Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (0)  

Feedback:   All (3599)  |   Reviews (184)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (3379)

Other:   Replies Received (1510)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 3351-3375 of 3379 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
3351
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Cum Play John's Reply

I think you may be out of luck with your porn fantasy. The women shooting for X-Art and the other vanilla type porn companies don't want to get cum in their face, eyes, mouth and they certainly don't want to swallow it. More importantly the people shooting for those companies don't want to do that kind of stuff.

I'd like to add that I'm not so sure that many guys are into the facial thing. It is degrading to the women in those scenes and I'd like to think that more guys are into respecting the women but that doesn't mean that it's not a popular fetish. At least I know it's one that is often talked about on other forums.

Finally I think that cum eating may be a thing of the past if only because there is an inherent danger of getting an STD from doing that and the industry is now is so much trouble that more producers are going to ban that type of activity or they simply won't get as many women willing to do them. Evil Angel banned all creampies a few years ago and they didn't see a drop in their business. At least not one related to that so the same thing will happen when they drop cum swallowing.


09-22-13  05:54pm

Reply
3352
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Cum Play John's Comment

I think you are barking up the wrong tree because I don't expect them to ever go down the route you are talking about. There are already plenty of sites with the type of content you want so why would a site like X-Art who's already an off-shoot of softcore sites but with the added hardcore part want to get in the ring with those sites.

The reason why anyone joins X-Art is because you want a mix of both softcore and hardcore content but where the HC is more vanilla in nature.

Have you seen any glamorous bukkakes? I think not and the reason is because it's not possible to do that. Bukkakes involve multiple men ejaculating on a woman and that kind of sexual act precludes the possibility that it can ever be glamorous. It would be like asking for a softcore orgy. There are certain sex acts that cannot be shot in a glamorous way and bukkakes and orgies are but two of those acts.


09-21-13  05:22pm

Reply
3353
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of JosiahE's Comment

I'm glad you were able to queue as much as 50Gb the last time you were a member but frankly I'm glad that they don't allow people to have 30 videos on queue who manage to download them all because that is just plain wrong. That's called bandwidth hogging and it slows websites way down for the rest of us. I'm thinking a 10 video queue limit is more than reasonable.

09-04-13  06:23pm

Reply
3354
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of streamingeagle's Comment

I think your first big mistake was taking a one year membership. It's true that the prices on those is often quite amazing and there was a time when I would have recommended them but the porn industry is in such dire trouble that paying for a one year membership now is like playing Russian roulette with your money. The chances that this site goes under in the next year are slim but stranger things have happened. You should bought a one month membership first to test the site and see if it has any bugs that you find hard to overlook.

Hopefully those mistakes get taken care of soon.


06-12-13  06:17pm

Reply
3355
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of sonofzog's Comment

It was bound to happen that g/g would start to be left behind in favor of b/g because that is probably what the majority of members wanted to see. If you do mostly g/g content then you get into an arena that is already being represented by a bunch of sites so you hav a lot of excellent comptetition but the more gentle b/g sex is not really being represented by anyone so you are more likely to get people to sign up. I know that as much as I love lesbian porn. I would never join X-art if this as the bulk of their content because I can get if elsewhere.

11-25-12  09:23am

Reply
3356
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I like their more gentle approach to hardcore porn. It's a nice change from the hyper gonzo stuff most studios put out these days.

08-25-12  06:09pm

Reply
3357
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of elephant's Review

Great review as always. I wasn't too sure about this site at first but it's definetely on my radar and I know that I'll have to join it sooner than later. How many anal scenes are there at the moment?

I don't know if you have already done this but in case you haven't then here is a link to EBI's page on the performer who appeared on X-Art.

http://www.eurobabeindex.com/modules/search.py?showtitle=x-art.com%20%28web%29


08-25-12  09:02am

Reply
3358
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(0)
Reply of Jutti24's Reply

I respect any reviewers choice of score because it is sometimes very subjective. The fact that you mention the info about the lack of download is the most important thing anyway. That was a very nice and informative review.

