| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
I'm not so sure that Sex and Submission or for that matter any of the other Kink sites have cut down on anal as much as they now hire such a wide variety of performers and some of these do not do anal so you know that if they are in any of the Kink sites then there will not be any anal. There have been a few of these on Everything Butt and I can remember one on bound gangbang who did not do anal and both sites by default have to at least include anal. I know the Bound Gangbang scene was not well received and Kink learned that they should never hire non-anal performers for a gang bang. It's somewhat different in the case of EB. If it's a non-anal performer in a two or more women scene then you know she will play the part of the dom who gives but never receives. Those aren't as bad because you still get anal but I usually feel cheated when the scene is advertised as starring a specific performer and she is not the one having anal sex.
I checked the number of anal VS non-anal scenes on S&S and out of the 50 latest scenes. I'd say about half or so are anal. Now out of the non-anal scenes you have 2 with Dani Daniels. She was a mostly g/g only performer until recently and she has always been a non-anal girl. Riley Reid has 2 scenes and she is also a non-anal girl so of course she won't do anal for Kink. Although it would be great to see more anal on S&S. The fact that they can hire some of the above performers is good news.
P.S: The only Kink site that is able to hire a wide variety of women willing to do anal is Everything Butt. They are even able to hire those that have never done anal elsewhere. I think the main reason is because it can be a women only scene and therefore very little danger of getting an STD.
|
01-11-14 11:47am
|
Reply
902
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I also picked #3 because there are quite a few days that can go by be before I visit a specific site but there are some reasons which are not mentioned in the choices. The most obvious one being that not every site updates on a daily basis so there is no reason to visit that site until there is a new update.
|
01-10-14 08:03am
|
Reply
903
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on facials because I believe that it's impossible to shoot a glamorous facial. The act itself prohibits the possibility that it can be glamorous. Of course that has not stopped these people from shooting them and I suspect that enough members like them to make them comeback.
I'm just glad that there is one site that still likes to show people kissing and guys going down on their lady friends
|
01-08-14 05:59pm
|
Reply
904
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I picked never.
|
01-08-14 09:48am
|
Reply
905
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Reply
I suspected that might be the case. I believe 8 is the maximum number of files you can queue on a download manager for Dogfart.
|
01-06-14 01:22pm
|
Reply
906
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Comment
I have a few questions that might help me or somebody else in replying to your post.
1-What do you mean by some movies? Are we talking queuing 10 or less videos/photosets or a lot more?
2-What do you mean when you say that you walk away from your pc? Are we talking for a few minutes or a lot longer?
|
01-06-14 06:52am
|
Reply
907
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Of course it isn't. Why would any performer want to change her name every few weeks when word of mouth is an integral part of how their career grows.
I know that it's significantly harder to find all the scenes of Eastern European performers because they have so many different names that it's next to impossible to find them all without doing some serious research. You just have to look at North American performers to see that having only one name is better for a long term career.
|
01-06-14 06:32am
|
Reply
908
|
I Love Mini Skirts
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Comment
What I'm writing below applies to any site listed on TBP so if you have any other site that you are curious about then simply do the same thing for those.
TBP doesn't have a review of every site listed on their site but they tend to still offer info on the content like how many videos or photo sets can be found in the members area. Usually this info is updated on a fairly regular basis so simply check the dates for the facts and you'll know how accurate the info is.
It's different in the case of this site because they actually did a review last month so you know the info is accurate and you have an accompanying review to go with the facts.
P.S: You may or may not be aware but TBP's claim that the scenes on this site are all exclusive is incorrect since they are all leased scenes that are available elsewhere. That is not TBP's fault since I'm sure that is what the site claimed but I know different since I recognize the ladies and the scenes on this site. If you are joining the network for only these scenes then pick a cheaper site than this one but if you are looking for the scenes on the other sites then go ahead.
|
01-05-14 09:54am
|
Reply
909
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
This is one of those really strange site/network that exist on the net. On the one hand they hire some really amazing looking girls but on the other hand I can't stand their style of porn. I guess I'm in the minority because they appear to be popular but I know that I never kept a single thing that I downloaded from them. Not that I had downloaded a lot but I simply didn't want their stuff to clutter my drives and I knew I'd never enjoy watching anything else.
I'm not a huge fan of the promotional approach some sites offer unless it's a reduction in the price of the membership. Otherwise you have to stay a long time and possibly pay a lot of money for a site that you could have simply joined right away for less money than you have already spent these long months.
|
01-04-14 10:38am
|
Reply
910
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
Fair warning to anyone looking to join anything with the name Playboy because I joined their main site a few years ago and I had to do the same thing to cancel. That's why I will never join another Playboy site.
|
01-04-14 10:31am
|
Reply
911
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think so and I don't even think that I was on one that stopped updating during my membership but I have joined some sites that were dead when it comes to new content. I just knew that prior to joining and was only doing so to get access at their past stuff.
|
01-04-14 10:29am
|
Reply
912
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
See I have a different opinion because they almost lost me when they decided to add a guy to the mix. The site was originally solo and g/g only but I guess pressure from fans made them alter the site to add a male to the mix. The reason why I stayed is that most of the videos were shot in such a way that you could satisfy both the people like me who want to see only g/g and the guys that wanted to have males involved in the scene by having the g/g only stuff ahead of the b/g/g stuff later in the video. I know that they have now gone back to a g/g or g/g/g only style and that's too bad for you but great news for me.
