| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2726
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for the info. I'm not sure why it does that.
|
01-02-12 06:08pm
|
Reply
2727
|
Molly's Life
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I don't mind as much when a network site like RK does that because the vast majority of people that join those sites don't do it for just one performer so the fact that someone is no longer on the site doesn't mean that the site will not replace the performer.
Case in point is captain stabbin. All the guys that were associated with that site stopped doing porn a long time ago and that's why you stopped seeing new scenes. The ones that have been added in the last couple of years are with new performers and I think the style is a little different as well.
|
10-02-12 06:34pm
|
Reply
2728
|
Molly's Life
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I get slightly tick off when a retired performer is telling people to keep on subscribing to her essentially dead site. I'm fine if she makes it clear on her join page that the content is older and you're not getting new content because prospective customers know that they are still getting some decent stuff. Otherwise you are basically paying for older and older content and if you don't know that she isn't updating with new stuff then you may feel cheated.
|
10-02-12 01:16pm
|
Reply
2729
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That's good so you should have a better clue before the end of the year.
|
11-21-11 10:24am
|
Reply
2730
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
My objections on this site and most of the other has less to do with the performers and more to do with the content that appears to be older and may not be of very good quality. The furniture and choice of toys is how I came to this conclusion. I may be off but I joined a network of sites this summer and the content looked somewhat like on this site and mine was a little dated. Although it's true that our taste in models isn't always the same. I know that we do share some. I'm not too worried about you. You are a smart man and I'm sure you will do the research before joining. I'll be waiting to see your review if and when you choose to join the site.
|
11-20-11 06:38pm
|
Reply
2731
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
They all seem to be working fine right now. I checked out most of the sites including this one but none of them inpired me very much.
I only recognized 2 performers in one of the pantyhose sites and I got the feeling that some of this content is rather old. If this was a 20$ or less than that might be different but 30$ is a lot of money.
|
11-20-11 11:34am
|
Reply
2732
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Roger Siskel's Reply
Let me first say that I tend to be rather intense in my feelings toward Tube and Torrent sites so some of my vocabulary tends to be more intense then maybe it should be.
Now it is quite possible that the people that own this site like many others in their position are now stuck at having to use tube sites to generate some revenue. I can assure you that they do not do it out of a true desire but because they need those extra dollars said revenue will bring them. I think they and us at TBP/PU would be a lot happier if people used a direct link to join or a review site like
us.
Here's an example to explain what I mean. Imagine you owned a cherry producing farm and for years thing were great. The crops were always pretty good and you could afford to hire many workers to work the property. The weather conditions were so good that there were plenty of other farms all doing quite well and then one day someone started to steal cherries from the different farms and offering them for free to anyone visiting their road side stand. At first no one noticed it because there weren't too many stands and people were still coming to the source for their cherries but as time went by more stands started to open and more cherries started to disappear from the different farms. Now some will argue that the cherries being given away aren't as good as those on the farms but they are free so people make do with their taste. It became so bad that farms started to fire their employees while others had to close their doors and those that remained open had to make some drastic changes to the production and marketing of their cherries to the point that they aren't as juicy and tasty as they once were.
Now transpose cherries for porn and this is the reality for every porn producers today. That is why a lot of the porn being made is not as good as it once was. why so many studios closed their doors, why porn performers spend more time on the escort sites then they do shooting porn and why so many new and established performers are no longer doing porn.
|
05-21-13 03:44am
|
Reply
2733
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Roger Siskel's Comment
Let me ask you a huge favor and please do not ever mention free sites because you are talking about peoples lives here. There's no such thing as free porn. You and others that use tube and torrent sites may not have paid for it but someone like me and other members of PU have paid for it and we certainly never expected others to get it for free nor did any of the people producing and starring in those movies.
Now I'm getting off my soap box. I'm pretty sure the people behind this site are the same ones as girls do porn so whatever is wrong in regards to the navigation on GDP is also wrong here. At least the guy shooting the scenes here is a lot better than on GDP and they actually have a camera man who shoots the scene. Mind you he doesn't really know how to shoot porn so that doesn't help.
There is plenty wrong with Mom's POV but maybe they will fix it in time. The site is still quite young.
|
05-20-13 06:43pm
|
Reply
2734
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Reply
I am not a fan of POV porn. Never was and never will be but after discovering this site not too long ago and seeing all of the unknown models then it was just a question of time before I joined. There are some really hot women here and the sex is usually quite good.
