| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2976
|
Sara Jay
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I think the same can be said for almost all of the sites within the network. I feel that they decided to make a network of performers that mostly do cam shows and the odd photo shoot. I could be wrong but there isn't all that mch new stuff that other than cam shows.
|
01-16-13 04:49pm
|
Reply
2977
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Can you download all the videos or are you limted to only those added in the last month?
|
07-17-12 10:50am
|
Reply
2978
|
Score Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The common thread among most of their models are either women with large to huge breast(usually natural), BBW or women over 40 or 50.
If you aren't into any of the above than you will want to avoid most of the Score sites.
|
11-18-12 05:19pm
|
Reply
2979
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I know what you mean. Can you imagine how pissed I was after I joined in April 2011 and discovered that what TBP wrote in their February 2011 review was no longer true? The only reason I joined over 40 something mag was becauase I wanted to download their videos and then I find out that most are streaming only....Fuck Me but that sucks.
I hope they have enjoyed that decision because I don't think they have been able to get as many new members and they certainly aren't getting many repeat ones.
|
01-25-12 10:35am
|
Reply
2980
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Comment
I think that the quality of the video is not that important when discussing all of the Score Group sites because this company made a business decision last year to stop offering their entire library for download. What you now have is streaming only content for all videos and download option for part of the library. If it was made obvious on their preview page which videos are streaming only and which ones are downloadable then that would be fine but it isn't and I should know because I got burned when I joined one of the sites.
I highly recommend that anyone interested in video avoid all their sites.
|
01-25-12 08:48am
|
Reply
2981
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
pornuserfb's Reply
Glad to be of help. I find comments are great for quick updates on something but a review is much better when you want to warn someone or recommend a site. I look forward to reading your reviews.
|
03-22-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
2982
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
pornuserfb's Reply
I thought my statements were pretty clear but I guess they weren't so let me try again. I'm suggesting that you create a review rather than simply post in the comment section. If you go to the review section of the site and look under this site then you will see that the last time the site was reviewed was in 2008.
As it is. You have posted some important info in the comment section which is limiting and frankly comments disapear from the main page rather quickly. A review tends to stick longer and any person visitng TBP will also see that you have made a recent review.
|
03-21-12 06:07pm
|
Reply
2983
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
pornuserfb's Comment
You should definetely do a review rather than post a comment. This way we would have the review to look at and you could put a lot more data. The last review goes back to 2008.
|
03-20-12 06:07pm
|
Reply
2984
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I noticed the discrepancy in models names but I only found a couple so I didn't mention it in my review. It's not a bad site but there are better ones out there.
|
03-08-11 02:36pm
|
Reply
2985
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I think your review is excellent and quite detailed. I respect your reasons for giving the site the score you did but there is no way that any of the current Kink sites deserve a perfect score because by your own admission they aren't perfect. The fact that their search engine sucks, the fact that you are basically relegated to scrolling from page to page to find a specific scene, the fact that most of their scenarios are not well thought out or well executed mean that they are more a distraction than an advantage. That said you did your homework and bothered to explain why you gave the site 100. I may not agree with your score but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
|
04-20-17 05:50pm
|
Reply
2986
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I know whipped ass is not having any problems at this moment because I just downloaded the most recent update in under 5 minutes.
|
04-25-14 05:15pm
|
Reply
2987
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I think they may have been a little too quick in saying that it was fixed. I know my EB update of yesterday is still not up so my guess is that it was a major server problem which is still not fixed. This will be the third time in a about a year that they are having server problems. The strange thing is that the server problems never affect all their sites because hardcore gangbang has their weekly update .
|
04-23-14 03:35pm
|
Reply
2988
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Did they give you any reason or timeline before the problem is fixed?
|
04-22-14 01:46pm
|
Reply
2989
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
It's probably a server problem. I know Everything Butt is slow but not as bad as S & S. It also doesn't help that this was the Easter Weekend so most staff must be on holiday.
|
04-21-14 05:45pm
|
Reply
2990
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
That is very strange because I have never had any problem with any of the kink sites. I use Win7 with their standard ad-blocking and Avast anti-virus and Firefox with nothing except what comes with the primary software. Have you contacted Kink's support desk? This may require them to look into this.
|
04-26-12 05:00am
|
Reply
2991
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I just tried it using Firefox and I had no problem accessing two different links on the sex and submission site. I even downloaded two videos as well.
