| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2076
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have never seen any.
|
08-18-11 03:49am
|
Reply
2077
|
Christina Skye XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I agree with you. She's really good looking and she looks like she enjoys women.
|
08-16-11 01:39pm
|
Reply
2078
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
trev's Comment
I know I just tried downloading a video and I had no problem. How long have you been a member? Were you able to log in to the site and download videos when you first joined?
|
08-16-11 05:22am
|
Reply
2079
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do exactly like Denner.
|
08-16-11 05:04am
|
Reply
2080
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
moby69's Review
Hi moby69.
You might want to add a larger amount of info than what you have if you're going to give this network for such a high score. I was a member last year and unless they have changed about everything then it's not even worth 30$.
|
08-15-11 01:34pm
|
Reply
2081
|
Kacey 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Caligula's Reply
Thanks Caligula. Did you get access to only her site or to the entire network? If it's the last then have you checked out any of the other sites?
|
08-15-11 08:40am
|
Reply
2082
|
Kacey 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Caligula's Review
Hiw caligula.
The site says that Kacey does hardcore shoots with older men and that she also does anal with some of them. is this true or is this a lie. Your review lacks a lot of important info. What are the video options? What's the qulaity of the videos?
|
08-14-11 08:03am
|
Reply
2083
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Since the question has the word "try" then yes I believe that some goverments will try. Most if not all will fail. The .XXX is probably one of the biggest scam happening to the net at this moment.
People are talking about porn being tagged but have you thought of all the corporations with an internet address that ends in .com, .net, .org and
so on. Don't you think they'll have to protect their address by buying into the scam? How about cnn.xxx and all the other reputable organisations that have a standard address. I think the people behind the ".xxx" scam may have started something that will comeback to bite them on the ass.
|
08-14-11 07:45am
|
Reply
2084
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm like Monahan and RustyJ except in reverse. IE for most of my regular surfing and Firefox for everything else.
|
08-12-11 05:20am
|
Reply
2085
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Reply
I really liked what I saw before joining them. It was a different story afterwards. Even without the slow downs. The content is not what I thought or hoped it would be. They have a couple of really beautiful models but I prefer my porn a little more hardcore and my lesbian porn has to be more passionate.
|
08-11-11 10:02am
|
Reply
2086
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Reply
Hi rinto.
I'm not sure if the site is still deadly slow. I asked the person who did the most recent review if that was the case but he hasn't replied yet. As much as the site has a many super cute girls. I can't say that there's a lot of heat in most videos. It's not softcore porn but it certainly isn't hardcore either. It's about midcore.
|
08-11-11 06:28am
|
Reply
2087
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like it but there are 3 things that have to be present. 1-The person giving the massage must know what he's/she's doing. 2-The massage should have a level of tease. 3-The massage should be a prelude to sex.
|
08-10-11 09:14am
|
Reply
2088
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
whynot2's Reply
I'm not sure if it's going to work but I'd recommend you take a look at TBP's site and see if any other sites owned by the parent company include this site in their membership. This way you could get more for your money.
|
08-09-11 12:39pm
|
Reply
2089
|
Retro Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
whynot2's Comment
Be advised that I reviewed this site not so long ago and and it's a pretty bad site. If the membership was less than 10$ then it might not be so bad but you'll be spending 20$ for possibly nothing worth saving.
|
08-09-11 05:57am
|
Reply
2090
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I've never joined a femdom site because I have no desire to see guy abused anymore than I'm curious to see a guy take a strap-on. I'm fine that some people like that kind of stuff but I'm not one of them. I've been a member of fucking machines, ultimate surrender, public disgrace, whipped ass, sex & submission, everything butt and bound gangbang.
I didn't like the first 2 and I'm borderline on the third. I've already said that the machines make way too much noise for me to enjoy the scenes. Ultimate surrender is mostly wrestling in front of a crowd and less so about sex. Nothing wrong with that since that's how it's advertised but I wanted more than the site offers.
I enjoyed a couple of the public disgrace videos but the premise doesn't appeal to me. Seeing girls abused in front of a crowd is not my kind of porn. The only ones that I liked were filmed indoors.
Now I've been a member of all the other sites more than once except for bound gangbangs but that's only because the site is new. I always comeback to these sites. I have a soft spot for everything butt and whipped ass because these are mostly women with women and anl is always the main theme.
|
08-08-11 10:19am
|
Reply
2091
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I notice that my taste is different from younger porn surfers in reagrds to pubic hair, body shape and age of models. It's less so for tattoos and implants. The first three make sense because many of the first performers I saw and loved looked a little different to many of todays performers. An example might be that Marilyn Monroe is probably considered fat by todays Hollywood standards. where in my case she's just perfect with just the right body shape.
