| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2551
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I don't know but the really sad part here is that her site looks decent. Of course you wouldn't know it based on the 3 recent reviews because there is nothing in them to excite a possible fan in joining.
I think the opposite is likely to happen because some people like me will feel that a site with such high scores and no hard data to support them is either a fraud or not a very good site at all.
|
06-01-13 10:44am
|
Reply
2552
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Elmien's Reply
Tell you what. Take a look at the reviewers with the most reviews and see what their reviews have in common. Then look at all of the recent reviews for Jo's site and you will notice that they don't have any of the important stuff needed to make a good review. What you basically have right now are a bunch of fans fawning over a porn performer and who cannot remove their feelings from their reviews.
The people who might be interested in joining want to know what they will find inside the members area and not that Jo is a girl next door type. They want to know if she does solo, b/g and g/g. What quantity of each. They want to know video resolution and photo resolution.
Let me see if I can make this simple. They want facts first and then fawning.
|
06-01-13 10:38am
|
Reply
2553
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
All I'll say is that a high score with no supporting data except for the insane adulation of the reviewer is a sure way to make the review useless. Case in point the two reviews for I dream of Jo. Sorry but you lose me when you describe a 32 year old woman has having a girl next door look. Jo/Monika is still an amazing looking woman but she has not looked like a girl in a very long time.
This may be a great site but none of the most I'll even go so far as to say that I'm now a little more nervous about content because of the reviews.
|
05-31-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
2554
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I checked the site out and I count 50 updates this year. That's 50 if you count videos and pic sets separately. Otherwise there have been only 25 updates this year. What I found interesting is that some of the new updates are actually from the future because they are dated Nov 2013. I think the webmaster should use that for promo because they are the only site that is able to release content ahead of it's being done.
I think Jo is a very attractive woman and I may one day join her site but it certainly won't be from any of the recent reviews or comments because these don't appear to be impartial and that in my opinion does not help the site but actually make me weary of joining.
|
05-31-13 03:40am
|
Reply
2555
|
I Love Mini Skirts
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Comment
What I'm writing below applies to any site listed on TBP so if you have any other site that you are curious about then simply do the same thing for those.
TBP doesn't have a review of every site listed on their site but they tend to still offer info on the content like how many videos or photo sets can be found in the members area. Usually this info is updated on a fairly regular basis so simply check the dates for the facts and you'll know how accurate the info is.
It's different in the case of this site because they actually did a review last month so you know the info is accurate and you have an accompanying review to go with the facts.
P.S: You may or may not be aware but TBP's claim that the scenes on this site are all exclusive is incorrect since they are all leased scenes that are available elsewhere. That is not TBP's fault since I'm sure that is what the site claimed but I know different since I recognize the ladies and the scenes on this site. If you are joining the network for only these scenes then pick a cheaper site than this one but if you are looking for the scenes on the other sites then go ahead.
|
01-05-14 09:54am
|
Reply
2556
|
iFriends
(0)
|
Reply of
Cammer's News
You do realise that if you give a site a nearly perfect score and put as little info as you did that no one and I mean no one will believe your review and some like me will avoid the site simply on principle.
|
10-01-12 05:19am
|
Reply
2557
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
inthecrack's Reply
Be advised that what I'm about to write may be way off because I originally commented on what the poster wrote without doing any research so hopefully I'm not in left field. I think that any site that is willing to be honest with their paying customer should be commended and considered to be one of the better sites on the net.
Where I think there may be a problem is if a site chooses to upload a scene that they did not consider to be very good in the first place in lieu of one that was. In my opinion a site is better to simply scrap a bad scene or instead use it as a bonus scene. I've been aware of your site for many years and since you are still in business than I know you have to be one of the better ones on the net.
|
01-17-17 03:32pm
|
Reply
2558
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
You are probably right because unlike hardcore sites that expect a lot more from their performers. ALS and In The Crack put out content that is mostly softcore to a more intense type of midcore so models will always be willing to work for them if for no other reason that they get paid money to basically play with themselves.
|
01-05-17 10:33am
|
Reply
2559
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I agree with you that you should respect a site that is so honest about their content and it's quite bold of them but it does open a can of worms that they may have a hard time closing because they have now openly criticized two of their performers. These same women can in return criticize the site by saying that on-set conditions were less than ideal which made them uncomfortable performing said scene.
