| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I picked 50-50 at first but I then changed my vote because I realise that I spend more time surfing for it. I'm not big on the sorting and that is a problem. Lots of porn but no clue where some of it is. I don't even want to think how badandy does it.
|
08-28-09 07:14pm
|
Reply
1402
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I reserve judgement on any new member to PU until they have posted on the forum or made a review.
|
08-24-09 06:24pm
|
Reply
1403
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
200 is acceptable but I prefer a higher download speed. One of the problem with the advent of HD is that many are going to be disapointed in the download speeds.
|
08-22-09 07:53am
|
Reply
1404
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I wouldn't have believed you if you had told me that you knew what
swallowing 12 loads felt like. You might be right that cum isn't as filling as I made it sound. Liquid diets always leave wanting more.
Since the poll was about dating a pornstar then I didn't give an opinion on dating an ex-pornstar. I agree that Marilyn seemed like a nice decent woman who just happened to have done porn and from what I read on many other sites. She actually was quite nice. It's quite hypocritical of me to say that I can jerk off to a pornstar but I wouldn't want to date one. I'm pretty sure that quite a few men slept with the schools easy lay but would never consider dating her.
I'd have no problem being friends with an ex-pornstar or even an active one. I just don't know if I'd be comfortable dating an
ex-pornstar. I guess it depends on how long ago she was a pornstar and whether I had seen her movies.
|
08-21-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
1405
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I'm with GCode on this one. I Wouldn't date one, let alone marry one. I have a hard time believing that anyone can enjoy dating a pornstar. It's all great to say that porn acting is just a job, but I don't think so. For one thing. I don't think you'd ask her how her day went for fear that she mentions that today was her big gang bang and that she swollowed 12 loads so she's not really hungry.
Then there would be the sex. I think the last thing a porn star wants to do when she spent the entire day doing it is have sex.
|
08-20-09 06:38pm
|
Reply
1406
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I don't care as long as the actresses appear to be in their teens. It is false advertising, but it's not enough for me to start lighting my torch just yet. I have never come across a site that said all teens inside and then I found out that it was all a lie.
|
08-18-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
1407
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dracken's Poll
The color theme is the only one on that list that doesn't bother me. The things that are a the top of the list are lossy navigation and slow downs in downloads.
|
08-16-09 10:19am
|
Reply
1408
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I have said it often in the past that I prefer natural breast and if I have to pick a cup size then A or a small B are my choices. That tends to make most breat implants rather unappealing.
I don't know if most women go the route of large breast implants like people in the enterntainment industry, but I only know of porn and mainstream actresses choices. The motto Bigger is Better seems to be the way to go.
I can't say that an actress that gets breast implants is going to wind up on my black list but
I always seem to have a harder time watching her scenes afterwards.
|
08-14-09 07:23pm
|
Reply
1409
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I'm not a fan of all POV. I find that too much of the action is left out. Not to mention but so few are able to do a good job that half the time the camera is moving all over the place. It removes the fantasy aspect. I agree with james4096 that a POV shot can enhance a BJ or NJ scene but I still want more than one perspective.
|
08-12-09 09:44am
|
Reply
1410
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Acting is a must if I want to truly enjoy a porn scene. I'm not talking about the ability for the actress to portray a specific character. That can be the case but it can be as simple as the actress appearing to enjoy the sex scene. Fake moaning and groaning might be fine for some but that tends to leave me limp.
Now if I'm watching a feature or even a small scne with an actual scenario then yes I want the person to be able to act the part. I think Pink Panther is correct about models and acting. It's not just in the porn wold. Most models never make the transition from the print to video. Years of having a photographer telling what you should look like don't prepare you for thinking what you should look like.
|
08-11-09 06:48pm
|
Reply
1411
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I think the setting should go with the scene. Of the ones mentioned only the shower and outdoor are limited or to be avoided. The shower is great but only if ot's used as a kind of tease.
This is how I see a shower scene: The scene starts outside the bathroom and then you follow inside toward the shower, you pan to the glass/plastic doors(they're fogged over). Thi is so you only get a partial view. The door slides open and you get the model revealed from the back showering but not necessarily in a enticing way. She could the bently start to turn around and continue the washing with a nice amount of suds. A sex scene in a shower might be great but you'd be limited to where the camera can be installed and which angle and water spalshing all ober the lens.
I think outdoor should be limited to only to softcore stuff. I've seen enough sex scene set outside where there is a fly flying around and landing in certain areas that completely distract from the scene. As well I've seen enough beach type scenes where there is sand and so forth that is also distracting from the scene.
|
08-08-09 07:28am
|
Reply
1412
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I don't necessarily mind remakes or sequels. I've seen a couple that were pretty good and some that were better. It's true that sometime Hollywood doesn't know when to stop. I'm dating myself here but although Jaws is a classic. I stillenjoyed Jaws 2. The problem is that they made 2 others after Jaws 2.
