have to watch porn all the time. Of course some of you are saying...HEll Ya, but what you haven'r realised is that you'd be looking at as many bad porn sites as good one, and likely more bad ones. I'd think tfter a time porn would become boring.
|
05-19-08 08:34am
|
Reply
1633
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
The 80's is by far the best decade of all followed by the 70's, 90's and finally today. Although I agree with Drooler that the sheer amount of porn available is incredible. I also find that it is like a TV dinner. It's quick to eat and just as quick to forget. The technology is better today, but I still prefer watching Star Wars to Phantom Menace.
What may be more telling than anything else is that I remember and more importantly still enjoy watching: Annette Haven, Seka, Vanessa Del Rio, Ginger Lynn, Christy Canyon, and I could keep on naming them or movies that they appeared in.
I wonder how many of todays stars or movies will any of us remember a decade from now?
|
05-13-08 06:28pm
|
Reply
1634
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
It's pretty important to me because I rarely read a review, if it got a general score of less than 70. When I read reviews on TBP. I always pick the highest score and the lowest and read the reason for those scores. I always check who the reviewer is on PU, because some of you have similar taste to mine and therefore your score is more likely to affect my decision to join or not a site.
|
05-11-08 10:20am
|
Reply
1635
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
I picked jessica because frankly it's only a question of time before a video is discovered of Christina getting it on with a guy/girl. The way the Olsens twins look these days only Max would film them. Eva leaves me indiferent and I'm affraid that Hillary stretches what I consider desirable porn. Too bad no one mentioned Kirsten Bell, Hayden Pannetiere, or a more appealing Hillary...Duff.
|
05-10-08 07:12pm
|
Reply
1636
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I have a harder time watching a star, if she took her own life. Time does make it easier. If it was an accident or health issue that is one thing, but suicide introduces the guilt factor into it. We don't like to think about it, but was our watching her movies part of the reasons for her suicide or would she have done it regardless of the porn life. IAFD has a full list of stars that are no longer with us, but Shauna Grant, Megan Leigh, Savannah are the ones that come to mind.
|
05-03-08 10:30am
|
Reply
1637
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I chose 20+ because my idea of a good sex scene actually requires that the performers start the scene with clothes on. That's one of the reasons why I'm not thrilled with most of todays porn. Once we've established the fact of clothes then it stands that my favorite scene is easilly over 20 minutes nad much closer to 30+ minutes.
|
04-29-08 06:50pm
|
Reply
1638
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't care which last name a performer picks, but I sure wish that they would keep the same one. The change of name is seems to be a much greater problem for European performers then for American ones. I'm not blaming the girl because I believe that websites are more to blame then the actual girl. I agree that Eurobabeindex is a must for anyone interested in European peformers. You can add egafd.com also as a good tool for finding performers and movies.
|
04-27-08 10:50am
|
Reply
1639
|
N/A
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Poll
I think that red heads are really hot, but Mary Ann wins hands down.
|
04-21-08 07:04pm
|
Reply
1640
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I watch movies for their fantasy aspect and not their reality. I want acting in my porn just as much as I do in any other type of movie that I watch. What I don't want to see are studios who invest money in making porn movies so that they look like non porn movies. A good example is "Pirates". Clearly using the appeal of "Pirates of the Carribean". In this case the acting is not sex related, but plot related. I'm reminded of movies from the golden age of porn where there was a plot, raunchy sex, and the acting was good to some cases amazing. What diffirentiates these with todays stuff is that they wanted to make a porn movie and not a mainstream one with hard sex included. If anyone thinks that he/she doesn't want acting in their porn then good luck if tomorrow all the girls stopped pretending that they are enjoying getting DP'Dd upside down by 2 guys for the third time that day.
|
04-19-08 06:32am
|
Reply
1641
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I've watched porn made in the 70's all the way to today, and the funny thing is that squirting only started appearing in the last few years. It's quite possible that women can squirt, but I'm affraid that it's not what appears in porn. More than likely it's either pee or water. The fact of the matter is that the amount that usually comes out is far too large and the speed and distance it can travel also makes it hard to belive. Like anything else in porn ,the only thing that is important is that if you enjoy it, then enjoy it and don't ask questions.
|
04-15-08 07:00pm
|
Reply
1642
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Larger hard drive might a possible way for the government to identify and tax people that enjoy porn, but a far better way will be
through our internet providers. They will probably allow a certain amount of download and then tax us for anything above that amount. My provider used to offer ultra high speed internet without any set amount for downloads, but now you still get the speed but are limited to maximum 100GB per month. Let me tell you that anything above that makes for a very expensive experience.
|
04-14-08 06:10pm
|
Reply
1643
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
There may not be an actual porn tax, there is still a sales tax on the purchase. If there was a porn tax then the government would have a harder time trying to discredit porn. I mean how can you tax an industry and at the same time try to stop it. Of course since we are talking about the government. It doesn't have to make things that makes sense.
|
04-13-08 06:32pm
|
Reply
1644
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
I was renting and buying porn long before the internet, so I guess I'll go back to doing that. In some ways a lot of studios would welcome a general ban since they are loosing money due to illegal download sites and the inrush of new porn sites everyday. That would suck for us. No more
TBP or Porn Users. Of course this is just a poll. The reality is that it is impossible to ban internet porn because you'd get credit card companies putting the squeeze on governement because of lost revenue. It's a legal business which pays taxes to the governement. When was the last time the government said no to tax money. If it's true that porn is a multi billion dollar industry then it's also true that the government is getting a lot of money as well.
|
04-13-08 11:06am
|
Reply
1645
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I was unaware that you could do it, but if I'm going to give a rating, I want people to know why
I gave it.
|
04-11-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
1646
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I haven't but I don't often click on those redirect anyway since I either know about the site or will go check out a review and use that has my portal to the site.
|
04-09-08 05:34pm
|
Reply
1647
|
N/A
|
Reply of
heff's Poll
I've been watching porn since the days of VHS and Beta. I've thrown away more porn than I currently have in my collection. Yes, I regret not having certain videos today. That's mostly because I find that the stuff that's been coming out of porn valley in the last 5+ years is mosttly crap, and that many of the ones I had aren't available in any format anymore.
|
04-05-08 09:54am
|
Reply
1648
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
I wish I could remember if I saw either of these girls perform after they had removed their braces but I cannot. It's possible that both left the business before that happened. I'll let you know if I ever find one that had them without braces
|
04-02-08 05:13pm
|
Reply
1649
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Your imagination on the subject leaves me speechless. Of course those kinds of braces might only appeal to horny plumbers, home renovators and mechanics. I guess, I'll stick with your run of the mill mouth braces for now. The blow jobs scenes do give me a few shivers. I keep picturing the shredding possibilities of braces.
|
04-02-08 05:06pm
|
Reply
1650
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I haven't seen enough girls with braces in porn to be able to make up my mind either way. The only ones I can think of right now are Leah Luv and Sugar Baby. Both girls are really cute, but I can't say that the braces enhance their appeal.
|
04-01-08 06:37pm
|