In the end it will be a sort of he said she said argument that no one ever wins.
|
01-03-17 08:52am
|
Reply
2560
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I though it was weird that they'd have some new girls but list on the prview pages some older ones. I guess they showcase more popular gilrs or something. Thanks for the info. I'll take a more indept look at some of the other sites because innocent high doesn't seem to have what I prefer.
|
02-17-10 06:08pm
|
Reply
2561
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I don't know if the preview page is correct but they have Bree Olson has the most recent update and not too far after than Dakoda Brooks and Kinzie Kenner. Dakoda left the biz early last year and I haven't heard a single thing from Kinzie in over a year. See those kind of things always make me nervous. It's not that the updates aren't new but when you teell me that star that is no longer doing porn is on your site then I wonder where you had that video?
|
02-16-10 07:12pm
|
Reply
2562
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks exotic.
Are the updates dated? I get kind of nervous when I see pornstars that aren't really active in the most recent updates.
|
02-16-10 06:53pm
|
Reply
2563
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Are you sure that she's still active? I was under the impression that her content is dated since she stopped shooting porn a while ago.
|
12-31-11 09:38am
|
Reply
2564
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Reply
Thanks for the info. I'm really considering joining since you get access to the other sites. I respect any performer to charge what they want for their site but I've never joined a single models site that wasn't a disapointment. The fact that her's happens to be 30$ just makes it even less appealing. Good first review.
|
01-03-10 10:32am
|
Reply
2565
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
Great review.
I notice you mentioned that you get access to the other diesel sites. Do you get a complete access or is it just a kind of tease. Her site is very expensive and I would never join if you only get access to her material. She is quite fetching but I do not feel that any single model site is worth 30$.
|
01-02-10 09:30am
|
Reply
2566
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nbaby8's Review
Thanks for the review. I have a couple of question about videos. Do you have multiple video download options? Can you download certain scenes from each video or do you have to download the entire movie?
|
08-28-11 08:15am
|
Reply
2567
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
bjajlt362's Comment
Thanks for the info. I was wondering why we got so many new reviews of the site. Not to mention that I now understand what karl was talking about when he said he wanted his free magazine.
|
07-25-10 06:21pm
|
Reply
2568
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Reply
I was a little suspicious when the second one appeared. At least karl was honest about his reason for doing it and I checked out the forum. The site is still updating but it's usually with just one page from one of the comics or maybe some art work. If you like the content than it's worth a one time membership but I can't see too many people remaining long term members.
|
07-25-10 06:19pm
|
Reply
2569
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
karl1984's Review
Where exactly did you find those frequent updates? That site has almost no updates and hasn't had too many in the last few years. I know because I checked his most recent stuff and there are only a couple of new comics since the last time I was a member and we're talkaing about 2 yrs ago.
|
07-25-10 08:37am
|
Reply
2570
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
duckmaster's Review
You won't find this style anywhere else because as far as I know he only draws comics for his own site. I joined it a few years ago and it wasn't bad but it's only worth a one time visit because he hasn't done too much updating since the last time I was a member.
I've been a member of a couple of other comic sites but all of them are reposotory of other artist work. Let me know if you'd like some suggestions.
|
07-24-10 08:20pm
|
Reply
2571
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
If you think she is hot then visit her store and buy one or more of her movies. You won't get a discount but I have already explained that the discount is only good if you buy a lot of movies.
|
03-08-13 08:58am
|
Reply
2572
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think that they haven't really changed anything since day one and maybe they get just enough people to join to make it worthwhile to keep it as is. If you are a fan of Janet and plan on buyng many of her movies than joining the site is more than worth it because you get a 20% discount on her movies. Sadly that's not the case for me.
|
03-07-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
2573
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I have also been a fan of Janet for a long time and that is why I decided to finally try her site. I don't know if it took me more than 4 minutes to regret my decision but I do know that I knew I was in trouble the moment I visited her video section and download a couple of clips.
I can at least take comfort in the fact that the site has a more recent review and maybe people who were thinking of joining will now change their mind.
|
03-07-13 06:18pm
|
Reply
2574
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
She's a hot looking woman but her site isn't. I agree that 5$ would be a decent price to join because you would get your money back with buying just one movie and come out a winner with anything above that.
|
03-07-13 06:12pm
|
Reply
2575
|
Jenna Haze - JenX Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
roy1485's Comment
I don't have any good news for you. Most Pornstar sites fall under the heading bad to awful. Rare are the ones that are any good and even more so those that are amazing. Jenna's site probably falls under the bad category because it doesn't really appear to be her site so much as a site where you can access some of her videos. Based on the fact that the site is owned by Jules Jordans company then I'd assume that most if not all the content is from Jules movies.
A dead giveaway for bad pornstar sites is when the preview pages offer very little personal info on her and content is not dated.
|
05-10-11 07:01pm
|