Another big problem is that if you decide to remake a classic. Why do you have to rewrite the entire script. It's a remake so all you need to do is modernize the story or alter parts that no longer make sense. There are quite a few geniuses in Hollywood who think they can re-invent the light bulb. They can't even screw one in so you can forget the rest.
|
08-06-09 06:06pm
|
Reply
1413
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm with Drooler on this one. I like all of these except for recent horro movies. My idea of a good horror movie is not watching how the next nameless character gets to meet is very graphic end. There was a time when the audiences imagination was the main key to a successful horror movie. I guess Hollywood thinks that imagination is a useless thing since they clearly don't have ANY.
|
08-06-09 03:10pm
|
Reply
1414
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It depends on the situation. When I'm browsing through different videos or sites then it's over an hour. I'f I'm watching a DVD then it's likely under an hour.
|
08-02-09 05:19am
|
Reply
1415
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I've joined a couple of sites after visiting their preview pages. Of course it's fairly rare to have a site without at least one review somewhere. The preview pages have to be top notch.
|
07-31-09 06:35pm
|
Reply
1416
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Reply
In this case what glitters is definetely not gold. I don't even think it's a silver lining. Most pornstars have at best 1-2 yrs to make a name for themselves and in return make their money. The contract seems like a great idea at first and for some girls it may be but I can think of at least 3 contract stars who should have greater name recognition but because of their contract. They can only film for a studio that releases their movies only every 2-3 months. In the real world that would be like a star making one movie every 2 yrs.
|
07-31-09 06:31pm
|
Reply
1417
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I suspect that I've seen too many videos to think that sexy pictures similar to a Playboy spread can get me aroused. It might peak my interest but I'd want more than just the tame picture. In return a good erotic story still gets me hot.
|
07-29-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
1418
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I had an artist rendition of the old Battlestar Galactica with some vipers flying toward me, but I deleted it by mistake and now I have one of those that comes with the OS.
|
07-27-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
1419
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
In a perfect world I would have chosen none but since I live in this one and tattoos seem to be very popular with theyoung then as long as it's 1 or 2 very discreet ones then that's fine.
|
07-25-09 06:18am
|
Reply
1420
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I think it will come down to money. If you offer a star 20 million$ to get a full body scan. Then you offer her royalties for any and all movies that her computer generated alter-ego apppears in. She could make millions without ever having to put on or lose weight. She wouldn't have to wear full body makeup or do dangerous stunts.
|
07-24-09 06:41pm
|
Reply
1421
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I actually think the technology exists but is too expensive at the moment to make any venture worth it. Another big problem is all the copyrights that this would break. Companies get sued for just using a stars picture for advertising. Can you imagine what they would do if they appeared in a porn film? I also don't think that they are able to create proper facial expressions yet. I don't think that there is a program that can simulate laughing or crying on an animated character. They can do animals because there are tons of commercials or movies that have them. Just look at G-force. I'm pretty confident that no hamster was harmed in the film.
|
07-24-09 06:35pm
|
Reply
1422
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I think that it will be so real that we won't be able to belive it isn't. I think the technology is already here but is so expensive that no one can afford it. I've seen enough commercials with animals performing specific trick to know that they are not real.
|
07-24-09 06:25pm
|
Reply
1423
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I took the question to mean far enough into the future to have a true animated movie which looks like the real thing. Looking at what they are currently able to do with special effects. I know that it's not a very distand future. All you'd need to do is pay actors and actresses to get a full body scan.
Although many of you say the real thing will always win out. Just think of your favorite star whether from porn or mainstream. The one who's never done more than a nude scene but now appears in xxx movie. I'm not talking Beowulf animation but the next generation. The lond that is so real that you can't tell that it's actually animated material.
|
07-23-09 06:46pm
|
Reply
1424
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I check the TBP and PU review(s) and then I take a look at the preview pages. I used to visit other review sites but I found that many of them had fake/misleading reviews. I'm not saying that all of them are lying but I found enough of them to be less than honest. That was the main reason why TBP appealed to me. The reviews always seem honest.
|
07-21-09 06:33pm
|
Reply
1425
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm a video mostly kind of guy but I do not see the point of a reverse strip in galleries or video. I can understand if in a feature film you have a performer appearing nude in one scene and then you see her putting all her clothes on and then in a later scene you see her performing a provocative strip with the complete outfit. Now that would make sense and might be great.
|
07-19-09 09:29am
|