Now tattoos and implants is a tricky one. I think that many find them less than desirable but the number of people that are starting to not care or love them as increased over the years. The main reason is that it's really hard to find models that don't sport a tattoo or implants.
|
08-08-11 05:54am
|
Reply
2092
|
Smack My Bitch
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I really liked smack my bitch but I'd never join again. Not when teen mega world has the same content and offers more for my money. I don't know if you care but there is only one download option at SMB
in reagrds to video. They only offer HD. I know many don't care but I do because I'm limited to 120GB download limit per month.
|
08-08-11 05:40am
|
Reply
2093
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I agree that it would be nice if they offered some kind of group pricing but I don't really mind paying a little more than for other sites. The reason why I don't mind is that I find them to be one of the best internet porn companies and they've retained that quality with all the problems facing every other company. I don't know if you ever look at their calendar but Tanner Mayes did a fucking machine shoot on August 2. I don't know if this is a one time deal but I certainly hope not.
|
08-08-11 05:37am
|
Reply
2094
|
Smack My Bitch
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
You are correct that the majority of the smack my bicth shoot are also available at teenmegaworld. They both buy shoots from adult labs. See link: http://adultlabs.com/new_faces.php. I would be a little leary to join smackmybicth because their preview pages aren`t the greatest and they didn`t seem to be updating as much as when they first started on the net. I did a review last year. I would recommend you join teenmegaworld instead. You`ll get most of SMB`s content and a lot more.
|
08-07-11 10:09am
|
Reply
2095
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The only site that seems to have less tattooed girls is fucking machines but as much as I wanted to like the site. Those machines make a lot of noise and that overhadows whatever thrill I got from hearing the girls have an orgams.
Mind you 30$ for 2 months is really hard to pass up. Especially if you have never been a memeber of the site. I much prefer girls without tatoos and implants but I`m usually able to overlook that for the kink sites because unlike your standard porn. The girls that choose to do kink shoots are usually into this stuff or want to try it. In both cases it tends to make for great porn and when it doesn`t then the site is usually quite honest about it and tells the viewer that such and such scene had to be cut short because the shoot was too intense for the performer.
|
08-07-11 10:03am
|
Reply
2096
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
You are correct that on paper they would make more money but the reality is that if they made each scene only one kink then every dick head content thief would buy those scenes and post them on free sites and there goes their extra money. By making them so expensive then they don't get as many thieves.
It's possible that you saw a different screen then me but the sites that I saw at 14$ are really 29.95 for 2 month memberships. The 14$ is not a lie so much as a little bit of misinformation. The only way you can get that price is if you join for a year. Mind you 29.95$ for 2 months is an amzing deal for any of their sites.
|
08-07-11 09:26am
|
Reply
2097
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I've never really understood the pricing for this site. The only thing that I can see is that they offer it because people might want to stream some scenes rather than join the site. Maybe the reason why they charge such a high price for buying a scene is that they'd prefer the people buy a membership. There are plenty of deals where you get a 2 month membership for 29.95$. That's less than 15$ a month and that's hard to beat for such great content.
|
08-07-11 09:12am
|
Reply
2098
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never chosen a long term membership for any site but I have kept a couple of memberships for many months and one for a year. I would have to revisit the sites that I currently have long term to see what the advantage would be to buy a long term membership right away versus keeping my membership.
|
08-06-11 08:18am
|
Reply
2099
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
SidBushi's Reply
Thanks for the quick reply, and yes you have answered all of my concerns. I'm glad that you enoy this type of content. Sadly this is not a site I'd ever consider if for no other reason than I must be able to download the videos. I've heard the argument why some sites choose to only stream their videos and I'm fine with it. In return they must understand that I will never join their site regardless of their reasons.
|
08-05-11 07:08pm
|
Reply
2100
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
SidBushi's Review
Hi SidBushi.
I appreciate that you like her site but a score of 91 without the supporting information always makes us nervous and tend to make your review look like a plug for the site more than anything else.
1-Could you tell us if you can now download her videos for anything larger than an ipod screen? The most recent review stated that you could only stream her videos in HD but the downloaded videos were only 320x112.
2-Is there hardcore content or is it mostly glamorous?
3-What's the average length of the videos?
|
08-05-11 06:37pm
|