I tried the drop down menu and I also had no problem going from sex and submission to the forum and back.
I've never had to log out to preview the other sites. All I do is use the drop down menu and click on the appropriate link to reach the site I want to preview.
|
04-24-12 06:58am
|
Reply
2992
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I agree that it would have been better to make a cut between the interview and the actual scene. I wonder why they didn't do that.
They normally do that for their other shoots. Maybe because it was Amy Brooke and she's already shot so many videos for them that it's hard for the viewers to believe any scenario reagrdless.
|
11-03-11 10:26am
|
Reply
2993
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
The logic of having the model do a pre-interview is amazing because no one can claim that she was forced to do something that she didn't know prior to the shoot. We all know that Kink has a huge list of questions that all the models must fill out and sign prior to the shoot but someone can always claim that she hadn't filled out that questionaire but it's hard to say that about a video.
It sometimes interesting to hear what a performer says prior to the shoot and what she says afterwards. The type of porn that Kink does is rather different than what most performers are used to so not every performer knows all that they'll experience during the shoot.
Kink loves to push a performers boundaries and I think nothing makes them happier than to get a performer to orgasm as much as she can.
|
11-03-11 09:57am
|
Reply
2994
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I don't think it will happen anytime soon and It doesn't make good business sense for them to offer all the sites in a network.
Kink is possibly the top BSDM company at the moment and they have some of the best content on the net. For them to keep offering such good content means that they have to pay talent and that cost money.
Your idea of a token system that allows you to download certain scenes from each site is not a bad idea but again it would mean less money for them then if you have to join each site on it's own. At the moment they offer streaming and download to won but I don't think the cost is worth it.
Someone has already said that once you join one site then you automatically get reduce price for the others and they even offer a two for one deal where you get 2 months for the price of one.
I've joined at least 4 of their sites and I've never been disapointed with any of them. If you like their content then you should want to pay for it. You money will mean more content and that's a good thing.
|
08-05-10 07:33pm
|
Reply
2995
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
The only thing that I'm not sure is if the shoots that are available for purchase have DRM. I don't think so but I've never tried to buy one. The cost is too high. I prefer getting a full membership.
|
02-13-10 09:44am
|
Reply
2996
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Addicted's Comment
I've never joined sex and submission but I have joined 3 of the other sites owned by Kink and there is no DRM on their videos if you are a member of the site in question. I know you can buy shoots and maybe those have DRM but I'd be surprised. I think that if you like what you see on the preview pages than you are sure to like the site
|
02-11-10 06:14pm
|
Reply
2997
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for the info but I wasn't planning on joining this site only because if I were to join an SB site then I'd only do so if it had all of his movies. I don't know if he owns this one but it's quite possible that he doesn't own all of his movies anymore. He may have sold the rights in the past so no one will be able to release them all.
|
03-11-14 06:00pm
|
Reply
2998
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I don't know how much better the resolution can be on this site since all of the SB movies preceded HD so I can't see how much better they look here VS Videobox. It's possible they are better and if you can truly download all the content in a couple of days then you can get the full access trial for very little money but I don't know if I'd pay 25$.
|
03-10-14 06:15pm
|
Reply
2999
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for the review. I was always a big fan of SB movies but there is no way that paying good money for such a tiny site. I mean SB put out nearly 200 movies in his career so that means at the very least 600 to 800 scenes so if there are less than 200 on this site then it's not a very good deal. Even VB has 45 SB movies/191 scenes and you can get these for less than 15$.
|
03-10-14 08:54am
|
Reply
3000
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I agree that my statement was extreme but the reason why I said it has a lot to do with the preview section. We're expected to pay 10$ for unknown content, know way of knowing how much you get or if the site will keep on adding new stuff. There are worse sites but since this is Seymore's site then he should try to emulate other studios site and most of these do a far superior job than he does and they aren't necessarily more expensive.
I would feel just as cheated if I paid 2$ for content I already had than if I paid 10$. The only difference is that I would be out of more money and be a little more pissed. Seymore is more or less an inactive director and the bulk of his movies are many years old and they are not getting any younger. He made his profits on them years ago and this is just another way to make more money but unlike many of the other studios. he hasn't made available most of his work. not to mention that the content is really not exclusif.
If the site showed potential members what is available inside the members section then I think I would have a different opinion but it doesn't and I don't think they plan on doing that.
|
01-13-13 11:27am
|