The one thing that I would love to see and I know it will never happen is the addition of a camera operator.
|
12-10-12 06:12pm
|
Reply
2735
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I didn't mention piercings in my review but a couple of the models do sport some but they are rare. Of course since all the models are much older than what you like then unless you start to develop a taste for older models then I recommend you stay away.
|
12-10-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
2736
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I have a wide range of taste when it comes to almost everything in life and this includes porn. There are definetely no 18 years old because none of the models are below the age of 30 and I don't think there will be. Especially since they already have girls do porn to cover that market.
|
12-10-12 04:15am
|
Reply
2737
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I thought they might not be exclusif when I first saw them but that quick research I did makes me think that they are. I'm sure I have seen similar content elsewhere but not those videos.
|
06-16-12 11:14am
|
Reply
2738
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
If it's available then it's must be on other sites because I checked the IAFD pages of a couple of the performers and they don't have any dvd's of these scenes.
|
06-10-12 12:39pm
|
Reply
2739
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Thanks.
|
04-09-13 06:29pm
|
Reply
2740
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Thanks. Are there multiple options or is it only the flash version?
|
04-07-13 08:59am
|
Reply
2741
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I tried checking Housewife Kelly's site but it takes forever just to access the site and once your on it then you can't really access the rest of the site. Is the content all POV because that's what was on the main page. If it's all POV then it won't interest me.
I don't know if you looked at my past reviews but if you haven't then you should do so because you'll see a lot of reviews of amateur sites. Here is a list of amateur(semi-pro) performers who's content I liked a little to a lot.
Mrs Sirens(Her content is pretty extreme but then agian she is part of a network filled with extreme performers)
Alexis Golden(A lot of anal, IR and DP content)
Anjanette Astoria(I liked this site because it was only 10$ but I do not know how accurate my review is because her site looks different then when I was a member.)
Deaumax Live:(I first discovered her doing lesbian only videos so when I found out that she also did boys and she loves anal then I was sold.) The major advantage with her site is that you also get access to 12 other sites.
Claudia Marie: I didn't actually join her site. I got access through my membership to Celeste Fox but Claudia is the only site in that network that was worth it. All her stuff is filmed by a third person and it's all hot. Video resolution is only 640x480 for download but it's at higer res for streaming. The sex is hot and raunchy with anal and IR as a common theme. She is a larger woman than the norm and she has large fake breast but I didn't actually mind it because there is something appealing about Claudia.
Gangbang Dee: I don't know if she is still updating but even if she isn't then there is still plenty of porn on her site. She is an all natural red head who absolutely loves sex and anal, dp and IR are fairly common.
Cathy's craving: This is a really good site if you're into anal, DP, IR, gang bangs and creampies because this is the common thread in most of her videos.
|
07-31-12 09:00am
|
Reply
2742
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
I don't think you can ever match what Mr Skin has in nude celebrity content by searching the net but even if you could then you would spend months if not years looking for it when all you have to do is pay 20$ and get it all.
|
07-31-12 06:56am
|
Reply
2743
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
You don't need to appologize and you earned the trust vote.
|
09-08-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
2744
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I have a love/hate relationship with Mr Skin. I think the site has the potential to be so much better than it is. You might want to take a look at celebrity movie archive. They might have longer scenes thahn what Mr Skin can offer. Their library is much smaller but I've found a few gems there.
|
07-13-10 02:37pm
|
Reply
2745
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
I've been a member of Mr Skin more than once and the format hasn't changed much over the years. This is primarily a nude celebrity site so Mr Skin will often only have the nude part of the scene and very little else. His claim to fame is that he probably has the biggest library of nude scenes. The downside is that he has the biggest library. Unless you have a very small list of celebrity than you could spend hours looking for just a few scenes.
If your membership gives you access to all the celebrity and you can either stream in flash or download the same scene than you have a full access. I the past a trial membership meant you could stream but couldn't download. My biggest problem with Mr Skin is that his site is getting more and more clutered with all those damn adds for other site. I don't mind when there at the bottom of a site but when they are on the side and take a third of the page then you've pissed me off.
|
07-12-10 07:14pm
|
Reply
2746
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Comment
That's a pretty decent price because that site has had fluctuating prices over the years. For a while he was even as high as 30$. My problem is that the site feels more business than actual fan.
In the beginning the site was purely centered on finding elusive nude celebrities but these days almost a third of the members pages are taken up with advertising for other sites.
|
05-23-10 11:21am
|
Reply
2747
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Here's the link for celebrity movie archive(see below). They only have videos. celebritymoviearchive.com
|
09-15-09 06:56pm
|
Reply
2748
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
Not a problem. Thanks for your review of that celebrity website. Did you evcer visit celebrity movie archive? They have a pretty good library of celebrity nude and partial nude videos. The difference between them and Mr skin is that they work on a token like system and they have video for all their scenes. The day that MR Skin has videos for every scene that he talks about is the day I'll gladly pay 30$.
|
09-15-09 06:43pm
|
Reply
2749
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
Hi Axel2001. If I remember correctly. There was a time where you could get a full 3 day access for 5$. I think the membership was around 20$. That was a good deal and you didn't have sooooo many adds on his site. My problem is that a lot of the material where he describes the actresses nude scene without actual video proof are still without video proof. It's all greta to update the newer stuff but frankly I've joined his site a couplke of time in the last 7yrs and I'd be far more impressed if he had those then a nude scene from last year.
I guess it's a pretty good deal for a first time member but not for me.
|
09-15-09 06:29pm
|
Reply
2750
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
I was a member last month and it's true that the trial membership is different but you can still download the scnes, but they are flash based. Only full membership allows you proper downloads.
|
02-11-08 06:12pm
|