I remember reading that the president of Score said that the reason they stopped allowing mebers to download videos was because the content kept on winding up on tube and torrent sites. I would have been fine with that answer if he had been honest and made it quite clear that the content wasn't downloadable which he hasn't done.

Can I ask you a favor? If you havent' already done so then can you submit an error report on TBP about the price change. They still mention that the site is at 40$.


07-16-12  06:21pm

Reply
3359
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(0)
Reply of Jutti24's Review

Thanks for the review. This site belongs to the Score Group and it suffers from the same problem as all the other and that means you can only stream the bulk of the content. You can only download the videos uplaoded in the last month. I learned that the hard way and I've been warning everyone wince then to avoid those sites. I don't mind if a site offers mostly streaming videos but that info should be in bold which is not the case for any of their sites. Instead they deceive customers by having the download info on the same line as the streaming one.

Are you sure about your 20$ price? I just checked the site and the join price is 40$. The only way to get 20 is if you sign up for 3 months. Frankly one month at 40$ for streaming content is robbery.
I'm glad you enjoyed the site but I would never give a site that doesn't allow paying members the right to download content a score above 60 unless it was a streaming only site.


07-15-12  09:54am

Reply
3360
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(0)
Reply of gyang79's Reply

The reason given by the owner of the Score group was that so much of their content was winding up on tube sites and torrent sites that this was the only way to stop that happening.

You can accept that as the truth but I don't. If the score group advertised on their sites that their content is primarily streaming only then they could have a leg to stand on but since it's not written anywhere and it's pretty much implied that all their content is availbe for download then I don't see a big difference bettween someone steraling from them or them stealing from me.


03-30-12  11:10am

Reply
3361
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(0)
Reply of pantsmulligan's Comment

Be advised that I believe all the Score groups sites have limits on their downloads and it's not clear which videos are streaming only and which ones can be downloaded.

02-27-12  07:15am

Reply
3362
Visit XX Cel

XX Cel
(0)
Reply of fiou's Reply

If we were talking real life than you'd be correct that 80% is a high score but you have already done a review so you must know what each score means when it comes to the way TBP/PU scores things. If you didn't pay attention when you did your review than here it is. As you can see 80% is a borderline score because the reviewer would have relegated this site to a might recommend by removing one single point from his/her final score. As toy can see sites scored in the 70's a site that are 50/50 when it comes to the finish prodcut

100 Perfect Site is perfect, could do little to improve. Top recommendation.
90-99 Excellent Site is near perfect, best in it's class. Highly recommended.
80-89 Very Good Enjoyable site, but could improve in key areas. Recommended.
70-79 Average Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend.
60-69 Needs Work Does more things wrong than right. Low recommendation.
50-59 Poor Site Offers very little, needs serious work. Not recommended.


02-04-14  11:48am

Reply
3363
Visit XX Cel

XX Cel
(0)
Reply of fiou's Comment

I don't know why the reviewer gave the site an 80% score but you can always check out his review and see where what he wrote is incorrect.
I'd say that 80% is not a high score since it's really a borderline moderate score. Upper 80 or above is a high rating but as it stands this site was only one point away from being in the 70's and those sites must be joined knowing that it does quite a few things wrong.

TBP/PU offer quite a few sites with a higher score than this one so maybe you could look at those.


02-03-14  04:47pm

Reply
3364
Visit XXX Gianna

XXX Gianna
(0)
Reply of james4096's Reply

You are correct that she appears on many sites. The problem is that you have to join all those site to get access to her material. It would be nice to get one site that has as much material as possible.

08-12-09  06:40pm

Reply
3365
Visit XXX Gianna

XXX Gianna
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Comment

I took a quick look at her site and another one in that network. Both have the exact same set-up and neither has actual updates. Her IAFD page doesn't mention her having a site. IAFD tends to be good with posting one when the performer has a site. I would avoid this site and network because you will regret it.

