| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I agree that parents should take a much larger role when it comes to the sexual education of their children but there comes time when a society has to look at itself and say we are over sexualising our youth and at the same time promoting bad role models. I know sex sells but shouldn't corporations have somekind of morale obligation to try to promote the best quality and use the best possible people to do that?
I don't consider myself prudish but I don't want to see a nude beach anywhere I live. I don't want nudity to be readily available on TV.
I think fashion magazines should be classified in the same way that Playboy or Hustler is. If their is a single nude or semi-nude pictures than you have to be 18 to buy it. I don't want any singer, actor or sports personality to advertise anything intended for children. I kow that last one is a stretch but if you think about it. These are the people speaking to our children on a daily basis and they don't even have to use a single word to get their point across. Their actions speak louder than words.
Sorry for the rant.
|
09-12-10 07:07pm
|
Reply
1227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can a society be really considered too uptight about nudity when it's so easily available in many different medias? You can see it in many fashion magazine. You can see it in all adult magazine. You can watch in on many very popular TV shows. It's in a large portion of movies and it's also on the internet.
Now you can argue that all of these are meant for an over 18 audience. The fact remains that I am certain underage children have seen nudity in many of the above medias and quite possibly simulated sexual intercourse and certainly if they have watched an most HBO shows of the last 5yrs.
The question we should be asking ourselves is are we exposing our children to too much sexuality at a very young age?
|
09-12-10 12:06pm
|
Reply
1228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I tend to have the same view as BadMrFrosty's when it comes to the term pornstar. Just because you have had sex on camera does not make you a pornstar
It makes you a porn performer but I would prefer to reserve the star part for those that have earned it. It's the same thing for mainstream stuff.
Now back to the poll. How could there be enough of them? There may be too many at the moment for all of them to make a decent living at it but that's more because of the downturn than an actual over aboundance of them.
|
09-08-10 06:43pm
|
Reply
1229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yup I hate it as well. I have no clue why they do it but I sure hope they would stop doing it.
|
09-06-10 11:04am
|
Reply
1230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't have any sexy neighbors unless you consider
the 18-19yrs daughter of one. She'd classify as sexy but she's a little young for me to have a conversation about porn with her and certainly too young to entertain any other thoughts.
Now if I did have a married sexy neighbor then I still wouldn't lend her any of my porn. A cup of sugar is one thing but porn requires asking what she's looking for and that's just asking for
trouble. Specially when her husband asks her where she got the porn.
|
09-04-10 05:27am
|
Reply
1231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use 10W30 but then again I care about my engine.
In seriousness, I sometime use some.
|
09-02-10 06:46pm
|
Reply
1232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
This is not the kind of subject that's ever been brought up during any of the social gatherings that I've attended but for argument sake. To what advantage would it be to argue the point of porn watching to a group of people who are set against it? There are far more amorale and sick subject that I'd rather discuss with a mixed group. How about the fact that "The Situation" from Jersey Shore is likely to make 5 millions dollars. If that's not imorale and sick then I don't know what is.
|
08-31-10 06:34pm
|
Reply
1233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I used to read those quite often but I haven't so much in the last year. I used to visit one or 2 sites that had free stories but one went the route of pay to see and the other almost never updated.
|
08-29-10 07:39am
|
Reply
1234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't look for it but it's also not a turn off. I have seen some scenes where it was well done and it added something extra to the scene.
|
08-27-10 07:15pm
|
Reply
1235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'm pretty consistent with my porn. Although I've noticed that there seems to be less updates on the sites that I keep track of, or the updates don't appeal to me. I think this is in part because of the financial problems affecting many Countries around the world and the ever increasing amount of illegal tube sites stealing profit from producers.
|
08-25-10 06:47pm
|
Reply
1236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I enjoy some of the amazing things an axcellent photographer can do with a camera. I'd say that my collection is about 98% video and the rest are photos.
|
08-23-10 07:10pm
|
Reply
1237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I consider most of them to be some kind of scam. I don't have any proof because I don't think I've ever joined one but I can't see it worth it for any decent site to offer full acces for one day to all comers for a dollar. I can see offering a few tidbits that aren't worth a dollar because you can easily get 10,000 people to take you up on your offer and that means a lot of cash for little loss.
|
08-21-10 11:04am
|
Reply
1238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Tan lines aren't necessarily unhealthy for you if they're aquired in a natural way (no taning booth) and your tan isn't very dark. You don't see too many pornstars with them anymore but I can still remember quite a few stars from the golden age that sported them. I always thought they looked amazing with those tan lines. Mind you I prefer tan lines on small breated women. Arcadia Lake, Bunny Bleu and Danielle are 3 names from bygone years that had them.
|
08-19-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
1239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I put 1 since I assume that the one that I use at work doesn't count.
|
08-15-10 08:08am
|
Reply
1240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
I'm mostly curious to know what they plan to do in the future for their site or other sites & studios.
I really don't want to know too much about their personal life because that kills the fantasy and I'm a complete stranger so I think some things should be reserved for close friends and family.
|
08-13-10 03:28pm
|
Reply
1241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, they shouldn`t feel obliged to do anything but I would hope that they would choose to support as many as possible. Mind you I`ve yet to see one site that didn`t support my 2 browsers.
|
08-09-10 07:07pm
|
Reply
1242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No and Jay G gave the reason why I would never.
|
08-07-10 07:35am
|
Reply
1243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked a middle of the road answer and said sometimes because I wasn't too sure if it mean that all the pictures were censored or that some of the content was. If all of them are censored then how are you going to know whetehr this is a good or bad site. If they censor some of their more popular pictures but offer some good selection in the hopes that you'll pay to see the good stuff then that's fine.
|
08-05-10 07:21pm
|
Reply
1244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's very important otherwise all your watching are a couple of people screwing without any heat or passion. Why I find a lot of todays porn less than memorable.
|
08-03-10 07:32pm
|
Reply
1245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer the complete package. I tend to feel cheated when the cameran keeps focusing on only certain parts or if he avoids some completely.
|
08-01-10 10:15am
|
Reply
1246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I sometimes feel guilty about watching porn but that usually happens if I see a certain type of scene or performer.
|
07-30-10 07:03pm
|
Reply
1247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think I've written a positif or negative comment to a webmaster but I have written about an issue once or twice. I've gotten satisfaction everytime it happened but sometimes it takes a day or two to get it.
|
07-28-10 06:42pm
|
Reply
1248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
I wouldn't because I prefer to keep my fantasies exactly where they are. In my head.
|
07-26-10 08:06pm
|
Reply
1249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I was a regular TBP visitor like Drooler and that's how I found PU. The only site that I trusted was TBP until PU. Now it's a toss up between these 2. I always visit TBP first and then come over to PU.
|
07-22-10 07:26pm
|
Reply
1250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't think of one site that hasn't updated in a while and that I'd like to join but if I found one and their existing library appealed to me than I'd join once to get their content.
There are quite a few sites that aren't really updating with brand new content as much as older material that has gotten a major face lift.
Should these sites charge the same amount as they did when it was all new?
|
07-20-10 06:45pm
|
