| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
My membership was over by the time I posted my review so no way to check and I didn't really pay too much attention to her site when I was a member. My gut feeling is that her site is dead or dying because I didn't get the feeling that they were adding a lot of new stuff.
|
08-06-13 06:01pm
|
Reply
1077
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
My first love is scenario porn so story line and setting are super important. Of course since so many scenes no longer have much of this then I'm mostly left a major disappointment in most of todays porn.
|
08-06-13 03:26am
|
Reply
1078
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I grant you that Diesel did not spare on the HD stuff and I'm sure that's a major positive for some but I tend to avoid those so that did not help me. I really wish they wouldn't use older content as new stuff because it's bound to confuse visitors and members alike. The only reason I noticed it is because I have quite a lot of that stuff on my computer and I know the date they have for it is wrong.
Thanks for the info on the indexxx site. I already know about that one. I prefer pornteengirls.com. I find their interface a little easier to use.
|
08-05-13 03:34am
|
Reply
1079
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
The bulk of the models are on the young and thin side of things. I don't think that they are unhealthy thin per say but some might be.
|
08-05-13 03:26am
|
Reply
1080
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Nasos's Comment
I don't know what their update schedule was in the past but I checked their preview section and they appear to update with at least 5 new scenes a week (at least in the last 4 months or so). I do know that many of their sites are now dead so if you were a fan then you might want to skip the network.
I always thought they hired some of the best looking girls in porn but I was never a fan of their shooting style nor of the overall content.
|
08-03-13 09:07am
|
Reply
1081
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Since I haven't looked at female bodybuilder in a long time. then I Googled the words to see which images would come up Some of the women who came up in the search are attractive but they are in the minority. The vast majority look way too manly for me to find them remotely beautiful and I'm not just talking about their body but their face as well.
|
08-03-13 08:58am
|
Reply
1082
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
That is true but unless you only consider that a woman has done anal when a dick has entered her ass then you have to agree that these women have all done anal. When the site first went online. They were mostly doing only solo stuff and then they added another girl to the shoot and then it was always 2 women. I think about 2 years or so ago they added a guy to the shoot. They still had the g/g stuff before and then they would fade out and then comeback with a guy and the 2 women. I don't know if there were too many complaints or if it's just too expensive to add the guy but I have noticed that they have gone back to the g/g only stuff. I actually prefer it that way because most of the women also shoot for sex and submission and you will see their anal cherry get popped on that site often enough.
|
08-01-13 03:44pm
|
Reply
1083
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I have a long term membership with Brazzer and you have to add at least 5 more sites to that list so I currently have 6 active membership but 3 of those are for sites that I'm not visiting or using but since my membership is still active then I have to count them.
|
08-01-13 02:36pm
|
Reply
1084
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I was originally going to pick that I don't mind but I decided to go with the I like since I prefer to see a condom in todays porn industry. There are simply too many people getting std's and you better start to like condoms because they will be the norm
|
07-30-13 06:29pm
|
Reply
1085
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had to pick undecided because I can't actually remember when was the last time I saw a scene where the girl had hairy armpits or legs.
|
07-28-13 09:06am
|
Reply
1086
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
If you check out the link then you will see that the answer is a resounding yes.
http://firstanalquest.com/scenes
|
07-27-13 05:50pm
|
Reply
1087
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm sure that for some it's at least a 50/50 split because you dont' see a lot of lube being used. I'm no doctor but sticking a penis in a girls ass without using any lube can't be comfortable for the girl.
Mind you that might be the plan and that's why they do it. I guess it works since the site is still producing scenes. It sadly has the opposite on me as I don't enjoy seeing pain (fake or real) on a girls face during that kind of scene.
|
07-27-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
1088
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
They still have some gorgeous performers but the number of new girls as seriously dropped in the last couple of years but that has nothing to do with 21Sextury. It's a question of economics and one of their primary source for talent makes it really hard for girls to work in porn. The quality of the finish product is also affected by the two above reasons.