Frankly the male is really obsolete in a scene where extreme ass play is involved. Especially when most girls do anal fisting. Frankly Sex and Submission is the site you want if b/g stuff is what you want to see on Kink.
|
01-04-14 10:27am
|
Reply
913
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
She may still be updating with the odd new video but if what I saw when I was a member last year is indicative then they are on the rare side of things. The vast majority of the updates I saw are remasters of her older scenes. Nothing wrong with that and her site isn't exactly charging huge amounts of money to join so I have no complain.
If she was charging above 20$ then I might have an issue with pretend new updates but 15$ is a very reasonable amount to pay for what Cathy has to offer. Just be forewarned that returning members may not have much new stuff to download.
|
01-03-14 10:21am
|
Reply
914
|
Device Bondage
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's one of those cases where it really hurts to pay that amount but you don't feel so bad because you know you are getting something that is worth it and more importantly you know this amount means you'll get more of it in the years to come.
|
01-02-14 11:12am
|
Reply
915
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I don't know if they have changed all that much. I just think that they are so much bigger now then they were just a few years ago and that's bound to have serious effects on the way you deal with your customers. I still remember when there were only a few sites and not the staggering number they have today. At least they still put out amazing porn on a regular basis.
|
01-02-14 11:11am
|
Reply
916
|
Device Bondage
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
That's quite high for anyone but especially so if you are a returning member because you won't be getting as much as a new member will.
They have over 700 videos which is impressive and probably justifies their higher cost than most of the other Kink site. Luckily for me this type of content doesn't appeal so I won't ever have to make a decision to join or not.
|
12-31-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
917
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The good news is that Kink finally fixed the problem and uploaded two new scenes in late afternoon. I'm easy going with these things but since Kink only updates once a week then missing two weeks worth of updates is half a monthly membership. I was luckier than some people because my membership is still active but I'm sure some people weren't as lucky.
I'm glad the problem is fixed but it's still inexcusable to pass off old content as new. Just be honest with your members and say that there was a major glitch. Uploading older content makes people nervous.
|
12-31-13 05:45pm
|
Reply
918
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm sure I've done it in the past but they are usually just words since the will is almost never there to actually go through with them.
|
12-31-13 09:14am
|
Reply
919
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Can't speak for broke amateurs because their preview section is so poor that I would never join based only on that. True that the girls are really cute for the other two sites and sad that most never do more than these sites. I know the guy isn't located in California and that's why most of the girls don't make the jump to the industry.
P.S: I forgot to mention but the special offer is 19.99$ for the 3 sites mentioned yesterday.
|
12-31-13 09:13am
|
Reply
920
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
See the fact that he goes out of his way to avoid showing his face is a problem for me because that means he'll avoid shooting from certain angles for fear that too many shots will have his face in them and he will have to use that stupid circle or he'll have to edit too much content to remove his face.
Mind you this guy is a genius when compared to the idiots at girls do porn. They also avoid showing the performers face and they use an actual camera operator but the shots are 100 times worse at GDP than here.
The sad part for me is that both sites manage to hire some really cute unknowns with great potential but completely mess the shoots so that these one and gone girls can never make it onto my wish list for more stuff.
|
12-30-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
921
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
How does the shooting style of the newer stuff compare to the older content? My biggest issue with this site was that it was so badly shot that it was nearly unwatchable. The fact that he takes his face out of the video is also a problem for me because I need a connection to happen between both performers and that's ruined when one of them has a circle hiding his face whenever his face should be in the shot.
The static cameras are a problem for me but if he could actually use and handheld camera properly then that might be okay. I keep getting a special offer to join but since I have only saved a tiny portion of the past videos that I suspect the newer stuff will also not work for me.
|
12-30-13 01:34pm
|
Reply
922
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I don't know if this helps but there are some notes on the TBP review that mention a possible download limit but there was no available info to confirm or deny the statement.
|
12-30-13 09:58am
|
Reply
923
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My answer is different now then it was in the last few years because we're finally seeing less reality TV and more actual drama. I'd say that I watch at least one new show per day.
|
12-29-13 10:34am
|
Reply
924
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
I've always found that Epoch's conversion rates are far better than CCBill and that's why I'm always happy when Epoch is the CC processor
of the site I'm looking to join.
|
12-27-13 07:55am
|
Reply
925
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I always do because it's not so much that I missed it the first time around but realising that it was always there only after I discover that it's gone.
Luckily for me that doesn't happen often.
|
12-27-13 07:52am
|