08-12-09  10:04am

Reply
3366
Visit Young Busty

Young Busty
(0)
Reply of Thomas20's Reply

The full vids was why I enjoyed this site more that sexy kittens. I'm still surpsied when I find sites that still offer vids in small clips only.

04-12-11  06:34pm

Reply
3367
Visit Young Busty

Young Busty
(0)
Reply of Thomas20's Reply

The only place where the girls look at the camera quite often is on the solo shoots. I did see it a little on the G/G stuff but almost not there for the B/G stuff. I looked at a couple of vids and there is no music at all. The only sound is the action and I'm happy about that.

04-11-11  02:42pm

Reply
3368
Visit Young Busty

Young Busty
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I got a email offer from club seventeen where they were offering me a 3 day trial full access to 27 sites for 5 Euros. It was an offer I couldn't pass up but only 9 of the sites hold any interest because I've been a recent member of all of the others in the last couple of months. I think that they could get some serious business their way if they were to do somekind of network package deal that includes some or all of the sites I got. Some of the sites they included aren't what I'd consider worth any amount of money.

04-10-11  06:08pm

Reply
3369
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

My membership was over by the time I posted my review so no way to check and I didn't really pay too much attention to her site when I was a member. My gut feeling is that her site is dead or dying because I didn't get the feeling that they were adding a lot of new stuff.

08-06-13  06:01pm

Reply
3370
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I grant you that Diesel did not spare on the HD stuff and I'm sure that's a major positive for some but I tend to avoid those so that did not help me. I really wish they wouldn't use older content as new stuff because it's bound to confuse visitors and members alike. The only reason I noticed it is because I have quite a lot of that stuff on my computer and I know the date they have for it is wrong.

Thanks for the info on the indexxx site. I already know about that one. I prefer pornteengirls.com. I find their interface a little easier to use.


08-05-13  03:34am

Reply
3371
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply

The bulk of the models are on the young and thin side of things. I don't think that they are unhealthy thin per say but some might be.

08-05-13  03:26am

Reply
3372
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of saVa631's Comment

I'll avoid discussing bonus sites and subscription and instead write about what I can confirm. I am a current YLP member and I got access to 8 other sites with my membership. I could be wrong but I believe that 6 of those sites are now dead since they are no longer updating with new content. Both YLP and 18 Only Girls contain a fairly large amount of leased material that can be found on a few sites. That is not necessarily a problem if you have never joined those sites but I have so that drastically reduces the amount of content that I will download from this network. Here are the 8 extra sites you get with your YLP membership.

18 only girls, alice wonder bang, ivana fukalot, skinny super girl, beata porn, sasha blond, Natasha shy and vika nymph


06-28-13  05:43pm

Reply
3373
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of bibo's Comment

Thanks but this really should be in a review and not a comment. Comments are to be used for a couple of lines or info that may not be in a review or to advise us that there have been changes done to the site. The amount of work you put into this is really impressive and will sadly be lost since comments get added on a regular basis and I know that I only look at them form time to time but I always look for a review before joining a site.

05-27-12  11:43am

Reply
3374
Visit Your Mom Loves Anal

Your Mom Loves Anal
(0)
Reply of malikstarks's Reply

I am willing to give them prop for remastering some of their older videos. I would even be fine if they were using these remastered videos as part of their update schedule but the problem is that they have a very expensive site (or group of sites) offering less content than some of their less expensive sites and worse the other site has better stuff as well.

12-31-16  08:20pm

Reply
3375
Visit Zero Tolerance On Demand

Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
Reply of Laptopbs's Reply

Your best bet when you aren't sure is to look at TBP's review because they make sure to mention it when a site has DRM content. Mind you it's been a very long time since I have seen any site mention DRM. I think that experiment died when sites with them were more or less black listed.

The only thing I would recommend is that you avoid buying a long term membership because this is a studio more or less dying so the number of new movies is quite low so unless you think you'll need more than one month to download what you want then get a monthly membership


09-20-13  09:14pm


Shown : 3351-3375 of 3379 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.49 seconds.