I had a long term membership that I let go last year and I haven't joined since then. I still visit at least once a week and I may join in the future but I know I won't be downloading all that many scenes since there is way too much duplication now and not that much that I care to watch over and over.
|
07-27-13 08:53am
|
Reply
1089
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
jeppegutt's Comment
The days when TCC was producing all exclusive content is long gone. They've been using leased material for their Hardcore Youth site for many years now and that's been their main source for new(not really)content. It was bound to happen that they would have to find a new cheaper source to fill their network since those HY shoots are pretty expensive while buying old content from dead sites is a lot cheaper.
|
07-25-13 06:41pm
|
Reply
1090
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another great review. I will only add two small things that may or may not make the site more appealing. The site is still known for having the only anal scenes from some of the more popular new girls in the industry. The sad part for me is that they are still shot as though the girls are being tortured or something. I'm not saying that the girls are enjoying the anal but the way they take a dick in their ass then most can't claim to be anal virgins so there is a lot of acting in pain during their scene.
|
07-25-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
1091
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
It's neither for me because seeing a woman pee on someone else or having someone else pee on her does absolutely nothing for me. Now I know some will argue that squirting is not pee but something quite different and maybe they are right but I have seen way too many squirting scenes where the liquid was on the yellow side of things to believe them. It's porn so if squirting turns you on and you believe that it's not pee then enjoy the ride and don't ask questions.
This is still a mostly European fetish and one the Germans seem to love making. At least they used to.
|
07-22-13 04:28am
|
Reply
1092
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
In that case then I definitely don't watch porn for more than an hour.
|
07-20-13 06:47pm
|
Reply
1093
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Randyman's Poll
The question is somewhat vague because I may surf for porn for a couple of hours but I actually only view it for less than one. Does coming on TBP and PU count as viewing porn?
|
07-20-13 08:03am
|
Reply
1094
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The real question is not if I would or wouldn't take my computer to get repaired but what is wrong with it that I have to do that and does that mean that I have lost part of my porn collection?
|
07-19-13 06:13pm
|
Reply
1095
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
Truer words were never said. It's mind blogging to think that this guy is able to hire such amazingly cute girls willing to do hardcore porn and he has been doing this for a few years and he still can't shoot the porn in any way that can be considered decent.
I tried the site twice and I think I was more pissed the second time than the first because the guy actually managed to do a worse job in the more recent shoots than he did in past ones. I know that all the shots avoid showing the male performers face(not sure why) so that really limits the possible angles but it still doesn't explain the piss poor camera work done by the camera operator.
|
07-18-13 06:41pm
|
Reply
1096
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think the reason why Pierre mentioned the gangbang is because he thought the girl was interested in doing that. He tends to stay away from the more insane girls.
|
07-16-13 08:16pm
|
Reply
1097
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
The art of tease is one thing but how much tease can you really get out of a non-nude model doing mostly glamour shots? I can understand being attracted to a specific model because of her overall appearance
but at some point you must want more than just looking at her with clothes on. My biggest issue with non-nude or for that matter nude modeling is that it can be visually pleasing to the eyes but it's not going to sexually excite me and sooner or later I want more from that model.
|
07-16-13 03:00pm
|
Reply
1098
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I wouldn't because I don't see the point of looking at fully clothed models who are basically lounging around. If I really want to see that then there are plenty of fashion magazines with the same content and some of them even have the odd nude supermodel.
|
07-16-13 02:43pm
|
Reply
1099
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
The new site design is your basic "How to screw up a site up 101". How can they hope to get new customers when anyone who's not familiar with the site is unable to see anything and worse is lied to on the only page you can see
|
07-14-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
1100
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
That seems to be a fairly new thing because that was not the pages that I used to see when I visited the site and it's definitely not the ones that I still see when I use my Firefox link. I still see the original pages which do allow you to see the current info.
That page is actually a giant mess because it's full of lies and half truths. The perfect is example is if you scroll down to the section where it says "Just Added". They have two movies starring Jayden James. That part is true but these were added at least two years ago since there are comments about those movies that are that old.
I know it's VB and there are tons of reviews so anyone curious about what he or she is getting need only read those but this new marketing idea is a really bad one. If I use my Firefox link then I have to pay 15$ instead of 12$ but I will at least know exactly what I'm getting for that amount and frankly 15$ is a joke because there is just too much content for that amount.
|
07-14-13 07:32am
|
